Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
gender
int64
height
int64
weight
float64
ap_hi
int64
ap_lo
int64
cholesterol
int64
gluc
int64
smoke
int64
alco
int64
active
int64
cardio
int64
age_years
int64
BP_Diagnosis
string
BMI
float64
1
156
85
140
90
3
1
0
0
1
1
55
Too High
34.93
1
165
64
130
70
3
1
0
0
0
1
51
Too High
23.51
1
156
56
100
60
1
1
0
0
0
0
47
Normal
23.01
1
151
67
120
80
2
2
0
0
0
0
60
Too High
29.38
1
157
93
130
80
3
1
0
0
1
0
60
Too High
37.73
1
158
71
110
70
1
1
0
0
1
0
48
Normal
28.44
1
164
68
110
60
1
1
0
0
0
0
54
Normal
25.28
1
169
80
120
80
1
1
0
0
1
0
61
Normal
28.01
1
158
78
110
70
1
1
0
0
1
0
54
Normal
31.24
1
170
75
130
70
1
1
0
0
0
0
58
Too High
25.95
1
154
68
100
70
1
1
0
0
0
0
47
Normal
28.67
1
157
69
130
80
1
1
0
0
1
0
58
Too High
27.99
1
158
90
145
85
2
2
0
0
1
1
63
Too High
36.05
1
170
68
150
90
3
1
0
0
1
1
45
Too High
23.53
1
153
65
130
100
2
1
0
0
1
0
39
Too High
27.77
1
156
59
130
90
1
1
0
0
1
0
53
Too High
24.24
1
159
78
120
80
1
1
0
0
1
0
49
Too High
30.85
1
155
105
120
80
3
1
0
0
1
1
50
Too High
43.7
1
169
71
140
90
3
1
0
0
1
1
63
Too High
24.86
1
159
60
110
70
1
1
0
0
1
0
40
Normal
23.73
1
160
73
130
85
1
1
0
0
0
1
56
Too High
28.52
1
163
55
120
80
1
1
0
0
1
0
55
Too High
20.7
1
164
70
130
90
1
1
0
0
1
0
49
Too High
26.03
1
165
70
140
90
1
1
0
0
1
1
49
Too High
25.71
1
157
62
110
70
1
1
0
0
0
0
54
Normal
25.15
1
178
68
110
80
1
1
0
0
1
1
50
Too High
21.46
1
162
64
140
90
1
1
0
0
1
1
47
Too High
24.39
1
162
107
150
90
2
1
0
0
1
1
49
Too High
40.77
1
170
69
120
70
1
1
0
0
1
0
43
Normal
23.88
1
160
75
100
60
1
1
0
0
0
0
49
Normal
29.3
1
169
84
150
100
1
1
0
0
1
1
50
Too High
29.41
1
165
77
135
90
3
3
0
0
1
1
39
Too High
28.28
1
152
79
130
90
1
1
0
0
1
1
53
Too High
34.19
1
171
76
90
60
1
2
0
0
1
0
47
Normal
25.99
1
165
90
120
80
1
1
0
0
0
1
62
Normal
33.06
1
164
64
180
90
1
1
1
0
1
1
55
Too High
23.8
1
159
58
110
70
1
1
0
0
1
0
52
Normal
22.94
1
170
85
120
80
1
1
0
0
1
0
61
Normal
29.41
1
148
80
130
90
1
1
0
0
1
1
59
Too High
36.52
1
152
76
160
100
1
2
0
0
1
1
54
Too High
32.89
1
155
57
120
80
1
1
0
0
1
1
64
Normal
23.73
1
156
58
110
70
1
1
0
0
1
0
64
Normal
23.83
1
157
77
140
90
1
1
0
0
1
1
60
Too High
31.24
1
158
75
130
90
1
1
0
0
0
1
56
Too High
30.04
1
160
68
140
90
1
1
0
0
1
1
59
Too High
26.56
1
173
82
140
90
1
1
0
0
1
1
49
Too High
27.4
1
155
64
120
70
1
1
0
0
1
0
52
Normal
26.64
1
158
75
120
80
1
1
0
0
1
1
53
Too High
30.04
1
152
