Hugging Face's logo

EuroPython 2022

non-profit
https://ep2022.europython.eu/
Activity Feed Request to join this org

AI & ML interests

None defined yet.

Recent Activity

reach-vb  authored a paper about 2 months ago
Lina-Speech: Gated Linear Attention is a Fast and Parameter-Efficient Learner for text-to-speech synthesis
Nyandwi  authored a paper about 2 months ago
Pangea: A Fully Open Multilingual Multimodal LLM for 39 Languages
Nyandwi  authored a paper 2 months ago
NaturalBench: Evaluating Vision-Language Models on Natural Adversarial Samples
View all activity

EuroPython2022's activity

albertvillanova 
posted an update about 1 month ago
view post
Post
1353
🚨 How green is your model? 🌱 Introducing a new feature in the Comparator tool: Environmental Impact for responsible #LLM research!
👉 open-llm-leaderboard/comparator
Now, you can not only compare models by performance, but also by their environmental footprint!

🌍 The Comparator calculates CO₂ emissions during evaluation and shows key model characteristics: evaluation score, number of parameters, architecture, precision, type... 🛠️
Make informed decisions about your model's impact on the planet and join the movement towards greener AI!
awacke1 
posted an update about 1 month ago
view post
Post
811
🕊️Hope🕊️ and ⚖️Justice⚖️ AI
🚲 Stolen bike in Denver FOUND - Sometimes hope & justice DO prevail.

🎬 So I Created an AI+Art+Music tribute:
-🧠 AI App that Evaluates GPT-4o vs Claude:
awacke1/RescuerOfStolenBikes
https://x.com/Aaron_Wacker/status/1857640877986033980?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1857640877986033980%7Ctwgr%5E203a5022b0eb4c41ee8c1dd9f158330216ac5be1%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fpublish.twitter.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FAaron_Wacker%2Fstatus%2F1857640877986033980

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">QT your 🕊️Hope🕊️ and ⚖️Justice⚖️ art🎨<br><br>🚲 Stolen bike in Denver FOUND! <br> - Sometimes hope &amp; justice DO prevail! <br><br>🎬 Created an AI+Art+Music tribute: <br> -🧠 AI App that Evaluates GPT-4o vs Claude: <a href="https://t.co/odrYdaeizZ">https://t.co/odrYdaeizZ</a><br> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/GPT?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#GPT</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Claude?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Claude</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Huggingface?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Huggingface</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/OpenAI?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@OpenAI</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/AnthropicAI?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@AnthropicAI</a> <a href="https://t.co/Q9wGNzLm5C">pic.twitter.com/Q9wGNzLm5C</a></p>&mdash; Aaron Wacker (@Aaron_Wacker) <a href="https://twitter.com/Aaron_Wacker/status/1857640877986033980?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 16, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


#GPT #Claude #Huggingface
@OpenAI
@AnthropicAI
albertvillanova 
posted an update about 2 months ago
view post
Post
1447
🚀 New feature of the Comparator of the 🤗 Open LLM Leaderboard: now compare models with their base versions & derivatives (finetunes, adapters, etc.). Perfect for tracking how adjustments affect performance & seeing innovations in action. Dive deeper into the leaderboard!

🛠️ Here's how to use it:
1. Select your model from the leaderboard.
2. Load its model tree.
3. Choose any base & derived models (adapters, finetunes, merges, quantizations) for comparison.
4. Press Load.
See side-by-side performance metrics instantly!

Ready to dive in? 🏆 Try the 🤗 Open LLM Leaderboard Comparator now! See how models stack up against their base versions and derivatives to understand fine-tuning and other adjustments. Easier model analysis for better insights! Check it out here: open-llm-leaderboard/comparator 🌐
albertvillanova 
posted an update about 2 months ago
view post
Post
3113
🚀 Exciting update! You can now compare multiple models side-by-side with the Hugging Face Open LLM Comparator! 📊

open-llm-leaderboard/comparator

Dive into multi-model evaluations, pinpoint the best model for your needs, and explore insights across top open LLMs all in one place. Ready to level up your model comparison game?
albertvillanova 
posted an update about 2 months ago
view post
Post
1219
🚨 Instruct-tuning impacts models differently across families! Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct excels on IFEval but struggles with MATH-Hard, while Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct avoids MATH performance loss! Why? Can they follow the format in examples? 📊 Compare models: open-llm-leaderboard/comparator
awacke1 
posted an update about 2 months ago
view post
Post
1865
Since 2022 I have been trying to understand how to support advancement of the two best python patterns for AI development which are:
1. Streamlit
2. Gradio

The reason I chose them in this order was the fact that the streamlit library had the timing drop on gradio by being available with near perfection about a year or two before training data tap of GPT.

Nowadays its important that if you want current code to be right on generation it requires understanding of consistency in code method names so no manual intervention is required with each try.

With GPT and Claude being my top two for best AI pair programming models, I gravitate towards streamlit since aside from common repeat errors on cache and experimental functions circa 2022 were not solidified.
Its consistency therefore lacks human correction needs. Old dataset error situations are minimal.

