sense_id stringlengths 8 55 | lexeme_id stringlengths 1 48 | headword stringlengths 1 48 | pos stringclasses 10
values | sense_index int32 0 16 | domain stringclasses 162
values | tier stringclasses 7
values | reading_level stringclasses 5
values | register stringclasses 5
values | text stringlengths 10 314 | span_start int32 0 194 ⌀ | span_end int32 1 216 ⌀ | readability_grade float64 -3.2 33.8 ⌀ | source stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0:noun:0 | 0 | 0 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | plain | Zero is the number you add to something to get the same number back. | 0 | 4 | null | renditions |
0:noun:0 | 0 | 0 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | plain | I forgot that adding zero to a value doesn’t change it. | 16 | 20 | null | renditions |
0:noun:0 | 0 | 0 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | grade_1 | plain | Adding 0 to five gives you five. | 7 | 8 | 0.63 | renditions |
0:noun:0 | 0 | 0 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | grade_5 | plain | When Maya added 0 to her score, the score stayed the same. | 16 | 17 | 1.87 | renditions |
0:noun:0 | 0 | 0 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | grade_10 | plain | The calculator showed that adding 0 to the total left it unchanged. | 34 | 35 | 6.79 | renditions |
0:noun:0 | 0 | 0 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | college | plain | Adding 0 to the account balance leaves the balance invariant. | 7 | 8 | 7.19 | renditions |
0:noun:0 | 0 | 0 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | informal | I added 0 to my game score, and it stayed put. | 8 | 9 | 1.57 | renditions |
0:noun:0 | 0 | 0 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | formal | The clerk added 0 to the invoice total, leaving the amount unchanged. | 16 | 17 | 6.79 | renditions |
0:noun:0 | 0 | 0 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | technical | Adding 0 to the measured value preserves its numerical value. | 7 | 8 | 7.19 | renditions |
0:noun:0 | 0 | 0 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | slang | I slapped 0 onto my score, and the total didn’t budge. | 10 | 11 | 2.65 | renditions |
0:adjective:0 | 0 | 0 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | neutral | plain | a zero score | 2 | 7 | null | renditions |
0:adjective:0 | 0 | 0 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | grade_1 | plain | My game score was 0 after I missed every shot. | 18 | 19 | 3.65 | renditions |
0:adjective:0 | 0 | 0 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | grade_5 | plain | Our team got a score of 0 after missing every shot. | 24 | 25 | 4.79 | renditions |
0:adjective:0 | 0 | 0 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | grade_10 | plain | The player finished the round with a score of 0. | 46 | 47 | 1.29 | renditions |
0:adjective:0 | 0 | 0 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | college | plain | The team recorded a score of 0 after failing to earn any points. | 29 | 30 | 5.82 | renditions |
0:adjective:0 | 0 | 0 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | neutral | informal | I got a 0 on the quiz, even though I answered every question. | 8 | 9 | 5.82 | renditions |
0:adjective:0 | 0 | 0 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | neutral | formal | The final score was 0 after the match was abandoned. | 20 | 21 | 4.83 | renditions |
0:adjective:0 | 0 | 0 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | neutral | technical | The contestant's score was recorded as 0 because no valid answers were submitted. | 39 | 40 | 9.45 | renditions |
0:adjective:0 | 0 | 0 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | neutral | slang | Our side put up a big fat 0 on the scoreboard. | 26 | 27 | 2.65 | renditions |
1:noun:0 | 1 | 1 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | plain | he has the one but will need a two and three to go with it | null | null | null | renditions |
1:noun:0 | 1 | 1 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | plain | they had lunch at one | null | null | null | renditions |
1:noun:0 | 1 | 1 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | grade_1 | plain | I put 1 block on the mat. | 6 | 7 | -1.06 | renditions |
1:noun:0 | 1 | 1 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | grade_5 | plain | The locker marked 1 stood beside the gym door. | 18 | 19 | 2.34 | renditions |
1:noun:0 | 1 | 1 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | grade_10 | plain | She found the trail marker labeled 1 beside the park entrance. | 35 | 36 | 4.79 | renditions |
1:noun:0 | 1 | 1 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | college | plain | The set begins with 1, but completing the sequence requires adding 2 and 3. | 20 | 21 | 6.73 | renditions |
1:noun:0 | 1 | 1 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | informal | I grabbed 1 cup, but we’ll need a couple more for everyone. | 10 | 11 | 3.84 | renditions |
1:noun:0 | 1 | 1 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | formal | The inventory records 1 replacement key for the office. | 22 | 23 | 10.21 | renditions |
1:noun:0 | 1 | 1 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | technical | Assign the value 1 to the first element in the sequence. | 17 | 18 | 4.79 | renditions |
1:noun:0 | 1 | 1 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | slang | I’ve got 1 slice, but we need more if everyone’s eating. | 9 | 10 | 3.72 | renditions |
1:noun:0 | 1 | 1 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | technical | In base ten, the numeral 1 represents the integer one. | 25 | 26 | 7.19 | per_sense |
1:adjective:0 | 1 | 1 | adjective | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | plain | I only have one apple. | null | null | null | renditions |
1:adjective:0 | 1 | 1 | adjective | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | plain | She wore a one-piece swimsuit. | null | null | null | renditions |
1:adjective:0 | 1 | 1 | adjective | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | grade_1 | plain | I have 1 red ball. | 7 | 8 | -1.84 | renditions |
1:adjective:0 | 1 | 1 | adjective | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | grade_5 | plain | There is only 1 cookie left in the jar. | 14 | 15 | 2.34 | renditions |
