Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
qid
stringlengths
26
26
did
stringlengths
26
26
dense_rank
int8
1
100
⌀
stage
stringclasses
8 values
label
int8
0
2
⌀
judge
stringclasses
2 values
rm8b_score
float32
-1.06
3.13
⌀
dense_score
float32
0.42
0.98
⌀
reranker_score
float32
-16.89
11.2
⌀
answer_validity
stringclasses
5 values
reason_codes
listlengths
1
5
⌀
confidence
stringclasses
3 values
rationale
stringlengths
22
730
⌀
rubric_sha256
stringclasses
2 values
query_evaluable
bool
2 classes
is_source_page
bool
2 classes
bm25_rank
int8
1
100
⌀
ngram5_rank
int8
1
100
⌀
fused_rank
int8
1
20
⌀
rrf_score
float64
0.01
0.07
⌀
p_00021f40cdc830fe40aee5e8
d_15935b322320fcd1255b4744
10
short_doc
0
rm8b
0.1514
0.6938
-3.1875
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
null
18
0.028571
p_00021f40cdc830fe40aee5e8
d_19c91960529e2a01e258d746
30
fused_short
0
rm8b
0.127
0.6758
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
31
null
8
0.033211
p_00021f40cdc830fe40aee5e8
d_229a5b650c79be148003e263
8
short_doc
1
rm8b
0.832
0.6953
-4.1875
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
null
15
0.029412
p_00021f40cdc830fe40aee5e8
d_28e84410927a5e02e795dce4
65
fused_short
0
rm8b
0.0549
0.6675
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
15
null
16
0.029333
p_00021f40cdc830fe40aee5e8
d_33a37b8682cfaabc8fe454a2
3
dense_top5
0
llm
null
0.7017
null
major_error
[ "major_math_error", "wrong_problem" ]
high
The document addresses a different income problem and does not explain when to use Z rather than t. It also incorrectly gives the standard error of a sample mean using sqrt(n-1) instead of sqrt(n).
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
null
12
0.031746
p_00021f40cdc830fe40aee5e8
d_3e005cb38f9a9c256c5bdd7e
null
fused_short
0
rm8b
0.2734
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
2
3
10
0.032002
p_00021f40cdc830fe40aee5e8
d_423ce158a879881ae25a9ece
19
rerank_top5
0
llm
0.0835
0.6836
0.25
not_applicable
[ "contaminated_or_spliced", "unresolved_attempt" ]
high
This is a large splice of unrelated statistics questions. Although one multiple-choice prompt mentions an unknown population standard deviation, no answer is selected or explanation of the query's z-versus-t distinction is supplied.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
7
null
6
0.040242
p_00021f40cdc830fe40aee5e8
d_524bf915e309b6fb159811be
16
short_doc
1
rm8b
0.7969
0.687
-2.4375
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
null
null
0.026316
p_00021f40cdc830fe40aee5e8
d_525c81484d42f2827661d9f7
18
rerank_top5
0
llm
1.5391
0.6836
1.8125
major_error
[ "major_math_error" ]
high
The document incorrectly treats a small sample by itself as grounds for using t and even uses t in an example where a population standard deviation is stated. This reinforces the query's misconception instead of explaining that known population sigma gives a z statistic even for n=25.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
null
null
0.025641
p_00021f40cdc830fe40aee5e8
d_6a72b7a20b8b722f5c46e100
15
rerank_top5
1
llm
1.1797
0.6875
0.5
correct
[ "correct_partial_method" ]
medium
The document correctly states that t is used for a small normal sample when the population standard deviation is unknown, which explains part (b). It does not directly state or apply the complementary fact that known population sigma makes z appropriate in part (a).
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
null
null
0.026667
p_00021f40cdc830fe40aee5e8
d_6d53564bcc4a56b44bc6bed6
14
short_doc
0
rm8b
0.3145
0.6875
-2.75
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
null
null
0.027027
p_00021f40cdc830fe40aee5e8
d_72db36a3beac90ff2e9592ea
2
dense_top5
0
llm
null
0.7046
null
not_applicable
[ "topic_only" ]
high
This is a collection of statistics multiple-choice questions. Although it mentions small-sample tests and known standard deviations, it does not explain the known-versus-estimated standard-deviation distinction asked about.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
null
9
0.032258
p_00021f40cdc830fe40aee5e8
d_734333e4dc6cb1a1b37dde1d
12
short_doc
0
rm8b
0.1895
0.6909
-1.125
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
5
null
5
0.043162
p_00021f40cdc830fe40aee5e8
d_7eedcd06d8592d9b60ab7e21
13
short_doc
1
rm8b
0.6875
0.6895
-2.125
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
null
20
0.027397
p_00021f40cdc830fe40aee5e8
d_80de20b0ab0c046c40c7139f
6
short_doc
0
rm8b
0.4414
0.6978
-5
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
null
14
0.030303
p_00021f40cdc830fe40aee5e8
d_92697cb8b1dd3a5468f8c58d
17
rerank_top5
0
llm
1.1953
0.6865
1.5
major_error
[ "major_math_error" ]
high
