Datasets:
The dataset viewer is not available because its heuristics could not detect any supported data files. You can try uploading some data files, or configuring the data files location manually.
RAPT G1 OOD Benchmark
Simulation datasets for out-of-distribution (OOD) detection on a Unitree G1 humanoid, released with "RAPT: Model-Predictive Out-of-Distribution Detection and Failure Diagnosis for Sim-to-Real Humanoid Deployment" (arXiv:2602.01515, code, project page).
Each task directory contains proprioceptive trajectories collected from an expert RL policy in NVIDIA Isaac Lab (50 Hz):
train.npz— nominal-only episodes for training self-supervised detectors (~1.2M steps, matching the paper's training scale).train_small.npz— a 4x smaller nominal training set (~300k steps), for studying detection under limited nominal data (see below).calibration.npz— a dedicated nominal batch collected under the evaluation protocol, for calibrating detector operating points (the paper's "brief nominal calibration episode precedes evaluation").test.npz— labeled evaluation episodes (1000 steps velocity / 1500 mimic): for every OOD category, half the parallel environments are perturbed from onset step 50 and half run unperturbed as nominal controls.metadata.json— task, policy, dimensions, timestep, onset, category list, split sizes.
Tasks
| directory | task | obs dim | act dim | train (small) | calibration eps | test seqs (OOD / nominal) | size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
g1_velocity |
omni-directional velocity tracking | 96 | 29 | 225 | 432 / 401 | 491 MB | |
g1_mimic_dance102 |
motion mimicry (Dance-102) | 154 | 29 | 437 | 521 / 523 | 1.25 GB | |
g1_mimic_gangnam |
motion mimicry (Gangnam Style) | 154 | 29 | 407 | 268 / 837 | 1.28 GB |
Experts: the paper's GCR-PPO velocity policy and the deployed mimic policies. (The paper's fourth task, ballistic throwing, requires a policy checkpoint that is not part of this release yet.)
Evaluating
Two evaluators ship with the code release:
scripts/evaluate_paper.py replicates the paper's simulation protocol
(RAPT model gates only, thresholds normalized on calibration.npz, Safety
Score = TPR at 0.5% FPR from the episode-level ROC, reported pooled and
per-category), and scripts/benchmark.py provides a deployment-style
evaluation (hybrid gates + quantile-calibrated operating point with
TPR/FPR/PADD). Note the dataset scale (single seed, 128 parallel envs)
is smaller than the paper's evaluation (4096 envs, 5 seeds, plus the
throwing task).
Nominal-data efficiency: train.npz vs train_small.npz
In simulation, nominal data is nearly free — on real systems it is scarce
and expensive to verify. The two training splits let you study that
tradeoff directly: identical test and calibration splits, only the amount
of nominal training data changes. RAPT reference results (single seed,
paper protocol, scripts/evaluate_paper.py):
| task | train split | AUROC (pooled) | Safety Score (TPR@0.5% FPR, pooled) |
|---|---|---|---|
g1_velocity |
small (~300k) | 0.891 | 0.565 |
g1_velocity |
full (~1.2M) | 0.911 | 0.704 |
g1_mimic_dance102 |
small (~300k) | 0.887 | 0.605 |
g1_mimic_dance102 |
full (~1.2M) | 0.910 | 0.695 |
g1_mimic_gangnam |
small (~300k) | 0.900 | 0.612 |
g1_mimic_gangnam |
full (~1.2M) | 0.909 | 0.631 |
Protocol note. Reported with scripts/evaluate_paper.py defaults: RAPT
model gates only (no range detector), thresholds normalized on
calibration.npz with the paper's calibration (per-dimension
max + 5*sigma; global mean-of-maxes + 3*sigma), Safety Score =
TPR at 0.5% FPR read from the episode-level ROC step function. Two
practical findings are baked into this protocol: (i) the calibration
formula barely matters (<0.01 across variants) because the per-dimension
gate dominates the combined risk score — consistent with the paper's
ablation that per-dimension max aggregation is the key detection choice;
(ii) TPR at 0.5% FPR is an order statistic of the nominal pool, so
g1_mimic_gangnam's test split ships 837 nominal controls (extended by
+544 sequences, seed 777) — with only ~300 controls the threshold was set
by one or two extreme near-fall nominal episodes and the metric became
unstable. For context, the paper's larger evaluation (4096 envs, 5 seeds)
reports Safety Scores of 0.74 / 0.67 / 0.75 on these tasks.
Real-robot runs (g1_velocity_real)
Proprioceptive logs from the paper's physical Unitree G1 deployment of the
velocity policy (50 Hz, same 96 named dimensions; actions.csv values are
raw policy outputs):
calibration.npz— the nominal real-world calibration run used by the paper's evaluation (~2.3 min).test.npz— 50 labeled runs (~76 min): 11 nominal walks (1.6–10.6 min) and 39 anomalous runs across 8 induced fault categories (action_scaling,initial_state,policy_latency,motor_dynamics,motor_failure,observation_ordering,sensor_noise,footwear_contact), with per-run names. There is no train split — detectors are trained in simulation (g1_velocity/train.npz) and calibrated on the real calibration run, mirroring the paper's sim-to-real protocol.
Caveats: fault onset times are unknown (onset = -1); several anomalous
logs are only 1–22 steps long because the fault destabilized the robot
immediately (the truncated log is itself the anomaly signature); and the
paper's push, payload, collision/obstruction, and deformable-terrain runs
are not included in this release (N=50 here vs 78 in the paper).
OOD categories (test split)
Observation-level: sensor_drift, sensor_zero, scale_half,
scale_double, obs_swap, action_swap, noise, latency_offset,
latency_slow, frozen_sensor. Physics-level (simulated in Isaac Lab):
actuator_dynamics, init_state, env_disturbance (pushes / payload),
env_friction. Sampling ranges follow the paper (Supplementary,
"Simulation OOD categories"). Sequences end early if the robot falls
(safety termination), so lengths vary.
Format
Ragged NumPy archives (float16). Keys per sequence i:
seq_%05d [T_i, obs_dim], act_%05d [T_i, action_dim]; plus
dim_names (named observation dimensions), and in test.npz:
labels (0 nominal / 1 anomalous), onset (injection step, -1 for
nominal), fault (category name).
from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download
path = snapshot_download("hmunn/rapt-g1-ood", repo_type="dataset")
# with the RAPT release (https://github.com/humphreymunn/RAPT):
from rapt import load_sequences
train = load_sequences(f"{path}/g1_velocity/train.npz") # nominal only
test = load_sequences(f"{path}/g1_velocity/test.npz") # labeled
# or with plain numpy:
import numpy as np
data = np.load(f"{path}/g1_velocity/test.npz")
obs0 = data["seq_00000"].astype("float32")
Train/evaluate RAPT end-to-end (metrics saved as JSON):
python scripts/benchmark.py <path>/g1_velocity <path>/g1_mimic_* --out results
Citation
@article{munn2026rapt,
title = {RAPT: Model-Predictive Out-of-Distribution Detection and Failure
Diagnosis for Sim-to-Real Humanoid Deployment},
author = {Munn, Humphrey and Tidd, Brendan and B{\"o}hm, Peter and
Gallagher, Marcus and Howard, David},
journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.01515},
year = {2026}
}
- Downloads last month
- 73