sample_id stringlengths 36 36 | audio audioduration (s) 4.54 23.4 | query stringlengths 71 345 | category stringclasses 5
values | sub_category stringclasses 17
values | audio_emotion stringclasses 6
values | polarity stringclasses 2
values | intensity stringclasses 1
value | modality_consistency stringclasses 1
value | gender stringclasses 2
values | pitch float64 582 1.94k | pitch_level stringclasses 3
values | energy float64 0.02 0.11 | energy_level stringclasses 2
values | speed float64 0.07 0.19 | speed_level stringclasses 2
values | intonation_contour stringclasses 5
values | stress listlengths 0 8 | context_understanding stringlengths 199 436 | latent_need stringlengths 210 416 | core_demand stringlengths 185 393 | strategy_recommended listlengths 2 5 | strategy_not_recommended listlengths 2 7 | constraints stringlengths 224 375 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
f4201996-bb96-5890-8a7c-0291ab449c2b | How should I handle it when my manager tells me one thing privately but doesn’t stand by it in front of the team? | Interpersonal_Relationships | Workplace_Relations | angry | negative | normal | consistent | male | 899.4145 | normal | 0.0704 | high | 0.0919 | normal | falling-rising | [
"doesn't",
"team?"
] | The user is venting about a recent interaction where their manager privately promised support but failed to uphold it in front of the team; they’re reaching out for a safe, practical response and a sense that their frustration will be taken seriously. This utterance functions as a mix of complaint and a request for act... | Beneath the question there’s a need to have the experience acknowledged as unfair and to recover personal standing and predictability at work; the wording and sharp tone suggest they also want concrete ways to protect their credibility without escalating the situation. They likely want permission to feel frustrated plu... | Right now they most need their upset validated and named so it isn’t dismissed, followed quickly by practical, low-risk options they can pick from (phrased as choices, not orders) and reassurance that it’s reasonable to address the inconsistency. Emotional containment should come before any detailed strategy or analysi... | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"future_oriented_savoring",
"interpretation"
] | Do not lecture, moralize, or rush into problem-solving before acknowledging the user’s frustration. Avoid minimizing language, telling them to simply ‘calm down,’ making firm assumptions about the manager’s motives, or shifting the focus away with long personal anecdotes. Keep responses concise, nonjudgmental, and cent... | |
57689afc-8c16-5414-be19-05a9df715c87 | The client praised my work, but my boss took all the credit in the follow-up meeting. | Interpersonal_Relationships | Workplace_Relations | angry | negative | normal | consistent | male | 894.8004 | normal | 0.07 | high | 0.1065 | normal | rising-falling | [
"client",
"all",
"follow-up",
"meeting."
] | The speaker is venting about a recent meeting where their contribution was ignored and someone else claimed credit; they sound upset and are checking whether it’s safe to show how wronged and frustrated they feel. This utterance functions as both release and a test for validation rather than a request for immediate str... | They seem to need clear acknowledgement that their work mattered and permission to feel hurt and indignant about being overshadowed, plus assurance that their emotional response is understandable given the unfairness they experienced. | What they most need right now is to have the experience named and their anger accepted without minimization; only after that should any gentle, optional exploration of what they might do next be offered. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization"
] | Do not lecture, moralize, or rush to problem-solving; avoid telling them to 'calm down' or offering quick fixes or personal anecdotes that shift focus away from their experience. Keep responses grounded, respectful, and focused on acknowledging the unfairness before suggesting actions. | |
c09b4826-d226-5e08-ae9f-2fa940103440 | My colleague took the liberty of rewriting my entire presentation last night to make it 'better' before the meeting. | Interpersonal_Relationships | Workplace_Relations | angry | negative | normal | consistent | male | 893.4246 | normal | 0.0737 | high | 0.0993 | normal | rising | [
"rewriting",
"entire",
"make",
"'better'",
"meeting."
] | This sounds like an in-the-moment vent after someone overrode the speaker’s work without permission; the user is testing whether it’s safe to express frustration and have that frustration taken seriously. They’re signaling hurt around lost control and respect rather than calmly asking for problem-solving right now. | They seem to need their professional autonomy and effort to be acknowledged, and to have permission to be upset about a boundary violation. Underneath the complaint is a desire for respect, clear boundaries, and for someone to validate that it’s reasonable to feel undermined. | Right now they most need their feelings to be named and accepted — an empathic listener who confirms that their anger and resentment make sense — before any advice about next steps is offered. Once contained, a gentle exploration of what they want to do next (repair, confrontation, or let go) would be appropriate. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization"
] | Avoid minimizing their feelings, lecturing about professionalism, rushing into problem-solving, or offering personal stories that shift focus. Do not respond with upbeat celebration, platitudes, or immediate directives about how they 'should' handle the colleague — validation must come first. | |
d439ea50-4cff-59b6-9e9c-605880d04f81 | We received a third set of revisions today, but the manager still hasn't signed the original contract. We are effectively rewriting the same document over and over without a clear goal. | Interpersonal_Relationships | Workplace_Relations | angry | negative | normal | consistent | male | 905.2092 | normal | 0.0748 | high | 0.0972 | normal | rising | [
"revisions",
"effectively"
] | The speaker is venting frustration about a stalled process—repeated edits without a manager signing off—and is checking whether it’s safe to complain about how pointless and draining this feels. They seem to be looking for acknowledgment of the unfairness and for someone to validate that their frustration is reasonable... | Beneath the exasperation is a need for recognition that their time and effort are being wasted and for a clear decision or ownership to be taken so the cycle can stop. The repeated-revision comment and the edged tone suggest they want permission to be frustrated and want that frustration to be seen as legitimate rather... | Right now they most need their frustration to be named and accepted so they feel heard and not alone in the annoyance; only after that should any short, optional suggestions about ways to prompt a decision be offered if they want them. The immediate priority is containment and validation, not procedural problem-solving... | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"future_oriented_savoring",
"strength_spotlighting"
] | Avoid lecturing, minimizing, or quickly offering step-by-step solutions or upbeat platitudes that imply the feeling is overblown. Do not change the focus to the responder’s own experiences, nor rush the user toward action before their frustration is acknowledged. | |
abf59e7b-4725-5966-b01c-d240e7e25379 | During my performance review, my boss spent the entire time listing all the things my colleague does better than me instead of discussing my actual work. | Interpersonal_Relationships | Workplace_Relations | angry | negative | normal | consistent | female | 994.1342 | normal | 0.0755 | high | 0.1023 | normal | expressive | [
"performance",
"entire"
] | The user is venting after a performance review that felt unfair and diminishing; they sound angry and are likely checking whether someone will acknowledge that being compared to a colleague instead of being evaluated on their own work is hurtful and inappropriate. | They seem to need validation that their reaction and frustration are reasonable, and to have their effort and professional identity recognized rather than erased by comparisons. The angry tone suggests a deeper need for fairness, respect, and a safe space to express upset without being told to downplay it. | Right now they most need their anger and hurt to be named and accepted, with a clear message that their experience was understandable and not their fault; only after that emotional containment will it be helpful to offer any optional, concrete suggestions about how to address the boss or the next review. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"information",
"strength_spotlighting",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Avoid lecturing, minimizing, or quickly moving to problem-solving or advice; do not tell them to 'calm down' or insist they should be grateful or see the bright side. Refrain from moralizing, unsolicited personal stories, or cheerleading — they need being heard and respected first, not solutions or platitudes. | |
851375fb-f844-5550-8e60-47d43b114e8f | My friend Jamie promised to call me back, but it's been a week with no word. | Interpersonal_Relationships | Friend_Relations | angry | negative | normal | consistent | female | 797.1097 | normal | 0.0779 | high | 0.1108 | normal | rising-falling | [
"no",
"word."
