Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
account_id
string
is_mule
int64
mule_flag_date
string
alert_reason
string
flagged_by_branch
float64
ACCT_000000
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000002
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000003
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000004
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000008
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000010
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000011
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000012
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000013
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000014
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000017
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000019
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000023
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000024
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000025
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000026
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000027
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000028
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000030
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000031
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000032
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000036
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000037
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000038
1
2022-08-19
Income-Transaction Mismatch
7,361
ACCT_000040
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000043
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000044
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000047
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000054
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000056
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000057
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000062
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000063
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000064
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000065
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000067
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000069
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000071
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000073
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000075
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000078
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000079
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000084
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000086
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000087
1
2021-02-17
Routine Investigation
1,389
ACCT_000089
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000090
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000092
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000093
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000095
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000098
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000099
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000101
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000103
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000105
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000106
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000107
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000109
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000110
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000112
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000113
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000114
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000119
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000121
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000127
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000130
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000131
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000133
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000134
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000135
1
2025-05-31
Layered Transaction Pattern
6,200
ACCT_000137
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000140
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000143
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000144
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000147
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000148
1
2025-06-04
Routine Investigation
1,612
ACCT_000149
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000152
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000153
1
2025-02-07
Salary Cycle Anomaly
2,775
ACCT_000154
1
2025-12-20
Routine Investigation
8,800
ACCT_000155
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000157
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000160
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000162
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000164
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000165
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000167
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000168
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000171
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000173
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000176
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000177
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000178
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000180
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000182
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000185
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000188
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000189
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000191
0
null
null
null
ACCT_000193
0
null
null
null
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card

Check out the documentation for more information.

AML Mule Account Detection Challenge

Data Format: All files are in Apache Parquet format (Snappy compression). Use pandas.read_parquet(), pyarrow.parquet, or any Parquet-compatible reader. Transaction files are split across batch-N/ subdirectories.

Primary Objective/Problem Statement

Identify mule accounts used for money laundering from banking transaction and account data. Given labelled training data and unlabelled test accounts, predict which test accounts are mules.

Evaluation

  • Exact Submission Guidelines will be provided shortly
  • Evaluation Criteria is listed below:
    • 40% weightage for Model/Feature Ingenuity
      • Rewarded for creative and innovative ideas in types of models/features used, multiple models/algorithms in series/parallel may be used to generate final predictions
    • 20% weightage for model performance scores
      • Rewarded for high accuracy/precision scores, calculated scores such as AUC-ROC and F1 scores
    • 15% weightage for avoidance of red-herrings in data
      • Rewarded for succesfully avoiding several red-herrings injected in the training data
    • 15% weightage for additional insights such as Temporal IOU scores, other insights
    • 10% weightage for report quality
      • Rewarded for clear and concise insights presented in the report with data-driven logic.

Data Files

Provided to You

File Rows Size Description
customers.parquet 159,000 2.3 MB Customer demographics and KYC information
accounts.parquet 160,000 6.7 MB Account-level attributes
transactions/ ~400,000,000 8.2 GB Individual transaction records (5-year window: Jul 2020 - Jun 2025), 396 parts in 4 batches
demographics.parquet ~159,000 4.6 MB Customer demographics (name, gender, address, phone)
accounts-additional.parquet ~160,000 0.9 MB Scheme codes per account
transactions_additional/ ~400,000,000 8.4 GB Extended transaction fields, 311 parts in 4 batches
branch.parquet ~9,000 0.3 MB Branch-level metadata
customer_account_linkage.parquet 160,000 1.8 MB Maps customers to their accounts
product_details.parquet 159,000 2.9 MB Aggregated product holdings per customer
train_labels.parquet 96,000 0.6 MB Training labels β€” is_mule: 1 = mule, 0 = legitimate
test_accounts.parquet 64,000 0.4 MB Account IDs you need to predict on

Total: 720 files, 16.2 GB

Note: transactions/ and transactions_additional/ are split into batch subdirectories (batch-1/, batch-2/, etc.) with up to 100 part files each. To read all parts:

import pandas as pd
from glob import glob

# Read all transaction parts
parts = sorted(glob("transactions/batch-*/part_*.parquet"))
df = pd.concat([pd.read_parquet(p) for p in parts], ignore_index=True)

