- Highlights
- Benchmarks — the wide trick pays off
- 🔬 The "wide" trick — why it scores higher
- ⚡ Speed — MTP speculative decoding
- 🖼️ Multimodal — sees images & video
- 🚀 Quickstart — this is a big-card model
- 🧬 The family
- 🍳 Recipe (reproducible)
- 🔢 Why HuggingFace shows "~11.5B params"
- 📜 License & attribution
The clean Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B base (no distill, no abliteration — creator alignment intact),
quantized by us with AutoRound INT4 using a wide recipe: the large linear-attention (SSM/GDN)
projections are kept in BF16 instead of INT4. That single choice lifts hard-coding from 70 → 78
(+8 pp) over the standard narrow quant — the highest hard score in our fleet, at a third the size
of the 80B it beats. MTP head preserved → speculative decoding works in vLLM out of the box.
Highlights
Benchmarks — the wide trick pays off
Same clean base Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B, one harness — only the quant recipe changes. Keeping the big
SSM projections in BF16 lifts hard +8 pp over the standard narrow quant:
| Model (our harness) | Recipe | hard | tools | Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lorbus Qwen3.6-27B narrow INT4 (reference) | narrow | 70 | 83 | 18.5 GB |
| abliterated sister | narrow + Heretic | 70 | 87 | 19 GB |
| ➡️ wide (this) | wide | 78 🏆 | 83 | 26 GB |
| antonyMox 35B-A3B (coming soon) | MoE narrow | 48 | 83 | 22 GB |
| Qwen3-Coder-Next 80B (UD-IQ4_XS, reference) | 80B MoE | 62 | 80 | ~38 GB |
+8 pp hard for +7.5 GB over narrow — and it beats Qwen3-Coder-Next 80B (hard 62 on our harness), three times its size.
Numbers are % of tasks passed (40 hard coding + 30 tool tasks; raw pass/total in
benchmark-results/). Conditions: temp 1.0 / top_p 0.95 / top_k 20 / min_p 0 · seed 42 · non-thinking · vLLM 0.19 · RTX 4090 (48 GB) · MTP n=3. The abliterated & wide rows share the exact 40 hard tasks the narrow quant scored 70 on → clean apples-to-apples. The Lorbus row is our own measurement of their public quant, not their claim. The 80B Coder-Next row is likewise our own measurement of the UD-IQ4_XS GGUF (via LM Studio) on the same task set — a bigger, different model shown for scale. Reproduce it, don't trust it.
🔬 The "wide" trick — why it scores higher
Qwen3.6 is a hybrid model: most layers are linear-attention (GDN/Mamba), where long-range logic
flows through the large projections in_proj_qkv, in_proj_z, out_proj. Standard "narrow" INT4
quants compress these to 4-bit too — and that quietly costs reasoning. We keep them in BF16:
| Kept in BF16 (not quantized) | Tensors | Why |
|---|---|---|
| 🔬 Big SSM projections (the wide trick) | in_proj_qkv, in_proj_z, out_proj |
carry long-range logic — INT4 here costs ~8 pp hard |
| 🌊 Small SSM control | A_log, conv1d, dt_bias, in_proj_a/b, norm |
SSM recurrence stability |
| 🧬 MTP head | 15× mtp.* |
makes speculative decoding work |
| 👁️ Vision tower | 333× visual.* |
full image/video, untouched |
Everything else (full-attention q/k/v/o, MLP gate/up/down) is INT4. The recipe was validated on Qwen3.5 first (+6 pp) and confirmed here on 3.6 (+8 pp).
⚡ Speed — MTP speculative decoding
Honest 768-token × 3-run measurement on a single RTX 4090 (48 GB), vLLM 0.19:
MTP n |
short tok/s | 28k-ctx tok/s | acceptance @28k |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 55 | 33 | 79% |
| 2 | 71 | 39 | 64% |
| 3 ⭐ | 83 | 40 | 52% |
| 4 | 92 | 42 | 44% |
| 5 | 96 | 40 | 37% |
Use num_speculative_tokens: 3 — long-context throughput is already on its plateau (~40 tok/s)
while acceptance stays highest (52%), so the draft head misfires least. Spec-decode is lossless —
n changes speed only, never output.
🖼️ Multimodal — sees images & video
The full vision-language model. The entire vision tower (333 tensors) is kept in full BF16 —
quantization never touched it — so image/video understanding is identical to the pristine base.
Serve with --limit-mm-per-prompt '{"image":4,"video":1}'. Published benchmarks cover text/coding/tool-use;
vision quality is inherited from the base, not separately re-scored.
