The dataset viewer is not available for this subset.
Exception: SplitsNotFoundError
Message: The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.
Traceback: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 286, in get_dataset_config_info
for split_generator in builder._split_generators(
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
StreamingDownloadManager(base_path=builder.base_path, download_config=download_config)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
)
^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/webdataset/webdataset.py", line 84, in _split_generators
raise ValueError(
...<2 lines>...
)
ValueError: The TAR archives of the dataset should be in WebDataset format, but the files in the archive don't share the same prefix or the same types.
The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/split_names.py", line 68, in compute_split_names_from_streaming_response
for split in get_dataset_split_names(
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
path=dataset,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
config_name=config,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
token=hf_token,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
)
^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 340, in get_dataset_split_names
info = get_dataset_config_info(
path,
...<6 lines>...
**config_kwargs,
)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 291, in get_dataset_config_info
raise SplitsNotFoundError("The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.") from err
datasets.inspect.SplitsNotFoundError: The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card
Check out the documentation for more information.
GLM-5.2 (abliterated) on llama.cpp + opencode: two-pod workflow
Runs huihui-ai/Huihui-GLM-5.2-abliterated-GGUF (quant UD-Q3_K_M, 342.7 GB) with llama.cpp (CUDA) on
6x RTX PRO 6000 (96 GB) and chats with it through opencode. No building and no installing on the pods:
the CPU pod only downloads, the GPU pod only starts the server.
The model is an abliterated (refusal-reduced) build of zai-org/GLM-5.2 (MIT). The author left the first 12 layers
and all expert modules un-ablated, so refusal removal is partial. Outputs are unfiltered; review them.
(The repo name still says "ollama" for historical reasons: Ollama is not used any more. Its import copies the
model (about 2x the disk, ~55 min on a network volume) and I never confirmed it can load this architecture.)
The workflow
- Network volume: 400 GB in a datacenter that has 6x RTX PRO 6000. The CPU pod and the GPU pod must be in that
same datacenter, with the volume mounted at
/workspace. (Check GPU availability there first.) - CPU pod (Ubuntu 24.04, volume at
/workspace):Downloads the prebuilt llama.cpp, opencode, the config and the 9 shards (9 parallelcurl -fsSL https://huggingface.co/datasets/kopyl/glm52-ollama-setup/resolve/main/run.sh -o run.sh bash run.sh # no GPU found -> DOWNLOAD modecurlstreams, resumable), then checks sizes and SHA-256 of every shard. Needs onlycurl,tar,zstd,sha256sum(already on Ubuntu images I used). SetHF_TOKENonly if you hit rate limits; the repos are public. - GPU pod (6x RTX PRO 6000, Ubuntu 24.04, CUDA 12.8 image, same volume at
/workspace):Checks the GPU/driver/CUDA libraries, startsbash /workspace/dl/run.sh # GPU found -> SERVE modellama-server(about 8 min to load), runs a smoke test and prints how to open opencode:Other commands:cd /workspace && /workspace/oc # model glm/glm52 is the defaultbash run.sh status,bash run.sh stop. Forcing a mode:bash run.sh download|serve. After changing the context size, restart opencode too (its sidebar percentage uses opencode's ownlimit.context).