1:adjective:0 | 1 | 1 | adjective | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | grade_10 | plain | The shelf held only 1 book after the library sale. | 20 | 21 | 6.01 | renditions |
1:adjective:0 | 1 | 1 | adjective | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | college | plain | After the final count, the collection contained only 1 surviving photograph. | 53 | 54 | 11.23 | renditions |
1:adjective:0 | 1 | 1 | adjective | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | informal | I grabbed just 1 slice of pizza for the ride home. | 15 | 16 | 1.57 | renditions |
1:adjective:0 | 1 | 1 | adjective | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | formal | The applicant submitted 1 signed form with the completed packet. | 24 | 25 | 8.37 | renditions |
1:adjective:0 | 1 | 1 | adjective | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | technical | The device recorded 1 error during the overnight test. | 20 | 21 | 8.9 | renditions |
1:adjective:0 | 1 | 1 | adjective | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | slang | I scored 1 ticket, so I'm heading to the show solo. | 9 | 10 | 3.72 | renditions |
10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | plain | I wrote the number 10 on the board. | 19 | 21 | null | renditions |
10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | plain | Ten is the base of the decimal system. | 0 | 3 | null | renditions |
10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | grade_1 | plain | I drew 10 on my school board. | 7 | 9 | -1.06 | renditions |
10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | grade_5 | plain | Mia counted ten toy cars and wrote 10 in her notebook. | 35 | 37 | 3.72 | renditions |
10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | grade_10 | plain | During math class, I entered 10 into the answer box. | 29 | 31 | 4.83 | renditions |
10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | college | plain | The form requires applicants to enter 10 in the designated field. | 38 | 40 | 8.01 | renditions |
10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | informal | I jotted 10 down on the page. | 9 | 11 | 0.63 | renditions |
10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | formal | I recorded the number 10 in my notes. | 22 | 24 | 3.76 | renditions |
10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | technical | I transcribed the numeral 10 onto the worksheet. | 26 | 28 | 6.71 | renditions |
10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | slang | I slapped a 10 onto my homework sheet. | 12 | 14 | 3.76 | renditions |
10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | grade_1 | plain | Count nine shells, then add one to make 10. | 40 | 42 | -0.28 | per_sense |
10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | grade_5 | plain | Our class used 10 to show how many fingers we have. | 15 | 17 | 2.65 | per_sense |
10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | grade_10 | plain | Since 10 is the base of decimal notation, each place represents a power of it. | 6 | 8 | 7.57 | per_sense |
10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | college | plain | In the decimal system, 10 serves as the base for expressing every whole number. | 23 | 25 | 9.26 | per_sense |
10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | informal | Hey, 10 is the answer when you add nine and one. | 5 | 7 | 1.57 | per_sense |
10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | formal | The calculation yields 10, the cardinal value immediately following nine. | 23 | 25 | 13.09 | per_sense |
10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | technical | For decimal positional notation, 10 is the radix that determines place-value scaling. | 33 | 35 | 11.26 | per_sense |
10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | slang | Nine plus one lands on 10, easy as that. | 23 | 25 | 1.03 | per_sense |
10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | neutral | plain | We are on lesson 10 of the course. | 17 | 19 | null | renditions |
10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | neutral | plain | That’s a 10-minute walk from my house. | 9 | 11 | null | renditions |
10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | grade_1 | plain | I have 10 toy cars in my box. | 7 | 9 | -0.67 | renditions |
10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | grade_5 | plain | Our class read 10 pages before lunch. | 15 | 17 | 2.31 | renditions |
10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | grade_10 | plain | Maya scored 10 points during the final round of the game. | 12 | 14 | 2.65 | renditions |
10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | college | plain | The survey received responses from 10 participants during its first week. | 35 | 37 | 9.08 | renditions |
10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | neutral | informal | We only need 10 more minutes to finish this game. | 13 | 15 | 3.65 | renditions |
10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | neutral | formal | The building contains 10 floors. | 22 | 24 | 2.88 | renditions |
10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | neutral | technical | The device records 10 readings per second. | 19 | 21 | 5.68 | renditions |
10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | neutral | slang | I got 10 bucks for that old bike. | 6 | 8 | -0.67 | renditions |
10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | grade_1 | plain | I put 10 blocks in my red box. | 6 | 8 | -0.67 | per_sense |
10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | grade_5 | plain | Maya baked 10 cookies for the class party. | 11 | 13 | 0.8 | per_sense |
10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | grade_10 | plain | After the final bell, 10 students stayed behind to rehearse the school play. | 22 | 24 | 5.82 | per_sense |
10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | college | plain | The museum displayed 10 bronze bowls in a row beneath the gallery lights. | 21 | 23 | 4.91 | per_sense |
10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | neutral | informal | We grabbed 10 slices of pizza, so nobody went hungry. | 11 | 13 | 6.01 | per_sense |
10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | neutral | formal | Please submit 10 signed copies of the application to the registrar. | 14 | 16 | 6.94 | per_sense |