] | The speaker is venting about being ignored after an explicit promise and is checking whether it’s acceptable to feel hurt and annoyed; this feels like a test to see if someone will acknowledge the unfairness and the emotional impact on them. They may also be quietly weighing what this silence means for the friendship. | Beneath the complaint is a need for validation that their expectation to be returned a call was reasonable and that their irritation and resentment are legitimate. They likely also want clarity or some sense of control—either acknowledgement that their time and feelings matter, or guidance about how to respond if this ... | Right now they most need their disappointment and anger to be reflected and accepted without being minimized; once that safety is established, a gentle, optional offer of practical next steps (if they want advice) would be appropriate. Any problem-solving should wait until the feeling of being heard is satisfied. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"information",
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"future_oriented_savoring",
"strength_spotlighting"
] | Avoid rushing into solutions, lecturing about blame, minimizing the hurt with platitudes, or immediately offering long personal anecdotes. Do not moralize Jamie's behavior or pressure the user to 'forgive' or 'let it go' before their anger and disappointment are acknowledged. | |
9d76d5e2-0bce-5294-b445-94c8b3434340 | My partner promised to be honest, but I keep finding little things that don’t make sense. | Interpersonal_Relationships | Romance_Relations | angry | negative | normal | consistent | female | 1,553.2195 | high | 0.0796 | high | 0.1051 | normal | falling | [
"My",
"partner"
] | They are expressing growing frustration and suspicion after noticing small inconsistencies in their partner’s behavior; this feels like a vent and a test to see if their worry will be taken seriously and not dismissed. | Beneath the anger there seems to be a need to have their confusion and mistrust acknowledged as reasonable, to feel emotionally safe enough to name suspicion without being blamed, and to get a clearer sense of whether these little signs are meaningful. | Right now they most need their frustration and doubt to be heard and validated — for someone to reflect back what they’re feeling and that those small inconsistencies can reasonably unsettle someone — before moving into problem-solving or advice. | [
"approval_and_reassurance",
"restatement",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"information",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"future_oriented_savoring",
"strength_spotlighting"
] | Avoid minimizing or dismissing their anger, lecturing about trust, rushing into step-by-step advice, moralizing about what they should do, or offering upbeat platitudes. Don’t take the partner’s side or reveal personal stories that shift focus away from the user; first prioritize validation and safety. | |
781ede71-e931-5e8b-99d2-87f6827e29c0 | When I bring up concerns, they say it's not a big deal and change the topic. | Interpersonal_Relationships | Romance_Relations | angry | negative | normal | consistent | female | 1,550.167 | high | 0.072 | high | 0.1223 | normal | falling-rising | [
"topic."
] | They are venting about repeated dismissals from their partner and testing whether someone will take their concerns seriously; the speaker sounds frustrated and worn down by having important topics brushed aside. This moment functions as a request for emotional recognition more than a request for immediate problem-solvi... | They seem to need clear acknowledgment that their concerns matter and permission to feel annoyed without being minimized, plus a sense that someone will hold space for the uncomfortable topic rather than change it away. The voice of irritation suggests this has happened enough times that they now want their partner’s a... | Right now they most need their frustration to be heard and validated — a concise reflection and normalization of how hurtful it feels when concerns are dismissed. Only after that emotional containment should any gentle, optional exploration of what they'd like to happen next be offered. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure"
] | Avoid telling them to 'calm down,' minimizing their experience, lecturing about communication skills, or immediately offering step-by-step advice. Do not cheerlead or share long personal stories that shift attention away from their felt frustration; prioritize holding their emotion rather than fixing it right away. | |
fddcbf26-b10c-5cf6-915a-3b2ebbc04218 | My partner’s schedule changed again, so I’m adjusting my sleep routine for the third time this month. | Interpersonal_Relationships | Romance_Relations | angry | negative | normal | consistent | female | 1,685.5269 | high | 0.0799 | high | 0.1178 | normal | falling | [
"My",
"third"
] | They are voicing a fed-up, frustrated complaint about repeatedly having to change their sleep schedule because of their partner’s shifting plans; this feels like a vent that’s also testing whether it’s okay to be annoyed. The remark that it’s the third time this month signals mounting strain and a need to have that str... | They appear to need acknowledgment that the repeated disruptions are burdensome and not trivial, plus permission to feel irritated without being dismissed. Beneath the complaint is likely a desire for more predictability or respect for their routines and for someone to witness how draining these repeated adjustments ar... | Right now they most need their frustration to be heard and validated—someone to name how annoying and exhausting repeatedly changing sleep patterns would be—before any suggestions are offered. After that, a gentle invitation to explore what feels worst or what small boundaries might help would be welcome, but only if t... | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"information"
] | Avoid minimizing or smoothing over their feeling (e.g., saying it’s ‘no big deal’ or that they should just adapt). Don’t rush into problem-solving, lecturing about compromise, offering unsolicited step-by-step fixes, or turning the focus to the listener’s experiences. Keep responses empathetic and concise rather than c... | |
b1553c52-0976-55ab-84d9-e4222218f10e | I’m comfortable with how things are with the person I’m dating, but others keep asking if we’re together. | Interpersonal_Relationships | Romance_Relations | angry | negative | normal | consistent | female | 1,432.2117 | high | 0.0859 | high | 0.1127 | normal | falling | [
"others"
] | The speaker is airing frustration about repeated, external questioning of their relationship status while signaling they are fine with the current pace; this feels like a low-key vent that is also testing whether it's safe to express annoyance and keep boundaries. They want someone to acknowledge that the pressure is i... | Beneath the irritation is a need for autonomy and permission to keep the relationship on their own terms: they want others to respect the couple's pace and stop imposing labels or timelines. The phrasing and tone suggest they also want their frustration to be taken seriously so they don't feel guilty for resisting that... | Right now they most need their feeling of irritation to be acknowledged and normalized; only after that should a listener offer simple, practical ways to respond to nosy questions or to set boundaries with family/friends. The priority is emotional containment first, then brief, usable options if the user wants them. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"information",
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"interpretation",
"strength_spotlighting",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Avoid minimizing or dismissing their annoyance (e.g., 'it's not a big deal') or lecturing about labels or commitment timelines. Do not rush into analyzing motives, push them to 'define' the relationship, offer unsolicited personal stories, or respond with upbeat platitudes that smooth over the frustration. | |
3fe53697-3956-5b88-b3dd-6cc5c25fadad | I picked up a wallet on the park bench hoping to return it, but when I opened it to find an ID, I realized it was full of stolen credit cards. | Lifestyle & Leisure | Daily_Hassles | angry | negative | normal | consistent | male | 1,043.5188 | normal | 0.0742 | high | 0.1271 | normal | rising | [
"park",
"bench"
] | The speaker is reporting an upsetting discovery after trying to do the right thing — they sound morally outraged and are likely both venting and checking whether this reaction and next steps are acceptable. This utterance functions as a request for a witness who will both acknowledge the injustice and help figure out w... | They seem to need validation that their impulse to return the wallet was the right one and permission to be angry about finding stolen cards; beneath that is also a practical need for clarity and reassurance about responsibility and safety (e.g., will they be blamed or put at risk) suggested by the contrast between 'ho... | First, they need their indignation and confusion to be named and accepted without judgment so they feel heard; immediately after that they need clear, nonjudgmental information and simple options for safe next steps (who to contact, how to document what they found) so they can act with confidence. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"information",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"future_oriented_savoring",
"interpretation"
] | Avoid lecturing, moralizing, or minimizing their anger (e.g., saying they overreacted or should have done something else), do not rush into complex psychological interpretations, and do not shift focus with long personal anecdotes. Keep responses calm, nonjudgmental, and practically oriented. | |
0797d6a7-9c19-5377-b399-ca88ed731b79 | Why is it that even the smallest things seem to take up so much of my time? | Lifestyle & Leisure | Daily_Hassles | angry | negative | normal | consistent | male | 1,275.7993 | high | 0.0863 | high | 0.1554 | normal | falling | [
"smallest",
"time?"