Schema

customers.parquet

Column Description
customer_id Unique customer identifier
date_of_birth Date of birth (YYYY-MM-DD)
relationship_start_date Date customer relationship began
pan_available PAN card on file (Y/N)
aadhaar_available Aadhaar on file (Y/N)
passport_available Passport on file (Y/N)
mobile_banking_flag Mobile banking registered (Y/N)
internet_banking_flag Internet banking registered (Y/N)
atm_card_flag ATM/debit card issued (Y/N)
demat_flag Demat account linked (Y/N)
credit_card_flag Credit card held (Y/N)
fastag_flag FASTag linked (Y/N)
customer_pin Residential PIN code
permanent_pin Permanent address PIN code

accounts.parquet

Column Description
account_id Unique account identifier
account_status active or frozen
product_code Product code
currency_code Currency (1 = INR)
account_opening_date Date account was opened
branch_code Branch identifier
branch_pin Branch location PIN code
avg_balance Average balance (can be negative for overdraft)
product_family S (Savings), K (K-family), O (Overdraft)
nomination_flag Nominee registered (Y/N)
cheque_allowed Cheque facility available (Y/N)
cheque_availed Cheque book opted (Y/N)
num_chequebooks Number of cheque books issued
last_mobile_update_date Date of last mobile number change
kyc_compliant KYC compliant (Y/N)
last_kyc_date Date of last KYC verification
rural_branch Rural branch (Y/N)
monthly_avg_balance Monthly average balance
quarterly_avg_balance Quarterly average balance
daily_avg_balance Daily average balance
freeze_date Date the account was frozen (null if never frozen)
unfreeze_date Date the account was unfrozen (null if never unfrozen)

Note: customer_id is not in this file. Use customer_account_linkage.parquet to join accounts to customers.

transactions (partitioned)

Column Description
transaction_id Unique transaction identifier
account_id Account the transaction belongs to
transaction_timestamp ISO format timestamp
mcc_code Merchant Category Code
channel Transaction channel (see below)
amount Amount in INR (negative values indicate reversals)
txn_type D (Debit) or C (Credit)
counterparty_id Counterparty identifier

Transaction channels: UPC (UPI Credit), UPD (UPI Debit), END (E-commerce/POS), IPM (IMPS), STD (Standing instruction debit), P2A (Pay-to-account), FTD (Fund transfer debit), NTD (NEFT debit), MCR (Mobile credit), FTC (Fund transfer credit), MAC (Mobile app), TPD (Third-party debit), APD (Auto-pay debit), CHQ (Cheque), ATW (ATM withdrawal), TPC (Third-party credit), STC (Standing instruction credit), OCD (Over-counter deposit), RCD (Recurring deposit credit), IFD (Internal fund debit), ETD (Electronic transfer debit), NWD (Network debit), CSD (Cash deposit), IFC (Internal fund credit), PCA (Payment card authorization), MAD (Mandate debit), CHD (Clearing house debit), RTD (Return debit), CCL (Credit card linked), OPI (Online payment initiation), CTC (Clearing transfer credit), SID (System-initiated debit), ASD (Auto-sweep debit), IAD (Inter-account debit), SCW (Smart card withdrawal).

customer_account_linkage.parquet

Column Description
customer_id Customer identifier
account_id Account identifier

A single customer may hold multiple accounts.

product_details.parquet

Column Description
customer_id Customer identifier
loan_sum Total outstanding loan amount (can be negative)
loan_count Number of active loans
cc_sum Total credit card outstanding (can be negative)
cc_count Number of credit cards
od_sum Total overdraft facility amount (can be negative)
od_count Number of overdraft accounts
ka_sum Total balance across K-family accounts
ka_count Number of K-family accounts
sa_sum Total balance across savings accounts
sa_count Number of savings accounts

train_labels.parquet

Column Description
account_id Account identifier (training set only)
is_mule 1 = mule account, 0 = legitimate account
mule_flag_date Date the account was flagged as a mule (empty for legitimate accounts)
alert_reason Reason the account was flagged (empty for legitimate accounts)
flagged_by_branch Branch code that reported the activity (empty for legitimate accounts)

Note: Labels may contain noise/red-herrings. Not all labels are guaranteed to be correct.