Now, I seek to make it consistent on gradio side. Why? Gradio lapped streamlit for blocks paradigm and API for free which are I feel are amazing features which change software engineering forever.

For a few months I thought BigCode would become the new best model due to its training corpus datasets, yet I never felt it got to market as the next best AI coder model.

I am curious on Gradio's future and how. If the two main models (GPT and Claude) pick up the last few years, I could then code with AI without manual intervention. As it stands today Gradio is better if you could get the best coding models to not repeatedly confuse old syntax as current syntax yet we do live in an imperfect world!

Is anyone using an AI pair programming model that rocks with Gradio's latest syntax? I would like to code with a model that knows how to not miss the advancements and syntax changes that gradio has had in the past few years. Trying grok2 as well.

My IDE coding love is HF. Its hands down faster (100x) than other cloud paradigms. Any tips on models best for gradio coding I can use?

--Aaron
·
albertvillanova 
posted an update about 2 months ago
view post
Post
1909
Finding the Best SmolLM for Your Project

Need an LLM assistant but unsure which hashtag#smolLM to run locally? With so many models available, how can you decide which one suits your needs best? 🤔

If the model you’re interested in is evaluated on the Hugging Face Open LLM Leaderboard, there’s an easy way to compare them: use the model Comparator tool: open-llm-leaderboard/comparator
Let’s walk through an example👇

Let’s compare two solid options:
- Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct from Alibaba Cloud Qwen (1.5B params)
- gemma-2-2b-it from Google (2.5B params)

For an assistant, you want a model that’s great at instruction following. So, how do these two models stack up on the IFEval task?

What about other evaluations?
Both models are close in performance on many other tasks, showing minimal differences. Surprisingly, the 1.5B Qwen model performs just as well as the 2.5B Gemma in many areas, even though it's smaller in size! 📊

This is a great example of how parameter size isn’t everything. With efficient design and training, a smaller model like Qwen2.5-1.5B can match or even surpass larger models in certain tasks.

Looking for other comparisons? Drop your model suggestions below! 👇
Nyandwi 
authored a paper about 2 months ago
Nyandwi 
authored a paper 2 months ago
albertvillanova 
posted an update 2 months ago
view post
Post
1946
🚨 We’ve just released a new tool to compare the performance of models in the 🤗 Open LLM Leaderboard: the Comparator 🎉
open-llm-leaderboard/comparator

Want to see how two different versions of LLaMA stack up? Let’s walk through a step-by-step comparison of LLaMA-3.1 and LLaMA-3.2. 🦙🧵👇

1/ Load the Models' Results
- Go to the 🤗 Open LLM Leaderboard Comparator: open-llm-leaderboard/comparator
- Search for "LLaMA-3.1" and "LLaMA-3.2" in the model dropdowns.
- Press the Load button. Ready to dive into the results!

2/ Compare Metric Results in the Results Tab 📊
- Head over to the Results tab.
- Here, you’ll see the performance metrics for each model, beautifully color-coded using a gradient to highlight performance differences: greener is better! 🌟
- Want to focus on a specific task? Use the Task filter to hone in on comparisons for tasks like BBH or MMLU-Pro.

3/ Check Config Alignment in the Configs Tab ⚙️
- To ensure you’re comparing apples to apples, head to the Configs tab.
- Review both models’ evaluation configurations, such as metrics, datasets, prompts, few-shot configs...
- If something looks off, it’s good to know before drawing conclusions! ✅

4/ Compare Predictions by Sample in the Details Tab 🔍
- Curious about how each model responds to specific inputs? The Details tab is your go-to!
- Select a Task (e.g., MuSR) and then a Subtask (e.g., Murder Mystery) and then press the Load Details button.
- Check out the side-by-side predictions and dive into the nuances of each model’s outputs.

5/ With this tool, it’s never been easier to explore how small changes between model versions affect performance on a wide range of tasks. Whether you’re a researcher or enthusiast, you can instantly visualize improvements and dive into detailed comparisons.

🚀 Try the 🤗 Open LLM Leaderboard Comparator now and take your model evaluations to the next level!
awacke1 
posted an update 2 months ago
view post
Post
698
Today I was able to solve a very difficult coding session with GPT-4o which ended up solving integrations on a very large scale. So I decided to look a bit more into how its reasoners work. Below is a fun markdown emoji outline about what I learned today and what I'm pursuing.

Hope you enjoy! Cheers, Aaron.

