query_id stringlengths 11 59 | sense_id stringlengths 8 55 | lexeme_id stringlengths 1 48 | headword stringlengths 1 48 | pos stringclasses 10
values | sense_index int32 0 16 | domain stringclasses 162
values | tier stringclasses 7
values | style stringclasses 8
values | text stringlengths 1 192 | headword_free bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0:noun:0#q0 | 0:noun:0 | 0 | 0 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | keyword | additive identity in arithmetic | true |
0:noun:0#q1 | 0:noun:0 | 0 | 0 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | question | Which number can you add to any number without changing its value? | true |
0:noun:0#q2 | 0:noun:0 | 0 | 0 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | conversational | I remember there's a number that leaves a sum unchanged when you add it—what's that called? | true |
0:noun:0#q3 | 0:noun:0 | 0 | 0 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | constraint | Find the number that keeps the sum unchanged for any addend, not a number describing missing units | true |
0:noun:0#q4 | 0:noun:0 | 0 | 0 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | role | As a student learning addition, what number can I add to 8 and still get 8? | true |
0:noun:0#q5 | 0:noun:0 | 0 | 0 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | example_based | Give me a sentence using 0 as the number that leaves a sum unchanged | false |
0:noun:0#q6 | 0:noun:0 | 0 | 0 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | step_by_step | Show step by step why adding this number to 17 still gives 17 | true |
0:noun:0#q7 | 0:noun:0 | 0 | 0 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | directive | Explain the number that acts as the identity element for addition | true |
0:noun:0#q8 | 0:noun:0 | 0 | 0 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | keyword | number that leaves sums unchanged | true |
0:noun:0#q9 | 0:noun:0 | 0 | 0 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | question | Why does adding nothing numerically preserve the original value? | true |
0:noun:0#q10 | 0:noun:0 | 0 | 0 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | conversational | My homework asks which number keeps the other number the same in an addition problem, and I've blanked | true |
0:noun:0#q11 | 0:noun:0 | 0 | 0 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | example_based | Give an example equation where adding this value leaves the other addend unchanged | true |
0:adjective:0#q0 | 0:adjective:0 | 0 | 0 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | keyword | score with no points | true |
0:adjective:0#q1 | 0:adjective:0 | 0 | 0 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | question | What do you call a score with no points earned? | true |
0:adjective:0#q2 | 0:adjective:0 | 0 | 0 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | conversational | My team finished without scoring at all—what would you call that kind of score? | true |
0:adjective:0#q3 | 0:adjective:0 | 0 | 0 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | constraint | a count showing no items, not a number you add | true |
0:adjective:0#q4 | 0:adjective:0 | 0 | 0 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | role | as a math teacher, how would you describe a score with no points? | true |
0:adjective:0#q5 | 0:adjective:0 | 0 | 0 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | example_based | write a sentence using zero to describe a score, not a number being added | true |
0:adjective:0#q6 | 0:adjective:0 | 0 | 0 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | step_by_step | how do I record a result when no units were counted, step by step | true |
0:adjective:0#q7 | 0:adjective:0 | 0 | 0 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | directive | give examples of quantities that can be recorded as having none | true |
0:adjective:0#q8 | 0:adjective:0 | 0 | 0 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | keyword | temperature reading with no degrees above the reference point | true |
0:adjective:0#q9 | 0:adjective:0 | 0 | 0 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | question | Which adjective describes a quantity when there are no units present? | true |
0:adjective:0#q10 | 0:adjective:0 | 0 | 0 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | conversational | I need to label a tally where nothing was counted; what wording fits? | true |
0:adjective:0#q11 | 0:adjective:0 | 0 | 0 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | example_based | sentence using zero before a noun to show none are present | true |
1:noun:0#q0 | 1:noun:0 | 1 | 1 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | keyword | first positive integer | true |
1:noun:0#q1 | 1:noun:0 | 1 | 1 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | question | Which counting number comes immediately after zero? | true |
1:noun:0#q2 | 1:noun:0 | 1 | 1 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | conversational | I’m labeling the first page of a set—what number starts the count? | true |
1:noun:0#q3 | 1:noun:0 | 1 | 1 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | constraint | the number after zero, written as a digit rather than a word | true |
1:noun:0#q4 | 1:noun:0 | 1 | 1 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | role | Explain the first counting number to a preschooler learning to recognize digits | true |
1:noun:0#q5 | 1:noun:0 | 1 | 1 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | example_based | Give me a sentence using 1 as a number in a basic addition problem | false |
1:noun:0#q6 | 1:noun:0 | 1 | 1 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | step_by_step | Show how to count from zero to the first positive integer, one step at a time | true |
1:noun:0#q7 | 1:noun:0 | 1 | 1 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | directive | Compare the value of 1 with zero on a number line | false |
1:noun:0#q8 | 1:noun:0 | 1 | 1 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | keyword | digit that begins the positive counting sequence | true |
1:noun:0#q9 | 1:noun:0 | 1 | 1 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | question | What numeral do I write for the answer to zero plus one? | true |
1:noun:0#q10 | 1:noun:0 | 1 | 1 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | conversational | I keep mixing up the word for the number at the start of counting with the idea of a single item. Which number am I thinking of? | true |
1:noun:0#q11 | 1:noun:0 | 1 | 1 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | example_based | Write one as a numeral in a simple equation, not as a description of how many items there are | true |
1:adjective:0#q0 | 1:adjective:0 | 1 | 1 | adjective | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | keyword | single item quantity adjective | true |
