Datasets:
The dataset viewer is not available for this subset.
Exception: SplitsNotFoundError
Message: The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.
Traceback: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 286, in get_dataset_config_info
for split_generator in builder._split_generators(
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
StreamingDownloadManager(base_path=builder.base_path, download_config=download_config)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
)
^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/folder_based_builder/folder_based_builder.py", line 246, in _split_generators
raise ValueError(
"`file_name`, `*_file_name`, `file_names` or `*_file_names` must be present as dictionary key in metadata files"
)
ValueError: `file_name`, `*_file_name`, `file_names` or `*_file_names` must be present as dictionary key in metadata files
The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/split_names.py", line 71, in compute_split_names_from_streaming_response
for split in get_dataset_split_names(
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
path=dataset,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
config_name=config,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
token=hf_token,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
)
^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 340, in get_dataset_split_names
info = get_dataset_config_info(
path,
...<6 lines>...
**config_kwargs,
)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 291, in get_dataset_config_info
raise SplitsNotFoundError("The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.") from err
datasets.inspect.SplitsNotFoundError: The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
LeVo 2 Vocals — 8,582 captioned a cappella singing clips
8,582 synthetic solo-singing / a cappella clips generated with LeVo 2
(gen_type: vocal), each with a detailed prose caption written by Gemini 3 Flash
from the audio itself, plus structured vocal-texture flags, a music-aesthetics score and
a popularity score.
The set targets a slice that is hard to find in the wild at scale: lead singing voice with little or no accompaniment, across 85 vocal genres. The distinguishing feature is not that every clip is perfectly a cappella — it is not — but that the singer-count and instrument-presence facts are labelled per clip from the audio, so you can select the subset you actually want instead of trusting the generator's intent.
These are synthetic vocals with known, documented failure modes. Read What this data is not before you train on it.
Two caveats big enough to belong up here: 35.5% of clips have audible instrumental backing despite every prompt requesting unaccompanied voice — filter on
instruments_audible == False(5,537 clips) if you need a strictly a cappella subset. Andgenreis what was requested, not what was produced;genre_guessis what a listener actually heard.
Contents
| Clips | 8,582 |
| Shards | 18 WebDataset .tar |
| Audio | 48 kHz stereo FLAC, 28.7 s mean (3.4–32.0 s) |
| Genres | 85 |
| Split | 8,424 train / 158 val |
| Total audio | 22.8 GB |
Sources
| Source | Clips | What it is |
|---|---|---|
g60 |
6,000 | 60-genre x 100-clip production run, the winning recipe applied at scale |
evo_phase1 |
1,566 | Phase-1 evolutionary prompt search over 4 pilot genres (opera, choir, pop, country) |
evo_transfer |
600 | 50-genre transfer test, base and evo arms |
evo_probe_acappella |
186 | Ablation probe: does adding a cappella to the prompt help? (it does not) |
evo_probe_negation |
186 | Ablation probe: do negations like no choir help? (they do not) |
levo_misc |
44 | Early small LeVo 2 runs kept for completeness |
How it was generated
All audio is LeVo 2 (lglg666/SongGeneration-v2-large) run with gen_type: vocal, which
is what actually produces an unaccompanied voice — asking for it in the prompt does not work
(see the probes below). The generation recipe is the winner of a 10-generation evolutionary
prompt search (recipe.json in this repo):
description = "<gender>, <IN-VOCABULARY genre tag>, <free style words>"
gen_type = vocal temperature = 0.9 top_k = 50
cfg = 2.0 duration = 30 s one [verse] block
NO negations ("no choir", "no backing vocals"), NO "a cappella"
Two ablations in this dataset are the evidence for those last two rules, and both are
published here as evo_probe_* clips so you can listen for yourself:
a cappellahurts. Adding it to an opera prompt dropped the genre-match judge score from 4.17 to 1.83 out of 5 — the model reads it as a style tag and abandons the genre.- Negation does not work.
no backing vocalsscored 4.33 against a plain baseline of 4.96 — statistically indistinguishable from addingbacking vocals(4.29). The model keys on the noun and drops the negation. Solo-ness comes fromgen_type: vocal, not from asking for it.