10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | neutral | technical | The protocol requires 10 replicate samples from each treatment group. | 22 | 24 | 8.37 | per_sense |
10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | neutral | slang | They scored 10 goals and absolutely crushed the other team. | 12 | 14 | 6.01 | per_sense |
100:noun:0 | 100 | 100 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | plain | I wrote down the answer as ten 10s. | 26 | 28 | null | renditions |
100:noun:0 | 100 | 100 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | plain | The scoreboard showed ten 10s in a row. | 28 | 30 | null | renditions |
100:noun:0 | 100 | 100 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | grade_1 | plain | I wrote 100 on my paper. | 8 | 11 | 0.52 | renditions |
100:noun:0 | 100 | 100 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | grade_5 | plain | I wrote 100 as the answer on my worksheet. | 8 | 11 | 2.34 | renditions |
100:noun:0 | 100 | 100 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | grade_10 | plain | I entered 100 as my answer on the quiz. | 10 | 13 | 2.34 | renditions |
100:noun:0 | 100 | 100 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | college | plain | I recorded 100 as the result of the calculation. | 11 | 14 | 7.59 | renditions |
100:noun:0 | 100 | 100 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | informal | My little brother counted to 100 without missing a number. | 29 | 32 | 7.19 | renditions |
100:noun:0 | 100 | 100 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | formal | The library catalog assigns the collection the reference number 100. | 64 | 67 | 11.91 | renditions |
100:noun:0 | 100 | 100 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | technical | The sensor recorded a temperature of 100 degrees during the test. | 37 | 40 | 8.01 | renditions |
100:noun:0 | 100 | 100 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | slang | That old game hit 100 points, and we went wild. | 18 | 21 | 0.11 | renditions |
100:adjective:0 | 100 | 100 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | neutral | plain | The number was one hundred, which is ten more than ninety. | null | null | null | renditions |
100:adjective:0 | 100 | 100 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | neutral | plain | He picked the one-hundred option since it’s ten more than ninety. | 8 | 11 | null | renditions |
100:adjective:0 | 100 | 100 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | grade_1 | plain | A box can hold 100 small toys. | 15 | 18 | -1.06 | renditions |
100:adjective:0 | 100 | 100 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | grade_5 | plain | The school collected 100 cans, ten more than ninety. | 21 | 24 | 4.96 | renditions |
100:adjective:0 | 100 | 100 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | grade_10 | plain | The scoreboard showed 100 points after the team completed the final round. | 22 | 25 | 6.79 | renditions |
100:adjective:0 | 100 | 100 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | college | plain | The survey recorded 100 responses, establishing the final sample size. | 20 | 23 | 11.91 | renditions |
100:adjective:0 | 100 | 100 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | neutral | informal | She turned in 100 pages, way more than she expected. | 14 | 17 | 3.65 | renditions |
100:adjective:0 | 100 | 100 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | neutral | formal | The committee approved 100 applications during its first review. | 23 | 26 | 10.21 | renditions |
100:adjective:0 | 100 | 100 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | neutral | technical | The dataset contains 100 records, each assigned a unique identifier. | 21 | 24 | 10.73 | renditions |
100:adjective:0 | 100 | 100 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | neutral | slang | He scored 100 on the quiz and totally crushed it. | 10 | 13 | 2.47 | renditions |
1000:noun:0 | 1000 | 1000 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | neutral | plain | The total was 10 times 100, or 1000. | 31 | 35 | null | renditions |
1000:noun:0 | 1000 | 1000 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | grade_1 | plain | Ten bags hold 1000 beads. | 14 | 18 | -1.84 | renditions |
1000:noun:0 | 1000 | 1000 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | grade_5 | plain | Ten boxes held 100 books each, for a total of 1000 books. | 46 | 50 | 4.82 | renditions |
1000:noun:0 | 1000 | 1000 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | grade_10 | plain | The school collected 100 books from each of ten classrooms, reaching a total of 1000 books. | 80 | 84 | 7.61 | renditions |
OpenGloss v2.4 — Examples
Every example sentence in OpenGloss v2.4, one row at a time, each tagged to the sense it illustrates and carrying the [span_start, span_end) character offsets of the headword occurrence inside it. That combination — a sentence, the sense it uses, and where the word is — is what a word-in-context or sense-disambiguation task needs and is normally paid for by annotation. source distinguishes the per-sense examples stage's verified sentences from reading-level and register rewrites of an existing example.
Part of the OpenGloss v2.4 release family — 16 datasets built from one store of 160,724 lexemes and 300,787 live senses, all joinable on derived ids. See Related datasets for the rest.
What's new in v2.4 vs v1.3
- Schema v3. Every lexeme carries a
kinddiscriminator (simplex, compound, phrasal verb, idiom, proper noun, abbreviation, affix, function word); every sense carries a controlled domain leaf from a fixed ~160-leaf taxonomy instead of free text; every example carries the character span of the headword occurrence inside it. - Renditions, not one string. A definition is a set: the canonical one plus rewrites at four reading levels and in four registers, each produced in a single call from the canonical text so they say the same thing at different altitudes.
- A sense graph, not a word graph. Typed relations resolve to sense ids wherever
the target's entry exists in the release, so
bank --hypernym--> financial institutionpoints at a meaning rather than at a string. - Retrieval data is first-class. Synthetic per-sense queries in eight styles, grounded QA pairs, mined word-in-context pairs, MS MARCO-style triples with graph-derived hard negatives, and graded TREC qrels — all derivable from, and consistent with, the same entries.