Its claim that t should be used whenever n<30, regardless of whether population sigma is known, is the central misconception the query asks to resolve. It does not justify the correct z choice in part (a).
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
null
null
0.025974
p_00021f40cdc830fe40aee5e8
d_9c5ab899601bbbd8086e4d57
null
fused_short
1
rm8b
0.6172
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
3
2
11
0.032002
p_00021f40cdc830fe40aee5e8
d_a2b0aaeef753c170a7e74389
71
fused_long
1
rm8b
1.2734
0.6665
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
12
null
17
0.029156
p_00021f40cdc830fe40aee5e8
d_ae07b24f9ac862b20c91baf5
7
rerank_top5
0
llm
0.125
0.6973
-0.875
not_applicable
[ "contaminated_or_spliced", "unresolved_attempt" ]
high
The document is an incoherent compilation of many unrelated exercises. Its uncompleted multiple-choice item about t distributions does not explain why known sigma leads to z in part (a) and estimated sigma leads to t in part (b).
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
8
null
3
0.044557
p_00021f40cdc830fe40aee5e8
d_b8db37356cfe1930448d8e5e
4
dense_top5
2
llm
null
0.6992
null
correct
[ "full_solution" ]
high
The relevant portions give the exact distinction: with known sigma, the standardized sample mean is normal; with unknown sigma replaced by S, it has a t distribution with n-1 degrees of freedom under normal sampling. This directly resolves why the two cases use different statistics regardless of both sample sizes being...
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
null
13
0.03125
p_00021f40cdc830fe40aee5e8
d_bcd007b73eda43299fbd14d6
5
dense_top5
1
llm
null
0.6978
null
correct
[ "correct_partial_subquestion" ]
medium
The document contains the correct key criterion that t is used when the population standard deviation is unknown and the normal-model conditions apply. It does not coherently contrast this with the known-sigma Z case or explain why 30 is not the deciding cutoff.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
9
null
2
0.045262
p_00021f40cdc830fe40aee5e8
d_bd5c8c73e603184ec80fba24
20
short_doc
0
rm8b
0.2812
0.6816
-5
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
null
null
0.025
p_00021f40cdc830fe40aee5e8
d_d89a0808db08bf4bafa852bd
9
short_doc
0
rm8b
0.127
0.6948
-1.0625
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
6
null
4
0.044137
p_00021f40cdc830fe40aee5e8
d_e256974ca72e587a766c71ff
11
long_doc
2
llm
null
0.6924
null
correct
[ "full_solution" ]
high
The document gives the decisive distinction: with a normal population and known population standard deviation, standardizing the sample mean uses the normal Z distribution; when the standard deviation is estimated by the sample SD, the statistic has a t distribution with n−1 degrees of freedom. Thus sample size 30 is o...
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
null
19
0.028169
p_00021f40cdc830fe40aee5e8
d_e87081db946a164fc262ee41
31
fused_short
0
rm8b
0.0234
0.6758
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
16
null
7
0.035136
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_00555ef95da9445585ead3b8
25
fused_short
1
rm8b
0.8828
0.7222
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
2
25
10
0.051423
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_1551c73be8b6e3ba25e34c98
11
rerank_top5
0
llm
0.2383
0.7661
-0.5
not_applicable
[ "target_mismatch", "topic_only" ]
high
The document discusses geometric reducedness and a general topological irreducibility lemma but neither states nor proves the transitivity of geometric irreducibility in the query.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
null
null
0.028169
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_1ac47d6a594abd7556e44252
7
rerank_top5
0
llm
0.1943
0.8096
-0.5625
not_applicable
[ "target_mismatch" ]
high
It proves a sufficient condition for a field extension K/k to be geometrically irreducible, whereas the query already assumes that fact and asks for the resulting geometric irreducibility of S over k.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
19
16
0.042509
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_278cd83d89764b1720f67450
17
short_doc
0
rm8b
0.0152
0.7344
-6.9062
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
null
null
0.025974
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_3086d4754d62f49a83a02dd9
22
fused_short
0
rm8b
0.1011
0.7256
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
24
6
9
0.051447
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_4276c2f8821877d0f4afe2d5
5
dense_top5
1
llm
null
0.8354
null
correct
[ "correct_partial_subquestion" ]
medium
The document correctly proves that tensoring a reduced algebra with a separable field extension preserves reducedness. This helps prove K⊗_k k' is a field after irreducibility is supplied, but it neither supplies that step nor concludes that S is geometrically irreducible over k.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
