Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
sense_id
stringlengths
8
55
lexeme_id
stringlengths
1
48
headword
stringlengths
1
48
pos
stringclasses
10 values
sense_index
int32
0
16
domain
stringclasses
162 values
tier
stringclasses
7 values
reading_level
stringclasses
5 values
register
stringclasses
5 values
text
stringlengths
10
314
span_start
int32
0
194
⌀
span_end
int32
1
216
⌀
readability_grade
float64
-3.2
33.8
⌀
source
stringclasses
2 values
0:noun:0
0
0
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
plain
Zero is the number you add to something to get the same number back.
0
4
null
renditions
0:noun:0
0
0
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
plain
I forgot that adding zero to a value doesn’t change it.
16
20
null
renditions
0:noun:0
0
0
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
grade_1
plain
Adding 0 to five gives you five.
7
8
0.63
renditions
0:noun:0
0
0
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
grade_5
plain
When Maya added 0 to her score, the score stayed the same.
16
17
1.87
renditions
0:noun:0
0
0
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
grade_10
plain
The calculator showed that adding 0 to the total left it unchanged.
34
35
6.79
renditions
0:noun:0
0
0
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
college
plain
Adding 0 to the account balance leaves the balance invariant.
7
8
7.19
renditions
0:noun:0
0
0
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
informal
I added 0 to my game score, and it stayed put.
8
9
1.57
renditions
0:noun:0
0
0
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
formal
The clerk added 0 to the invoice total, leaving the amount unchanged.
16
17
6.79
renditions
0:noun:0
0
0
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
technical
Adding 0 to the measured value preserves its numerical value.
7
8
7.19
renditions
0:noun:0
0
0
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
slang
I slapped 0 onto my score, and the total didn’t budge.
10
11
2.65
renditions
0:adjective:0
0
0
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
neutral
plain
a zero score
2
7
null
renditions
0:adjective:0
0
0
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
grade_1
plain
My game score was 0 after I missed every shot.
18
19
3.65
renditions
0:adjective:0
0
0
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
grade_5
plain
Our team got a score of 0 after missing every shot.
24
25
4.79
renditions
0:adjective:0
0
0
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
grade_10
plain
The player finished the round with a score of 0.
46
47
1.29
renditions
0:adjective:0
0
0
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
college
plain
The team recorded a score of 0 after failing to earn any points.
29
30
5.82
renditions
0:adjective:0
0
0
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
neutral
informal
I got a 0 on the quiz, even though I answered every question.
8
9
5.82
renditions
0:adjective:0
0
0
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
neutral
formal
The final score was 0 after the match was abandoned.
20
21
4.83
renditions
0:adjective:0
0
0
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
neutral
technical
The contestant's score was recorded as 0 because no valid answers were submitted.
39
40
9.45
renditions
0:adjective:0
0
0
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
neutral
slang
Our side put up a big fat 0 on the scoreboard.
26
27
2.65
renditions
1:noun:0
1
1
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
plain
he has the one but will need a two and three to go with it
null
null
null
renditions
1:noun:0
1
1
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
plain
they had lunch at one
null
null
null
renditions
1:noun:0
1
1
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
grade_1
plain
I put 1 block on the mat.
6
7
-1.06
renditions
1:noun:0
1
1
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
grade_5
plain
The locker marked 1 stood beside the gym door.
18
19
2.34
renditions
1:noun:0
1
1
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
grade_10
plain
She found the trail marker labeled 1 beside the park entrance.
35
36
4.79
renditions
1:noun:0
1
1
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
college
plain
The set begins with 1, but completing the sequence requires adding 2 and 3.
20
21
6.73
renditions
1:noun:0
1
1
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
informal
I grabbed 1 cup, but we’ll need a couple more for everyone.
10
11
3.84
renditions
1:noun:0
1
1
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
formal
The inventory records 1 replacement key for the office.
22
23
10.21
renditions
1:noun:0
1
1
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
technical
Assign the value 1 to the first element in the sequence.
17
18
4.79
renditions
1:noun:0
1
1
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
slang
I’ve got 1 slice, but we need more if everyone’s eating.
9
10
3.72
renditions
1:noun:0
1
1
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
technical
In base ten, the numeral 1 represents the integer one.
25
26
7.19
per_sense
1:adjective:0
1
1
adjective
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
plain
I only have one apple.
null
null
null
renditions
1:adjective:0
1
1
adjective
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
plain
She wore a one-piece swimsuit.
null
null
null
renditions
1:adjective:0
1
1
adjective
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
grade_1
plain
I have 1 red ball.
7
8
-1.84
renditions
1:adjective:0
1
1
adjective
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
grade_5
plain
There is only 1 cookie left in the jar.
14
15
2.34
renditions
1:adjective:0
1
1
adjective
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
grade_10
plain
The shelf held only 1 book after the library sale.
20
21
6.01
renditions
1:adjective:0
1
1
adjective
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
college
plain
After the final count, the collection contained only 1 surviving photograph.
53
54
11.23
renditions
1:adjective:0
1
1
adjective
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
informal
I grabbed just 1 slice of pizza for the ride home.
15
16
1.57
renditions
1:adjective:0
1
1
adjective
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
formal
The applicant submitted 1 signed form with the completed packet.
24
25
8.37
renditions
1:adjective:0
1
1
adjective
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
technical
The device recorded 1 error during the overnight test.
20
21
8.9
renditions
1:adjective:0
1
1
adjective
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
slang
I scored 1 ticket, so I'm heading to the show solo.
9
10
3.72
renditions
10:noun:0
10
10
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
plain
I wrote the number 10 on the board.
19
21
null
renditions
10:noun:0
10
10
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
plain
Ten is the base of the decimal system.
0
3
null
renditions
10:noun:0
10
10
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
grade_1
plain
I drew 10 on my school board.
7
9
-1.06
renditions
10:noun:0
10
10
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
grade_5
plain
Mia counted ten toy cars and wrote 10 in her notebook.
35
37
3.72
renditions
10:noun:0
10
10
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
grade_10
plain
During math class, I entered 10 into the answer box.
29
31
4.83
renditions
10:noun:0
10
10
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
college
plain
The form requires applicants to enter 10 in the designated field.
38
40
8.01
renditions
10:noun:0
10
10
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
informal
I jotted 10 down on the page.
9
11
0.63
renditions
10:noun:0
10
10
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
formal
I recorded the number 10 in my notes.
22
24
3.76
renditions
10:noun:0
10
10
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
technical
I transcribed the numeral 10 onto the worksheet.
26
28
6.71
renditions
10:noun:0
10
10
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
slang
I slapped a 10 onto my homework sheet.
12
14
3.76
renditions
