Instructions to use dronefreak/uavdt-yolov9s with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- ultralytics
How to use dronefreak/uavdt-yolov9s with ultralytics:
# Couldn't find a valid YOLO version tag. # Replace XX with the correct version. from ultralytics import YOLOvXX model = YOLOvXX.from_pretrained("dronefreak/uavdt-yolov9s") source = 'http://images.cocodataset.org/val2017/000000039769.jpg' model.predict(source=source, save=True) - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
YOLOv9s Finetuned on UAVDT
Fine-tuned YOLOv9s object detector on the UAVDT benchmark dataset, trained and evaluated as part of DetectionBench -- a framework for reproducibly benchmarking modern object detectors with identical training recipes and evaluation metrics across multiple real-world datasets.
Performance
| Metric | Score (%) |
|---|---|
| mAP@50 | 31.82 |
| mAP@50-95 | 18.71 |
| Precision | 39.83 |
| Recall | 38.12 |
| F1 Score | 38.96 |
| Parameters | 7.3M |
| FLOPs | 27.6B (at 640 px) |
Evaluation Protocol
Metrics reported in this model card are computed on the UAVDT test split, using DetectionBench's standard evaluation pipeline (detectionbench-evaluate).
UAVDT Model Zoo
Every model DetectionBench has trained and evaluated on UAVDT so far, for full transparency -- see DetectionBench for the smaller, curated comparison set used on the project README.
| Model | mAP@50 | mAP@50-95 | Precision | Recall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YOLOv26s | 32.98 | 19.61 | 43.86 | 40.38 |
| RF-DETR Nano | 32.78 | 20.31 | 73.6 | 66.98 |
| RF-DETR Small | 32.62 | 20.21 | 73.83 | 71.63 |
| YOLOv9s | 31.82 | 18.71 | 39.83 | 38.12 |
| YOLOv8m | 31.42 | 18.8 | 40.27 | 37.79 |
| YOLOv10m | 30.12 | 17.33 | 40.13 | 35.68 |
| YOLOv9t | 29.42 | 17.03 | 35.75 | 36.47 |
| YOLOv11s | 29.1 | 17.16 | 34.32 | 37.31 |
| YOLOv26n | 28.88 | 16.79 | 33.14 | 35.66 |
| YOLOv10s | 28.85 | 16.48 | 36.53 | 33.16 |
| YOLOv11n | 28.56 | 16.3 | 38.04 | 32.26 |
| YOLOv8n | 27.8 | 15.34 | 35.42 | 33.61 |
| YOLOv10n | 27.17 | 15.16 | 33.3 | 31.21 |
| YOLOv8s | 27.12 | 15.33 | 34.65 | 31.87 |
Per-Class Performance
| Class | mAP@50 | mAP@50-95 |
|---|---|---|
| car | 72.93 | 40.38 |
| truck | 9.73 | 6.34 |
| bus | 12.8 | 9.42 |
Evaluation Visualizations
Precision-Recall Curve
F1 Curve
Confusion Matrix
Normalized Confusion Matrix
Dataset
This model was trained on UAVDT. For the full dataset description, provenance, license, and citation, see the dataset card:
https://huggingface.co/datasets/dronefreak/UAVDT
Classes
- car
- truck
- bus
Usage
Install Dependencies
pip install ultralytics huggingface_hub
Load Model from Hugging Face
from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download
from ultralytics import YOLO
weights = hf_hub_download(
repo_id="dronefreak/uavdt-yolov9s",
filename="best.pt"
)
model = YOLO(weights)
Run Inference
results = model.predict(
source="image.jpg",
conf=0.25
)
results[0].show()
Training Configuration
| Setting | Value |
|---|---|
| Dataset | UAVDT |
| Framework | Ultralytics YOLO |
| Training Toolkit | DetectionBench |
| Epochs (configured max) | 30 |
| Epochs (actually trained) | 15 |
| Early Stopping Patience | 8 |
| Batch Size | auto (Ultralytics AutoBatch) |
| Image Size | 1024 |
| Optimizer | AdamW |
| Initial Learning Rate | 0.0005 |
| Seed | 0 |
Repository Contents
best.pt
results.csv
args.yaml
BoxPR_curve.png
BoxF1_curve.png
BoxP_curve.png
BoxR_curve.png
confusion_matrix.png
confusion_matrix_normalized.png
val_batch0_pred.jpg
uavdt_yolov9s_showcase.jpg
assets/demo_banner.mp4
assets/demo_banner_poster.jpg
README.md
Related Resources
- UAVDT dataset card on Hugging Face
- DetectionBench -- reproducible benchmarks for modern object detectors on real-world datasets
- UAVDT paper preprint (arXiv:1804.00518)
- UAVDT project website (official data source)
Training Framework
This model was trained using DetectionBench, an open-source framework for benchmarking object detectors across multiple real-world datasets with a common pipeline.
Features include:
- A dataset-adapter registry for converting real-world datasets into a canonical format
- Identical training/evaluation recipes across model families (Ultralytics YOLO/RT-DETR, RF-DETR)
- Hardware profiling (latency, FPS, VRAM, parameters, FLOPs)
- One-command reproducibility via versioned Hydra configs
If you find this model useful, please consider starring the repository.