8
18
5
0.058296
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_5eb647907b9182cd2bd0d821
9
short_doc
0
rm8b
0.3477
0.7759
-3.4375
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
null
null
0.028986
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_66492d6b51f5f2a41a2fa6ba
2
dense_top5
1
llm
null
0.8398
null
correct
[ "correct_partial_method" ]
high
The document supplies the definition and finite-separable testing criterion for geometric irreducibility, which gives the appropriate initial reduction. It does not perform the crucial argument that K⊗_k k' is a field or apply the hypothesis on S to finish the proof.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
1
7
2
0.063577
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_66f9562aac7ccdb731dc43b1
20
short_doc
0
rm8b
0.4043
0.7275
-5.5938
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
null
null
0.025
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_7007526eed5ddcbad3a8ec71
14
short_doc
0
rm8b
0.0172
0.7529
-6.4375
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
null
null
0.027027
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_96150241cf528ae0b42f0be8
3
dense_top5
1
llm
null
0.8364
null
correct
[ "correct_partial_subquestion" ]
medium
Lemma 10.42.6 gives a useful required substep: for finite separable k'/k, the tensor product K⊗_k k' is reduced. Combined with its irreducibility this helps show it is a field, but the document does not establish that irreducibility or complete the argument for S.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
13
17
4
0.058432
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_997e1e96d009e11434689503
8
short_doc
0
rm8b
0.3906
0.7773
-3.5
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
100
20
0.035662
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_9acbcadd24e4b955f641ebe0
4
dense_top5
1
llm
null
0.8364
null
correct
[ "correct_partial_subquestion" ]
medium
The result that separable scalar extension preserves reducedness can be applied to show K⊗_k k' is reduced for finite separable k'/k, a genuine intermediate step in the desired proof. The document treats geometric reducedness rather than completing the geometric-irreducibility argument.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
7
16
3
0.059333
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_af2eed69291ab140bcf6d79a
26
fused_short
0
rm8b
0.1206
0.7217
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
22
3
11
0.051324
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_c3824fe13114ee61ac0c7e19
39
fused_short
0
rm8b
0.2012
0.7085
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
20
20
15
0.045202
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_c432dcf6e64ccb4eb1edf12b
32
fused_short
0
rm8b
0.3184
0.7148
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
3
28
12
0.048976
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_c46612c0437279aade8f6ad2
21
fused_short
0
rm8b
0.1348
0.7266
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
23
5
8
0.052124
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_c61cfd67beceb0fa6827a95b
16
rerank_top5
0
llm
0.8438
0.7378
-2.875
major_error
[ "major_math_error", "condition_mismatch", "unresolved_attempt" ]
high
The discussion concerns tensor products of domains and relies on finite-type, algebraically closed, or separability assumptions absent from the query. Its broad opening claim that tensor products of domains over an arbitrary field are domains is false, and it never proves the requested irreducibility result.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
11
null
17
0.0404
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_c7c28052d97a4ee7fe95be23
18
short_doc
1
rm8b
0.6211
0.7324
-3.3125
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
null
null
0.025641
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_c7c8a925d25b8c3f3869376f
10
short_doc
0
rm8b
0.4004
0.7754
-3.5
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
79
19
0.035766
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_c96f5916c58878f44a3d5716
6
rerank_top5
1
llm
0.3867
0.8169
0.375
correct
[ "correct_partial_method" ]
medium
The valid tensor-product lemma for geometrically integral algebras supplies the analogous argument under stronger domain and reducedness hypotheses. It does not handle merely geometrically irreducible, possibly nonreduced algebras or complete the requested transitivity proof.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
9
23
6
0.056844
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_d762e1221983ae53a7209746
12
rerank_top5
0
llm
0.1836
0.7646