1:adjective:0#q1 | 1:adjective:0 | 1 | 1 | adjective | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | question | Which word describes having just a single item, rather than several? | true |
1:adjective:0#q2 | 1:adjective:0 | 1 | 1 | adjective | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | conversational | I'm labeling a box with just one mug in it—what adjective says there's only a single item? | true |
1:adjective:0#q3 | 1:adjective:0 | 1 | 1 | adjective | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | constraint | a term for a single object, not a count or numeral | true |
1:adjective:0#q4 | 1:adjective:0 | 1 | 1 | adjective | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | role | as an English learner, how do I describe just one apple rather than multiple apples? | true |
1:adjective:0#q5 | 1:adjective:0 | 1 | 1 | adjective | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | example_based | give me a sentence using “one” to describe the amount of fruit | true |
1:adjective:0#q6 | 1:adjective:0 | 1 | 1 | adjective | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | step_by_step | show how to use the adjective for a single item in a sentence, step by step | true |
1:adjective:0#q7 | 1:adjective:0 | 1 | 1 | adjective | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | directive | explain how this quantity word modifies a noun | true |
1:adjective:0#q8 | 1:adjective:0 | 1 | 1 | adjective | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | keyword | word for a lone ticket in a stack | true |
1:adjective:0#q9 | 1:adjective:0 | 1 | 1 | adjective | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | question | How would I describe a chair when there aren't any others? | true |
1:adjective:0#q10 | 1:adjective:0 | 1 | 1 | adjective | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | conversational | I need to say the package contains a single bottle, not a batch—what wording fits? | true |
1:adjective:0#q11 | 1:adjective:0 | 1 | 1 | adjective | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | constraint | describe a single serving without referring to the number as a numeral | true |
10:noun:0#q0 | 10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | keyword | decimal numeral system base | true |
10:noun:0#q1 | 10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | question | Which cardinal number is the sum of nine and one? | true |
10:noun:0#q2 | 10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | conversational | I’m working out place value—what number does the decimal system use as its base? | true |
10:noun:0#q3 | 10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | constraint | Give me the written numeral for nine plus one, not an ordinal or an adjective. | true |
10:noun:0#q4 | 10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | role | As a primary school student, what number do I get when I add nine and one? | true |
10:noun:0#q5 | 10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | example_based | Write a sentence using 10 as a noun for a number, not as a describing word. | false |
10:noun:0#q6 | 10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | step_by_step | Show me step by step how adding nine and one gives the decimal system’s base. | true |
10:noun:0#q7 | 10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | directive | Explain how the numeral 10 represents the decimal system’s base. | false |
10:noun:0#q8 | 10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | keyword | name of the quantity after nine | true |
10:noun:0#q9 | 10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | question | What single cardinal number do nine objects and one more make? | true |
10:noun:0#q10 | 10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | conversational | I need the number that tells how many there are when I count from one through ten. | true |
10:noun:0#q11 | 10:noun:0 | 10 | 10 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | constraint | For a quick arithmetic worksheet, give the cardinal-number answer to 9 + 1. | true |
10:adjective:0#q0 | 10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | keyword | tenth lesson number | true |
10:adjective:0#q1 | 10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | question | Which lesson comes immediately after lesson nine in a course? | true |
10:adjective:0#q2 | 10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | conversational | I finished lesson nine and need to label the next one in my course notes—what number goes before “lesson”? | true |
10:adjective:0#q3 | 10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | constraint | number the next chapter after nine, using digits rather than a word | true |
10:adjective:0#q4 | 10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | role | as a student organizing my course notes, how should I label the lesson after nine? | true |
10:adjective:0#q5 | 10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | example_based | write a sentence using 10 before the word “lesson” | false |
10:adjective:0#q6 | 10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | step_by_step | how do I number course lessons in order through the one after nine? | true |
10:adjective:0#q7 | 10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | directive | show how this numeral works as a label before a lesson title | true |
10:adjective:0#q8 | 10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | keyword | label for the course session following lesson nine | true |
10:adjective:0#q9 | 10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | question | What number should appear before “chapter” when it follows chapter nine? | true |
10:adjective:0#q10 | 10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | conversational | My workbook has nine units already; I’m naming the next unit and want the digit form. | true |
10:adjective:0#q11 | 10:adjective:0 | 10 | 10 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | directive | give me a course heading with 10 modifying the word “lesson” | false |
100:noun:0#q0 | 100:noun:0 | 100 | 100 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | keyword | ten groups of ten items | true |
100:noun:0#q1 | 100:noun:0 | 100 | 100 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | question | How many pieces are there in ten sets of ten? | true |
100:noun:0#q2 | 100:noun:0 | 100 | 100 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | conversational | I’m counting these in groups of ten—what’s the total once I’ve made ten groups? | true |
100:noun:0#q3 | 100:noun:0 | 100 | 100 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | constraint | a total for ten full bundles of ten, not a measurement or score | true |