- Derivable identifiers everywhere. v1.3 published a positional id for lexemes and
senses (
3d_model_noun_0) and nothing below that. v2.4 gives every rendition, edge, query, QA pair and provenance record an id computable from the row alone, and never renumbers: a retired sense is tombstoned, so the ids after it keep their meaning. - Per-field provenance. Which model wrote a field, how many tokens it took, what it cost — published as its own dataset.
What changed since v2.3
v2.3 (2026-09-09) added tier 6, named entities. v2.4 adds no new headwords: it fills in the supervision the lower tiers never received and makes every reading level of the pretraining corpus carry text of its own.
- Retrieval supervision for every sense. Tiers 3-6 (about two thirds of all senses) had no search queries, QA pairs, register variants or contrast paragraphs in v2.3; those existed only for core and tier 2. Every live sense now has search queries in eight styles (twelve per sense; 85% of all queries never name the headword), 99.7% have grounded QA pairs, and every tier has register variants, register-crossed examples and contrasts.
- Verified word-in-context examples everywhere. The sense-disambiguated example stage (eight checked sentences per sense) ran only on tier 2 in v2.3; it now covers core and tiers 3-6 as well.
- Leveled register text. Every sense gains five definitions crossing reading level and register (grade 5 informal and formal; college informal, formal and technical); every contrast paragraph gains a grade-5 and a college version; every lexical explanation gains a grade-5 and a college version.
- A pretraining corpus with no copies. v2.3's thesaurus and usage-note documents at
grade_5andcollegewere byte-identical toneutral(25% of all pretraining documents). A non-neutral document is now emitted only when it carries text written at its level and differs from the neutral one, and the export fails if any two documents share text. The thesaurus template gains a "Choosing between them" section of leveled contrast notes (moved from the usage note), and the usage note lists the register variants written at the document's level. - Graph repair. Relations were regenerated for senses that had none (senses without a relation fell from 4,722 to about 1,600), re-resolved, re-judged, and hypernym cycles broken back to zero.
- Writer. New v2.4 text was written by
gpt-6-luna(low reasoning); v2.3's bygpt-5.6-luna. Theprovenancerepo records the model of every call.
| v2.3 (2026-09-09) | v2.4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Lexemes | 160,724 | 160,724 |
| Live senses | 300,787 | 300,787 |
| Search queries | 1,249,683 | 3,851,978 |
| QA pairs | 704,950 | 2,304,127 |
| Definition renditions | 1,919,007 | 4,209,494 |
| Example renditions | 2,421,809 | 4,939,887 |
| Encyclopedia renditions | 500,320 | 802,914 |
| Lexical-explanation renditions | 160,724 | 482,172 |
| Contrast paragraphs (all levels) | 81,046 | 812,184 |
| Unique source-text tokens (16K student tokenizer) | 697,553,973 | 1,461,832,309 |
| Pretraining documents | 1,560,030 | 1,910,373 |
| Pretraining words | 418,161,358 | 483,649,976 |
| Pretraining tokens (cl100k_base) | 594,154,612 | 676,733,509 |
| Exact-duplicate pretraining documents | 25.0% | 0 (the export fails on any duplicate) |
| Judge score, Opus, 40-entry samples | 70.2 (core + tier 2), 66.7 (tier 3), 67.0 (tier 4), 81.3 (tier 5), 73.0 (tier 6) | 64.8 (core), 69.9 (tier 2), 65.8 (tier 3), 68.1 (tier 4), 79.6 (tier 5), 71.3 (tier 6) |
Schema. No column was removed or retyped. pretrain gains sections_at_level;
level_used gains the value mixed (some leveled sections fell back to neutral text);
non-neutral pretraining documents with no text of their own at their level are no longer
emitted, and retired lexemes (no live sense) emit no pretraining document. contrasts
now carries grade_5 and college rows beside neutral.
Known issues. Leveled informal definitions open with "It's a / It's the / It's when" about 18% of the time. About 1.1% of QA answers are exact duplicates of another QA answer (mostly short answers). Listwise qrels lists that contain all four grades fell as a share, because tier 3-6 senses joined with fewer grade-2 neighbours.
What changed since v2.2
v2.2 (2026-09-07) added tier 5, the WordNet 3.0 gap. v2.3 adds tier 6: named entities. Every tier before it was selected by word frequency or by WordNet membership, and neither signal ranks a name — a name's importance is a fact about the world, not about a corpus — so v2.2 knew Washington and Lincoln but not George Washington, New York City or World War II. Tier 6 is 15,000 candidates ranked by Wikipedia vital-article level, Wikidata sitelink count, WordNet instance membership and US salience, of which 12,078 became entries. Three schema changes come with it:
- Entity types are written rather than defaulted. Every proper noun in v2.2 carried
entity_type = other, because the two migrations and the kind classifier all wrote that placeholder and nothing ever replaced it. 28,915 proper nouns now carry a real type —person,place,organization,work,event,product,species— taken from the candidate list where it knew one and bought as a single batched verdict where it did not.lexiconandsensesgain anentity_typecolumn, andlexicongainswikidata_qid, the join key for reconciling an entry against Wikidata. - Aliases. A name has variants — Lincoln for Abraham Lincoln, the Netherlands
for Netherlands, FDR, NASA — and v2.2 had nowhere to put them. A variant that
has an entry of its own is now an
alias_ofedge inopengloss-v2.4-relations(1,267 of them, written by a judged alias pass). The schema also reserves alexicon.aliasescolumn andaliasrows inopengloss-v2.4-inflectionsfor variants with no entry of their own, but no pass populates them yet:aliasesis empty on every v2.4 row. Analias_ofedge is never demoted, pruned, capped or re-judged by the hygiene passes, unlike every other relation type. - Two new domain leaves.