10:noun:0
10
10
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
grade_1
plain
Count nine shells, then add one to make 10.
40
42
-0.28
per_sense
10:noun:0
10
10
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
grade_5
plain
Our class used 10 to show how many fingers we have.
15
17
2.65
per_sense
10:noun:0
10
10
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
grade_10
plain
Since 10 is the base of decimal notation, each place represents a power of it.
6
8
7.57
per_sense
10:noun:0
10
10
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
college
plain
In the decimal system, 10 serves as the base for expressing every whole number.
23
25
9.26
per_sense
10:noun:0
10
10
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
informal
Hey, 10 is the answer when you add nine and one.
5
7
1.57
per_sense
10:noun:0
10
10
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
formal
The calculation yields 10, the cardinal value immediately following nine.
23
25
13.09
per_sense
10:noun:0
10
10
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
technical
For decimal positional notation, 10 is the radix that determines place-value scaling.
33
35
11.26
per_sense
10:noun:0
10
10
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
slang
Nine plus one lands on 10, easy as that.
23
25
1.03
per_sense
10:adjective:0
10
10
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
neutral
plain
We are on lesson 10 of the course.
17
19
null
renditions
10:adjective:0
10
10
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
neutral
plain
That’s a 10-minute walk from my house.
9
11
null
renditions
10:adjective:0
10
10
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
grade_1
plain
I have 10 toy cars in my box.
7
9
-0.67
renditions
10:adjective:0
10
10
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
grade_5
plain
Our class read 10 pages before lunch.
15
17
2.31
renditions
10:adjective:0
10
10
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
grade_10
plain
Maya scored 10 points during the final round of the game.
12
14
2.65
renditions
10:adjective:0
10
10
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
college
plain
The survey received responses from 10 participants during its first week.
35
37
9.08
renditions
10:adjective:0
10
10
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
neutral
informal
We only need 10 more minutes to finish this game.
13
15
3.65
renditions
10:adjective:0
10
10
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
neutral
formal
The building contains 10 floors.
22
24
2.88
renditions
10:adjective:0
10
10
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
neutral
technical
The device records 10 readings per second.
19
21
5.68
renditions
10:adjective:0
10
10
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
neutral
slang
I got 10 bucks for that old bike.
6
8
-0.67
renditions
10:adjective:0
10
10
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
grade_1
plain
I put 10 blocks in my red box.
6
8
-0.67
per_sense
10:adjective:0
10
10
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
grade_5
plain
Maya baked 10 cookies for the class party.
11
13
0.8
per_sense
10:adjective:0
10
10
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
grade_10
plain
After the final bell, 10 students stayed behind to rehearse the school play.
22
24
5.82
per_sense
10:adjective:0
10
10
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
college
plain
The museum displayed 10 bronze bowls in a row beneath the gallery lights.
21
23
4.91
per_sense
10:adjective:0
10
10
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
neutral
informal
We grabbed 10 slices of pizza, so nobody went hungry.
11
13
6.01
per_sense
10:adjective:0
10
10
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
neutral
formal
Please submit 10 signed copies of the application to the registrar.
14
16
6.94
per_sense
10:adjective:0
10
10
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
neutral
technical
The protocol requires 10 replicate samples from each treatment group.
22
24
8.37
per_sense
10:adjective:0
10
10
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
neutral
slang
They scored 10 goals and absolutely crushed the other team.
12
14
6.01
per_sense
100:noun:0
100
100
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
plain
I wrote down the answer as ten 10s.
26
28
null
renditions
100:noun:0
100
100
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
plain
The scoreboard showed ten 10s in a row.
28
30
null
renditions
100:noun:0
100
100
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
grade_1
plain
I wrote 100 on my paper.
8
11
0.52
renditions
100:noun:0
100
100
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
grade_5
plain
I wrote 100 as the answer on my worksheet.
8
11
2.34
renditions
100:noun:0
100
100
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
grade_10
plain
I entered 100 as my answer on the quiz.
10
13
2.34
renditions
100:noun:0
100
100
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
college
plain
I recorded 100 as the result of the calculation.
11
14
7.59
renditions
100:noun:0
100
100
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
informal
My little brother counted to 100 without missing a number.
29
32
7.19
renditions
100:noun:0
100
100
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
formal
The library catalog assigns the collection the reference number 100.
64
67
11.91
renditions
100:noun:0
100
100
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
technical
The sensor recorded a temperature of 100 degrees during the test.
37
40
8.01
renditions
100:noun:0
100
100
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
slang
That old game hit 100 points, and we went wild.
18
21
0.11
renditions
100:adjective:0
100
100
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
neutral
plain
The number was one hundred, which is ten more than ninety.
null
null
null
renditions
100:adjective:0
100
100
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
neutral
plain
He picked the one-hundred option since it’s ten more than ninety.
8
11
null
renditions
100:adjective:0
100
100
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
grade_1
plain
A box can hold 100 small toys.
15
18
-1.06
renditions
100:adjective:0
100
100
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
grade_5
plain
The school collected 100 cans, ten more than ninety.
21
24
4.96
renditions
100:adjective:0
100
100
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
grade_10
plain
The scoreboard showed 100 points after the team completed the final round.
22
25
6.79
renditions
100:adjective:0
100
100
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
college
plain
The survey recorded 100 responses, establishing the final sample size.
20
23
11.91
renditions
100:adjective:0
100
100
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
neutral
informal
She turned in 100 pages, way more than she expected.
14
17
3.65
renditions
100:adjective:0
100
100
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
neutral
formal
The committee approved 100 applications during its first review.
23
26
10.21
renditions
100:adjective:0
100
100
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
neutral
technical
The dataset contains 100 records, each assigned a unique identifier.
21
24
10.73
renditions
100:adjective:0
100
100
adjective
0
mathematics.arithmetic
tier5
neutral
slang
He scored 100 on the quiz and totally crushed it.
10
13
2.47
renditions
1000:noun:0
1000
1000
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
neutral
plain
The total was 10 times 100, or 1000.
31
35
null
renditions
1000:noun:0
1000
1000
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
grade_1
plain
Ten bags hold 1000 beads.
14
18
-1.84
renditions
1000:noun:0
1000
1000
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
grade_5
plain
Ten boxes held 100 books each, for a total of 1000 books.
46
50
4.82
renditions
1000:noun:0
1000
1000
noun
0
everyday_life.quantity_time
tier5
grade_10
plain
The school collected 100 books from each of ten classrooms, reaching a total of 1000 books.
80
84
7.61
renditions
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