-2
not_applicable
[ "target_mismatch", "topic_only" ]
high
The document proves that the generic-point residue field of a geometrically irreducible scheme is geometrically irreducible. It does not address composition of base fields or the K-algebra S.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
95
26
14
0.045857
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_db0cf5e8cd5e42a9fc94f06d
33
fused_short
0
rm8b
0.0908
0.7148
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
26
4
13
0.048758
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_dcd855d5eecbf72d8173291c
15
short_doc
0
rm8b
0.2832
0.7388
-3.625
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
59
null
0.03507
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_de644d78813c7e239d257126
19
short_doc
0
rm8b
0.2266
0.7295
-3.875
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
57
null
0.033863
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_f4475917c98f036b68290568
13
short_doc
0
rm8b
0.0513
0.7588
-6.6875
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
43
18
0.037106
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_f554a48db24bc1f8ac60b781
24
fused_short
0
rm8b
0.1357
0.7227
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
21
2
7
0.052284
p_00043540acc32a47a5b1d2bf
d_fda5fb51aa3abbde127d7a1c
1
dense_top5
2
llm
null
0.8657
null
correct
[ "full_solution" ]
high
The document proves the exact claim by reducing to finite separable extensions k'/k, showing K⊗_k k' is a finite separable field extension of K, and applying the geometric irreducibility of S over K.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
true
5
1
1
0.064565
p_00092ac075db954489913e2b
d_113c98023ac3e528b9236c59
null
source_page
2
llm
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
true
null
3
null
0.015873
p_00092ac075db954489913e2b
d_16ee47a9c6d42a470377fdc5
8
rerank_top5
0
llm
1.9766
0.7451
2.1875
not_applicable
[ "unresolved_attempt" ]
high
The document merely recalls that the units of F[x] are F* and uses that fact later; it supplies no proof of the requested assertion.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
null
10
0.029412
p_00092ac075db954489913e2b
d_515b9ef18beae1f5f9e5562d
10
short_doc
1
rm8b
1.3281
0.7378
1.25
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
null
12
0.028571
p_00092ac075db954489913e2b
d_581aa36bfec30ee56cadd54c
63
fused_short
0
rm8b
0.0845
0.7109
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
6
null
4
0.031412
p_00092ac075db954489913e2b
d_5b0ac9622108bc7b38259e6e
65
fused_short
0
rm8b
-0.0452
0.7095
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
9
7
0.030493
p_00092ac075db954489913e2b
d_72d836e281e3336d06e76d86
3
dense_top5
2
llm
null
0.7622
null
correct
[ "full_solution" ]
high
The response correctly uses the nonvanishing leading coefficient of a product over a field to rule out a positive-degree unit, then observes that every nonzero constant has an inverse in F. Both inclusions in F[x]^*=F^* are established.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
null
3
0.031746
p_00092ac075db954489913e2b
d_7ffaecb692288bce763b3b93
18
rerank_top5
2
llm
1.7578
0.7334
1.25
correct
[ "full_solution" ]
high
The Herstein 3.11.4 solution takes uv=1, applies degree additivity in the integral domain to force deg(u)=deg(v)=0, and concludes u is a unit of the coefficient ring. Together with the evident converse, this proves the equality for a field.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
null
20
0.025641
p_00092ac075db954489913e2b
d_84529ecb9054a52429171658
15
short_doc
1
rm8b
0.7539
0.7344
0.25
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
null
17
0.026667
p_00092ac075db954489913e2b
d_8b670c4ebf819a1d60325606
1
dense_top5
2
llm
null
0.7671
null
correct
[ "full_solution" ]
high
The document states that a polynomial is a unit exactly when it divides 1, which in F[x] occurs exactly for nonzero constant polynomials, and notes that these are precisely the invertible elements of F. This proves F[x]^*=F^*.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
null
1
0.032787
p_00092ac075db954489913e2b
d_9dd862d6ed24b9e5a36c30e2
19
short_doc
1
rm8b
0.543
0.7329
-2.1875
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
null
null
0.025316
p_00092ac075db954489913e2b
d_a593258cfad155bc09cc5fe6
16
rerank_top5
0
llm
1.4844
0.7334
1.3125
not_applicable
[ "target_mismatch" ]
high
The argument only proves that the indeterminate x is not a unit and hence that R[x] is not a field. It does not establish that every nonconstant polynomial is noninvertible or characterize all units.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
null
18
0.026316
p_00092ac075db954489913e2b
d_b5e84535f83185e90d3f0af3
12
rerank_top5
2
llm
1.8516
0.7368
2.375