100:noun:0#q4 | 100:noun:0 | 100 | 100 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | role | for a shop assistant counting ten boxes with ten cans in each, what quantity is that? | true |
100:noun:0#q5 | 100:noun:0 | 100 | 100 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | example_based | Give me a sentence using “100” as the counted quantity of objects. | false |
100:noun:0#q6 | 100:noun:0 | 100 | 100 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | step_by_step | How do I count a pile of objects in tens until I reach ten groups? | true |
100:noun:0#q7 | 100:noun:0 | 100 | 100 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | directive | Show how ten groups of ten make one counted total. | true |
100:noun:0#q8 | 100:noun:0 | 100 | 100 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | keyword | quantity from ten rows of ten | true |
100:noun:0#q9 | 100:noun:0 | 100 | 100 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | question | If each tray holds ten muffins and I fill ten trays, how many muffins have I counted? | true |
100:noun:0#q10 | 100:noun:0 | 100 | 100 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | conversational | I need to check an inventory: there are ten packs with ten screws in each. What’s the total number of screws? | true |
100:noun:0#q11 | 100:noun:0 | 100 | 100 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | constraint | Find the number of objects in ten equal groups of ten, without describing a score or measurement. | true |
100:adjective:0#q0 | 100:adjective:0 | 100 | 100 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | keyword | three-digit count before a noun | true |
100:adjective:0#q1 | 100:adjective:0 | 100 | 100 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | question | Which number word describes a group of exactly one hundred apples? | true |
100:adjective:0#q2 | 100:adjective:0 | 100 | 100 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | conversational | I need to describe the exact number of people in the room, not name a group of tens. What word fits? | true |
100:adjective:0#q3 | 100:adjective:0 | 100 | 100 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | constraint | a quantity word for exactly 100 items, not a noun naming groups of ten | false |
100:adjective:0#q4 | 100:adjective:0 | 100 | 100 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | role | For a child learning number words, how would you describe a collection of 100 marbles? | false |
100:adjective:0#q5 | 100:adjective:0 | 100 | 100 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | example_based | Write a sentence using “100” to describe the number of books, rather than naming a set of tens. | false |
100:adjective:0#q6 | 100:adjective:0 | 100 | 100 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | step_by_step | Show how to turn a count of 100 objects into a phrase that modifies the noun | false |
100:adjective:0#q7 | 100:adjective:0 | 100 | 100 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | directive | Give an adjective for a class with exactly 100 students | false |
100:adjective:0#q8 | 100:adjective:0 | 100 | 100 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | keyword | word before dollars for an amount of 100 | false |
100:adjective:0#q9 | 100:adjective:0 | 100 | 100 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | question | What word should go before “pages” to say the book has exactly 100 of them? | false |
100:adjective:0#q10 | 100:adjective:0 | 100 | 100 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | conversational | I'm filling in a form and need to describe a quantity of 100 tickets—what wording should I use? | false |
100:adjective:0#q11 | 100:adjective:0 | 100 | 100 | adjective | 0 | mathematics.arithmetic | tier5 | directive | Describe a 100-item collection with a number word, not a term for ten groups of ten | false |
1000:noun:0#q0 | 1000:noun:0 | 1000 | 1000 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | keyword | number after nine hundred ninety-nine | true |
1000:noun:0#q1 | 1000:noun:0 | 1000 | 1000 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | question | What number do you get by multiplying ten by one hundred? | true |
1000:noun:0#q2 | 1000:noun:0 | 1000 | 1000 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | conversational | I know the product is ten times a hundred, but what do you call that number? | true |
1000:noun:0#q3 | 1000:noun:0 | 1000 | 1000 | noun | 0 | everyday_life.quantity_time | tier5 | constraint | name the number, not a description of a quantity of objects | true |
OpenGloss v2.4 — Queries
Synthetic search queries written per sense, in eight styles — keyword, question, conversational, constraint, role, example-based, step-by-step and directive — with each sense's sibling senses in the prompt so the queries discriminate between the meanings of one headword. headword_free marks the queries that never name their own headword, the property that stops a retriever trained on them from collapsing into string matching. This is the doc2query side of the release; the graded relevance judgements live in opengloss-v2.4-qrels.
Part of the OpenGloss v2.4 release family — 16 datasets built from one store of 160,724 lexemes and 300,787 live senses, all joinable on derived ids. See Related datasets for the rest.
What's new in v2.4 vs v1.3
- Schema v3. Every lexeme carries a
kinddiscriminator (simplex, compound, phrasal verb, idiom, proper noun, abbreviation, affix, function word); every sense carries a controlled domain leaf from a fixed ~160-leaf taxonomy instead of free text; every example carries the character span of the headword occurrence inside it. - Renditions, not one string. A definition is a set: the canonical one plus rewrites at four reading levels and in four registers, each produced in a single call from the canonical text so they say the same thing at different altitudes.
- A sense graph, not a word graph. Typed relations resolve to sense ids wherever
the target's entry exists in the release, so
bank --hypernym--> financial institutionpoints at a meaning rather than at a string. - Retrieval data is first-class. Synthetic per-sense queries in eight styles, grounded QA pairs, mined word-in-context pairs, MS MARCO-style triples with graph-derived hard negatives, and graded TREC qrels — all derivable from, and consistent with, the same entries.
- Derivable identifiers everywhere. v1.3 published a positional id for lexemes and
senses (
3d_model_noun_0) and nothing below that. v2.4 gives every rendition, edge, query, QA pair and provenance record an id computable from the row alone, and never renumbers: a retired sense is tombstoned, so the ids after it keep their meaning. - Per-field provenance. Which model wrote a field, how many tokens it took, what it cost — published as its own dataset.
