MiniCPM5-2B on an i3-6006U (CPU only): Q3–Q8 throughput + a small blind eval

#3
by Noggurix - opened

I’ve been running MiniCPM5-2B with llama.cpp on an old Intel i3-6006U (2C/4T, Skylake, CPU only), and figured I’d leave some of the results here in case they’re useful to anyone else testing it on CPU.

The main throughput runs used 2 threads on a clean, unattended system:

Quant pp512 tg128
Q3_K_M 11.49 tok/s 8.26 tok/s
official Q4_K_M 19.79 tok/s 9.08 tok/s
IQ4_XS 21.83 tok/s 6.98 tok/s
Q5_K_M 10.06 tok/s 6.49 tok/s
Q6_K 12.81 tok/s 7.20 tok/s
official Q8_0 15.67 tok/s 6.04 tok/s

The official Q4_K_M was the fastest for generation in this set, while IQ4_XS had the highest pp512 throughput. Q5_K_M and Q6_K were surprisingly slow on this Skylake CPU, especially compared with Q4.

I also did a small blind comparison of Q4, Q6 and Q8 across 9 qualitative cases. Q8 was the most consistent of the three in that sample and never ranked last. It’s a small sample, though, so I wouldn’t treat that as a general quality ranking between the quants.

One failure mode I found interesting was a fabricated-API prompt. Both Q4 and Q8 accepted the false premise and confidently produced implementation details for an API that didn’t exist.

I also ran a small reasoning ON/OFF ablation. OFF ranked better in that sample, but the extraction procedure wasn’t uniform across candidates, so I’d treat that result as exploratory rather than evidence that reasoning should generally be disabled.

I kept the raw outputs, blind mappings, benchmark logs, scripts, protocol notes and experiment limitations here:

https://github.com/Noggurix/minicpm5-2b-local-eval

This isn’t intended as a standardized benchmark suite, just a local evaluation on fairly old CPU hardware with the artifacts preserved so the results can be inspected.

There still doesn’t seem to be much detailed CPU-only data for MiniCPM5-2B, so I wanted to leave these results somewhere reproducible instead of letting them disappear into a one-off benchmark post.

Sign up or log in to comment