correct
[ "equivalent_solution" ]
high
The stated lemma proves the stronger integral-domain result: a unit f in R[x] and its inverse g satisfy 0=deg(fg)=deg(f)+deg(g), so both are constant units of R; the converse inclusion is immediate. Applying this to a field gives the requested equality.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
null
14
0.027778
p_00092ac075db954489913e2b
d_b6556c11432f4fc2ea321d46
4
dense_top5
0
llm
null
0.7524
null
not_applicable
[ "question_restatement" ]
high
The document merely presents the more general domain result as an exercise and supplies no proof or substantive derivation. An explicitly requested proof is therefore unsupported.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
null
5
0.03125
p_00092ac075db954489913e2b
d_c13e9c16b0372b76bc2a1d62
5
dense_top5
2
llm
null
0.751
null
correct
[ "full_solution" ]
high
It correctly shows that a product involving a positive-degree polynomial cannot equal 1 because the leading coefficient remains nonzero over a field. Hence every unit is a nonzero constant, and conversely every nonzero constant is invertible in the field.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
null
6
0.030769
p_00092ac075db954489913e2b
d_c2f7b833620a1e2316b1a8d3
9
rerank_top5
2
llm
1.4453
0.7451
2.4375
correct
[ "full_solution" ]
high
The document proves that if A has polynomial inverse B, then deg(AB)=deg(A)+deg(B)=0, forcing both polynomials to be constants. Thus every unit is a nonzero field element, while every nonzero constant is plainly invertible.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
null
11
0.028986
p_00092ac075db954489913e2b
d_c9c768bc0aee8cc0d6d03265
14
short_doc
1
rm8b
1.0859
0.7349
-1.375
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
null
16
0.027027
p_00092ac075db954489913e2b
d_dd0e8172303fa9d1ab4df5de
6
short_doc
1
rm8b
0.7227
0.749
0.75
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
null
8
0.030303
p_00092ac075db954489913e2b
d_e192b48c40125b82f02bdf9e
17
short_doc
0
rm8b
0.3613
0.7334
-1.6875
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
null
19
0.025974
p_00092ac075db954489913e2b
d_e422dfdd80433cf609e24d48
20
long_doc
2
llm
null
0.7329
null
correct
[ "full_solution" ]
high
The document proves that deg(fg)=deg(f)+deg(g). Thus fg=1 forces both factors to have degree zero, while every nonzero constant has an inverse in F, establishing F[x]^*=F^*.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
null
null
0.025
p_00092ac075db954489913e2b
d_e635fb7cfb66b50d73830f13
11
short_doc
2
rm8b
1.8438
0.7378
-0.25
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
null
13
0.028169
p_00092ac075db954489913e2b
d_fd1f5a0b61bf8f2b2decc9c1
7
short_doc
1
rm8b
1.0625
0.748
-1.0625
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
null
9
0.029851
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_09357d567272db888e6a33b4
4
dense_top5
1
llm
null
0.7974
null
correct
[ "correct_partial_method" ]
high
It correctly counts the six sum-7 outcomes and states P(sum 7)=1/6, while also giving the general complement rule, but does not explicitly calculate the requested 1-1/6=5/6.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
null
null
0.03125
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_1051b252bea001aa0c709000
1
dense_top5
2
llm
null
0.8271
null
correct
[ "correct_short_answer" ]
high
The document explicitly states that the probability of not rolling a 7 on one roll of two fair dice is 5/6, which is the requested result.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
1
2
1
0.065309
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_2b6939c179bf461b6c595459
18
rerank_top5
1
llm
1.0312
0.7637
3.125
correct
[ "correct_partial_method" ]
high
It correctly lists the 36 outcomes and the six outcomes summing to 7, yielding 1/6, but stops without computing the requested complementary probability 5/6.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
null
null
0.025641
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_2d481f3201ec5cf8ce2ac7c7
null
fused_long
1
rm8b
1.1172
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
6
1
20
0.031545
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_32d5366d51ac9d964e3dbfc9
13
short_doc
1
rm8b
1.3516
0.7715
1.625
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
41
11
0.037298
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_3d5db9257e9d601f98dfcefa
24
fused_short
1
rm8b
1.3203
0.7559
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
56
null
16
0.03243
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_3d7a59aac72b7135f360e7c7
9
short_doc
1
rm8b
1.2891
0.7769
1.875
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
null
null
0.028986
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_443b67e9c8651584d64b5ecb