🚀 Quickstart — this is a big-card model
Weights are 26 GB, so this is a big-card model. A 48 GB card is its home; a 32 GB card runs it but with only a small context window; 24 GB can't load it at all.
| GPU | VRAM | Script | max-model-len |
gpu-mem-util |
Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTX 4090 48G / A6000 / L40S / RTX 6000 | 48 GB | run_48gb.sh |
150 000 | 0.72 | ✅ tested (benchmark rig) |
| RTX 5090 | 32 GB | run_32gb.sh |
16 384 | 0.95 | ✅ verified (tight; dedicated card) |
| RTX 3090 / 4090 | 24 GB | — | — | — | ❌ 26 GB weights don't fit |
32 GB is tight. The 26 GB weights leave only ~1.7 GB for KV even at mem-util 0.95, so the safe window is ~16k tokens (measured by emulating a 32 GB budget on a 48 GB card: concurrency ~1.5x at 16k; 24k dropped to 1.03x = the hang zone). mem 0.95 assumes a dedicated/headless card — lower it if a display is attached. Want long context on ≤ 32 GB? Use the 19 GB abliterated sister (fits 24 GB with 40k ctx, or 32 GB with much more).
vllm serve antonyMox/Qwen3.6-27B-AutoRound-INT4-wide-MTP \
--quantization auto-round \
--max-model-len 150000 \
--gpu-memory-utilization 0.72 \
--max-num-seqs 1 \
--kv-cache-dtype fp8_e4m3 \
--enable-prefix-caching \
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder \
--reasoning-parser qwen3 \
--speculative-config '{"method":"mtp","num_speculative_tokens":3}' \
--trust-remote-code
Long context is cheap: Qwen3.6 is a hybrid (Mamba/GDN + attention), KV costs ~37 MB/1k tokens at fp8. The model's native maximum is 256k (262,144) tokens — how much fits on 48 GB depends on mem-util:
Context vs mem-util (48 GB card, measured)
gpu-mem-util |
context that fits | notes |
|---|---|---|
| 0.72 ⭐ (default preset) | ~150k (conc 1.15x) | balanced; leaves VRAM free |
| 0.80 | 256k (conc 1.11x) | full native context |
Raise --gpu-memory-utilization toward 0.80 for the full 256k; the 0.72 default keeps more VRAM free
(this variant's 26 GB weights leave less room than the 19 GB abliterated sister).
Never set
--max-model-lenat exact KV capacity. On vLLM 0.19 hybrid models, requests in the last ~3 % of the window pass validation then hang forever (no error, GPU idle) — the scheduler can't allocate the final KV block. Keep the window a couple of blocks below capacity: after launch, the log lineMaximum concurrency for N tokens: Yxmust be ≥ ~1.10x (ours is 1.15x at 150k), never 1.00x. Also, theGPU KV cache size: X tokenslog line understates real capacity ~3× on hybrids — trust only theMaximum concurrencyline.
🧬 The family
Clean quants of the same base — pick by hardware:
| Model | Size | hard | tools | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➡️ wide (this) | 26 GB | 78 🏆 | 83 | 48 GB+ cards — maximum reasoning |
| abliterated | 19 GB | 70 | 87 | 24 GB cards · uncensored |
| 35B-A3B (coming soon) | 22 GB | 48 | 83 | fast MoE (~188 tok/s) |
The 27B sisters: AutoRound INT4, MTP preserved, multimodal. All benchmarked against the community reference Lorbus narrow INT4 (hard 70) — see the table above.
🍳 Recipe (reproducible)
- Base — pristine
Qwen/Qwen3.6-27BBF16. - Quant — AutoRound W4A16, group 128, 200 iters, v2 calibration.
- Wide fp_layers (kept BF16) —
mtp.*,visual.*, small SSM (in_proj_a/b,A_log,conv1d,dt_bias,linear_attn.norm) + the wide trick:in_proj_qkv,in_proj_z,out_proj. - MTP — 15
mtp.*tensors preserved (BF16), n=3 recommended. - Sampler — ships temp 1.0 / top_p 0.95 / top_k 20 (
generation_config.json).
🔢 Why HuggingFace shows "~11.5B params"
Not a small model — it's how the widget reads a partially-packed INT4 quant. The INT4 weight
tensors are packed 8× int4 into each int32 (HF counts fewer slots), while the large wide projections,
vision, and MTP stay full BF16 (counted fully). The true model is Qwen3.6-27B, 26 GB on disk.
Verified breakdown: language_model 9.35 B · other 1.27 B · vision 0.46 B (333 t, BF16) ·
mtp 0.42 B (15 t, BF16). (The wide sister shows more BF16 than a narrow quant precisely because it
keeps those big projections full-precision — that's the whole point.)
📜 License & attribution
Apache-2.0, same as the base. Quantized from
Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B with a wide AutoRound INT4 recipe.
This is the clean base (creator safety alignment intact). Community build; benchmark numbers are from
our own harness — JSON included, methodology open. Provided "as is", without warranty.
- Downloads last month
- 48
Model tree for antonyMox/Qwen3.6-27B-AutoRound-INT4-wide-MTP
Base model
Qwen/Qwen3.6-27BEvaluation results
- hard pass@1 (%) on LiveCodeBench-hard (subset, reproducible harness)self-reported78.000
- tool-use pass@1 (%) on Tool-use tasks (own harness)self-reported83.000