What changed since v2.3
v2.3 (2026-09-09) added tier 6, named entities. v2.4 adds no new headwords: it fills in the supervision the lower tiers never received and makes every reading level of the pretraining corpus carry text of its own.
- Retrieval supervision for every sense. Tiers 3-6 (about two thirds of all senses) had no search queries, QA pairs, register variants or contrast paragraphs in v2.3; those existed only for core and tier 2. Every live sense now has search queries in eight styles (twelve per sense; 85% of all queries never name the headword), 99.7% have grounded QA pairs, and every tier has register variants, register-crossed examples and contrasts.
- Verified word-in-context examples everywhere. The sense-disambiguated example stage (eight checked sentences per sense) ran only on tier 2 in v2.3; it now covers core and tiers 3-6 as well.
- Leveled register text. Every sense gains five definitions crossing reading level and register (grade 5 informal and formal; college informal, formal and technical); every contrast paragraph gains a grade-5 and a college version; every lexical explanation gains a grade-5 and a college version.
- A pretraining corpus with no copies. v2.3's thesaurus and usage-note documents at
grade_5andcollegewere byte-identical toneutral(25% of all pretraining documents). A non-neutral document is now emitted only when it carries text written at its level and differs from the neutral one, and the export fails if any two documents share text. The thesaurus template gains a "Choosing between them" section of leveled contrast notes (moved from the usage note), and the usage note lists the register variants written at the document's level. - Graph repair. Relations were regenerated for senses that had none (senses without a relation fell from 4,722 to about 1,600), re-resolved, re-judged, and hypernym cycles broken back to zero.
- Writer. New v2.4 text was written by
gpt-6-luna(low reasoning); v2.3's bygpt-5.6-luna. Theprovenancerepo records the model of every call.
| v2.3 (2026-09-09) | v2.4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Lexemes | 160,724 | 160,724 |
| Live senses | 300,787 | 300,787 |
| Search queries | 1,249,683 | 3,851,978 |
| QA pairs | 704,950 | 2,304,127 |
| Definition renditions | 1,919,007 | 4,209,494 |
| Example renditions | 2,421,809 | 4,939,887 |
| Encyclopedia renditions | 500,320 | 802,914 |
| Lexical-explanation renditions | 160,724 | 482,172 |
| Contrast paragraphs (all levels) | 81,046 | 812,184 |
| Unique source-text tokens (16K student tokenizer) | 697,553,973 | 1,461,832,309 |
| Pretraining documents | 1,560,030 | 1,910,373 |
| Pretraining words | 418,161,358 | 483,649,976 |
| Pretraining tokens (cl100k_base) | 594,154,612 | 676,733,509 |
| Exact-duplicate pretraining documents | 25.0% | 0 (the export fails on any duplicate) |
| Judge score, Opus, 40-entry samples | 70.2 (core + tier 2), 66.7 (tier 3), 67.0 (tier 4), 81.3 (tier 5), 73.0 (tier 6) | 64.8 (core), 69.9 (tier 2), 65.8 (tier 3), 68.1 (tier 4), 79.6 (tier 5), 71.3 (tier 6) |
Schema. No column was removed or retyped. pretrain gains sections_at_level;
level_used gains the value mixed (some leveled sections fell back to neutral text);
non-neutral pretraining documents with no text of their own at their level are no longer
emitted, and retired lexemes (no live sense) emit no pretraining document. contrasts
now carries grade_5 and college rows beside neutral.
Known issues. Leveled informal definitions open with "It's a / It's the / It's when" about 18% of the time. About 1.1% of QA answers are exact duplicates of another QA answer (mostly short answers). Listwise qrels lists that contain all four grades fell as a share, because tier 3-6 senses joined with fewer grade-2 neighbours.
What changed since v2.2
v2.2 (2026-09-07) added tier 5, the WordNet 3.0 gap. v2.3 adds tier 6: named entities. Every tier before it was selected by word frequency or by WordNet membership, and neither signal ranks a name — a name's importance is a fact about the world, not about a corpus — so v2.2 knew Washington and Lincoln but not George Washington, New York City or World War II. Tier 6 is 15,000 candidates ranked by Wikipedia vital-article level, Wikidata sitelink count, WordNet instance membership and US salience, of which 12,078 became entries. Three schema changes come with it:
- Entity types are written rather than defaulted. Every proper noun in v2.2 carried
entity_type = other, because the two migrations and the kind classifier all wrote that placeholder and nothing ever replaced it. 28,915 proper nouns now carry a real type —person,place,organization,work,event,product,species— taken from the candidate list where it knew one and bought as a single batched verdict where it did not.lexiconandsensesgain anentity_typecolumn, andlexicongainswikidata_qid, the join key for reconciling an entry against Wikidata. - Aliases. A name has variants — Lincoln for Abraham Lincoln, the Netherlands
for Netherlands, FDR, NASA — and v2.2 had nowhere to put them. A variant that
has an entry of its own is now an
alias_ofedge inopengloss-v2.4-relations(1,267 of them, written by a judged alias pass). The schema also reserves alexicon.aliasescolumn andaliasrows inopengloss-v2.4-inflectionsfor variants with no entry of their own, but no pass populates them yet:aliasesis empty on every v2.4 row. Analias_ofedge is never demoted, pruned, capped or re-judged by the hygiene passes, unlike every other relation type. - Two new domain leaves.