OpenGloss v2.4 — Examples

Every example sentence in OpenGloss v2.4, one row at a time, each tagged to the sense it illustrates and carrying the [span_start, span_end) character offsets of the headword occurrence inside it. That combination — a sentence, the sense it uses, and where the word is — is what a word-in-context or sense-disambiguation task needs and is normally paid for by annotation. source distinguishes the per-sense examples stage's verified sentences from reading-level and register rewrites of an existing example.

Part of the OpenGloss v2.4 release family — 16 datasets built from one store of 160,724 lexemes and 300,787 live senses, all joinable on derived ids. See Related datasets for the rest.

What's new in v2.4 vs v1.3

  1. Schema v3. Every lexeme carries a kind discriminator (simplex, compound, phrasal verb, idiom, proper noun, abbreviation, affix, function word); every sense carries a controlled domain leaf from a fixed ~160-leaf taxonomy instead of free text; every example carries the character span of the headword occurrence inside it.
  2. Renditions, not one string. A definition is a set: the canonical one plus rewrites at four reading levels and in four registers, each produced in a single call from the canonical text so they say the same thing at different altitudes.
  3. A sense graph, not a word graph. Typed relations resolve to sense ids wherever the target's entry exists in the release, so bank --hypernym--> financial institution points at a meaning rather than at a string.
  4. Retrieval data is first-class. Synthetic per-sense queries in eight styles, grounded QA pairs, mined word-in-context pairs, MS MARCO-style triples with graph-derived hard negatives, and graded TREC qrels — all derivable from, and consistent with, the same entries.
  5. Derivable identifiers everywhere. v1.3 published a positional id for lexemes and senses (3d_model_noun_0) and nothing below that. v2.4 gives every rendition, edge, query, QA pair and provenance record an id computable from the row alone, and never renumbers: a retired sense is tombstoned, so the ids after it keep their meaning.
  6. Per-field provenance. Which model wrote a field, how many tokens it took, what it cost — published as its own dataset.