nature.settlements(cities, towns, villages, neighbourhoods) andlaw_government.polities(countries, states, provinces, empires, historical polities). A quarter of tier 6 is a settlement or a polity and the taxonomy had no leaf for either; adding ageographyroot would have been a breaking change to a fixed 15-root vocabulary, so both went under roots that already exist.
| v2.2 (2026-09-07) | v2.3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Lexemes | 148,292 | 160,724 |
| Live senses | 288,304 | 300,787 |
| Tier 6 lexemes (named entities) | 0 | 12,078 |
| Pretraining documents | 1,458,684 | 1,560,030 |
| Pretraining words | 398,029,628 | 418,161,358 |
| Pretraining tokens (cl100k_base) | 565,384,746 | 594,154,612 |
| Judge score, Opus, 40-entry samples | 70.2 (core + tier 2), 66.7 (tier 3), 67.0 (tier 4), 81.3 (tier 5) | 70.2 (core + tier 2), 66.7 (tier 3), 67.0 (tier 4), 81.3 (tier 5), 73.0 (tier 6) |
Schema. No column was removed or retyped. lexicon gains entity_type,
wikidata_qid and aliases; senses gains entity_type; relations gains the
alias_of type; inflections gains the alias relation; tier gains the value
tier6; and the domain taxonomy gains two leaves (taxonomy version 3).
What changed since v2.1
v2.1 (2026-09-07) added tier 4 and the inflections repo. v2.2 adds tier 5:
43,652 WordNet 3.0 candidate lemmas the earlier tiers lacked — common
compounds and technical nouns, adjectives, adverbs and verbs, instances/taxa/organisms
excluded — 38,526 of them imported outright, the rest matched against
v1.3's own files. The other three changes are about honesty rather than coverage:
- The lemma fold.
lexeme-hygiene(D-79) folded 4,377 inflected-form headwords onto the lemma that already carried their meaning ("databases" onto "database", through the store's own recorded morphology) and retired 172 multiword fragments that began or ended on a function word ("is not", "on top of"). Together with D-76's phantom part-of-speech retirements, 4,549 lexemes store-wide now have every sense tombstoned. A lexeme like that is not counted as a lexeme anywhere in this card or inStatsany more — it has no live sense, so it is not a lexeme by this release's own count — but it is not gone: its surface form still resolves throughopengloss-v2.2-inflections, and itslexiconrow carriesretired = truewith aretired_reasonexplaining why. - Provenance on inherited fields. Every field a migration or import wrote, not only
what a model wrote from scratch, now carries a
migrate-stage provenance record naming where it came from, so "where did this text come from" is answerable bygreprather than by trusting the pipeline that happened to run. - A
sourcecolumn onlexiconandsenses:opengloss-v1.3for content this project generated or migrated from its own legacy releases,wordnet-3.0for the tier-5 entries imported directly from Princeton WordNet 3.0.
| v2.1 (2026-09-07) | v2.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Lexemes | 109,633 | 160,724 |
| Live senses | 250,003 | 300,787 |
| Tier 5 lexemes (WordNet gap) | 0 | 43,227 |
| Retired lexemes (every sense tombstoned) | 0 | 4,567 |
| Pretraining documents | 1,111,044 | 1,458,684 |
| Pretraining words | 331,888,239 | 398,029,628 |
| Pretraining tokens (cl100k_base) | 471,451,693 | 565,384,746 |
| Judge score, Opus, 40-entry samples | 70.2 (core + tier 2), 66.7 (tier 3), 67.0 (tier 4) | 70.2 (core + tier 2), 66.7 (tier 3), 67.0 (tier 4), 81.3 (tier 5) |
Schema. No column was removed or retyped. lexicon gains source, retired and
retired_reason; senses gains source; tier gains the value tier5.
What changed since v2.0
v2.0 (2026-09-05) covered the frequency-ranked single words. v2.4 adds tier 4: the function words the core ranking had excluded on purpose, and every remaining v1.3 entry at Wikipedia frequency ≥ 10 — mostly multiword compounds ("natural selection", "catalog number"), plus names and rarer single words. That doubles the lexeme count and changes the mix: v2.0 was 99.8% single words; a third of v2.4 is multiword.