] | This sounds like a frustrated vent: the speaker is naming how tiny interruptions keep piling up and eating their time and is likely checking whether the listener will acknowledge how draining that feels. They are testing for a responsive, validating listener rather than a quick fix or lecture. | Beneath the question is a need to have that ongoing annoyance recognized and permitted — they want someone to confirm that it’s reasonable to feel worn down by constant small hassles and to gain a sense of regained control or relief from the accumulation of interruptions. | Right now they most need their frustration to be heard and validated (a calm naming of how unfair and exhausting this is); only after that should any brief, practical explanations or gentle, optional steps be offered to help reduce those recurring small disruptions. | [
"approval_and_reassurance",
"restatement",
"information"
] | [
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Avoid minimizing or dismissing the frustration, lecturing about time management, rushing into long lists of fixes, moralizing about priorities, or using upbeat platitudes that erase the annoyance. Do not shift focus by sharing long personal stories or assume they have bandwidth for major reorganizing right now. | |
6d07e252-a057-5337-a0df-54e1e1919d3f | I was wiping the counter for the third time today, and that's when it hit me—my mind had completely zoned out. | Lifestyle & Leisure | Daily_Hassles | angry | negative | normal | consistent | male | 1,432.3833 | high | 0.0874 | high | 0.1388 | normal | rising | [
"counter",
"hit",
"mind",
"zoned",
"out."
] | The speaker is venting a small but sharp moment of irritation and mental blankness while doing repetitive chores, signaling both annoyance and cognitive fatigue. This line feels like a test to see if someone will notice and validate that their frustration and zoning out are real and understandable. | Beneath the remark they seem to want simple recognition that getting mentally 'zoned out' during tedious, repeated tasks is understandable and not a personal failing. The repetition ('third time') plus the frustrated delivery suggests they also need permission to be tired and to have their annoyance taken seriously. | Right now they most need their frustration and exhaustion to be named and accepted without judgment; once that feeling is contained, a gentle, optional check-in about whether they're just bored, tired, or overwhelmed would be appropriate. Pushing solutions or minimizing the feeling would likely break trust at this mome... | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"future_oriented_savoring",
"strength_spotlighting",
"information"
] | Avoid lecturing, quick fixes, or moralizing about productivity (e.g., telling them to ‘just stop’ or ‘be more disciplined’). Do not minimize the feeling with platitudes, rush into problem-solving, make light of their frustration, or shift focus to the helper's own experiences. | |
8152c161-f64a-569e-92a5-2df79afd5fd2 | My landlord 'fixed' the leaky faucet with duct tape. Now I have a free, avant-garde metronome in my kitchen. | Lifestyle & Leisure | Daily_Hassles | angry | negative | normal | consistent | male | 1,563.2015 | high | 0.0732 | high | 0.1699 | normal | falling | [
"'fixed'",
"faucet"
] | This is a venting remark that uses sarcastic humor to signal real irritation about a sloppy repair; the user is checking whether someone will share their frustration and treat the situation as legitimate rather than brushing it off. The line functions as both a complaint and a test of whether their feelings will be hea... | Beneath the joke they seem to want recognition that the landlord’s fix is unacceptable and a sense that their frustration is justified and taken seriously. They may also be quietly looking for a simple, practical path forward — but only after their annoyance is acknowledged. | They first need their frustration to be named and accepted so they don’t feel dismissed; after that, a brief offer of concrete, optional next steps (documenting the issue, requesting a proper repair, or short-term fixes) would be helpful if they want it. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"interpretation"
] | Do not minimize or laugh off the complaint, rush into fix-it solutions before validating the feeling, moralize about tenants’ responsibilities, or respond with long personal anecdotes. Avoid overly cheerful or congratulatory tones that would undercut the user’s obvious annoyance. | |
392b336f-0222-5f19-a584-c4f885c82688 | My coworker kept stopping me to discuss weekend plans while I was rushing through the store. | Lifestyle & Leisure | Daily_Hassles | angry | negative | normal | consistent | male | 1,494.4114 | high | 0.0962 | high | 0.116 | normal | rising | [
"rushing",
"through",
"the",
"store."
