Instructions to use huseyincavus/tr-abdomen-rad-weights with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- ultralytics
How to use huseyincavus/tr-abdomen-rad-weights with ultralytics:
from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download from ultralytics import YOLO # pick the weights file from this repo's "Files and versions" tab weights = hf_hub_download("huseyincavus/tr-abdomen-rad-weights", "<weights>.pt") model = YOLO(weights) source = 'http://images.cocodataset.org/val2017/000000039769.jpg' model.predict(source=source, save=True) - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
TR-ABDOMEN-RAD — YOLO26-S-P2 demo weights
Six-class acute abdominal emergency detection on CT. Demo model trained on a balanced, patient-disjoint subset of TR_ABDOMEN_RAD — 6.8% of the positive slices (2.3% of all slices), 10 epochs, one 16 GB GPU.
Research/demo only. Not a medical device and not for clinical use.
Results (patient level)
| Metric | Val (36 patients) | Test (26 patients) |
|---|---|---|
| Macro AUROC | 0.879 [0.808–0.935] | 0.921 [0.867–0.967] |
| Macro F1 | 0.781 | 0.664 |
| Precision | 0.763 | 0.644 |
| Recall | 0.806 | 0.733 |
| Localization (restricted) | 0.889 | 0.870 |
Slice-level detection: mAP50 0.220 / mAP50-95 0.092 (val). Weakest class: diverticulitis (AUROC 0.692); strongest: AAA (1.000).
Training
- YOLO26-S-P2, 9.67 M parameters, 1280 px, bf16
- 10 epochs, batch 4 (effective 64), AdamW 7e-4, cosine schedule
- Mosaic for the first 6/10 epochs (close-mosaic in the last 4)
- 10,764 train / 3,148 val / 2,828 test images
Files
best.pt final model (20 MB)
last.pt final-epoch weights
checkpoints/epoch*.pt full training checkpoints (10 × 75 MB)
smoke/ smoke-test weights (mAP 0 — ignore)
pretrained/ upstream YOLO weights used for initialization
results.csv training log
eval_report.json patient-level evaluation report
eval/scores_*.csv per-patient scores
pred/ raw val/test detections
plots/ training curves, confusion matrix, PR
demo/ GT-vs-prediction overlays
Limitations
- 6.8% of the positive slices (2.3% of all slices) and 10 epochs: a demo, not a paper reproduction.
- 26 test patients → wide confidence intervals.
- Specificity was not evaluated.
Classes
acute appendicitis · acute cholecystitis · acute pancreatitis · kidney/ureteral stone · acute diverticulitis · AAA/dissection
Dataset
TR_ABDOMEN_RAD (introduced at TEKNOFEST-2022). Our corrected labels contain 1,296 studies / 43,166 boxes; the published Table 1 reports 1,274 patients / 42,922 boxes (896/189/189) — the +22 studies are mostly stones/AAA. Dataset terms apply.
References
Method (baseline): Erdoğan, H.M., Koç, U. Anatomically Localized Detection of Six Acute Abdominal Emergencies on CT Using Multi-window Deep Learning: Development and Validation. Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-026-02084-x
Dataset: Koç, U., Akçapınar Sezer, E., Özkaya, Y.A., et al. Elevating healthcare through artificial intelligence: analyzing the abdominal emergencies data set (TR_ABDOMEN_RAD_EMERGENCY) at TEKNOFEST-2022. European Radiology 34, 3588–3597 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10391-y
- Downloads last month
- 1,239
