CyberSLM-instruct β 33.5M-parameter cybersecurity assistant
Instruction-tuned from sabari2005/cyberslm-base on 23,540 cybersecurity conversations.
Code: github.com/Sabari2005/cyberslm
Read this before using it
At 33.5M parameters this model learned the shape of a good answer β markdown structure, numbered steps, worked examples, mitigation sections β and is frequently wrong about the content.
Measured over 8 greedy prompts:
| category | mean 8-gram repetition | stopped on EOS |
|---|---|---|
| security | 18.7% | 1 / 4 |
| general | 18.9% | 1 / 2 |
| code | 19.9% | 0 / 2 |
| overall | 19.0% | 2 / 8 |
Do not use this as a factual security reference. Do not run code it generates. It is a demonstration of a correct end-to-end training pipeline and a baseline for scaling.
Where it works
Well-covered in-domain questions come out correct and terminate cleanly:
What is SQL injection and how do I prevent it?
SQL injection (SQLi) is a security vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate database queries by injecting malicious SQL code through input fields. It occurs when user-supplied data is improperly sanitized, allowing attackers to manipulate the database. For example, if an attacker submits a username like
admin' --as the username, the query becomes:SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = '[input]' AND password = '[input]'.
What is a firewall?
A firewall is a network security device or software that monitors and controls incoming and outgoing network traffic based on predefined security rules. It acts as a barrier between trusted internal networks and untrusted external networks, such as the internet.
Where it fails
All observed, reproducible, and the majority case:
- Wrong content, confident tone. Asked to contrast symmetric and asymmetric encryption it answered about hashing and IKE, never addressing the question.
- Circular definitions. "A buffer overflow is a type of buffer overflow that could lead to arbitrary code execution."
- Topically-adjacent but wrong vocabulary. Asked how to investigate a
phishing email it produced
SameSiteandStrictβ real security terms, wrong topic (they are cookie attributes). - Degenerate loops in code.
port: The port to userepeated to the token limit. - Unreliable termination. Only 2 of 8 prompts stopped on EOS; the rest ran to the token limit.
These are consequences of scale, not of the training run β the loss curve is healthy and the pipeline is machine-verified (35 architecture checks, 173 tests).
Model details
| parameters | 33,531,264 |
| architecture | 12 layers, d_model 384, 6 heads, SwiGLU 1024, RoPE, RMSNorm, tied head |
| context | 2048 |
| vocab | 32,000 (SentencePiece BPE) |
| base model | sabari2005/cyberslm-base |
| SFT data | 23,540 conversations, 15.1M supervised tokens |
| epochs | 3 (2,208 optimizer steps) |
| optimiser | AdamW, lr 2e-5, 3% warmup, cosine, bf16 |
| best val loss | 2.2627 (response tokens only) |
Loss is computed on assistant responses only; prompts are masked. 88% of tokens in the SFT set are supervised.
Usage
pip install torch sentencepiece
git clone https://huggingface.co/sabari2005/cyberslm-instruct
cd cyberslm-instruct
python infer_chat.py --prompt "What is SQL injection and how do I prevent it?"
Interactive:
python infer_chat.py --interactive
Options:
python infer_chat.py \
--prompt "What is a buffer overflow?" \
--max-new-tokens 200 \
--temperature 0.0 # 0 = greedy, recommended for this model
Prompt format
The model was trained on this exact layout, with a real BOS token id prepended and EOS terminating each response:
### User:
{question}
### Assistant:
{response}<eos>
Build prompts with the bundled formatter (infer_chat.py does this).
Hand-assembling the string produces different token ids at every segment
boundary, because SentencePiece prepends a word-boundary marker per encode()
call β the model then sees something it was never trained on.
import torch
from configs.sft_config import default_config
from data.prompt_formatter import PromptFormatter, Tokenizer
from model.cyberslm import CyberSLM
cfg = default_config()
cfg.tokenizer.model_path = "tokenizer/tokenizer.model"
cfg.model.max_seq_len = cfg.data.max_seq_len = 2048
tok = Tokenizer(cfg.tokenizer.model_path)
fmt = PromptFormatter(cfg=cfg, tokenizer=tok)
model = CyberSLM(cfg.model)
model.load_state_dict(torch.load("models/instruct.pt", map_location="cpu",
weights_only=False))
model.eval()
ids = fmt.format_for_inference({"messages": [{"role": "user",
"content": "What is XSS?"}]})
out = model.generate(torch.tensor([ids]), max_new_tokens=200,
temperature=0.0, eos_id=tok.eos_id)
print(tok.decode(out[0, len(ids):].tolist()))
Decoding uses a KV cache β roughly 50β70 tok/s on CPU.
Intended use
Research into small language models; a scaling baseline; a demonstration of a verified training pipeline. Not for security advice, incident response, code generation, or anything where accuracy matters.
Training data
Not published. Curated cybersecurity instruction data; not redistributed.
License
Apache-2.0 for the code and weights. Verify licensing for downstream use against the sources the data was curated from.
- Downloads last month
- 324
Model tree for sabari2005/cyberslm-instruct
Base model
sabari2005/cyberslm-base