What changed since v2.3

v2.3 (2026-09-09) added tier 6, named entities. v2.4 adds no new headwords: it fills in the supervision the lower tiers never received and makes every reading level of the pretraining corpus carry text of its own.

  • Retrieval supervision for every sense. Tiers 3-6 (about two thirds of all senses) had no search queries, QA pairs, register variants or contrast paragraphs in v2.3; those existed only for core and tier 2. Every live sense now has search queries in eight styles (twelve per sense; 85% of all queries never name the headword), 99.7% have grounded QA pairs, and every tier has register variants, register-crossed examples and contrasts.
  • Verified word-in-context examples everywhere. The sense-disambiguated example stage (eight checked sentences per sense) ran only on tier 2 in v2.3; it now covers core and tiers 3-6 as well.
  • Leveled register text. Every sense gains five definitions crossing reading level and register (grade 5 informal and formal; college informal, formal and technical); every contrast paragraph gains a grade-5 and a college version; every lexical explanation gains a grade-5 and a college version.
  • A pretraining corpus with no copies. v2.3's thesaurus and usage-note documents at grade_5 and college were byte-identical to neutral (25% of all pretraining documents). A non-neutral document is now emitted only when it carries text written at its level and differs from the neutral one, and the export fails if any two documents share text. The thesaurus template gains a "Choosing between them" section of leveled contrast notes (moved from the usage note), and the usage note lists the register variants written at the document's level.
  • Graph repair. Relations were regenerated for senses that had none (senses without a relation fell from 4,722 to about 1,600), re-resolved, re-judged, and hypernym cycles broken back to zero.
  • Writer. New v2.4 text was written by gpt-6-luna (low reasoning); v2.3's by gpt-5.6-luna. The provenance repo records the model of every call.
v2.3 (2026-09-09) v2.4
Lexemes 160,724 160,724
Live senses 300,787 300,787
Search queries 1,249,683 3,851,978
QA pairs 704,950 2,304,127
Definition renditions 1,919,007 4,209,494
Example renditions 2,421,809 4,939,887
Encyclopedia renditions 500,320 802,914
Lexical-explanation renditions 160,724 482,172
Contrast paragraphs (all levels) 81,046 812,184
Unique source-text tokens (16K student tokenizer) 697,553,973 1,461,832,309
Pretraining documents 1,560,030 1,910,373
Pretraining words 418,161,358 483,649,976
Pretraining tokens (cl100k_base) 594,154,612 676,733,509
Exact-duplicate pretraining documents 25.0% 0 (the export fails on any duplicate)
Judge score, Opus, 40-entry samples 70.2 (core + tier 2), 66.7 (tier 3), 67.0 (tier 4), 81.3 (tier 5), 73.0 (tier 6) 64.8 (core), 69.9 (tier 2), 65.8 (tier 3), 68.1 (tier 4), 79.6 (tier 5), 71.3 (tier 6)

Schema. No column was removed or retyped. pretrain gains sections_at_level; level_used gains the value mixed (some leveled sections fell back to neutral text); non-neutral pretraining documents with no text of their own at their level are no longer emitted, and retired lexemes (no live sense) emit no pretraining document. contrasts now carries grade_5 and college rows beside neutral.

Known issues. Leveled informal definitions open with "It's a / It's the / It's when" about 18% of the time. About 1.1% of QA answers are exact duplicates of another QA answer (mostly short answers). Listwise qrels lists that contain all four grades fell as a share, because tier 3-6 senses joined with fewer grade-2 neighbours.

What changed since v2.2

v2.2 (2026-09-07) added tier 5, the WordNet 3.0 gap. v2.3 adds tier 6: named entities. Every tier before it was selected by word frequency or by WordNet membership, and neither signal ranks a name — a name's importance is a fact about the world, not about a corpus — so v2.2 knew Washington and Lincoln but not George Washington, New York City or World War II. Tier 6 is 15,000 candidates ranked by Wikipedia vital-article level, Wikidata sitelink count, WordNet instance membership and US salience, of which 12,078 became entries. Three schema changes come with it:

  • Entity types are written rather than defaulted. Every proper noun in v2.2 carried entity_type = other, because the two migrations and the kind classifier all wrote that placeholder and nothing ever replaced it. 28,915 proper nouns now carry a real type — person, place, organization, work, event, product, species — taken from the candidate list where it knew one and bought as a single batched verdict where it did not. lexicon and senses gain an entity_type column, and lexicon gains wikidata_qid, the join key for reconciling an entry against Wikidata.
  • Aliases. A name has variants — Lincoln for Abraham Lincoln, the Netherlands for Netherlands, FDR, NASA — and v2.2 had nowhere to put them. A variant that has an entry of its own is now an alias_of edge in opengloss-v2.4-relations (1,267 of them, written by a judged alias pass). The schema also reserves a lexicon.aliases column and alias rows in opengloss-v2.4-inflections for variants with no entry of their own, but no pass populates them yet: aliases is empty on every v2.4 row. An alias_of edge is never demoted, pruned, capped or re-judged by the hygiene passes, unlike every other relation type.
  • Two new domain leaves. nature.settlements (cities, towns, villages, neighbourhoods) and law_government.polities (countries, states, provinces, empires, historical polities). A quarter of tier 6 is a settlement or a polity and the taxonomy had no leaf for either; adding a geography root would have been a breaking change to a fixed 15-root vocabulary, so both went under roots that already exist.
v2.2 (2026-09-07) v2.3
Lexemes 148,292 160,724
Live senses 288,304 300,787
Tier 6 lexemes (named entities) 0 12,078
Pretraining documents 1,458,684 1,560,030
Pretraining words 398,029,628 418,161,358
Pretraining tokens (cl100k_base) 565,384,746 594,154,612
Judge score, Opus, 40-entry samples 70.2 (core + tier 2), 66.7 (tier 3), 67.0 (tier 4), 81.3 (tier 5) 70.2 (core + tier 2), 66.7 (tier 3), 67.0 (tier 4), 81.3 (tier 5), 73.0 (tier 6)

Schema. No column was removed or retyped. lexicon gains entity_type, wikidata_qid and aliases; senses gains entity_type; relations gains the alias_of type; inflections gains the alias relation; tier gains the value tier6; and the domain taxonomy gains two leaves (taxonomy version 3).

What changed since v2.1

v2.1 (2026-09-07) added tier 4 and the inflections repo. v2.2 adds tier 5: 43,652 WordNet 3.0 candidate lemmas the earlier tiers lacked — common compounds and technical nouns, adjectives, adverbs and verbs, instances/taxa/organisms excluded — 38,526 of them imported outright, the rest matched against v1.3's own files. The other three changes are about honesty rather than coverage:

  • The lemma fold. lexeme-hygiene (D-79) folded 4,377 inflected-form headwords onto the lemma that already carried their meaning ("databases" onto "database", through the store's own recorded morphology) and retired 172 multiword fragments that began or ended on a function word ("is not", "on top of"). Together with D-76's phantom part-of-speech retirements, 4,549 lexemes store-wide now have every sense tombstoned. A lexeme like that is not counted as a lexeme anywhere in this card or in Stats any more — it has no live sense, so it is not a lexeme by this release's own count — but it is not gone: its surface form still resolves through opengloss-v2.2-inflections, and its lexicon row carries retired = true with a retired_reason explaining why.
  • Provenance on inherited fields. Every field a migration or import wrote, not only what a model wrote from scratch, now carries a migrate-stage provenance record naming where it came from, so "where did this text come from" is answerable by grep rather than by trusting the pipeline that happened to run.
  • A source column on lexicon and senses: opengloss-v1.3 for content this project generated or migrated from its own legacy releases, wordnet-3.0 for the tier-5 entries imported directly from Princeton WordNet 3.0.
v2.1 (2026-09-07) v2.2
Lexemes 109,633 160,724
Live senses 250,003 300,787
Tier 5 lexemes (WordNet gap) 0 43,227
Retired lexemes (every sense tombstoned) 0 4,567
Pretraining documents 1,111,044 1,458,684
Pretraining words 331,888,239 398,029,628
Pretraining tokens (cl100k_base) 471,451,693 565,384,746
Judge score, Opus, 40-entry samples 70.2 (core + tier 2), 66.7 (tier 3), 67.0 (tier 4) 70.2 (core + tier 2), 66.7 (tier 3), 67.0 (tier 4), 81.3 (tier 5)

Schema. No column was removed or retyped. lexicon gains source, retired and retired_reason; senses gains source; tier gains the value tier5.

What changed since v2.0

v2.0 (2026-09-05) covered the frequency-ranked single words. v2.4 adds tier 4: the function words the core ranking had excluded on purpose, and every remaining v1.3 entry at Wikipedia frequency ≥ 10 — mostly multiword compounds ("natural selection", "catalog number"), plus names and rarer single words. That doubles the lexeme count and changes the mix: v2.0 was 99.8% single words; a third of v2.4 is multiword.

v2.0 (2026-09-05) v2.1 (2026-09-07)
Lexemes 54,724 109,633
Live senses 137,314 250,003
Multiword entries (compounds, phrasal verbs, idioms) 86 36,366
Proper nouns 10,365 17,073
Function words 114 462
Gloss renditions 1,129,975 1,684,865
Example sentences 1,398,297 2,163,329
Live relations 735,318 1,574,438
Synthetic queries 1,330,311 1,304,650
QA pairs 750,348 736,010
Pretraining documents 617,175 1,111,044
Pretraining words 196,390,946 331,888,239
Pretraining tokens (cl100k_base) 275,659,096 471,451,693
Judge score, Opus, 40-entry samples 70.2 (core + tier 2), 66.7 (tier 3) 70.2 (core + tier 2), 66.7 (tier 3), 67.0 (tier 4)