Known Limitations
- Severe class imbalance:
car(94.6%) dominates the annotated boxes, whiletruck(3.1%) andbus(2.3%) are rare -- per-class accuracy on the minority classes is measured on comparatively few examples, and every model here scores far lower on them than oncar. - Very small objects: the median box covers only 0.14% of the image area (mean 0.26%), so this is a hard small-object regime and absolute mAP values are low for every architecture; the numbers are best read as a relative comparison between models, not as a production-quality detector.
- Video-derived, highly correlated frames: the ~40.7k labelled images come from 50 video sequences, so consecutive frames are near-duplicates. UAVDT's 50 tracking-only sequences have no detection labels and are excluded. The validation split is carved out of the training sequences by sequence (not by frame) to avoid leakage, but effective diversity is far lower than the image count suggests.
- Different density per split: instances per image are 15.7 (train), 28.0 (valid) and 22.7 (test), because the splits contain different sequences -- validation metrics are not directly predictive of test metrics.
- Research-use-only data: UAVDT is distributed "for research purpose only" with no redistribution grant, so the dataset is not mirrored here -- obtain it from the official source (see the Dataset section above) and check its terms before any use beyond research.
Citation
If you use this model in your research, please consider citing:
- The UAVDT dataset (see below)
- The original YOLOv9s architecture (see below)
- The other model architectures shown in the Model Zoo/External Comparison tables above, if you reference their results
- DetectionBench, the training/evaluation framework used to produce this checkpoint
@InProceedings{du2018unmanned,
title={The Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Benchmark: Object Detection and Tracking},
author={Du, Dawei and Qi, Yuankai and Yu, Hongyang and Yang, Yifan and Duan, Kaiwen and Li, Guorong and Zhang, Weigang and Huang, Qingming and Tian, Qi},
booktitle={Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV)},
year={2018}
}
@article{wang2024yolov9,
title={YOLOv9: Learning What You Want to Learn Using Programmable Gradient Information},
author={Wang, Chien-Yao and Yeh, I-Hau and Liao, Hong-Yuan Mark},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13616},
year={2024}
}
Other architectures compared against on UAVDT in this model card:
RF-DETR
@inproceedings{robinson2026rfdetr,
title = {RF-DETR: Real-Time Detection Transformer},
author = {Robinson, Isaac and Robicheaux, Peter and Popov, Matvei and Ramanan, Deva and Peri, Neehar},
booktitle = {International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)},
year = {2026},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.09554}
}
@article{oquab2023dinov2,
title={DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision},
author={Oquab, Maxime and Darcet, Timoth{\'e}e and Moutakanni, Theo and Vo, Huy and Szafraniec, Marc and Khalidov, Vasil and Fernandez, Pierre and Haziza, Daniel and Massa, Francisco and El-Nouby, Alaaeldin and others},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07193},
year={2023}
}
YOLOv10
@article{wang2024yolov10,
title={YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Object Detection},
author={Wang, Ao and Chen, Hui and Liu, Lihao and Chen, Kai and Lin, Zijia and Han, Jungong and Ding, Guiguang},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.14458},
year={2024}
}
YOLOv11
No official YOLO11 research paper has been published by Ultralytics; the most commonly cited independent architectural analysis is used instead:
@article{khanam2024yolov11,
title={YOLOv11: An Overview of the Key Architectural Enhancements},
author={Khanam, Rahima and Hussain, Muhammad},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.17725},
year={2024}
}
YOLOv26
@article{jocher2026yolo26,
title={Ultralytics YOLO26: Unified Real-Time End-to-End Vision Models},
author={Jocher, Glenn and Qiu, Jing and Liu, Mengyu and Lyu, Shuai and Akyon, Fatih Cagatay and Kalfaoglu, Muhammet Esat},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.03748},
year={2026}
}
YOLOv8
No official YOLOv8 research paper has been published by Ultralytics; this is their own recommended software citation instead:
@software{jocher2023yolov8,
author = {Glenn Jocher and Ayush Chaurasia and Jing Qiu},
title = {Ultralytics YOLOv8},
version = {8.0.0},
year = {2023},
url = {https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics},
license = {AGPL-3.0}
}
@software{Saksena_DetectionBench_2026,
author = {Saksena, Saumya Kumaar},
title = {DetectionBench: Reproducible Benchmarks for Modern Object Detectors on Real-World Datasets},
url = {https://github.com/dronefreak/DetectionBench},
year = {2026}
}
- Downloads last month
- -
Dataset used to train dronefreak/uavdt-yolov9s
Collection including dronefreak/uavdt-yolov9s
Papers for dronefreak/uavdt-yolov9s
Ultralytics YOLO26: Unified Real-Time End-to-End Vision Models
RF-DETR: Neural Architecture Search for Real-Time Detection Transformers
YOLOv11: An Overview of the Key Architectural Enhancements
YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Object Detection
YOLOv9: Learning What You Want to Learn Using Programmable Gradient Information
Evaluation results
- mAP@50 (test split) on UAVDTDetectionBench31.820
- mAP@50-95 (test split) on UAVDTDetectionBench18.710
- Precision (test split) on UAVDTDetectionBench39.830
- Recall (test split) on UAVDTDetectionBench38.120