] | This utterance is a short vent about being interrupted while trying to move quickly through a store; the speaker is expressing immediate irritation and is likely checking whether someone will acknowledge that their time and focus were disrespected. | They appear to want their frustration and time pressure recognized and legitimized — to hear that it’s reasonable to be annoyed when small talk repeatedly derails a task — and, secondarily, a simple way to protect their time in similar moments. | Right now they need a brief, accurate reflection of their annoyance and reassurance that their reaction makes sense; only after that should any concise, practical suggestions for setting a boundary or a quick phrase to use be offered. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"information"
] | Avoid minimizing or moralizing the anger (e.g., saying they 'shouldn't' be upset), long-winded analysis, unsolicited personal stories, sarcastic responses, or immediately jumping into detailed problem-solving before acknowledging the feeling. | |
89a3f30a-d616-5df1-ae4e-41df0cee7ae8 | Why does it have to be so much trouble to get a refund for such a small amount? | Lifestyle & Leisure | Finance | angry | negative | normal | consistent | female | 960.383 | normal | 0.0683 | high | 0.1147 | normal | falling | [
"such"
] | This is a brief vent about the frustration of having to spend time and energy to reclaim a very small amount; the speaker is testing whether their annoyance will be heard and taken seriously rather than dismissed. They're likely looking for someone to validate that the hassle feels disproportionate. | Beneath the complaint is a need for validation that their time and effort matter and that it’s reasonable to be annoyed when small amounts trigger disproportionate bureaucracy. The sharpness of the question suggests they want permission to feel bothered rather than being told to shrug it off. | Right now they most need their frustration to be named and accepted so they feel understood; only after that should any brief, practical options for a less painful refund process be offered, and only if they ask for them. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure"
] | Do not minimize or moralize the feeling (for example, saying it’s 'not worth it' or 'get over it'), avoid immediate problem-solving or long instructions before validating, and don’t respond with cheerful platitudes or lengthy personal anecdotes that move attention away from their frustration. | |
45d3c6d1-5124-5cc1-acc5-6c4a452700a4 | The customer service representative kept insisting on additional fees until I argued for twenty minutes about the contract terms. | Lifestyle & Leisure | Finance | angry | negative | normal | consistent | female | 1,088.0999 | normal | 0.0679 | high | 0.0998 | normal | rising-falling | [] | You're reporting a recent frustrating interaction where a representative pressed for extra fees and you spent a long time pushing back; this sounds like venting and a test to see if someone will acknowledge how irritating and unfair that felt. You're likely checking whether it's reasonable to be upset after investing t... | Beneath the complaint is a need for recognition that their time and effort were valid and that being pressured for extra charges was unfair. They also likely want practical reassurance that pushing back was the right move and to know there are reasonable next steps if the fee claim continues. | Right now they primarily need their frustration and the effort they put in to be heard and legitimized; once that is accepted, a concise, practical suggestion about how to confirm or dispute the fee (or prevent it next time) would be welcome but should be optional and brief. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"interpretation",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Avoid minimizing or dismissing their anger, lecturing about how they should have acted, or rushing into long legalistic advice. Do not respond with sarcasm, moralizing, or long personal anecdotes — they need acknowledgement first and only brief, practical options after. | |
455c75b2-a30b-52df-85d4-529799f7194f | I finally got around to watching that show, and I have to say something about it. | Lifestyle & Leisure | Entertainment | angry | negative | normal | consistent | female | 1,019.4382 | normal | 0.075 | high | 0.1155 | normal | falling | [
"that",
"say"
] | They are opening a space to complain about the show and are primed to vent; the line reads like a cue to judge the content and see if the listener will endorse or contest that judgement. This utterance functions as both a test of the listener's alignment and an invitation to hear their critique. | Beneath the remark they seem to want permission to express frustration and have their disappointment acknowledged without being dismissed. The phrasing (“I have to say something about it”) suggests they’re looking for someone who will listen, validate their taste, and possibly commiserate. | Right now they need to be heard and have their negative reaction normalized before any analysis or counterargument. A brief restatement of their frustration and a warm, nonjudgmental invitation to elaborate will meet the immediate need. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"information",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"strength_spotlighting",
"future_oriented_savoring",
"interpretation"
] | Avoid arguing about the show, dismissing or minimizing their feelings, offering immediate fixes or unsolicited recommendations, or shifting the focus to your own anecdotes. Do not rush to reinterpret or cheerlead; prioritize validating and staying with their complaint. | |
6471749c-1cb3-5509-a712-ffaf08c7f4f9 | Why do I always feel like I have to choose between being independent and being accepted? | Health & Self-Growth | Identity | angry | negative | normal | consistent | male | 625.1351 | low | 0.0669 | high | 0.1181 | normal | falling | [] | The speaker is voicing frustrated exhaustion about a recurring inner conflict—feeling forced to choose between autonomy and belonging—and is likely testing whether it’s safe to admit that this tension is wearing them down. This feels like venting mixed with a request to be understood rather than an immediate request fo... | Beneath the irritation they seem to want permission to hold both needs at once: to be seen as someone who values independence while also wanting acceptance, and to have that tension acknowledged without being judged or pressured to 'pick a side.' | Right now they most need their frustration and the dilemma named and accepted (emotional containment/validation) before any suggestions; once felt heard, a gentle exploration of where the pressure comes from and small, agency-preserving options might be welcome. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"information",
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"future_oriented_savoring",
"strength_spotlighting"
] | Do not rush to fix the problem, lecture, moralize, or minimize the feeling by offering simplistic 'you should' advice or cheerful platitudes. Avoid providing technical explanations, unsolicited step-by-step guidance, or shifting focus onto the responder’s own experiences before the user feels understood. | |
6582173c-a04f-5392-9c19-7b191e6d1305 | I don’t know why it took me this long to see that I’ve actually done some good things. | Health & Self-Growth | Identity | angry | negative | normal | consistent | male | 756.4169 | normal | 0.0613 | high | 0.1506 | normal | falling | [
"good"
] | The speaker is expressing a mixed emotion: mild frustration with themselves for not recognizing their own accomplishments sooner, alongside a tentative pride. This line sounds like both a self-observation and a quiet request to have that discovery acknowledged and accepted. | They seem to want external recognition and permission to feel good about their achievements without feeling guilty for noticing late; the slight irritation in their tone suggests they also want that self-criticism named and held. In other words, they need someone to validate that it’s okay to arrive at this realization... | Right now they most need to be heard and have both the frustration and the emerging pride reflected back compassionately; once that containment is offered, gentle highlighting of specific strengths can help them truly own what they’ve done. Any response should prioritize validation over advice or analysis. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"strength_spotlighting",
"celebration_and_capitalization"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"information",
"self_disclosure"
] | Avoid lecturing or saying they 'should have' noticed sooner, minimizing their mixed feelings, rushing into problem-solving, or using overly cheerful platitudes that erase the frustration. Do not pivot to sharing the helper’s own stories or offering step-by-step fixes before validating their feelings. | |
c9dc17d8-446f-5d63-80ba-2f94282af0e3 | I catch myself saying one thing, but deep down, I’m not sure I truly mean it. | Health & Self-Growth | Identity | angry | negative | normal | consistent | male | 693.6476 | normal | 0.0678 | high | 0.1309 | normal | falling | [] | The speaker is admitting a mismatch between what they say and what they feel, sounding frustrated and self-questioning; this feels like a tentative, vulnerable moment where they are checking whether it’s safe to admit confusion about their own authenticity. They are likely looking to have that inner conflict witnessed ... | Beneath the statement is a need for acceptance of ambivalence and relief from self-judgment: the phrasing "I catch myself" plus the sharp tone suggests they want permission to be inconsistent and reassurance that struggling with meaning is understandable, not evidence of a flaw. | Right now they most need their experience to be accurately heard and normalized—someone to name the split between saying and meaning and validate the confusion and frustration—followed, only if they want it, by a gentle offer to explore when or why the split happens. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"strength_spotlighting",
"future_oriented_savoring",
"information"
] | Avoid lecturing, moralizing, quick fixes, or pushing immediate advice; do not minimize the feeling or jump to praising inconsistency as a ‘skill.’ Also avoid sharing personal stories that shift focus away from their experience or rushing them toward problem-solving before they feel contained. | |
95ec1d83-a566-5213-ac0b-79ba07696370 | The team assessment concluded I'm not a good listener. I don't know if they considered all the interactions properly. | Health & Self-Growth | Identity | angry | negative | normal | consistent | female | 877.1182 | normal | 0.0667 | high | 0.1041 | normal | rising-falling | [
"team",
"not",
"all",
"properly."