Also here are my favorite last 4 spaces I am working on:
1. GPT4O: awacke1/GPT-4o-omni-text-audio-image-video
2. Claude:
awacke1/AnthropicClaude3.5Sonnet-ACW
3. MSGraph M365: awacke1/MSGraphAPI
4. Azure Cosmos DB: Now with Research AI! awacke1/AzureCosmosDBUI

# 🚀 OpenAI's O1 Models: A Quantum Leap in AI

## 1. 🤔 From 🦜 to 🧠: O1's Evolution

- **Thinking AI**: O1 ponders before replying; GPT models just predict. 💡

## 2. 📚 AI Memory: 💾 + 🧩 = 🧠

- **Embeddings & Tokens**: Words ➡️ vectors, building knowledge. 📖

## 3. 🔍 Swift Knowledge Retrieval

- **Vector Search & Indexing**: O1 finds info fast, citing reliable sources. 🔎📖

## 4. 🌳 Logic Trees with Mermaid Models

- **Flowchart Reasoning**: O1 structures thoughts like diagrams. 🎨🌐

## 5. 💻 Coding Mastery

- **Multilingual & Current**: Speaks many code languages, always up-to-date. 💻🔄

## 6. 🏆 Breaking Records

- **92.3% MMLU Score**: O1 outperforms humans, setting new AI standards. 🏅

## 7. 💡 Versatile Applications

- **Ultimate Assistant**: From fixing code to advancing research. 🛠️🔬

## 8. 🏁 Racing Toward AGI

- **OpenAI Leads**: O1 brings us closer to true AI intelligence. 🚀

## 9. 🤖 O1's Reasoning Pillars

- **🧠 Chain of Thought**: Step-by-step logic.
- **🎲 MCTS**: Simulates options, picks best path.
- **🔍 Reflection**: Self-improves autonomously.
- **🏋️‍♂️ Reinforcement Learning**: Gets smarter over time.

---

*Stay curious, keep coding!* 🚀
awacke1 
posted an update 2 months ago
view post
Post
577
I have finally completed a working full Azure and Microsoft MS Graph API implementation which can use all the interesting MS AI features in M365 products to manage CRUD patterns for the graph features across products.

This app shows initial implementation of security, authentication, scopes, and access to Outlook, Calendar, Tasks, Onedrive and other apps for CRUD pattern as AI agent service skills to integrate with your AI workflow.


Below are initial screens showing integration:

URL: awacke1/MSGraphAPI
Discussion: awacke1/MSGraphAPI#5

Best of AI on @Azure and @Microsoft on @HuggingFace :
https://huggingface.co/microsoft
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/
---
Aaron
awacke1 
posted an update 3 months ago
view post
Post
993
Updated my 📺RTV🖼️ - Real Time Video AI app this morning.
URL: awacke1/stable-video-diffusion

It uses Stable Diffusion to dynamically create videos from images in input directory or uploaded using A10 GPU on Huggingface.


Samples below.

I may transition this to Zero GPU if I can. During Christmas when I revised this I had my highest billing from HF yet due to GPU usage. It is still the best turn key GPU out and Image2Video is a killer app. Thanks HF for the possibilities!
awacke1 
posted an update 3 months ago
albertvillanova 
posted an update 3 months ago
awacke1 
posted an update 4 months ago
view post
Post
590
I am integrating Azure Cosmos DB, the database system that backs GPT conversations into my workflow, and experimenting with new patterns to accelerate dataset evolution for evaluation and training of AI.

While initially using it for research prompts and research outputs using my GPT-4o client here which can interface and search ArXiv, I am excited to try out some new features specifically for AI at scale. Research on memory augmentation is shown. awacke1/GPT-4o-omni-text-audio-image-video

awacke1/AzureCosmosDBUI
xianbao 
posted an update 4 months ago
view post
Post
1691
With the open-weight release of CogVideoX-5B from THUDM, i.e. GLM team, the Video Generation Model (how about calling it VGM) field has officially became the next booming "LLM"

What does the landscape look like? What are other video generation models? This collection below is all your need.

xianbao/video-generation-models-66c350163c74f60f5c412af6

The above video is generated by @a-r-r-o-w with CogVideoX-5B, taken from a nice lookout for the field!
awacke1 
posted an update 5 months ago
view post
Post
1343
I just launched an exciting new multiplayer app powered by GPT-4o, enabling collaborative AI-driven queries in a single shared session!

### 🔗 Try It Out! 👉 Check out the GPT-4o Multiplayer App
Experience the future of collaborative AI by visiting our space on Hugging Face: awacke1/ChatStreamlitMultiplayer

🎉 This innovative tool lets you and your team reason over:

###📝 Text
###🖼️ Image
###🎵 Audio
###🎥 Video

## 🔍 Key Features

### Shared Contributions
Collaborate in real-time, seeing each other's inputs and contributions.
Enhances teamwork and fosters a collective approach to problem-solving.

### Diverse Media Integration
Seamlessly analyze and reason with text, images, audio, and video.
Breakthrough capabilities in handling complex media types, including air traffic control images and audio.

## 🛠️ Real-World Testing
This morning, we tested the app using images and audio from air traffic control—a challenge that was nearly impossible to handle with ease just a few years ago. 🚁💬

🌱 The Future of AI Collaboration
We believe AI Pair Programming is evolving into a new era of intelligence through shared contributions and teamwork. As we continue to develop, this app will enable groups to:

Generate detailed text responses 📝
Collaborate on code responses 💻
Develop new AI programs together 🤖
taesiri 
authored 2 papers 5 months ago