nature.settlements(cities, towns, villages, neighbourhoods) andlaw_government.polities(countries, states, provinces, empires, historical polities). A quarter of tier 6 is a settlement or a polity and the taxonomy had no leaf for either; adding ageographyroot would have been a breaking change to a fixed 15-root vocabulary, so both went under roots that already exist.
| v2.2 (2026-09-07) | v2.3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Lexemes | 148,292 | 160,724 |
| Live senses | 288,304 | 300,787 |
| Tier 6 lexemes (named entities) | 0 | 12,078 |
| Pretraining documents | 1,458,684 | 1,560,030 |
| Pretraining words | 398,029,628 | 418,161,358 |
| Pretraining tokens (cl100k_base) | 565,384,746 | 594,154,612 |
| Judge score, Opus, 40-entry samples | 70.2 (core + tier 2), 66.7 (tier 3), 67.0 (tier 4), 81.3 (tier 5) | 70.2 (core + tier 2), 66.7 (tier 3), 67.0 (tier 4), 81.3 (tier 5), 73.0 (tier 6) |
Schema. No column was removed or retyped. lexicon gains entity_type,
wikidata_qid and aliases; senses gains entity_type; relations gains the
alias_of type; inflections gains the alias relation; tier gains the value
tier6; and the domain taxonomy gains two leaves (taxonomy version 3).
What changed since v2.1
v2.1 (2026-09-07) added tier 4 and the inflections repo. v2.2 adds tier 5:
43,652 WordNet 3.0 candidate lemmas the earlier tiers lacked — common
compounds and technical nouns, adjectives, adverbs and verbs, instances/taxa/organisms
excluded — 38,526 of them imported outright, the rest matched against
v1.3's own files. The other three changes are about honesty rather than coverage:
- The lemma fold.
lexeme-hygiene(D-79) folded 4,377 inflected-form headwords onto the lemma that already carried their meaning ("databases" onto "database", through the store's own recorded morphology) and retired 172 multiword fragments that began or ended on a function word ("is not", "on top of"). Together with D-76's phantom part-of-speech retirements, 4,549 lexemes store-wide now have every sense tombstoned. A lexeme like that is not counted as a lexeme anywhere in this card or inStatsany more — it has no live sense, so it is not a lexeme by this release's own count — but it is not gone: its surface form still resolves throughopengloss-v2.2-inflections, and itslexiconrow carriesretired = truewith aretired_reasonexplaining why. - Provenance on inherited fields. Every field a migration or import wrote, not only
what a model wrote from scratch, now carries a
migrate-stage provenance record naming where it came from, so "where did this text come from" is answerable bygreprather than by trusting the pipeline that happened to run. - A
sourcecolumn onlexiconandsenses:opengloss-v1.3for content this project generated or migrated from its own legacy releases,wordnet-3.0for the tier-5 entries imported directly from Princeton WordNet 3.0.
| v2.1 (2026-09-07) | v2.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Lexemes | 109,633 | 160,724 |
| Live senses | 250,003 | 300,787 |
| Tier 5 lexemes (WordNet gap) | 0 | 43,227 |
| Retired lexemes (every sense tombstoned) | 0 | 4,567 |
| Pretraining documents | 1,111,044 | 1,458,684 |
| Pretraining words | 331,888,239 | 398,029,628 |
| Pretraining tokens (cl100k_base) | 471,451,693 | 565,384,746 |
| Judge score, Opus, 40-entry samples | 70.2 (core + tier 2), 66.7 (tier 3), 67.0 (tier 4) | 70.2 (core + tier 2), 66.7 (tier 3), 67.0 (tier 4), 81.3 (tier 5) |
Schema. No column was removed or retyped. lexicon gains source, retired and
retired_reason; senses gains source; tier gains the value tier5.
What changed since v2.0
v2.0 (2026-09-05) covered the frequency-ranked single words. v2.4 adds tier 4: the function words the core ranking had excluded on purpose, and every remaining v1.3 entry at Wikipedia frequency ≥ 10 — mostly multiword compounds ("natural selection", "catalog number"), plus names and rarer single words. That doubles the lexeme count and changes the mix: v2.0 was 99.8% single words; a third of v2.4 is multiword.
| v2.0 (2026-09-05) | v2.1 (2026-09-07) | |
|---|---|---|
| Lexemes | 54,724 | 109,633 |
| Live senses | 137,314 | 250,003 |
| Multiword entries (compounds, phrasal verbs, idioms) | 86 | 36,366 |
| Proper nouns | 10,365 | 17,073 |
| Function words | 114 | 462 |
| Gloss renditions | 1,129,975 | 1,684,865 |
| Example sentences | 1,398,297 | 2,163,329 |
| Live relations | 735,318 | 1,574,438 |
| Synthetic queries | 1,330,311 | 1,304,650 |
| QA pairs | 750,348 | 736,010 |
| Pretraining documents | 617,175 | 1,111,044 |
| Pretraining words | 196,390,946 | 331,888,239 |
| Pretraining tokens (cl100k_base) | 275,659,096 | 471,451,693 |
| Judge score, Opus, 40-entry samples | 70.2 (core + tier 2), 66.7 (tier 3) | 70.2 (core + tier 2), 66.7 (tier 3), 67.0 (tier 4) |
Schema. No column was added, removed or retyped in any existing dataset. Three things did change:
tiergains the valuetier4(it wascore,tier2ortier3).- One new dataset,
opengloss-v2.4-inflections: a flat surface-form → lemma lookup (plural, past tense, participles, comparative, superlative, derivations) built from the morphology that the lexicon already carried nested. - New provenance note prefixes on tombstones and edges, all reversible and all counted
in the store audit:
phantom_pos:(a v1.3 part-of-speech block whose glosses defined a component word rather than the compound — 11,440 blocks retired),regen:(relations regenerated for senses that had lost every edge to judging), andretyped: contrast(synonym edges the contrast paragraphs showed to be hypernym or hyponym).