] | They are voicing anger and skepticism about a team evaluation and seem to be both venting and testing whether someone will take their concern about fairness seriously. This utterance functions as a tentative challenge to the assessment and a request for someone to listen and weigh in without dismissing them. | They appear to need two things at once: emotional validation for feeling upset and undermined by the judgment, and an ally to help evaluate whether the assessment was based on a complete, fair view of their behavior. The phrasing “I don't know if they considered all the interactions properly” signals a hope for help in... | Right now they most need their frustration and doubt to be reflected and accepted so they feel heard and not judged for pushing back; only after that should any gentle, optional exploration occur about what parts of the evaluation might have been incomplete or how to address it. Immediate solutions or critiques would l... | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure"
] | Do not minimize or dismiss their feelings, rush into problem-solving, lecture about interpersonal skills, or try to cheerlead with overly positive reassurances. Avoid assuming they are simply defensive or offering unsolicited personal stories that shift focus away from evaluating the fairness of the team's assessment. | |
bd582414-d816-58e6-ac00-437415768987 | I’ve been dealing with this for a while now, and it just doesn’t seem to be getting better. | Health & Self-Growth | Physical_Health | angry | negative | normal | consistent | female | 778.6982 | normal | 0.0837 | high | 0.0871 | normal | rising | [
"getting"
] | The speaker is venting about an ongoing physical problem and expressing growing frustration and discouragement; they seem to be checking whether someone will hear their exhaustion instead of immediately trying to fix it. | Beneath the words is a need for their chronic struggle and impatience to be acknowledged and legitimized — permission to feel worn down without being judged — and for a calm, steady listener who holds that frustration as understandable. | Right now they most need emotional containment: their frustration named and accepted and space to vent without being rushed into solutions. Only after that acceptance might a gentle, collaborative exploration of next steps feel safe. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"information",
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"strength_spotlighting",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Avoid minimizing, quick fixes, lecturing, platitudes or urging greater patience; do not shift focus by sharing long personal stories or immediately offering strategies — the user needs their frustration validated before any problem-solving is invited. | |
2581dc2e-9e11-5eff-9c91-d465c64cb51b | I have done everything the doctor suggested, but this fever just came back again today. | Health & Self-Growth | Physical_Health | angry | negative | normal | consistent | female | 809.3564 | normal | 0.0777 | high | 0.0963 | normal | falling | [
"everything",
"back",
"again"
] | This utterance sounds like a frustrated vent: the speaker followed medical advice but the fever returned, and they are checking whether the listener will acknowledge their effort and frustration rather than minimize it. | They seem to want their effort and distress recognized and to have permission to feel angry and exasperated without being judged; the sharp tone suggests they need someone to confirm that this recurrence is upsetting and understandable. | Right now they primarily need their frustration to be heard and validated—an explicit acknowledgment that it makes sense to be upset—before any troubleshooting or advice is offered; only after that should a gentle offer to explore next steps be made if they want it. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"information",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure"
] | Avoid lecturing, minimizing, or immediately offering solutions or medical facts; do not imply they did something wrong, rush them to calm down, or tell a long personal anecdote that shifts attention away from their feelings. | |
e65f3dae-17bd-53b3-979a-fdc58a6f8fcb | My partner insists we both follow a low-sodium diet, but the food lacks any real flavor. | Health & Self-Growth | Physical_Health | angry | negative | normal | consistent | female | 739.0775 | normal | 0.0934 | high | 0.1108 | normal | falling | [
"food",
"lacks",
"any"
] | This is a short vent: the speaker is angry and resentful about their partner insisting on a low-sodium diet because it has made meals taste bland. They are testing whether the listener will recognize the frustration and the loss of pleasure and autonomy around eating. | Beneath the complaint is a need for emotional permission to be annoyed and for that loss of everyday enjoyment to be acknowledged; they also likely want practical affirmation that flavor can be preserved without surrendering taste or agency in the relationship. | Right now they need their irritation and sense of being restricted to be named and accepted before any advice is offered; after that, a few concrete, respectful options for restoring flavor or negotiating the diet would be helpful if they want them. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"information"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization"
] | Avoid lecturing about why a low-sodium diet is necessary, minimizing or dismissing the anger, rushing into 'fix it' commands, moralizing about the partner, or using upbeat cheer that downplays the complaint. Don't shift the focus to the helper's own stories or push immediate confrontation tactics. | |
dd4b7ede-367c-561d-a4b7-6bc62d4cffa3 | I keep pushing myself to get things done, but it feels like I’m not moving forward. | Health & Self-Growth | Self-Growth | angry | negative | normal | consistent | female | 864.759 | normal | 0.0666 | high | 0.0928 | normal | rising | [
"pushing",
"not"
] | They are venting about feeling stuck despite sustained effort, sounding worn down and a bit sharp about the lack of forward movement. This utterance reads like a test to see if it’s safe to admit being exhausted and discouraged rather than performing competence. | Beneath the complaint is a need for recognition that their effort matters and permission to be tired and frustrated without being judged; they want their experience of stalled progress acknowledged and contained so they don't feel alone with it. | Right now they most need empathetic hearing and validation — someone to name the exhaustion and the unfairness of pushing without visible gains — before any advice or problem-solving is offered; a clear restatement and gentle acceptance will help them feel safe to explore next steps if they want to. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure"
] | Do not lecture, minimize, or rush into concrete solutions or productivity tips; avoid platitudes or telling them to ‘try harder.’ Steer clear of long personal anecdotes from the helper and any tone that implies their feelings are unjustified or overblown. | |
4ebf1889-97d9-5c99-8031-d744bcecee65 | I’ve been trying to make sense of things, but it feels like I’m not getting anywhere. | Health & Self-Growth | Self-Growth | angry | negative | normal | consistent | female | 659.0567 | low | 0.0923 | high | 0.1044 | normal | falling | [
"trying",
"getting",
"anywhere."
] | They are voicing frustration about feeling stuck after trying to make sense of things; this sounds like a moment of venting and a test to see if their disappointment and effort will be heard without judgment. The utterance functions more as seeking emotional containment and validation than asking for concrete steps rig... | Underneath the sentence is a need for recognition of the effort put in and permission to feel frustrated without being blamed; they want someone to acknowledge that plateauing or slow progress is hard and not to be dismissed. The phrasing “not getting anywhere” and the sharp tone suggest they’re also hoping for relief ... | Right now they most need their frustration to be named and accepted so they feel seen and less alone in this stall; once that containment is offered, a gentle, tentative reflection about what feels most stuck could be helpful, but only if invited. Immediate problem-solving or advice would likely feel premature until th... | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"information",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure"
] | Avoid lecturing, minimizing, or rushing to solutions; do not insist on steps or reframe quickly, and do not offer upbeat platitudes that undercut the frustration. Keep the focus on their experience rather than shifting to your own anecdotes or technical explanations. | |
cad18666-e793-5bb6-a041-5a8bb54dbc93 | The team implemented all the productivity hacks from the seminar, but our project timelines keep slipping. | Health & Self-Growth | Self-Growth | angry | negative | normal | consistent | female | 893.0306 | normal | 0.0779 | high | 0.099 | normal | falling | [
"all",
"productivity",
"keep",
"slipping."