49
fused_long
1
rm8b
0.8477
0.7407
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
32
89
12
0.03593
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_4ba7c461bbc9f9d3cf924579
12
short_doc
1
rm8b
1.0547
0.7725
0.125
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
null
null
0.027778
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_4f7e46a2841329de03669eb0
45
fused_long
1
rm8b
0.75
0.7432
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
9
39
7
0.043641
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_59a4f4ecac7cfb62243ec5b8
58
fused_short
1
rm8b
0.6289
0.7378
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
8
null
19
0.031655
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_67668d803724c9617e6c958c
39
fused_short
1
rm8b
1.2734
0.7456
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
15
3
4
0.049408
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_76c90ba1da009b43d8d4a125
14
rerank_top5
2
llm
1.625
0.7705
3.625
correct
[ "full_solution" ]
high
It correctly enumerates all six sum-7 pairs, obtains probability 1/6, and takes the complement to give 5/6.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
null
null
0.027027
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_76ccba9f2fff15558ba8e6ca
6
rerank_top5
1
llm
1.7422
0.7871
5.125
minor_error
[ "correct_partial_method", "minor_math_error" ]
high
The complement calculation and final value 5/6 are correct, but the displayed list contains only five sum-7 outcomes because it omits (4,3) while nevertheless claiming six.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
null
null
0.030303
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_7b96e0b4cfedb1557b64f503
7
short_doc
1
rm8b
1.0703
0.7822
2.6875
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
9
5
0.044343
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_7e466147ef175bd127a86145
54
fused_short
1
rm8b
0.9336
0.7393
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
2
null
14
0.033673
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_966543f917fcaf6b9c7053e1
5
dense_top5
1
llm
null
0.7886
null
minor_error
[ "correct_partial_method", "minor_math_error" ]
high
It gives the requested result 5/6 using the complement of 1/6, but its supporting list omits the outcome (4,3) while nonetheless claiming six favorable outcomes.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
null
null
0.030769
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_9788cc9ba179fe6919206dd4
11
long_doc
1
llm
null
0.7734
null
minor_error
[ "correct_partial_method", "minor_math_error" ]
high
It correctly establishes P(sum 7)=6/36=1/6, from which the requested complement 5/6 follows, but it never states that answer and incorrectly calls mutually exclusive sum events independent.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
4
10
2
0.05808
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_a1183f37eaaa4cf4648a883f
3
dense_top5
1
llm
null
0.7988
null
correct
[ "correct_partial_method" ]
high
The document correctly establishes P(sum 7)=1/6 and explains complementary events elsewhere, but it does not apply the complement to state the requested probability 5/6.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
null
18
0.031746
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_a31c43fc44d30b6191aa4f83
10
rerank_top5
2
llm
1.7891
0.7739
5.8125
correct
[ "full_solution" ]
high
It correctly counts six sum-7 outcomes among 36 and explicitly gives the complementary probability 1-1/6=5/6.
031ac72b649ae9793c04c9cbb8a7acc64fc9de65e871d6e20589f11522c5eaa6
true
false
null
4
6
0.044196
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_ac6748520388813e9d3afc24
22
fused_short
1
rm8b
1.2344
0.7588
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
3
6
3
0.055415
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_b31647a1170840d8ed695dfe
20
short_doc
1
rm8b
0.6445
0.7617
1.625
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
null
null
0.025
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_b96bf8667c75a58d7cde52e5
19
short_doc
1
rm8b
1.3672
0.7632
2.75
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
null
null
0.025316
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_c3acbd412ca7aab05a0b6b9d
15
short_doc
1
rm8b
0.8398
0.7695
2.5625
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
7
null
10
0.041592
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_c48cb96b7048f754bd5f2b54
32
fused_short
1
rm8b
0.9922
0.75
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
21
58
9
0.042559
p_000bc940bd868650bebfdfcb
d_c82a1fbc9d644bc8cd656666
16
short_doc
1
rm8b
0.832
0.7646
2.3125
null
null
null
null
null
null
false
null
null
null
0.026316
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