110
160
90
1
1
0
0
1
1
53
Too High
47.61
1
178
93
130
90
1
1
0
0
0
1
62
Too High
29.35
1
156
55
100
60
1
1
0
0
1
0
50
Normal
22.6
1
156
75
150
90
2
2
0
0
1
1
60
Too High
30.82
1
151
92
130
90
1
1
0
0
0
1
63
Too High
40.35
1
160
82
140
100
1
1
0
0
1
0
63
Too High
32.03
1
164
103
140
90
3
3
0
0
0
1
53
Too High
38.3
1
165
99
150
110
1
1
0
0
0
1
50
Too High
36.36
1
167
71
120
80
2
1
0
1
1
1
47
Too High
25.46
1
167
80
190
90
2
1
0
1
0
0
51
Too High
28.69
1
168
77
100
70
1
1
0
0
1
0
46
Normal
27.28
1
170
72
120
80
1
1
0
0
0
1
60
Too High
24.91
1
158
78
110
70
1
1
0
0
1
0
45
Normal
31.24
1
157
79
125
65
1
2
0
0
1
1
51
Normal
32.05
1
167
84
130
80
1
1
0
0
1
0
60
Too High
30.12
1
160
90
120
80
1
1
0
0
1
1
54
Too High
35.16
1
156
63
100
70
1
1
0
0
1
0
49
Normal
25.89
1
156
71
120
80
2
2
0
0
1
1
59
Too High
29.17
1
170
70
140
90
1
1
0
0
1
1
49
Too High
24.22
1
167
66
110
70
1
1
0
0
1
0
39
Normal
23.67
1
165
65
140
90
1
1
0
0
1
1
59
Too High
23.88
1
170
66
120
80
1
1
0
0
0
0
57
Too High
22.84
1
152
67
160
90
1
1
0
0
0
1
59
Too High
29
1
176
74
120
80
1
1
0
0
1
1
60
Too High
23.89
1
159
84
160
100
1
1
0
0
1
1
50
Too High
33.23
1
161
67
120
80
1
1
0
0
1
1
55
Too High
25.85
1
156
60
120
80
1
1
0
0
1
0
46
Too High
24.65
1
170
60
120
80
1
1
0
0
1
0
50
Too High
20.76
1
158
55
120
90
1
1
0
0
1
0
53
Too High
22.03
1
165
55
140
80
1
1
0
0
1
1
60
Too High
20.2
1
152
57
120
80
1
1
0
0
1
0
50
Too High
24.67
1
160
90
130
90
1
1
0
1
1
0
49
Too High
35.16
1
164
70
120
70
1
1
0
0
1
0
55
Normal
26.03
1
162
71
110
80
1
1
0
0
0
0
47
Too High
27.05
1
160
67
120
60
1
1
0
0
1
1
59
Normal
26.17
1
167
80
140
80
1
1
0
0
1
1
51
Too High
28.69
1
168
62
140
90
1
1
0
0
1
1
51
Too High
21.97
1
159
73
130
100
3
1
0
0
1
1
61
Too High
28.88
1
157
69
120
80
1
1
0
1
1
1
43
Too High
27.99
1
154
67
110
70
1
1
0
0
1
1
49
Normal
28.25
1
165
66
110
70
1
1
0
0
0
0
43
Normal
24.24
1
158
72
120
80
1
1
0
0
1
0
50
Too High
28.84
1
153
73
120
80
2
1
0
0
1
0
48
Too High
31.18
1
170
68
130
80
3
3
0
0
1
1
53
Too High
23.53
1
160
60
120
80
1
1
0
0
0
0
41
Too High
23.44
1
165
70
170
100
1
1
0
0
0
1
62
Too High
25.71
1
170
70
140
90
1
1
0
0
1
1
56
Too High
24.22
1
165
68
150
80
2
1
0
0
0
1
61
Too High
24.98
1
153
78
140
90
2
1
0
0
1
1
58
Too High
33.32
1
169
64
120
80
3
1
0
0
1
1
45
Too High
22.41
1
180
70
120
80
2
2
0
0
1
1
54
Too High
21.6
1
158
58
110
80
1
1
0
0
1
0
45
Too High
23.23
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card