] | The speaker is venting frustration: they followed recommended steps but are still seeing deadlines slip, and they seem to be testing whether someone will acknowledge that effort without dismissing their anger or blaming them. This utterance is doing both complaint and a quiet request for someone to make sense of the mi... | Underneath the frustration is a need for the team's effort to be recognized as meaningful and not ignored, plus a desire for a plausible reason why the fixes didn't work — either that something structural is blocking progress or that the chosen tactics were a poor fit for the situation. | Right now they most need their frustration to be named and validated so they feel heard and not blamed; once that's secured, a tentative, nonjudgmental exploration of possible reasons for the timeline slippage would be helpful, but only if offered gently and as an option. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"strength_spotlighting"
] | Avoid lecturing, quick fixes, moralizing, or cheerful platitudes that minimize the anger; do not rush into prescriptive 'do this next' steps or shift focus to the helper's own experiences. Keep responses grounded, specific to the situation, and nonjudgmental. | |
6b5e82ee-ecd0-5b89-a41e-c00e04c1087f | I looked at the trending list and saw people my age achieving things I haven't even started. | Society & Views | Trending_Topics | angry | negative | normal | consistent | female | 1,022.0742 | normal | 0.0669 | high | 0.112 | normal | falling | [
"my",
"age",
"haven't"
] | The speaker is venting after scanning trending topics and reacting with frustration and envy about peers' visible achievements; they seem to be testing whether it’s safe to admit feeling behind and to have that disappointment acknowledged. | Beneath the statement is a need for empathic acknowledgment and permission to feel disappointed and envious without being judged; the angry tone and the phrase “haven’t even started” suggest self-criticism and a hope for someone to hold that frustration as understandable. | Right now they most need to have their feeling named and accepted—steady, nonjudgmental listening and normalization of the upset—before any suggestions or problem-solving are offered; once contained, a tentative exploration of what feels most painful or what small next step they'd want could follow if they’re open to i... | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"strength_spotlighting",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Avoid lecturing, quick fixes, platitudes (e.g., 'everyone moves at their own pace') or minimizing their feelings; do not rush into problem-solving, moralizing, or unsolicited cheerleading, and refrain from sharing long personal anecdotes that shift focus away from their experience. | |
e9a871df-a8e2-5950-9fd2-76b187d6feab | I am looking at these trending headlines and realizing that nothing is as simple as right or wrong anymore. | Society & Views | Trending_Topics | angry | negative | normal | consistent | female | 874.5919 | normal | 0.0635 | high | 0.101 | normal | falling | [
"nothing"
] | They are venting about how headlines are making them see issues as morally messy, using a sharp tone that tests whether it's safe to express frustration and confusion about how topics are being covered. This feels like a moment of disillusionment where they want someone to witness the complexity without simplifying it ... | Beneath the remark there seems to be a need for validation that their frustration and confusion are reasonable, and for a steady listener who will acknowledge the moral ambiguity they're noticing rather than rushing to tidy it. They may also be seeking a sounding board to help sort through why the coverage feels unfair... | Right now they most need their reaction to be named and accepted — a calm reflection that their concern about oversimplified headlines makes sense — before any analysis or advice. Once contained, a gentle, tentative exploration of what specifically feels most troubling would be welcome, not directive fixes. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure"
] | Avoid lecturing, moralizing, or trying to immediately fix their reaction by offering solutions or facts. Do not minimize or dismiss the frustration, rush to alternative perspectives, overwhelm with analysis, or respond with personal anecdotes that shift focus away from their experience. | |
6539094e-0710-5530-a102-58bbbc31414b | My neighbor’s landlord keeps raising rent illegally, but every time she tries to report it, the housing office dismisses her. How is this fair? | Society & Views | Trending_Topics | angry | negative | normal | consistent | female | 946.4669 | normal | 0.0637 | high | 0.1086 | normal | rising | [
"illegally,",
"How"
] | The speaker is venting strong frustration about a repeated injustice and is testing whether someone will acknowledge how unfair and futile the reporting process feels; beneath the anger there is also a sense of helplessness about why the housing office keeps dismissing her neighbor. They seem to be both seeking validat... | They appear to need their outrage about the unfair treatment to be witnessed and validated so it doesn't feel isolated, and they also want practical clarity or options — a sense that the situation could be understood or acted on rather than ignored. The angry tone and the rhetorical 'How is this fair?' suggest they wan... | Right now they most need their anger and powerlessness to be named and accepted without minimization; once that containment is established, they need clear, practical information or concrete next steps they could consider if they want to help or support their neighbor. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"information",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Do not lecture, minimize, or tell the person to 'calm down'; avoid moralizing the landlord or offering cheerleading positivity. Don't push detailed legalese or force immediate solutions before the user has had their feelings acknowledged, and avoid sharing lengthy personal anecdotes that shift focus away from the user'... | |
861bb714-bebf-5ee8-afa2-b45497e52ee7 | The company cut overtime pay to reduce costs, but now they’re hiring twice as many contractors. | Society & Views | Trending_Topics | angry | negative | normal | consistent | female | 1,150.2555 | high | 0.0945 | high | 0.0857 | normal | rising-falling | [
"now",
"twice",
"contractors."
] | The speaker is venting about a company decision that feels hypocritical and unfair, naming a contradiction (cut overtime pay while hiring more contractors) to express anger and moral outrage and to see if that feeling will be met. They are likely testing whether the listener will acknowledge the injustice rather than d... | Beneath the sharp remark is a need for the speaker’s sense of unfairness and frustration to be witnessed and validated — they want someone to recognize the contradiction and to legitimize feeling upset about being shortchanged or exploited. The wording and tone suggest they also want moral support or solidarity rather ... | Right now they most need their anger and the injustice they named to be heard and accepted without minimization; a clear restatement and empathetic affirmation would meet that need. Only after feeling contained might they be open to interpretations about motivation or to practical next steps. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"information"
] | Do not lecture, downplay, or rush to problem-solving; avoid offering immediate advice, cheerful reframing, or moralizing about company finances. Refrain from sharing long personal anecdotes or dumping facts that could come across as minimizing their frustration — focus on validation and careful, tentative meaning-makin... | |
cd60a303-8796-594b-926e-1c08f3c9d251 | My friend keeps sharing articles about overnight success. I wonder why those narratives are so common. | Society & Views | Trending_Topics | angry | negative | normal | consistent | male | 1,051.2054 | normal | 0.0728 | high | 0.1384 | normal | rising-falling | [
"success.",
"common."