How it was captioned
Every clip was sent as 16 kHz mono WAV to Gemini 3 Flash through the native
v1beta/models/gemini-3-flash:generateContent endpoint, with the audio inline as
inline_data and a structured responseSchema.
The prompt asks the model, as a music expert, for several sentences of flowing prose covering: whether one solo singer or backing voices/choir/doubling are audible; genre and sub-genre; vocal style and technique; timbre; register and range; emotions; whether the voice is rough / gritty / fragile / breathy / pure / strained; any audible instrumentation or background noise; and the recording character.
The audio-modality assertion. The OpenAI-compatible chat endpoint for this model
silently drops the audio — it returns a confident, fluent, entirely fabricated description
of a track it never heard, and the only visible symptom is a suspiciously small
prompt_tokens. So every single call in this dataset was checked for an AUDIO entry in
usageMetadata.promptTokensDetails with a non-zero token count, and any response without one
was rejected and retried rather than stored. Every caption here is backed by
6,168,003 audio tokens actually billed
(median 750 per clip). If you build on this pipeline,
keep that assertion — it is the one check that separates a real caption from a fabricated one.
Structured fields
Alongside the prose caption, each clip carries filterable fields:
| Field | Type | True in this set |
|---|---|---|
solo_voice |
bool | 8,019 (93.4%) |
backing_voices |
bool | 5,307 (61.8%) |
instruments_audible |
bool | 3,045 (35.5%) |
genre_guess |
string | Gemini's own genre call, independent of the prompt |
emotions |
list[string] |
genre_guess is deliberately not conditioned on the requested genre, so
genre vs genre_guess disagreement is a usable signal for "LeVo did not produce what was
asked" — that is exactly how the excluded genres below were identified.
The scores, and their known disagreement
Two stored scores, both from LAION music heads running on the laion/music-whisper encoder:
aesthetics—laion/music-aesthetics, five SongEval experts (Coherence, Musicality, Memorability, Clarity, Naturalness), each 1.0–5.0; the stored value is their mean. Per-expert values are inaesthetics_parts. Distribution here: mean 2.2779, median 2.2361, p25-p75 2.0929-2.423, range 1.4539-4.1176.pop_log1p_plays,pop_log1p_upvotes—laion/music-popularity-full-ft, on the model's nativelog1p(count)scale. Distribution: mean 0.0641, median 0.0201, p25-p75 0.012-0.0376, range -0.0023-6.1751 / mean 0.0374, median 0.019, p25-p75 0.0151-0.0255, range 0.0044-4.4123. These are not exponentiated to play counts: the model's log-MAE is ~2.1, so an exponentiated prediction is not a number anyone should quote.
Do not filter on these scores. They are stored as metadata, and they are reported here because they are informative about the scorers, not only about the audio. On a controlled 4-way comparison of music generators judged by an LLM on 30 clips each, the aesthetic head ranked HeartMuLa 4.12 with 0/30 judge passes and LeVo 2 2.41 with 22/30 passes — an almost perfectly inverted ranking:
| Arm | aesthetics | LLM-judge passes (≥4/5) |
|---|---|---|
| HeartMuLa | 4.12 | 0 / 30 |
| acestep-xl-turbo | 2.77 | 4 / 30 |
| acestep-xl-sft | 1.70 | 5 / 30 |
| LeVo 2 | 2.41 | 22 / 30 |
The reason is domain shift: both heads were trained on finished, produced, full-band songs. Dry unaccompanied voice looks "unfinished" to them regardless of how well it is sung. They are good at spotting broken audio and bad at ranking good a cappella. Use them as an outlier detector, not as a quality filter.
