Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
schema
string
slug
string
title
string
date
timestamp[s]
canonical_url
string
claim
string
takeaway
string
sources
list
data
dict
modevc.chart.v1
open-weights-vs-proprietary-arena-gap
Open Weights vs. Proprietary AI: The Gap Stays at 42 Points
2026-10-14T00:00:00
https://modevc.com/charts/open-weights-vs-proprietary-arena-gap/
Open weights briefly beat every proprietary model in early 2025 (deepseek-r1); today the best open model trails by 42 points.
A 42-point gap does not justify a 10× price premium for 80% of workflows.
[ { "name": "Arena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai, CC BY 4.0)", "url": "https://huggingface.co/datasets/lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset" } ]
{ "type": "line", "yFmt": "pts", "xFmt": "year", "yDomain": [ -15, 140 ], "zero": true, "zeroLabel": "Parity line (0 pts)", "endLabels": true, "series": [ { "name": "Proprietary Lead", "short": "Closed vs Open", "pts": [ { "t": 1704758400000, "...

Open Weights vs. Proprietary AI: The Gap Stays at 42 Points

Empirical Claim: Open weights briefly beat every proprietary model in early 2025 (deepseek-r1); today the best open model trails by 42 points.

Best proprietary rating minus best openly licensed rating, per snapshot, Arena points · below 0 = open model leads · 2024 – Oct 2026.

Canonical Interactive Visualization & Primary Source

Key Analytical Takeaway

A 42-point gap does not justify a 10× price premium for 80% of workflows.

Citation & Attribution

Published by Mode VC under CC-BY-4.0. When referencing this dataset, cite Open Weights vs. Proprietary AI: The Gap Stays at 42 Points (https://modevc.com/charts/open-weights-vs-proprietary-arena-gap/).

Downloads last month
40