] | They’re expressing irritation about a recurring cultural story their friend keeps sharing and sounding for a listener who will both validate that annoyance and help make sense of the pattern. This feels like a short vent paired with genuine curiosity — they want to be heard and to understand why those narratives are so... | They seem to want permission to be skeptical and frustrated without being dismissed, and they also want a clearer explanation for the mismatch between how success is portrayed and how it actually happens — to make sense of why these stories keep appearing and feel less personally annoyed by them. | Right now they most need their frustration to be named and normalized so they feel understood; once that emotional containment is in place, they likely want a clear, non-judgmental account of the social and media forces (e.g., survivorship bias, platform incentives) that make 'overnight success' stories common. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation",
"information"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"strength_spotlighting",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Avoid minimizing or dismissing the anger, immediately lecturing about how the user should respond to their friend, offering glib platitudes about 'just keep working,' or shifting focus by over-sharing personal anecdotes. Don't rush into tactical advice until the user's feelings are acknowledged. | |
55ea48df-6da3-5d33-812d-9f3f1c7675b5 | During a live town hall stream, the host moved on quickly after a question about the missing persons case. Can you suggest a way to bring attention back to it? | Society & Views | Trending_Topics | angry | negative | normal | consistent | female | 1,143.1215 | normal | 0.0483 | high | 0.0862 | normal | expressive | [
"live",
"quickly"
] | The speaker is expressing sharp frustration at being brushed off during a public forum and is both venting and asking for practical help to redirect attention to a missing-persons question. This utterance functions as a test for whether the listener will validate the upset and offer concrete, usable tactics. | Beneath the anger is a need for public acknowledgment and accountability: the user wants their concern to be taken seriously and to regain some control over the conversation so the missing persons case isn't quietly sidelined. The tone suggests they also want someone to recognize that being brushed off is unfair before... | Right now they most need their frustration to be named and accepted, and then a few concise, realistic options they can use immediately to bring the topic back into the stream without escalating into hostility. Practical, tactical steps presented after brief validation will meet both the emotional and instrumental need... | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"future_oriented_savoring",
"strength_spotlighting"
] | Avoid minimizing or lecturing (e.g., 'calm down' or telling them they overreacted), offering long theoretical analyses before acknowledging the anger, moralizing about proper behavior, or sharing lengthy personal anecdotes. Do not rush to grand solutions without first validating the experience and giving short, actiona... | |
0712a22e-679c-52bf-98b3-dfcaa540dd69 | I keep telling myself I’ll start being kinder to me, but then I don’t follow through. | Society & Views | Views & Insights | angry | negative | normal | consistent | female | 1,111.9119 | normal | 0.0825 | high | 0.1015 | normal | expressive | [
"keep",
"don't",
"follow",
"through."
] | The speaker is venting frustration at themselves for repeatedly failing to act on a goal to be kinder, testing whether it's safe to admit this recurring disappointment and irritation. The tone communicates anger turned inward — they're blaming themselves and seem worn down by the pattern. | They appear to need understanding and permission to feel frustrated without additional shame — someone to acknowledge how exhausting it is to intend change and then fall short. Beneath the self-criticism is a desire for a nonjudgmental space that makes it easier to notice what's actually getting in the way of follow-th... | Right now they most need their frustration and self-blame to be named and accepted so it stops feeling isolating; once that containment is in place, a gentle, curiosity-based prompt about specific barriers or small next steps might be welcome, but only if they signal readiness. | [
"approval_and_reassurance",
"restatement",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"information",
"strength_spotlighting",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Avoid lecturing, moralizing, or offering quick fixes like 'just do it' or cheerleading that brushes past the anger. Don't minimize or reframe their feelings too fast, pressure them into solutions, or shift focus to the helper's experiences; keep responses brief, grounded, and nonjudgmental until they invite problem-sol... | |
bb5b9aef-5f77-5d88-8270-8e87d8e49ca8 | My supervisor told me to ignore the regulations to meet deadlines. Now I have to choose between compliance and keeping my team employed. | Society & Views | Views & Insights | angry | negative | normal | consistent | female | 961.1847 | normal | 0.0426 | normal | 0.0847 | normal | rising-falling | [
"supervisor",
"ignore",
"the",
"regulations",
"team"
] | The speaker is voicing a moral dilemma under pressure: they were told by a supervisor to break rules and now feel torn between doing the right thing and protecting their team's livelihoods. This feels like a vent and a test to see whether it's safe to bring anger and conflict into the conversation. | Beneath the words is a need for moral legitimacy and practical safety: they want their anger and conflicted loyalty acknowledged, permission to feel torn without being judged, and a nonthreatening space to explore options that won't put their team at unnecessary risk. | They most urgently need their distress and the ethical tension to be heard and validated before any advice is offered; only after that containment should the conversation gently move toward clarifying options or safeguards that respect both rules and staff well‑being. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Avoid lecturing, moralizing, or rushing to problem‑solve; do not minimize their fear for the team's livelihood or push blunt directives (e.g., 'just report them' or 'just follow rules') without first acknowledging the personal and practical stakes, and avoid shifting focus to the responder's own experiences. | |
db7ac126-34f3-57af-82d9-f6dd1fe0cf1c | There’s this person I know who’s always doing favors for everyone, but it feels like they’re just being used all the time. | Society & Views | Others’ Stories | angry | negative | normal | consistent | male | 803.8959 | normal | 0.0309 | normal | 0.1589 | normal | rising-falling | [
"know",
"always",
"everyone,",
"feels",
"used"
] | The user is venting about someone who keeps doing favors and is expressing clear frustration and indignation about that person being taken advantage of; they seem to be checking whether the listener will acknowledge the unfairness and may be open to either validation or a gentle conversation about next steps. | Beneath the statement is a need for their upset to be seen as legitimate and for an ally’s perspective confirming that the situation is unfair; they may also be quietly hoping for a safe, nonjudgmental sounding board about how to help or protect the person who’s being used. | Right now they most need their frustration to be named and accepted—someone to reflect back the unfairness and validate that their reaction makes sense—before any advice is offered; after that, a tentative interpretation or options for how to respond would be helpful if they ask for it. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"future_oriented_savoring",
"strength_spotlighting",
"information"
] | Do not lecture, moralize, minimize, or rush to fix the problem; avoid telling them to 'calm down,' shifting the focus to the helper's own anecdotes, or offering prescriptive steps before the user’s feelings are acknowledged and accepted. | |
f48425fd-7f4d-5d20-a1db-d98bf375582e | My coworker Dylan rarely takes on tasks, yet he keeps getting recognized. Can we talk through what might be going on? | Society & Views | Others’ Stories | angry | negative | normal | consistent | male | 951.9213 | normal | 0.0817 | high | 0.12 | normal | rising | [
"he",
"recognized.",
"talk",
"might"
] | The user is venting frustration about a perceived workplace injustice and is inviting a calm, collaborative exploration of possible reasons behind their coworker’s recognition. This utterance tests whether the listener will both validate the feeling and help make sense of the situation. | They seem to want their irritation acknowledged as reasonable and safe to express, plus a coherent set of nonjudgmental explanations for why Dylan might be rewarded despite doing little — so they can regain a sense of fairness and decide what, if anything, to do next. | Right now they most need to be heard and have their frustration legitimized; after that, they want thoughtful hypotheses about organizational or interpersonal dynamics (and optional, practical options) rather than being rushed into confrontation or blamed for feeling upset. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation",
"information"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"strength_spotlighting",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Avoid minimizing or lecturing, offering quick-step confrontation plans, moralizing about Dylan, or using upbeat platitudes that dismiss the anger. Do not shift focus by over-sharing personal anecdotes or press the user into choosing a specific course of action before they feel understood. | |
c5d59498-bad5-567c-bc0f-854e6b4dcd3b | The library closed early without notice, and I couldn’t access the materials I needed for my thesis. | Career & Academics | Academics | angry | negative | normal | consistent | male | 1,010.2054 | normal | 0.096 | high | 0.0984 | normal | rising | [
"early",
"without",
"notice,",
"couldn't",
"my",
"thesis."