The 9 genres deliberately excluded
A 50-genre transfer test judged every genre on three axes, 0–5: S (exactly one singer), G (genre matched), I (no instruments). Nine genres failed, and they failed in a very specific way — solo and no-instrument passed; only genre failed:
| Key | Genre | S (solo) | G (genre) | I (no instr.) | n judged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
joik |
Sámi joik | 3.92 | 1.08 | 4.75 | 12 |
keening |
Irish keening | 3.42 | 1.17 | 4.67 | 12 |
khayal |
Hindustani khayal | 3.75 | 0.83 | 4.75 | 12 |
throat_tuvan |
Tuvan throat singing | 3.25 | 0.92 | 4.17 | 12 |
patter_song |
Gilbert & Sullivan patter song | 4.00 | 1.17 | 4.50 | 12 |
flamenco_sae |
flamenco saeta | 3.64 | 1.09 | 4.27 | 11 |
ranchera |
ranchera | 4.25 | 1.33 | 4.58 | 12 |
forro |
forró | 4.25 | 1.42 | 4.75 | 12 |
appalachian_ballad |
Appalachian ballad | 3.17 | 2.42 | 5.00 | 12 |
Across all nine (n=107 judged clips) the means are S 3.74, G 1.27, I 4.61 — solo and no-instrument both hold up, and only genre collapses. Per-genre G ranges 0.83–2.42 out of 5. For comparison the 41 kept genres that appear in this dataset average S 3.67, G 3.42, I 4.79 over 488 judged clips: the gap is almost entirely on G (3.42 vs 1.27), not on S or I.
(appalachian_ballad is the least bad of the nine at G 2.42;
it was cut with the rest because it still sits far below the kept-genre mean.)
This is a vocabulary limit, not a quality problem. LeVo 2 ships a 27-tag genre
vocabulary (pop, electronic, hip hop, rock, jazz, blues, classical, rap, country, classic rock, hard rock, folk, soul, rockabilly, reggae, experimental, k-pop, experimental pop, pop punk, rock and roll, R&B, pop rock, …). Out-of-vocabulary words are not rejected — they are
ignored, and the model falls back to the nearest in-vocabulary anchor. None of these nine
has a near neighbour, so throat_tuvan renders as generic indie folk and joik renders as
English-language pop. Spending 100 generations each on them buys nothing, so they were cut
from the production run. They remain in the taxonomy as a documented capability boundary, and
their transfer-test clips are still in this dataset under source = evo_transfer so the
failure is inspectable.
What this data is not
- It is synthetic. Every clip is a neural generation, not a recording of a human singer. Models trained on it will learn LeVo 2's artefacts along with its singing.
- The genre label is a request, not ground truth.
genreis what was asked for.genre_guessis what Gemini heard. They disagree often, and most of all on the nine genres above. - "Solo" is not guaranteed.
gen_type: vocalbiases strongly toward one voice but LeVo still adds doubling, harmony stacks and choir pads on its own. That is why thesolo_voice/backing_voicesflags are labelled per clip — 61.8% of clips have audible backing voices despite every prompt asking for none. - A third of the set is not actually a cappella.
instruments_audibleis true for 3,045 clips (35.5%), and spot-checking those captions shows real instrumental backing — acoustic guitar, bass, drum kit, synth pads — not faint artefacts or room tone.gen_type: vocalbiases LeVo 2 toward unaccompanied voice but does not enforce it, and the effect is strongest in the largeg60production run. The transfer-test judge score of I 4.79/5 was measured only on the 50-genre transfer set and does not generalise tog60. For a strictly unaccompanied subset, filter~instruments_audible— 5,537 clips remain. - 344 clips have an empty
description. These are theevo_probe_*ablation clips: their prompt genomes derived from an evolutionary elite that was later overwritten in the search state, so the exact prompt string is not recoverable. Genre, probe arm and caption are unaffected. We left the field empty rather than reconstruct a plausible-looking guess. - Durations vary. Nominally 30 s, but the range is 3.36–32.0 s (median 30.0 s); a few generations terminated early.
- Lyrics are shared across clips. The production run reuses a small set of lyric blocks across genres by design, so the text is not diverse and should not be used as a lyrics-transcription target.