MathPinpoint

Status: v2. Every count below comes from the released tables. For what a retriever fine-tuned on it gains, see Training a retriever on MathPinpoint.

MathPinpoint is training data for problem-level math retrieval. Given a math question, the task is to find the web page that solves that problem, and solves it correctly. Each (query, page) pair carries a relevance label of 0, 1 or 2 under one written rubric, prompts/judge_prompt.md. The rubric is strict in two ways:

  • Same problem, not same topic. A page gets 0 when it addresses a different problem (wrong_problem), changes the conditions (condition_mismatch), answers a different target (target_mismatch), or only shares the topic or keywords (topic_only).
  • Correctness-aware. A page whose central mathematics is wrong gets 0, even when it addresses the right problem. A correct final answer reached through invalid reasoning is also 0.

What the release contains

config split rows content
corpus train 3,525,546 deduplicated mathematical documents, shared by both splits
queries train 1,853,389 query text, the page it was extracted from, extraction metadata
judgments train 43,506,169 one row per judged (query, document) pair: its rank in each retrieval route, label, which judge produced it, and raw score where available
queries test 6,173 held-out test queries
qrels test 83,833 the relevant documents of each test query

Column-level schemas are in docs/schema.md. The test split is described in docs/test_split.md.

How the labels were made

  1. Documents. Mathematical web pages go through a content extractor, are normalized, and are deduplicated with MinHash. Documents whose extraction degenerated, and documents that bundle five or more problems, are removed. See docs/corpus.md.
  2. Queries. One query per page, produced with a minimal-edit prompt: if the page contains a question somebody actually asked, that question is the query, copied with as few changes as possible. The prompt is prompts/query_gen_prompt.txt. Queries are then deduplicated and filtered, leakage against evaluation sets is removed, and queries that two LLM judges both find not self-contained are dropped. See docs/queries.md.
  3. Candidates.
    • Three retrieval routes each contribute their top 100: dense (Qwen3-Embedding-4B), BM25, and word 5-gram. They are combined with weighted reciprocal rank fusion (dense weight 2, k = 60).
    • A query's candidates are its dense top 20 and its fused top 20. On average, 4.55 candidates per query come from the fused top 20 alone.
    • See docs/judging.md.
  4. Judging.
    • The LLM judge (GPT-5.6-Sol) labels, under prompts/judge_prompt.md: dense ranks 1–5; within dense ranks 6–20, the top 5 as ordered by a zero-shot reranker and every document longer than 8,144 tokens; and, among the candidates from the fused top 20 alone, documents longer than 8,144 tokens at fused positions 1–5.
    • An 8B relevance model, trained on the LLM labels, judges everything else. It also scores the reranker's picks, so those pairs carry both labels.
    • Every row records which judge produced its label, and the 8B's raw score is kept wherever it exists. See docs/judging.md.