| v2.0 (2026-09-05) | v2.1 (2026-09-07) | |
|---|---|---|
| Lexemes | 54,724 | 109,633 |
| Live senses | 137,314 | 250,003 |
| Multiword entries (compounds, phrasal verbs, idioms) | 86 | 36,366 |
| Proper nouns | 10,365 | 17,073 |
| Function words | 114 | 462 |
| Gloss renditions | 1,129,975 | 1,684,865 |
| Example sentences | 1,398,297 | 2,163,329 |
| Live relations | 735,318 | 1,574,438 |
| Synthetic queries | 1,330,311 | 1,304,650 |
| QA pairs | 750,348 | 736,010 |
| Pretraining documents | 617,175 | 1,111,044 |
| Pretraining words | 196,390,946 | 331,888,239 |
| Pretraining tokens (cl100k_base) | 275,659,096 | 471,451,693 |
| Judge score, Opus, 40-entry samples | 70.2 (core + tier 2), 66.7 (tier 3) | 70.2 (core + tier 2), 66.7 (tier 3), 67.0 (tier 4) |
Schema. No column was added, removed or retyped in any existing dataset. Three things did change:
tiergains the valuetier4(it wascore,tier2ortier3).- One new dataset,
opengloss-v2.4-inflections: a flat surface-form → lemma lookup (plural, past tense, participles, comparative, superlative, derivations) built from the morphology that the lexicon already carried nested. - New provenance note prefixes on tombstones and edges, all reversible and all counted
in the store audit:
phantom_pos:(a v1.3 part-of-speech block whose glosses defined a component word rather than the compound — 11,440 blocks retired),regen:(relations regenerated for senses that had lost every edge to judging), andretyped: contrast(synonym edges the contrast paragraphs showed to be hypernym or hyponym).
Not row-compatible with v2.0. Lexeme, sense, rendition, edge, query and QA ids are
stable for every entry v2.0 had. The derived training sets (retrieval-pairs,
retrieval-triples, qrels) re-sample negatives over the larger pool, so their rows
differ; and the store-wide quality passes run for v2.4 retired ~3,000 senses of the v2.0
entries (phantom part-of-speech blocks and near-duplicate senses), so those senses are
now tombstoned rather than live. Treat v2.4 as a new release, not a delta.
Scope: fewer headwords, far more per headword
v2.4 is not a superset of v1.3. It covers 160,724 of v1.3's 205,988 lexemes — every frequency-ranked single word, plus the compounds and names at Wikipedia frequency ≥ 10 — and spends the difference on depth. If you need breadth of vocabulary, use v1.3; if you need graded renditions, resolved relations, spans, or retrieval supervision, use v2.4.
| v1.3 | v2.4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Lexemes | 205,988 | 160,724 |
| Senses | 565,604 | 300,787 |
| Definition renditions per sense | 1 canonical | 1 canonical + up to 8 graded |
| Relation targets | bare strings | resolved to sense ids |
| Retrieval training data | companion sets | queries, QA, triples, qrels |
| Per-field provenance | no | model, tokens and cost per call |
Key statistics
| Lexemes | 160,724 |
| Retired lexemes (every sense tombstoned; not counted above) | 4,567 |
| Live senses | 300,787 |
| Rows in this dataset | 4,939,887 |
| Sentences carrying a headword span | 4,901,949 (99.2%) |
| From the per-sense examples stage | 2,037,567 |
| From rendition rewrites | 2,902,320 |
By tier
core— top 10K by composite frequencytier2— ranks to ~42Ktier3— the rest of the frequency-ranked single wordstier4— stopwords, plus compounds and names at Wikipedia frequency ≥ 10tier5— the WordNet 3.0 lemmas the earlier tiers lacked: common compounds and technical nouns, adjectives, adverbs and verbs (instances, taxa and organisms excluded); 5,126 from v1.3 files, the rest imported from WordNettier6— named entities — people, places, organizations, works and events ranked by Wikipedia vital-article level, Wikidata sitelinks, WordNet instance membership and US salience, which no frequency list ranks
| Tier | Lexemes | Live senses |
|---|---|---|
core |
9,427 | 32,193 |
tier2 |
30,346 | 71,957 |
tier3 |
11,452 | 23,511 |
tier4 |
53,841 | 113,873 |
tier5 |
43,227 | 46,755 |
tier6 |
12,078 | 12,145 |
unknown |
353 | 353 |
Coverage by tier
The release was built in 6 frequency-ranked passes (core, tier2, tier3, tier4, tier5 and tier6) and they did not all receive the same stages. This table is per-field and per-tier so the gaps are visible rather
than averaged away.
| Field | Of | core |
tier2 |
tier3 |
tier4 |
tier5 |
tier6 |
unknown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canonical gloss | sense | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Controlled domain tag | sense | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Gloss at 4 reading levels | sense | 100.0% | 99.9% | 99.9% | 100.0% | 99.9% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Gloss in 4 registers | sense | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| At least one example | sense | 100.0% | 99.9% | 100.0% | 99.6% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Examples at 4 reading levels | sense | 99.6% | 99.6% | 99.9% | 98.4% | 99.9% | 100.0% | 60.6% |
| At least one relation | sense | 99.4% | 99.4% | 99.4% | 99.5% | 99.3% | 99.9% | 100.0% |
| Synthetic retrieval queries | sense | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Grounded QA pairs | sense | 99.9% | 99.7% | 99.3% | 99.6% | 99.9% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Etymology | lexeme | 100.0% | 100.0% | 99.8% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Lexical explanation | lexeme | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Encyclopedia (neutral) | lexeme | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Encyclopedia at grade 5 + college (core entries also carry grade 1 and grade 10) | lexeme | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Contrast paragraphs | lexeme | 85.2% | 68.7% | 58.1% | 61.9% | 38.8% | 7.4% | 9.6% |
Files
| Files | Config | Rows | Shards | Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
data/train-*.parquet |
default | 4,939,887 | 10 | 180.5 MB |
Fields
4,939,887 rows, one row per example rendition.