Not row-compatible with v2.0. Lexeme, sense, rendition, edge, query and QA ids are
stable for every entry v2.0 had. The derived training sets (retrieval-pairs,
retrieval-triples, qrels) re-sample negatives over the larger pool, so their rows
differ; and the store-wide quality passes run for v2.4 retired ~3,000 senses of the v2.0
entries (phantom part-of-speech blocks and near-duplicate senses), so those senses are
now tombstoned rather than live. Treat v2.4 as a new release, not a delta.
Scope: fewer headwords, far more per headword
v2.4 is not a superset of v1.3. It covers 160,724 of v1.3's 205,988 lexemes — every frequency-ranked single word, plus the compounds and names at Wikipedia frequency ≥ 10 — and spends the difference on depth. If you need breadth of vocabulary, use v1.3; if you need graded renditions, resolved relations, spans, or retrieval supervision, use v2.4.
| v1.3 | v2.4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Lexemes | 205,988 | 160,724 |
| Senses | 565,604 | 300,787 |
| Definition renditions per sense | 1 canonical | 1 canonical + up to 8 graded |
| Relation targets | bare strings | resolved to sense ids |
| Retrieval training data | companion sets | queries, QA, triples, qrels |
| Per-field provenance | no | model, tokens and cost per call |
Key statistics
| Lexemes | 160,724 |
| Retired lexemes (every sense tombstoned; not counted above) | 4,567 |
| Live senses | 300,787 |
| Rows in this dataset | 3,851,978 |
| Queries | 3,851,978 |
| Headword-free | 3,274,153 (85.0%) |
| Query styles | 8 |
By tier
core— top 10K by composite frequencytier2— ranks to ~42Ktier3— the rest of the frequency-ranked single wordstier4— stopwords, plus compounds and names at Wikipedia frequency ≥ 10tier5— the WordNet 3.0 lemmas the earlier tiers lacked: common compounds and technical nouns, adjectives, adverbs and verbs (instances, taxa and organisms excluded); 5,126 from v1.3 files, the rest imported from WordNettier6— named entities — people, places, organizations, works and events ranked by Wikipedia vital-article level, Wikidata sitelinks, WordNet instance membership and US salience, which no frequency list ranks
| Tier | Lexemes | Live senses |
|---|---|---|
core |
9,427 | 32,193 |
tier2 |
30,346 | 71,957 |
tier3 |
11,452 | 23,511 |
tier4 |
53,841 | 113,873 |
tier5 |
43,227 | 46,755 |
tier6 |
12,078 | 12,145 |
unknown |
353 | 353 |
Coverage by tier
The release was built in 6 frequency-ranked passes (core, tier2, tier3, tier4, tier5 and tier6) and they did not all receive the same stages. This table is per-field and per-tier so the gaps are visible rather
than averaged away.
| Field | Of | core |
tier2 |
tier3 |
tier4 |
tier5 |
tier6 |
unknown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canonical gloss | sense | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Controlled domain tag | sense | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Gloss at 4 reading levels | sense | 100.0% | 99.9% | 99.9% | 100.0% | 99.9% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Gloss in 4 registers | sense | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| At least one example | sense | 100.0% | 99.9% | 100.0% | 99.6% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Examples at 4 reading levels | sense | 99.6% | 99.6% | 99.9% | 98.4% | 99.9% | 100.0% | 60.6% |
| At least one relation | sense | 99.4% | 99.4% | 99.4% | 99.5% | 99.3% | 99.9% | 100.0% |
| Synthetic retrieval queries | sense | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Grounded QA pairs | sense | 99.9% | 99.7% | 99.3% | 99.6% | 99.9% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Etymology | lexeme | 100.0% | 100.0% | 99.8% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Lexical explanation | lexeme | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Encyclopedia (neutral) | lexeme | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Encyclopedia at grade 5 + college (core entries also carry grade 1 and grade 10) | lexeme | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Contrast paragraphs | lexeme | 85.2% | 68.7% | 58.1% | 61.9% | 38.8% | 7.4% | 9.6% |
Query styles
| Style | Queries |
|---|---|
question |
653,384 |
keyword |
641,686 |
conversational |
589,515 |
directive |
491,164 |
example_based |
445,900 |
constraint |
368,085 |
role |
337,512 |
step_by_step |
324,732 |
Files
| Files | Config | Rows | Shards | Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
data/train-*.parquet |
default | 3,851,978 | 8 | 136.3 MB |
Fields
3,851,978 rows, one row per synthetic query.