Training a retriever on MathPinpoint

Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B was fine-tuned on training rows built from this release and compared with the same model before fine-tuning, on the test split (6,173 queries).

metric before after difference [95% CI]
nDCG@10 0.441 0.477 +0.036 [+0.028, +0.045]
R@100 0.561 0.568 +0.007 [−0.001, +0.016]

Both metrics count unjudged documents as not relevant, and the test pool covers the two models unequally: 66% of the top 10 of the model before fine-tuning is judged, but only 35% of the fine-tuned model's. Ranking only the judged documents instead (condensed nDCG@10) gives 0.486 before and 0.617 after, a difference of +0.131 [+0.123, +0.139]. On a 500-query sample where both models' top 10 was judged in full, the nDCG@10 difference was +0.114, close to the condensed value.

  • Training rows. Each query gives one row:

    • the positive is drawn at random from the query's score-2 candidates;
    • the three score-0 candidates with the best dense rank are the hard negatives; candidates outside the dense top 100 come last;
    • queries with fewer than three score-0 candidates are skipped.

    Labels from both judges are used:

    • Where both judges labeled a pair, the LLM label is used.
    • A pair labeled only by the 8B model counts as score 2 if its raw score is at least 1.5, and as score 0 if it is below 0.5.
    • Rows from the source-page check are not used, and pairs marked not evaluable are dropped. A query's own source page that retrieval also returned is a candidate like any other; it is the positive in 46.8% of rows.

    Documents are cut to 4,000 characters and queries to 2,000. This gives 1,225,057 rows.

  • Training.

    • Loss: multiple-negatives ranking loss, using in-batch negatives plus the three hard negatives, and a Matryoshka loss over 768, 512, 256 and 128 dimensions.
    • Batch: effective batch 512 (8 GPUs × 64, GradCache with mini-batch 32).
    • Schedule: learning rate 2e-5 with 10% warmup, sequence length 512, 1,000 steps. A run therefore sees 512,000 of the 1,225,057 rows.
    • Runs: three, with seeds 42, 43 and 44. Per-query scores are averaged over the three.
  • Evaluation.

    • Search runs over all 3,525,546 corpus documents, with last-token pooling at 512 tokens. Each query is prefixed with the instruction below; documents get no prefix.

      Instruct: Given a web search query, retrieve relevant passages that answer the query
      Query:
      
    • Relevant documents are the test split's qrels: documents judged score 2, which answer the same problem correctly.

    • The test queries are held out: no training query matches one verbatim, at word 5-gram Jaccard ≥ 0.50 (checked exhaustively), or as a semantic duplicate judged to be the same problem.

    • Intervals come from a paired bootstrap over queries, with 10,000 resamples.

Documentation

page covers
docs/corpus.md source pages, extraction, question removal, dedup, degenerate and multi-problem documents, document ids
docs/queries.md query extraction, dedup, leakage removal, source-page check, self-containedness check
docs/judging.md candidates, who judged what, the rubric, the LLM judge, the 8B model
docs/test_split.md test queries and how their relevant documents were judged
docs/schema.md release layout
docs/limitations.md what the labels do and do not tell you

Prompts and schemas

prompts/ holds the exact texts that produced the data. prompts/SHA256SUMS pins them. The judge prompt's guideline_version string is fixed in the output schema, so it does not identify which prompt text produced a label; the SHA-256 does.

file sha256
judge_prompt.md 031ac72b649ae979…
query_gen_prompt.txt d75d30a5b8cb0b03…
query_check_prompt.md 5de21b985641bc6a…

Provenance and license

TBD before any public release. The source pages come from a gated upstream dataset that declares no license, and the documents here are derived from that content.

Downloads last month
82