test_accounts.parquet

Column Description
account_id Account IDs to generate predictions for

demographics.parquet

Column Description
customer_id Customer identifier
name Full customer name
gender M or F
address_last_update_date Date of last address update
address Street address and city
phone_number Phone number
passbook_last_update_date Date of last passbook update
joint_account_flag Joint account (Y/N)
nri_flag Non-Resident Indian (Y/N)

accounts-additional.parquet

Column Description
account_id Account identifier
scheme_code Government scheme code (PMJDY, PMSBY, PMJJBY, APY, SCSS, SSA, REGULAR)

transactions_additional (partitioned)

Column Description
transaction_id Transaction identifier (joins to transactions)
mnemonic_code Transaction type mnemonic (same as channel)
latitude Transaction location latitude
longitude Transaction location longitude
ip_address Source IP address
balance_after_transaction Running account balance after this transaction
part_transaction_type CI (Customer Induced), BI (Bank Induced), IP (Interest Paid), IC (Interest Collected)
atm_deposit_channel_code CDM or CRM for ATM deposits, empty otherwise
transaction_sub_type CLT_CASH, LOAN, or NORMAL

branch.parquet

Column Description
branch_code Branch identifier
branch_address Branch street address
branch_pin_code Branch location PIN code
branch_city City
branch_state State code
branch_employee_count Number of employees at the branch
branch_turnover Branch turnover metric
branch_asset_size Branch asset size
branch_type urban, semi-urban, or rural

Known Mule Behavior Patterns

The following money laundering patterns are known to exist in real-world banking data. Mule accounts in this dataset may exhibit one or more of these behaviors:

  1. Dormant Activation β€” Long-inactive accounts suddenly showing high-value transaction bursts
  2. Structuring β€” Repeated transactions just below reporting thresholds (e.g., amounts near 50,000)
  3. Rapid Pass-Through β€” Large credits quickly followed by matching debits (funds barely rest in the account)
  4. Fan-In / Fan-Out β€” Many small inflows aggregated into one large outflow, or vice versa
  5. Geographic Anomaly β€” Transactions from locations inconsistent with the account holder's profile
  6. New Account High Value β€” Recently opened accounts with unusually high transaction volumes
  7. Income Mismatch β€” Transaction values disproportionate to account balance or customer profile
  8. Post-Mobile-Change Spike β€” Sudden transaction surge after a mobile number update (potential account takeover)
  9. Round Amount Patterns β€” Disproportionate use of exact round amounts (1K, 5K, 10K, 50K)
  10. Layered/Subtle β€” Weak signals from multiple patterns combined, no single strong indicator
  11. Salary Cycle Exploitation β€” Laundering disguised within natural salary credit and bill payment cycles at month boundaries
  12. Branch-Level Collusion β€” Clusters of suspicious accounts at the same branch with shared counterparties and coordinated timing
  13. MCC-Amount Anomaly β€” Transactions with amounts that are statistical outliers for their merchant category code

Relationships

customers ──(customer_id)──> customer_account_linkage ──(account_id)──> accounts
    |                                                                       |
(customer_id)                                                          (account_id)
    |                                                                       |
    v                                                                       v
demographics                                                          transactions
                                                                            |
                                                                     (transaction_id)
                                                                            |
                                                                            v
                                                                 transactions_additional

customers ──(customer_id)──> product_details
accounts  ──(account_id)──> train_labels / test_accounts
accounts  ──(account_id)──> accounts-additional
accounts  ──(branch_code)──> branch

Submission Format

account_id,is_mule,suspicious_start,suspicious_end
ACCT_000000,0.02,,
ACCT_000003,0.87,2023-11-15T09:30:00,2024-02-20T16:45:00
...

One row per account in test_accounts.parquet:

  • is_mule: Probability score between 0 and 1
  • suspicious_start: ISO timestamp of the beginning of the suspected suspicious activity window (empty if predicted legitimate)
  • suspicious_end: ISO timestamp of the end of the suspected suspicious activity window (empty if predicted legitimate)

The time window should capture when you believe the mule activity occurred. Primary scoring is on is_mule. Time window accuracy is scored separately as a bonus metric using temporal IoU (Intersection over Union) against the ground truth activity period.

Good luck.

Downloads last month
31