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
query_id |
string |
Derived, positional, zero-based: {sense_id}#q{n}. The stage only appends, so an id never changes meaning. |
sense_id |
string |
Sense id: {lexeme_id}:{pos}:{index}. Join key. |
lexeme_id |
string |
Owning entry id: slugify(headword). Join key. |
headword |
string |
The owning entry's surface headword. |
pos |
string |
Part of speech of the owning POS entry (noun, verb, …). |
sense_index |
int32 |
Zero-based position of the sense within its POS entry. |
domain |
string |
Controlled domain leaf, root.leaf (nullable). |
tier |
string |
core (top 10K by composite frequency), tier2 (ranks to ~42K), tier3 (the rest of the frequency-ranked single words), tier4 (stopwords, plus compounds and names at Wikipedia frequency ≥ 10), tier5 (the WordNet 3.0 gap the earlier tiers lacked), tier6 (named entities — people, places, organizations, works and events, ranked by importance rather than by frequency) or unknown (on none of the rank lists); an export may contain only some of these — see the coverage table. |
style |
string |
keyword, question, conversational, constraint, role, example_based, step_by_step or directive. |
text |
string |
The query, 1–200 characters. |
headword_free |
bool |
True when the query contains no form of its own headword (whole-word, case-insensitive, inflections included). |
One real row:
{
"query_id": "0:noun:0#q0",
"sense_id": "0:noun:0",
"lexeme_id": "0",
"headword": "0",
"pos": "noun",
"sense_index": 0,
"domain": "everyday_life.quantity_time",
"tier": "tier5",
"style": "keyword",
"text": "additive identity in arithmetic",
"headword_free": true
}
Loading it
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("mjbommar/opengloss-v2.4-queries", split="train")
print(ds)
print(ds[0])
The shards are plain parquet, so nothing forces you through datasets — read them
straight, locally or over hf://:
import polars as pl
df = pl.read_parquet("hf://datasets/mjbommar/opengloss-v2.4-queries/data/train-*.parquet")
print(df.head())
import duckdb
duckdb.sql("SELECT count(*) FROM 'hf://datasets/mjbommar/opengloss-v2.4-queries/data/train-*.parquet'").show()
Query/definition pairs for a bi-encoder
import polars as pl
queries = pl.read_parquet("hf://datasets/mjbommar/opengloss-v2.4-queries/data/train-*.parquet")
defs = pl.read_parquet(
"hf://datasets/mjbommar/opengloss-v2.4-definitions/data/train-*.parquet"
).filter(pl.col("is_canonical"))
pairs = queries.join(defs.select("sense_id", "text"), on="sense_id", suffix="_gloss")
print(pairs.select("text", "text_gloss").head())
Identifiers, and how they compose
Every id is derived from structure, never randomly minted, so a consumer can recompute one from a row and join across the whole family without a lookup table. Sense positions are stable across regenerations: a retired sense is tombstoned, not removed, so the indices after it never shift.
| Id | Shape | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Lexeme | slugify(headword) |
abseil |
| Sense | {lexeme_id}:{pos}:{index} (zero-based) |
abseil:verb:0 |
| Rendition | {owner_id}#{reading_level}/{register} |
abseil:verb:0#grade_5/plain |
| Entry-level owner | {lexeme_id}:encyclopedia / :explanation |
abseil:encyclopedia |
| Edge | {source_sense_id}-{type}->{target_lexeme_id} |
abseil:verb:0-synonym->rappel |
| Query | {sense_id}#q{n} (zero-based) |
abseil:verb:0#q3 |
| QA pair | {sense_id}#qa{n} (zero-based) |
abseil:verb:0#qa3 |
| Provenance record | p{n} within its entry (one-based) |
p12 |
An edge id keys on the target's slug, not on the target's sense, so resolving a target never changes the id of the edge that found it.
Reading levels and registers
A rendition is keyed on a (reading_level, register) pair. The canonical rendition of
every field is (neutral, plain); everything else is a rewrite of it.
reading_level |
Who it is written for | Rough CCSS band |
|---|---|---|
neutral |
The canonical text: an adult general reader, no level targeted | — |
grade_1 |
Beginning readers; short sentences, common words | K–1 |
grade_5 |
Upper elementary | 4–5 |
grade_10 |
Secondary | 9–10 |
college |
Undergraduate and above; technical vocabulary allowed | 11–CCR |
register |
What changes | Reading it |
|---|---|---|
plain |
Nothing — the neutral register | The default |
informal |
Conversational, contractions, everyday words | How you'd say it to a friend |
formal |
Full forms, precise hedging, no contractions | How you'd write it in a report |
technical |
Domain vocabulary, exact conditions | How a specialist would state it |
marketing |
Benefit-first, persuasive framing | A genre, not a formality level |
marketing sits on the register axis for convenience but is a genre value rather than
a point on the formality scale — worth remembering if you train a formality classifier on
this column.