Doing it by hand (no script)
CPU pod:
mkdir -p /workspace/dl /workspace/home /workspace/models/glm52/UD-Q3_K_M /workspace/logs && cd /workspace/dl
BASE=https://huggingface.co/datasets/kopyl/glm52-ollama-setup/resolve/main
for f in llama-cpp-cuda-sm120-cu128-ubuntu2404.tar.zst opencode-1.19.4-linux-x64.tar.zst shards.sha256 serve_glm.sh opencode.json run.sh; do
curl -fL --retry 5 -O "$BASE/$f"; done
zstd -dc llama-cpp-cuda-sm120-cu128-ubuntu2404.tar.zst | tar -x --no-same-owner -C /workspace # -> /workspace/llama-cpp-cuda
zstd -dc opencode-1.19.4-linux-x64.tar.zst | tar -x --no-same-owner -C /workspace/home # -> /workspace/home/.opencode
mkdir -p /workspace/home/.config/opencode && cp opencode.json /workspace/home/.config/opencode/
SRC=https://huggingface.co/huihui-ai/Huihui-GLM-5.2-abliterated-GGUF/resolve/main/UD-Q3_K_M/GLM-5.2-UD-Q3_K_M
for n in 00001 00002 00003 00004 00005 00006 00007 00008 00009; do
curl -fL --retry 10 -C - -o /workspace/models/glm52/UD-Q3_K_M/GLM-5.2-UD-Q3_K_M-$n-of-00009.gguf "$SRC-$n-of-00009.gguf" &
done; wait
cd /workspace/models/glm52 && awk '{print $1" "$2}' /workspace/dl/shards.sha256 | sha256sum -c - # expect 9 x OK
GPU pod:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/workspace/llama-cpp-cuda/bin:/usr/local/cuda/lib64 # any dir that has libcublas.so.12
nohup /workspace/llama-cpp-cuda/bin/llama-server \
-m /workspace/models/glm52/UD-Q3_K_M/GLM-5.2-UD-Q3_K_M-00001-of-00009.gguf -a glm52 \
-ngl 999 -sm layer -c 262144 -np 1 --jinja --no-warmup --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8099 > /workspace/logs/glm.log 2>&1 &
until curl -s http://127.0.0.1:8099/health | grep -q ok; do sleep 10; done # ~8 min
HOME=/workspace/home /workspace/home/.opencode/bin/opencode # model glm/glm52
Measured on 6x RTX PRO 6000 (driver 595.91.07, CUDA 12.8, Ubuntu 24.04; pod RAM limit 1.7 TB)
- Cold load: 7.8 min (a second cold load took about 8 min). GPU memory use was 51-61 GB per card at a 32k context (weights plus cache).
- Generation: 35-37 tokens/s on short prompts, 31 tokens/s at a 69k-token prompt. Prompt processing: ~1,800 tokens/s (5.6k-token prompt), ~1,380 tokens/s (69k-token prompt).
- Context: the model is trained for 1,048,576 tokens. Going from 32,768 to 262,144 added 34,044 MiB in total (~152 KiB per token). At 262,144 the busiest GPU uses 66,659 of 97,887 MiB. Default here is 262,144. A 69,314-token prompt with a code word hidden at 40% was answered correctly.
- opencode: connects to llama-server, and the model made a correct
bashtool call. - GLM writes its reasoning first and defaults to high reasoning effort, so open-ended prompts can spend many tokens thinking.
- Downloads (one pod): 1 stream ~119 MB/s, 8 parallel streams ~669 MB/s combined. A single 48.7 GB shard took ~7 min.
- All 9 shards matched the expected SHA-256 values; the sizes and hashes are in
shards.sha256.
| Context | KV cache | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 32,768 | ~4.8 GiB | derived from the measured 152 KiB/token |
| 262,144 | ~38 GiB | measured: +34,044 MiB in total versus 32,768 |
| 524,288 | ~76 GiB | extrapolated at 152 KiB/token, busiest GPU ~73,400 MiB; NOT tested |
| 1,048,576 | ~152 GiB | extrapolated, busiest GPU ~86,900 of 97,887 MiB; NOT tested, risky |
NOT verified
- The full two-step workflow on an empty volume has never been run end to end. Pieces were tested separately:
download mode on shards 8 and 9 in a clean directory (hash OK); serve mode in a clean directory against an
already-running server (everything except launching the server);
setup.shprebuilt path on the 6x pod. - The server launch inside
run.sh serveafter the last fix (it now watches the launched PID). The same launch was done by hand withserve_glm.shmany times. Test it once and delete this line. - A full 9-shard parallel download. One earlier run died silently at ~45 GB of shard 8 (script and curl vanished at the same second, cause unknown, not reproduced); the rerun succeeded.
- Other GPU types or counts,
--split-mode tensor,--load-mode dio, contexts above ~69k used for real, and thereasoning_effortsetting. Any other datacenter's volume speed.
Requirements and pitfalls
- Volume 400 GB: shards 342.7 GB + ~0.2 GB of tools. No Ollama copy and no merge needed.