- The captions are model-written, from a single model, at temperature 0.4. They are detailed and grounded in the audio, but they are Gemini 3 Flash's opinions and inherit its biases and vocabulary.
- 5,606 clips (65.3%) were peak-normalised. LeVo renders
float32 WAV that routinely peaks above 1.0, which PCM_16 FLAC cannot represent. Those clips
were scaled to 0.999 peak; the gain is recorded per clip in
gain_db(0.0 for everything else) and the original peak inpeak_orig, so it is documented rather than silent. This is a level change only — it avoided clipping distortion rather than causing it.
Repo layout
data/vocals-{0000..0017}.tar WebDataset shards: {id}.flac + {id}.json <- the data
metadata.parquet every field for every clip, no audio
audio/{id}.mp3 browser-streamable previews (see below)
recipe.json, genres60.json the generation recipe and the 60-genre spec
pipeline/ the scripts that produced all of this
audio/ is a preview tree, not the data. Mono, 24 kHz, VBR MP3, 130 KB a clip
(1.1 GB total, a 17x saving against the FLAC). It exists so a browser can stream one URL
per clip, which a tar member cannot do. The corpus is unaccompanied solo voice, where mono
at 24 kHz costs nothing audible on a web player — but it is lossy and downmixed, so
train on data/*.tar, not on audio/. metadata.parquet describes the FLAC.
Usage
WebDataset shards, {id}.flac + {id}.json per sample:
import webdataset as wds
url = "https://huggingface.co/datasets/ChristophSchuhmann/levo2-vocals/resolve/main/data/vocals-{0000..0017}.tar"
ds = (wds.WebDataset(url)
.decode("rand")
.to_tuple("flac", "json"))
for audio, meta in ds:
print(meta["genre"], meta["solo_voice"], meta["caption"][:80])
Metadata alone, no audio download:
import pandas as pd
df = pd.read_parquet("hf://datasets/ChristophSchuhmann/levo2-vocals/metadata.parquet")
# clips that really are one voice, alone, with nothing else audible
clean = df[df.solo_voice & ~df.backing_voices & ~df.instruments_audible]
The validation split
split == "val" holds out 158 clips, 1 from every genre bucket,
chosen with a fixed seed. It was held out before any fine-tuning and
TTS-AGI/vocal-music-whisper never saw it.
Keep using it as a val split and the comparison stays honest.
Fields
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
id |
Clip id, unique, matches the tar member name |
split |
train / val |
source, run, arm |
Provenance — which experiment produced the clip |
genre, family |
Requested genre and its bucket (proven / new / probe / …) |
description |
The LeVo 2 style prompt used |
lyrics |
The lyric block fed to the model (empty for evo clips) |
seed, cfg, temperature, top_k, gen_type |
Generation parameters |
caption |
Gemini 3 Flash prose caption |
genre_guess, solo_voice, backing_voices, instruments_audible, emotions |
Gemini structured fields |
caption_model, caption_audio_tokens |
Captioner and the billed audio tokens (the modality proof) |
aesthetics, aesthetics_parts |
music-aesthetics, 1–5 |
pop_log1p_plays, pop_log1p_upvotes |
music-popularity, log1p scale |
judge_solo, judge_genre, judge_noinstr, judge_heard |
Transfer-test LLM judge scores, 0–5 (only on evo_transfer clips) |
duration, sample_rate, channels, peak_orig, gain_db |
Audio properties |
Genre composition
All 85 genres by clip count
| Genre | Clips |
|---|---|
pop |
540 |
choir |
504 |
country |
474 |
opera |
423 |
punk |
115 |
indie_pop |
112 |
sea_shanty |