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
sense_id |
string |
Sense id: {lexeme_id}:{pos}:{index}. Join key. |
lexeme_id |
string |
Owning entry id: slugify(headword). Join key. |
headword |
string |
The owning entry's surface headword. |
pos |
string |
Part of speech of the owning POS entry (noun, verb, …). |
sense_index |
int32 |
Zero-based position of the sense within its POS entry. |
domain |
string |
Controlled domain leaf, root.leaf (nullable). |
tier |
string |
core (top 10K by composite frequency), tier2 (ranks to ~42K), tier3 (the rest of the frequency-ranked single words), tier4 (stopwords, plus compounds and names at Wikipedia frequency ≥ 10), tier5 (the WordNet 3.0 gap the earlier tiers lacked), tier6 (named entities — people, places, organizations, works and events, ranked by importance rather than by frequency) or unknown (on none of the rank lists); an export may contain only some of these — see the coverage table. |
reading_level |
string |
The rendition's reading level. |
register |
string |
The rendition's register. |
text |
string |
The example sentence. |
span_start |
int32 |
Character offset where the headword occurrence starts (null when the span could not be placed). |
span_end |
int32 |
Character offset one past the occurrence's end. |
readability_grade |
double |
Measured Flesch-Kincaid grade, when recorded. |
source |
string |
per_sense for a sentence written by the per-sense examples stage, renditions for a reading-level/register rewrite of an existing one. |
One real row:
{
"sense_id": "0:noun:0",
"lexeme_id": "0",
"headword": "0",
"pos": "noun",
"sense_index": 0,
"domain": "everyday_life.quantity_time",
"tier": "tier5",
"reading_level": "neutral",
"register": "plain",
"text": "Zero is the number you add to something to get the same number back.",
"span_start": 0,
"span_end": 4,
"readability_grade": null,
"source": "renditions"
}
Loading it
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("mjbommar/opengloss-v2.4-examples", split="train")
print(ds)
print(ds[0])
The shards are plain parquet, so nothing forces you through datasets — read them
straight, locally or over hf://:
import polars as pl
df = pl.read_parquet("hf://datasets/mjbommar/opengloss-v2.4-examples/data/train-*.parquet")
print(df.head())
import duckdb
duckdb.sql("SELECT count(*) FROM 'hf://datasets/mjbommar/opengloss-v2.4-examples/data/train-*.parquet'").show()
Word-in-context items: the sentence, the sense, the span
from datasets import load_dataset
ex = load_dataset("mjbommar/opengloss-v2.4-examples", split="train")
row = ex[0]
text, start, end = row["text"], row["span_start"], row["span_end"]
print(text[:start] + "[" + text[start:end] + "]" + text[end:])
print("sense:", row["sense_id"], "|", row["reading_level"], "/", row["register"])
Identifiers, and how they compose
Every id is derived from structure, never randomly minted, so a consumer can recompute one from a row and join across the whole family without a lookup table. Sense positions are stable across regenerations: a retired sense is tombstoned, not removed, so the indices after it never shift.
| Id | Shape | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Lexeme | slugify(headword) |
abseil |
| Sense | {lexeme_id}:{pos}:{index} (zero-based) |
abseil:verb:0 |
| Rendition | {owner_id}#{reading_level}/{register} |
abseil:verb:0#grade_5/plain |
| Entry-level owner | {lexeme_id}:encyclopedia / :explanation |
abseil:encyclopedia |
| Edge | {source_sense_id}-{type}->{target_lexeme_id} |
abseil:verb:0-synonym->rappel |
| Query | {sense_id}#q{n} (zero-based) |
abseil:verb:0#q3 |
| QA pair | {sense_id}#qa{n} (zero-based) |
abseil:verb:0#qa3 |
| Provenance record | p{n} within its entry (one-based) |
p12 |
An edge id keys on the target's slug, not on the target's sense, so resolving a target never changes the id of the edge that found it.
Reading levels and registers
A rendition is keyed on a (reading_level, register) pair. The canonical rendition of
every field is (neutral, plain); everything else is a rewrite of it.
reading_level |
Who it is written for | Rough CCSS band |
|---|---|---|
neutral |
The canonical text: an adult general reader, no level targeted | — |
grade_1 |
Beginning readers; short sentences, common words | K–1 |
grade_5 |
Upper elementary | 4–5 |
grade_10 |
Secondary | 9–10 |
college |
Undergraduate and above; technical vocabulary allowed | 11–CCR |
register |
What changes | Reading it |
|---|---|---|
plain |
Nothing — the neutral register | The default |
informal |
Conversational, contractions, everyday words | How you'd say it to a friend |
formal |
Full forms, precise hedging, no contractions | How you'd write it in a report |
technical |
Domain vocabulary, exact conditions | How a specialist would state it |
marketing |
Benefit-first, persuasive framing | A genre, not a formality level |
marketing sits on the register axis for convenience but is a genre value rather than
a point on the formality scale — worth remembering if you train a formality classifier on
this column.