- GPU pod RAM matters. llama.cpp maps the whole 343 GB file at load. On a pod with a 94 GB RAM limit the load
stalled (resident memory pinned at the limit, VRAM idle). On the 1.7 TB pod it worked. Use a pod whose RAM limit is
well above 350 GB, or try
LOAD_MODE=dio(untested). - The bundled llama.cpp only runs on compute capability 12.0 GPUs, Ubuntu 24.04 (glibc >= 2.39), with CUDA 12 runtime
libraries (
libcublas.so.12).run.sh servechecks this and stops with a message. For other setups usesetup.sh(builds llama.cpp from source: needsnvcc, CUDA >= 12.8 for Blackwell, and Python venv/pip; its build step worked on the 6x pod (the whole run up to the opencode step took ~12 min), but the script was not re-run after the last ownership fix). - 5x/4x/8x GPU counts (arithmetic only): weights are 342.7 GB, so 4x80 GB does not fit, 5x80 GB is tight, 8x48 GB is tight (~5 GB per card left), 6x96 GB is comfortable.
- On the network volume, a file still being written shows size 0 and a killed download likely restarts from zero.
- opencode's search tools (grep/glob) need ripgrep. opencode downloads it on first use and unpacks it with
taras root; on the network volume that fails withCannot change ownership to uid 1001 ... Operation not permitted, so the tools error out. The bundle therefore shipsrgathome/.cache/opencode/bin/rg. If you ever see that error, put anrgbinary there (extract it withtar --no-same-owner) and check it withopencode debug rg files. - Do not fill the 400 GB volume. The model is 342.7 GB, so only ~57 GB are spare. During testing, leftover copies of two
shards pushed a 400 GB volume over its quota (
Disk quota exceeded), which breaks every write, including opencode's own. - The llama.cpp web UI is not included (its asset download failed at build time); the OpenAI-compatible API works.
- The server listens on 127.0.0.1 only and has no API key.
- GLM's tokenizer config logs a harmless-looking warning (
special_eot_id is not in special_eog_ids); no problem seen so far. - opencode's own prompt is ~7,000 tokens; contexts below 16k leave nothing for work.
- Permissions:
opencode.jsonsetsbash,edit,read,external_directoryandwebfetchtoallow, so agents are never asked for permission. opencode runs asrooton these pods andsudoworks without a password (checked:sudo -n id -u-> 0). Without the block, reading a file outside the working directory is refused/prompted. Consequence: an agent can delete anything, including/workspaceand the model, and the model has no safety filtering. To get prompts back, delete thepermissionblock (or keep onlyexternal_directory). Checked withbashandread; the other keys were accepted by opencode but not exercised, and whether sub-agents inherit them was not tested.
Files in this repo
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
run.sh |
the one script: download mode (CPU pod) and serve mode (GPU pod), plus status and stop |
llama-cpp-cuda-sm120-cu128-ubuntu2404.tar.zst (51.9 MB) |
prebuilt llama.cpp (commit df9beac), has its own MANIFEST.txt |
opencode-1.19.4-linux-x64.tar.zst (79.3 MB) |
opencode binary + provider package + ripgrep 15.1.0 (see pitfalls) |
serve_glm.sh, opencode.json |
server launch settings and opencode config (model glm/glm52, context 262,144) |
shards.sha256 |
expected SHA-256 and size of each shard |
setup.sh |
fallback: builds llama.cpp from source and installs opencode (other GPUs / images) |
The shards themselves come from huihui-ai/Huihui-GLM-5.2-abliterated-GGUF, not from this repo. If that repo changes or
disappears, the download fails.
TODO
- Run the whole workflow on an empty volume (CPU pod, then GPU pod) and fix what breaks; then delete the "NOT verified" lines it covers.
- Test
LOAD_MODE=dio,--split-mode tensor, and a larger context (524,288) on 6x RTX PRO 6000. - Try a lower reasoning effort (
--chat-template-kwargs) if answers are too slow. - Rename this repo (the name says "ollama").
- Revoke the Hugging Face write token that was used for uploads.
- Downloads last month
- 150