112 |
grunge |
112 |
playground_chant |
112 |
pop_teen |
112 |
jpop |
112 |
pop_boyband |
112 |
rock_glam |
112 |
samba |
112 |
quiet_storm |
112 |
lieder |
112 |
lovers_rock |
112 |
afrobeats |
112 |
metal_black |
112 |
metal_clean_baritone |
112 |
metal_gothic_female |
112 |
metal_power |
112 |
opera_baritone |
112 |
opera_mezzo |
112 |
sprechgesang |
112 |
oratorio |
112 |
belt_max |
112 |
bel_canto |
112 |
americana_singer_songwriter |
112 |
reggae_roots |
112 |
blues_delta |
112 |
bolero_latin |
112 |
bedroom_pop |
112 |
beatbox |
112 |
britpop |
112 |
bulgarian_diaphonic |
112 |
cabaret |
112 |
cantorial |
112 |
choirboy_solo |
112 |
dancehall |
112 |
doo_wop |
112 |
emo |
112 |
falsetto_pure |
112 |
field_holler |
112 |
andean_huayno |
112 |
northern_soul |
100 |
opera_verismo |
100 |
opera_countertenor |
100 |
opera_soprano_coloratura |
100 |
opera_tenor_dramatic |
100 |
metalcore_scream |
100 |
operetta_soubrette |
100 |
motown_soul |
100 |
surf_pop_lead |
100 |
metal_thrash_bark |
100 |
metal_symphonic_soprano |
100 |
metal_doom_clean |
100 |
metal_death_growl |
100 |
rockabilly |
100 |
melodie_francaise |
100 |
brill_building_pop |
100 |
british_invasion |
100 |
gregorian_chant |
100 |
rock_n_roll_50s |
100 |
ranchera |
12 |
throat_tuvan |
12 |
patter_song |
12 |
khayal |
12 |
keening |
12 |
joik |
12 |
forro |
12 |
flamenco_sae |
12 |
appalachian_ballad |
12 |
lantern |
7 |
soul_jazz |
3 |
acappella |
3 |
rock_ballad |
3 |
metal |
3 |
lantern_s1234_rep |
3 |
lantern_long |
3 |
gospel |
3 |
gangsta_rap |
3 |
folk |
3 |
lullaby |
3 |
smoke |
1 |
Related
The generator. The audio is LeVo 2 / SongGeneration v2. laion/moss-tts-local-transformer-4.55b-voice-acting-v2 is not the base model for anything here — that is a
speech/voice-acting model and is unrelated to this music corpus.
LeVo 2 weights used (gen_type: vocal) |
https://huggingface.co/lglg666/SongGeneration-v2-large |
| LeVo model collection | https://huggingface.co/collections/lglg666/levo |
| LeVo technical report (arXiv:2506.07520) | https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.07520 |
| LeVo 2 audio samples | https://levo-demo.github.io/levo_v2_demo/ |
This project.
| Dataset | https://huggingface.co/datasets/ChristophSchuhmann/levo2-vocals |
| Fine-tuned captioner | https://huggingface.co/TTS-AGI/vocal-music-whisper |
| Listening pages (per-genre players + scores) | https://tts-agi-moss-voice-profiles.static.hf.space/vocals/genres.html |
| Genre space | https://tts-agi-moss-voice-profiles.static.hf.space/genre_space.html |
| MOSS voice-acting manual | https://laion-ai.github.io/moss-voiceacting-manual/site/index.html |
Scoring and captioning models.
laion/music-whisper (captioner base, score encoder) |
https://huggingface.co/laion/music-whisper |
laion/music-aesthetics |
https://huggingface.co/laion/music-aesthetics |
laion/music-popularity-full-ft |
https://huggingface.co/laion/music-popularity-full-ft |
| Captioner | Gemini 3 Flash, native generateContent endpoint |
Citation
@misc{levo2vocals,
title = {LeVo 2 Vocals: 8,582 captioned a cappella singing clips},
author = {LAION},
year = {2026},
url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/ChristophSchuhmann/levo2-vocals}
}
Audio generated with LeVo 2 / SongGeneration. Captions by Gemini 3 Flash. Scores by
laion/music-aesthetics and laion/music-popularity-full-ft. Released under CC-BY-4.0.
- Downloads last month
- 24