Schema. No column was added, removed or retyped in any existing dataset. Three things did change:

  • tier gains the value tier4 (it was core, tier2 or tier3).
  • One new dataset, opengloss-v2.4-inflections: a flat surface-form → lemma lookup (plural, past tense, participles, comparative, superlative, derivations) built from the morphology that the lexicon already carried nested.
  • New provenance note prefixes on tombstones and edges, all reversible and all counted in the store audit: phantom_pos: (a v1.3 part-of-speech block whose glosses defined a component word rather than the compound — 11,440 blocks retired), regen: (relations regenerated for senses that had lost every edge to judging), and retyped: contrast (synonym edges the contrast paragraphs showed to be hypernym or hyponym).

Not row-compatible with v2.0. Lexeme, sense, rendition, edge, query and QA ids are stable for every entry v2.0 had. The derived training sets (retrieval-pairs, retrieval-triples, qrels) re-sample negatives over the larger pool, so their rows differ; and the store-wide quality passes run for v2.4 retired ~3,000 senses of the v2.0 entries (phantom part-of-speech blocks and near-duplicate senses), so those senses are now tombstoned rather than live. Treat v2.4 as a new release, not a delta.

Scope: fewer headwords, far more per headword

v2.4 is not a superset of v1.3. It covers 160,724 of v1.3's 205,988 lexemes — every frequency-ranked single word, plus the compounds and names at Wikipedia frequency ≥ 10 — and spends the difference on depth. If you need breadth of vocabulary, use v1.3; if you need graded renditions, resolved relations, spans, or retrieval supervision, use v2.4.

v1.3 v2.4
Lexemes 205,988 160,724
Senses 565,604 300,787
Definition renditions per sense 1 canonical 1 canonical + up to 8 graded
Relation targets bare strings resolved to sense ids
Retrieval training data companion sets queries, QA, triples, qrels
Per-field provenance no model, tokens and cost per call

Key statistics

Lexemes 160,724
Retired lexemes (every sense tombstoned; not counted above) 4,567
Live senses 300,787
Rows in this dataset 4,939,887
Sentences carrying a headword span 4,901,949 (99.2%)
From the per-sense examples stage 2,037,567
From rendition rewrites 2,902,320

By tier

  • core — top 10K by composite frequency
  • tier2 — ranks to ~42K
  • tier3 — the rest of the frequency-ranked single words
  • tier4 — stopwords, plus compounds and names at Wikipedia frequency ≥ 10
  • tier5 — the WordNet 3.0 lemmas the earlier tiers lacked: common compounds and technical nouns, adjectives, adverbs and verbs (instances, taxa and organisms excluded); 5,126 from v1.3 files, the rest imported from WordNet
  • tier6 — named entities — people, places, organizations, works and events ranked by Wikipedia vital-article level, Wikidata sitelinks, WordNet instance membership and US salience, which no frequency list ranks
Tier Lexemes Live senses
core 9,427 32,193
tier2 30,346 71,957
tier3 11,452 23,511
tier4 53,841 113,873
tier5 43,227 46,755
tier6 12,078 12,145
unknown 353 353

Coverage by tier

The release was built in 6 frequency-ranked passes (core, tier2, tier3, tier4, tier5 and tier6) and they did not all receive the same stages. This table is per-field and per-tier so the gaps are visible rather than averaged away.

Field Of core tier2 tier3 tier4 tier5 tier6 unknown
Canonical gloss sense 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Controlled domain tag sense 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Gloss at 4 reading levels sense 100.0% 99.9% 99.9% 100.0% 99.9% 100.0% 0.0%
Gloss in 4 registers sense 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
At least one example sense 100.0% 99.9% 100.0% 99.6% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Examples at 4 reading levels sense 99.6% 99.6% 99.9% 98.4% 99.9% 100.0% 60.6%
At least one relation sense 99.4% 99.4% 99.4% 99.5% 99.3% 99.9% 100.0%
Synthetic retrieval queries sense 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Grounded QA pairs sense 99.9% 99.7% 99.3% 99.6% 99.9% 100.0% 100.0%
Etymology lexeme 100.0% 100.0% 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Lexical explanation lexeme 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Encyclopedia (neutral) lexeme 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Encyclopedia at grade 5 + college (core entries also carry grade 1 and grade 10) lexeme 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Contrast paragraphs lexeme 85.2% 68.7% 58.1% 61.9% 38.8% 7.4% 9.6%

Files

Files Config Rows Shards Size
data/train-*.parquet default 4,939,887 10 180.5 MB

Fields

4,939,887 rows, one row per example rendition.