Check out the documentation for more information.

Cardiovascular Disease dataset

Project by: Ido | Reichman University

https://huggingface.co/datasets/idoelg/Lastone_Cardiovascular_Disease/resolve/main/video_ass1_EDA.mp4

dataset name : Cardiovascular Disease dataset

sourse : kaggle https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/sulianova/cardiovascular-disease-dataset

Research Question: Can we effectively identify high-risk cardiovascular patients by combining clinical markers with lifestyle data, and which factors should take priority?

Project Overview

This project investigates a scale dataset of 70,000 patients to identify the most critical predictors of Cardiovascular Disease (CVD)

Data Cleaning

Before analysis, I performed a deep audit of the raw data. , I identified and corrected significant physiological inconsistencies:

*  I discovered a major error where the dataset (ages 29-64) included records with a minimum weight of 10 kg and a height of 55 cm. These measurements characterize infants, not adults, and were purged to maintain model integrity. *  I removed impossible values, such as negative blood pressure and extreme height records (e.g., 250 cm), treating them as data entry errors. *  I observed that in Weight, Cholesterol, and Blood Pressure, the mean was consistently higher than the median. This indicated a right-skewed distribution, where extreme outliers were biasing the averages.

before:

טבלת דאטה סט לפני ניקוי נתונים

after :

טבלת דאטה סט אחרי ניקוי נתונים

Feature Engineering (Clinical Value-Add)

To elevate the analysis from raw data to clinical insights, I engineered two primary features:

  • BMI (Body Mass Index): Calculated as $\text{BMI} = \frac{\text{weight (kg)}}{\text{height (m)}^2}$. This allows me to standardize metabolic risk across different body types.
  • Age Adjusted BP Diagnosis: Based on official guidelines from the Israel Ministry of Health, I built a dynamic classification system. Instead of static thresholds, this feature labels blood pressure as Normal or Too High based on the patient's specific age bracket.

The Narrative : Key Insights

1. question 1

Research Question: What is the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) within the study sample, and is there any significant statistical bias in the population distribution? The dataset maintains a nearly perfect 50/50 split between healthy and sick patients. This balance ensures that my analysis and any future predictive models are unbiased and trained equally on both outcomes.

גרף מספר 1

2. question

Research Question: Does the age-adjusted, dynamic blood pressure diagnostic framework (BP Diagnosis) serve as a reliable indicator for predicting cardiovascular disease?

Using our age-adjusted BP classification, we tested its effectiveness as a diagnostic tool.

  • Insight: This single engineered feature successfully identifies 80% of all CVD patients. This proves that medical thresholds are the most powerful first-line filters for risk assessment.

גרף מספר 2

3. question

Research Question: To what extent does the sensitivity of blood pressure as a diagnostic tool for cardiovascular disease vary across different age groups?

Screenshot 2026-04-06 215151

This analysis evaluates diagnostic efficacy among confirmed patients, showing that while high blood pressure is a highly reliable indicator for the 50-65 age group, it often fails to identify sick individuals in younger cohorts (ages 29-50). This diagnostic gap demonstrates that relying solely on blood pressure is insufficient; integrating additional markers like BMI and cholesterol is essential to minimize missed cases and improve early detection across all age groups.

4. Question

Research Question: Which metabolic and lifestyle factors serve as the most significant predictors of cardiovascular disease in patients who present with clinically normal blood pressure?

Screenshot 2026-04-06 215450

This analysis examines patients with normal blood pressure to identify the variables that distinguish healthy individuals from confirmed patients. The data shows a significant increase in the prevalence of obesity, high cholesterol, and high glucose among the patient group compared to healthy individuals. These findings demonstrate that blood pressure alone is an insufficient diagnostic tool, and that incorporating BMI and blood profiles is necessary to identify morbidity within this specific category.

Conclusion: Answering the Research Question

Research Question: Can we effectively identify high-risk cardiovascular patients by combining clinical markers with lifestyle data, and which factors should take priority?

The study confirms that high-risk cardiovascular patients can be effectively identified through a combined analytical approach. The findings establish a clear hierarchy for diagnostic priority:

  1. Primary Priority: Age-Adjusted Blood Pressure serves as the most powerful first-line filter, correctly identifying 80% of confirmed patients.
  2. Secondary Priority: In cases where blood pressure appears normal, or among younger cohorts (ages 29-50), metabolic markers—specifically BMI, Cholesterol, and Glucose—must take priority.

Summary: While clinical thresholds are the strongest predictors, they are not exhaustive. A multi-layered diagnostic model that integrates age adjusted clinical markers with metabolic and lifestyle data is essential to close the diagnostic gap and ensure early detection.

Downloads last month
7