Related datasets
Everything below is built from the same store and joins on lexeme_id / sense_id.
| Dataset | Grain | What it holds |
|---|---|---|
opengloss-v2.4-lexicon |
one row per lexeme | One row per lexeme: kind, morphology, etymology, encyclopedia, contrasts, sense ids, provenance summary. |
opengloss-v2.4-senses |
one row per live sense | One row per live sense: canonical gloss, 8 gloss renditions, examples, resolved relations, synthetic queries, grounded QA pairs. |
opengloss-v2.4-definitions |
one row per gloss rendition | One row per gloss rendition (canonical included): reading level, register, text, readability grade. |
opengloss-v2.4-examples (this one) |
one row per example rendition | One row per example sentence with the headword's character span, its reading level and register. |
opengloss-v2.4-encyclopedia |
one row per encyclopedia rendition · one row per lexical-explanation rendition | One row per encyclopedia article rendition, plus an explanation config for the "why this word" prose. |
opengloss-v2.4-etymology |
one row per entry with an etymology | One row per entry with an etymology: prose summary, ordered language trail, cognates, references. |
opengloss-v2.4-inflections |
one row per inflected, derived or lemma form | One row per inflected or derived form, plus the lemma itself: a flat form→lemma lookup. |
opengloss-v2.4-relations |
one row per live relation edge · one row per removed relation edge | One row per semantic edge, resolved to target sense ids; a tombstoned config recovers the edges the reconcile pass removed. |
opengloss-v2.4-queries |
one row per synthetic query | One row per synthetic retrieval query, across eight query styles, tagged to the sense it should retrieve. |
opengloss-v2.4-qa-pairs |
one row per question/answer pair | One row per grounded question/answer pair, with the rendition ids the answer cites. |
opengloss-v2.4-contrasts |
one row per contrast paragraph | One row per "X vs Y" paragraph on a synonym/antonym/confusable edge, with a verdict on the edge. |
opengloss-v2.4-provenance |
one row per provenance record | One row per recorded generation call: stage, model, tokens, cost, run id — the audit trail. |
opengloss-v2.4-retrieval-pairs |
one row per mined pair | Word-in-context and doc2query-shaped (text_a, text_b, label) pairs mined from the store for free. |
opengloss-v2.4-retrieval-triples |
one row per (query, positive, negative) triple | MS MARCO-style (query, positive, negative) triples whose hard negatives come from the graph. |
opengloss-v2.4-qrels |
one row per query, with its whole graded candidate list · one row per document in the retrieval corpus | Graded TREC relevance judgements (0–3) plus the document corpus and listwise candidate lists. |
opengloss-v2.4-pretrain |
one row per rendered document | Entries serialised into plain-prose dictionary, thesaurus, encyclopedia and usage-note documents. |
Known limitations
- It is synthetic. Every string here was written by a language model against a schema, not transcribed from a corpus or checked by a lexicographer. It is well-formed and internally consistent; it is not attested usage, and it will contain confident errors. Do not use it as ground truth about what a word means.
- Judge scores 70.2/100 (core + tier 2) and 66.7/100 (tier 3). A different model family (Claude Opus) scored fixed 40-entry stratified samples at the close of each build. Sample statistics, not per-entry guarantees, and the judge is itself a model.
- Relation precision is the weakest axis. Relations were judged for validity and the ones that failed were demoted rather than asserted; symmetric reciprocity finished at 94.2% for synonyms and 94.3% for antonyms, and 4,722 senses were left with no relation at all. Treat a single edge as a hypothesis, not a fact; treat the aggregate graph as usable.
core,tier2,tier3,tier4,tier5andtier6are deliberately partial. 160,371 lexemes acrosscore,tier2,tier3,tier4,tier5andtier6received the text stages (glosses, examples, encyclopedia) but not the queries, QA pairs, contrasts or register renditions. The coverage table above gives the exact per-field share; nothing is hidden behind an average.- The encyclopedia is entry-level. One article per headword, about the headword as a whole. On a polysemous entry it is not a description of any one sense, and it is never used as a positive for one (D-71). It is entry-level reference prose, not a specialist article.
Sources and licences
This release is Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0). Of 160,724 lexemes in this release, 40,643 (the tier-5 entries whose source column reads wordnet-3.0) are derived from Princeton WordNet 3.0: their glosses, examples, relations and derivationally related forms, plus WordNet's own capitalisation of the headword (D-78).
The WordNet License permits use, copying, modification and distribution without fee, provided its notice is preserved:
The WordNet License notice is quoted in full on the opengloss-v2.4-lexicon and opengloss-v2.4-senses cards; this repo's WordNet-derived rows are governed by the same terms.
Citation
@misc{bommarito2025opengloss,
title = {OpenGloss: A Synthetic Encyclopedic Dictionary and Semantic Knowledge Graph},
author = {Bommarito, Michael J., II},
year = {2025},
eprint = {2511.18622},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.18622}
}
Tier-5 entries additionally derive from Princeton WordNet 3.0 (D-78):
@article{miller1995wordnet,
title = {WordNet: A Lexical Database for English},
author = {Miller, George A.},
journal = {Communications of the ACM},
volume = {38},
number = {11},
pages = {39--41},
year = {1995}
}
@book{fellbaum1998wordnet,
title = {WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database},
editor = {Fellbaum, Christiane},
publisher = {MIT Press},
year = {1998}
}
License
Released under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0). Attribution to the OpenGloss project is required; commercial use is permitted. See Sources and licences above for the Princeton WordNet License that additionally covers this release's tier-5 entries.
- Downloads last month
- 80