Field Type Description
sense_id string Sense id: {lexeme_id}:{pos}:{index}. Join key.
lexeme_id string Owning entry id: slugify(headword). Join key.
headword string The owning entry's surface headword.
pos string Part of speech of the owning POS entry (noun, verb, …).
sense_index int32 Zero-based position of the sense within its POS entry.
domain string Controlled domain leaf, root.leaf (nullable).
tier string core (top 10K by composite frequency), tier2 (ranks to ~42K), tier3 (the rest of the frequency-ranked single words), tier4 (stopwords, plus compounds and names at Wikipedia frequency ≥ 10), tier5 (the WordNet 3.0 gap the earlier tiers lacked), tier6 (named entities — people, places, organizations, works and events, ranked by importance rather than by frequency) or unknown (on none of the rank lists); an export may contain only some of these — see the coverage table.
reading_level string The rendition's reading level.
register string The rendition's register.
text string The example sentence.
span_start int32 Character offset where the headword occurrence starts (null when the span could not be placed).
span_end int32 Character offset one past the occurrence's end.
readability_grade double Measured Flesch-Kincaid grade, when recorded.
source string per_sense for a sentence written by the per-sense examples stage, renditions for a reading-level/register rewrite of an existing one.

One real row:

{
  "sense_id": "0:noun:0",
  "lexeme_id": "0",
  "headword": "0",
  "pos": "noun",
  "sense_index": 0,
  "domain": "everyday_life.quantity_time",
  "tier": "tier5",
  "reading_level": "neutral",
  "register": "plain",
  "text": "Zero is the number you add to something to get the same number back.",
  "span_start": 0,
  "span_end": 4,
  "readability_grade": null,
  "source": "renditions"
}

Loading it

from datasets import load_dataset

ds = load_dataset("mjbommar/opengloss-v2.4-examples", split="train")
print(ds)
print(ds[0])

The shards are plain parquet, so nothing forces you through datasets — read them straight, locally or over hf://:

import polars as pl

df = pl.read_parquet("hf://datasets/mjbommar/opengloss-v2.4-examples/data/train-*.parquet")
print(df.head())
import duckdb

duckdb.sql("SELECT count(*) FROM 'hf://datasets/mjbommar/opengloss-v2.4-examples/data/train-*.parquet'").show()

Word-in-context items: the sentence, the sense, the span

from datasets import load_dataset

ex = load_dataset("mjbommar/opengloss-v2.4-examples", split="train")
row = ex[0]
text, start, end = row["text"], row["span_start"], row["span_end"]
print(text[:start] + "[" + text[start:end] + "]" + text[end:])
print("sense:", row["sense_id"], "|", row["reading_level"], "/", row["register"])

Identifiers, and how they compose

Every id is derived from structure, never randomly minted, so a consumer can recompute one from a row and join across the whole family without a lookup table. Sense positions are stable across regenerations: a retired sense is tombstoned, not removed, so the indices after it never shift.

Id Shape Example
Lexeme slugify(headword) abseil
Sense {lexeme_id}:{pos}:{index} (zero-based) abseil:verb:0
Rendition {owner_id}#{reading_level}/{register} abseil:verb:0#grade_5/plain
Entry-level owner {lexeme_id}:encyclopedia / :explanation abseil:encyclopedia
Edge {source_sense_id}-{type}->{target_lexeme_id} abseil:verb:0-synonym->rappel
Query {sense_id}#q{n} (zero-based) abseil:verb:0#q3
QA pair {sense_id}#qa{n} (zero-based) abseil:verb:0#qa3
Provenance record p{n} within its entry (one-based) p12

An edge id keys on the target's slug, not on the target's sense, so resolving a target never changes the id of the edge that found it.

Reading levels and registers

A rendition is keyed on a (reading_level, register) pair. The canonical rendition of every field is (neutral, plain); everything else is a rewrite of it.

reading_level Who it is written for Rough CCSS band
neutral The canonical text: an adult general reader, no level targeted —
grade_1 Beginning readers; short sentences, common words K–1
grade_5 Upper elementary 4–5
grade_10 Secondary 9–10
college Undergraduate and above; technical vocabulary allowed 11–CCR
register What changes Reading it
plain Nothing — the neutral register The default
informal Conversational, contractions, everyday words How you'd say it to a friend
formal Full forms, precise hedging, no contractions How you'd write it in a report
technical Domain vocabulary, exact conditions How a specialist would state it
marketing Benefit-first, persuasive framing A genre, not a formality level

marketing sits on the register axis for convenience but is a genre value rather than a point on the formality scale — worth remembering if you train a formality classifier on this column.

Related datasets

Everything below is built from the same store and joins on lexeme_id / sense_id.