Related datasets
Everything below is built from the same store and joins on lexeme_id / sense_id.
| Dataset | Grain | What it holds |
|---|---|---|
opengloss-v2.4-lexicon |
one row per lexeme | One row per lexeme: kind, morphology, etymology, encyclopedia, contrasts, sense ids, provenance summary. |
opengloss-v2.4-senses |
one row per live sense | One row per live sense: canonical gloss, 8 gloss renditions, examples, resolved relations, synthetic queries, grounded QA pairs. |
opengloss-v2.4-definitions |
one row per gloss rendition | One row per gloss rendition (canonical included): reading level, register, text, readability grade. |
opengloss-v2.4-examples |
one row per example rendition | One row per example sentence with the headword's character span, its reading level and register. |
opengloss-v2.4-encyclopedia |
one row per encyclopedia rendition · one row per lexical-explanation rendition | One row per encyclopedia article rendition, plus an explanation config for the "why this word" prose. |
opengloss-v2.4-etymology |
one row per entry with an etymology | One row per entry with an etymology: prose summary, ordered language trail, cognates, references. |
opengloss-v2.4-inflections |
one row per inflected, derived or lemma form | One row per inflected or derived form, plus the lemma itself: a flat form→lemma lookup. |
opengloss-v2.4-relations |
one row per live relation edge · one row per removed relation edge | One row per semantic edge, resolved to target sense ids; a tombstoned config recovers the edges the reconcile pass removed. |
opengloss-v2.4-queries (this one) |
one row per synthetic query | One row per synthetic retrieval query, across eight query styles, tagged to the sense it should retrieve. |
opengloss-v2.4-qa-pairs |
one row per question/answer pair | One row per grounded question/answer pair, with the rendition ids the answer cites. |
opengloss-v2.4-contrasts |
one row per contrast paragraph | One row per "X vs Y" paragraph on a synonym/antonym/confusable edge, with a verdict on the edge. |
opengloss-v2.4-provenance |
one row per provenance record | One row per recorded generation call: stage, model, tokens, cost, run id — the audit trail. |
opengloss-v2.4-retrieval-pairs |
one row per mined pair | Word-in-context and doc2query-shaped (text_a, text_b, label) pairs mined from the store for free. |
opengloss-v2.4-retrieval-triples |
one row per (query, positive, negative) triple | MS MARCO-style (query, positive, negative) triples whose hard negatives come from the graph. |
opengloss-v2.4-qrels |
one row per query, with its whole graded candidate list · one row per document in the retrieval corpus | Graded TREC relevance judgements (0–3) plus the document corpus and listwise candidate lists. |
opengloss-v2.4-pretrain |
one row per rendered document | Entries serialised into plain-prose dictionary, thesaurus, encyclopedia and usage-note documents. |
Known limitations
- It is synthetic. Every string here was written by a language model against a schema, not transcribed from a corpus or checked by a lexicographer. It is well-formed and internally consistent; it is not attested usage, and it will contain confident errors. Do not use it as ground truth about what a word means.
- Judge scores 70.2/100 (core + tier 2) and 66.7/100 (tier 3). A different model family (Claude Opus) scored fixed 40-entry stratified samples at the close of each build. Sample statistics, not per-entry guarantees, and the judge is itself a model.
- Relation precision is the weakest axis. Relations were judged for validity and the ones that failed were demoted rather than asserted; symmetric reciprocity finished at 94.2% for synonyms and 94.3% for antonyms, and 4,722 senses were left with no relation at all. Treat a single edge as a hypothesis, not a fact; treat the aggregate graph as usable.
core,tier2,tier3,tier4,tier5andtier6are deliberately partial. 160,371 lexemes acrosscore,tier2,tier3,tier4,tier5andtier6received the text stages (glosses, examples, encyclopedia) but not the queries, QA pairs, contrasts or register renditions. The coverage table above gives the exact per-field share; nothing is hidden behind an average.- The encyclopedia is entry-level. One article per headword, about the headword as a whole. On a polysemous entry it is not a description of any one sense, and it is never used as a positive for one (D-71). It is entry-level reference prose, not a specialist article.
- This repo excludes
core,tier2,tier3,tier4,tier5andtier6. Those tiers never ran this stage, so its senses are absent here entirely rather than present-and-empty. Join againstopengloss-v2.4-sensesif you need to know which senses have nothing.
Sources and licences
This release is Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0). Of 160,724 lexemes in this release, 40,643 (the tier-5 entries whose source column reads wordnet-3.0) are derived from Princeton WordNet 3.0: their glosses, examples, relations and derivationally related forms, plus WordNet's own capitalisation of the headword (D-78).
The WordNet License permits use, copying, modification and distribution without fee, provided its notice is preserved:
The WordNet License notice is quoted in full on the opengloss-v2.4-lexicon and opengloss-v2.4-senses cards; this repo's WordNet-derived rows are governed by the same terms.
Citation
@misc{bommarito2025opengloss,
title = {OpenGloss: A Synthetic Encyclopedic Dictionary and Semantic Knowledge Graph},
author = {Bommarito, Michael J., II},
year = {2025},
eprint = {2511.18622},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.18622}
}
Tier-5 entries additionally derive from Princeton WordNet 3.0 (D-78):
@article{miller1995wordnet,
title = {WordNet: A Lexical Database for English},
author = {Miller, George A.},
journal = {Communications of the ACM},
volume = {38},
number = {11},
pages = {39--41},
year = {1995}
}
@book{fellbaum1998wordnet,
title = {WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database},
editor = {Fellbaum, Christiane},
publisher = {MIT Press},
year = {1998}
}
License
Released under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0). Attribution to the OpenGloss project is required; commercial use is permitted. See Sources and licences above for the Princeton WordNet License that additionally covers this release's tier-5 entries.
- Downloads last month
- 33