Dataset Grain What it holds
opengloss-v2.4-lexicon one row per lexeme One row per lexeme: kind, morphology, etymology, encyclopedia, contrasts, sense ids, provenance summary.
opengloss-v2.4-senses one row per live sense One row per live sense: canonical gloss, 8 gloss renditions, examples, resolved relations, synthetic queries, grounded QA pairs.
opengloss-v2.4-definitions one row per gloss rendition One row per gloss rendition (canonical included): reading level, register, text, readability grade.
opengloss-v2.4-examples (this one) one row per example rendition One row per example sentence with the headword's character span, its reading level and register.
opengloss-v2.4-encyclopedia one row per encyclopedia rendition · one row per lexical-explanation rendition One row per encyclopedia article rendition, plus an explanation config for the "why this word" prose.
opengloss-v2.4-etymology one row per entry with an etymology One row per entry with an etymology: prose summary, ordered language trail, cognates, references.
opengloss-v2.4-inflections one row per inflected, derived or lemma form One row per inflected or derived form, plus the lemma itself: a flat form→lemma lookup.
opengloss-v2.4-relations one row per live relation edge · one row per removed relation edge One row per semantic edge, resolved to target sense ids; a tombstoned config recovers the edges the reconcile pass removed.
opengloss-v2.4-queries one row per synthetic query One row per synthetic retrieval query, across eight query styles, tagged to the sense it should retrieve.
opengloss-v2.4-qa-pairs one row per question/answer pair One row per grounded question/answer pair, with the rendition ids the answer cites.
opengloss-v2.4-contrasts one row per contrast paragraph One row per "X vs Y" paragraph on a synonym/antonym/confusable edge, with a verdict on the edge.
opengloss-v2.4-provenance one row per provenance record One row per recorded generation call: stage, model, tokens, cost, run id — the audit trail.
opengloss-v2.4-retrieval-pairs one row per mined pair Word-in-context and doc2query-shaped (text_a, text_b, label) pairs mined from the store for free.
opengloss-v2.4-retrieval-triples one row per (query, positive, negative) triple MS MARCO-style (query, positive, negative) triples whose hard negatives come from the graph.
opengloss-v2.4-qrels one row per query, with its whole graded candidate list · one row per document in the retrieval corpus Graded TREC relevance judgements (0–3) plus the document corpus and listwise candidate lists.
opengloss-v2.4-pretrain one row per rendered document Entries serialised into plain-prose dictionary, thesaurus, encyclopedia and usage-note documents.

Known limitations

  • It is synthetic. Every string here was written by a language model against a schema, not transcribed from a corpus or checked by a lexicographer. It is well-formed and internally consistent; it is not attested usage, and it will contain confident errors. Do not use it as ground truth about what a word means.
  • Judge scores 70.2/100 (core + tier 2) and 66.7/100 (tier 3). A different model family (Claude Opus) scored fixed 40-entry stratified samples at the close of each build. Sample statistics, not per-entry guarantees, and the judge is itself a model.
  • Relation precision is the weakest axis. Relations were judged for validity and the ones that failed were demoted rather than asserted; symmetric reciprocity finished at 94.2% for synonyms and 94.3% for antonyms, and 4,722 senses were left with no relation at all. Treat a single edge as a hypothesis, not a fact; treat the aggregate graph as usable.
  • core, tier2, tier3, tier4, tier5 and tier6 are deliberately partial. 160,371 lexemes across core, tier2, tier3, tier4, tier5 and tier6 received the text stages (glosses, examples, encyclopedia) but not the queries, QA pairs, contrasts or register renditions. The coverage table above gives the exact per-field share; nothing is hidden behind an average.
  • The encyclopedia is entry-level. One article per headword, about the headword as a whole. On a polysemous entry it is not a description of any one sense, and it is never used as a positive for one (D-71). It is entry-level reference prose, not a specialist article.

Sources and licences

This release is Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0). Of 160,724 lexemes in this release, 40,643 (the tier-5 entries whose source column reads wordnet-3.0) are derived from Princeton WordNet 3.0: their glosses, examples, relations and derivationally related forms, plus WordNet's own capitalisation of the headword (D-78).

The WordNet License permits use, copying, modification and distribution without fee, provided its notice is preserved:

The WordNet License notice is quoted in full on the opengloss-v2.4-lexicon and opengloss-v2.4-senses cards; this repo's WordNet-derived rows are governed by the same terms.

Citation

@misc{bommarito2025opengloss,
  title  = {OpenGloss: A Synthetic Encyclopedic Dictionary and Semantic Knowledge Graph},
  author = {Bommarito, Michael J., II},
  year   = {2025},
  eprint = {2511.18622},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.18622}
}

Tier-5 entries additionally derive from Princeton WordNet 3.0 (D-78):

@article{miller1995wordnet,
  title   = {WordNet: A Lexical Database for English},
  author  = {Miller, George A.},
  journal = {Communications of the ACM},
  volume  = {38},
  number  = {11},
  pages   = {39--41},
  year    = {1995}
}

@book{fellbaum1998wordnet,
  title     = {WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database},
  editor    = {Fellbaum, Christiane},
  publisher = {MIT Press},
  year      = {1998}
}

License

Released under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0). Attribution to the OpenGloss project is required; commercial use is permitted. See Sources and licences above for the Princeton WordNet License that additionally covers this release's tier-5 entries.

Downloads last month
80

Collection including mjbommar/opengloss-v2.4-examples

Paper for mjbommar/opengloss-v2.4-examples