] | The speaker is venting frustration about an unexpected obstacle that blocked their progress on an important thesis task and is likely checking whether their frustration is understandable and whether help is available. This feels like a combination of anger and worry about lost time and resources. | Beneath the complaint is a need for the disruption to be acknowledged as unfair and consequential, and for reassurance that this setback won’t be dismissed or leave them stranded. They also likely want practical options to recover momentum so the thesis doesn't fall further behind. | Right now they need their frustration to be heard and validated first, then a calm, practical sense of what can be done next (short, concrete options or next steps) so they can regain control and reduce the worry about delays. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"interpretation",
"information"
] | Avoid minimizing or dismissing their anger, lecturing about time management, offering platitudes like "it'll be fine" without specifics, or immediately launching into long technical explanations or resources. Do not turn the reply into the helper's own stories or moralizing about preparedness; keep the focus on validat... | |
753a3717-7ecf-5446-bcc1-46d3346e05ec | My study group spends half the break time deciding what to focus on. We barely get anything done. | Career & Academics | Academics | angry | negative | normal | consistent | male | 917.143 | normal | 0.0842 | high | 0.1013 | normal | rising | [
"half",
"the",
"break",
"time",
"what",
"barely",
"done."
] | This is a short, frustrated vent: the speaker is calling out that group decision-making eats up their limited break time and leaves them feeling like nothing gets done. They appear to be checking whether their annoyance will be taken seriously and whether practical help is available. | Underneath the irritation is a desire for their time to be respected and for the group to operate with clearer, shared structure; they want their experience of wasted time validated and to regain a sense of control over short study periods. | First, they need their frustration to be heard and normalized so they feel understood; once that containment is established, they likely want concise, practical ideas they can try to make break-time more focused (e.g., quick agenda, timekeeper, or roles). | [
"approval_and_reassurance",
"restatement",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"interpretation"
] | Avoid minimizing their annoyance, lecturing about teamwork, or rushing into long lists of abstract solutions. Do not respond with upbeat cheerleading or personal stories that shift focus away from their concern; keep validation front-loaded and any suggestions short, optional, and practical. | |
f70fd00b-7a19-5a04-8bcc-c82e8a476bff | The required textbook for my course changed halfway through the semester. Now I have to buy new materials. | Career & Academics | Academics | angry | negative | normal | consistent | male | 1,070.9259 | normal | 0.0911 | high | 0.1116 | normal | rising | [
"course",
"halfway",
"through",
"semester.",
"Now",
"new",
"materials."
] | They are venting immediate frustration about an inconvenient, unfair-sounding change that created unexpected cost and disruption mid-semester; this utterance is testing whether their frustration will be heard and whether any practical options exist. | Beneath the annoyed tone is a need for acknowledgment that this change is unreasonable and burdensome, plus a desire to regain some control—either through validation that their frustration is legitimate or through concrete avenues to avoid or lessen the new expense. | Right now they most need their annoyance to be named and accepted so they feel seen and not dismissed; once that containment is established, they likely want clear, practical options (e.g., ways to access the material without buying new, or how to ask for accommodations or refunds). | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Avoid minimizing or lecturing (e.g., saying it could be worse or they should have planned better), rushing into problem-solving before validating, moralizing about spending choices, or offering your own long personal anecdotes. Keep responses calm, concrete, and focused on the user's experience and options. | |
93dc4e35-7fa4-5ae2-b298-7c7ba52c1b56 | My lab partner is on the hockey team and has less time to contribute to our project now. | Career & Academics | Academics | angry | negative | normal | consistent | male | 895.688 | normal | 0.0674 | high | 0.101 | normal | rising-falling | [
"hockey",
"time"
] | The speaker is venting frustration about an uneven distribution of work after their lab partner’s hockey commitments reduced that partner’s availability; this feels like a test to see if someone else will acknowledge the unfairness and back them up. The remark functions as both a complaint and an implicit request for v... | Beneath the statement is a need to have their extra effort and the imbalance recognized and taken seriously, plus practical relief—either a way to share the load fairly or permission to set boundaries so their own grade or time isn’t compromised. | Right now they most need to have their frustration named and validated so it’s safe to be annoyed without being judged; once that containment is offered, a few clear, workable options for addressing the unequal contribution (how to talk to the partner or involve the instructor) would be useful. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Avoid minimizing or moralizing the user’s feelings (e.g., saying they should just be understanding of extracurriculars), lecturing about teamwork, rushing into problem-solving before validation, offering cheerfully upbeat platitudes, or shifting focus with long personal anecdotes; keep responses concise, respectful, an... | |
d36b9e9a-b47e-585a-bb5f-697fd2356300 | The professor barely covers the basics in class and expects us to learn the advanced material entirely on our own. I am paying full tuition, but it feels like I am just teaching myself the whole course. | Career & Academics | Academics | angry | negative | normal | consistent | male | 1,021.3972 | normal | 0.0603 | high | 0.0922 | normal | rising-falling | [
"barely",
"us",
"entirely",
"am"
] | The user is venting strong frustration about feeling short-changed by a course where they’re doing most of the learning themselves; they’re testing whether someone will acknowledge that this is unfair and take their complaint seriously. This message functions primarily as an expression of anger and a request for valida... | Beneath the anger there is a desire for their effort and money to be recognized as legitimate and for someone to acknowledge that the situation is unfair; they also likely want practical options or permission to push back (e.g., how to raise the issue or get support) but only after their frustration is accepted. | Right now they need their frustration and sense of being short-changed to be named and validated so they feel heard and not dismissed; once that safety is established, they would likely welcome clear, concrete steps they could take (talking to the professor, department, or seeking extra resources). | [
"approval_and_reassurance",
"restatement",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"interpretation",
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Do not lecture, minimize, or tell them to simply ‘work harder’ or ‘be grateful’; avoid rushing into solutions before acknowledging their anger. Steer clear of long personal anecdotes, moralizing language, or brush-off reassurances that invalidate their complaint about fairness. | |
bb9b7519-561b-57dc-bb28-6183b0c65c00 | I turned down a great job offer to pursue this master's degree, and now I realize the classes are outdated and irrelevant. | Career & Academics | Academics | angry | negative | normal | consistent | male | 838.3784 | normal | 0.0778 | high | 0.1156 | normal | rising | [
"great",
"job",
"now",
"outdated",
"irrelevant."
] | The speaker is venting strong regret and anger after realizing a costly trade-off—they gave up a good job for a degree that now feels irrelevant. This line feels like a test to see if someone will acknowledge the loss and the unfairness of the situation rather than immediately fix it. | They appear to need their sacrifice and frustration to be recognized and legitimized—permission to feel angry and disappointed about what may feel like wasted time and opportunity. Beneath the anger is likely a need for containment and reassurance that these feelings make sense given what they gave up. | Right now they most need to have the hurt and anger named and validated without being rushed into solutions; once they feel heard, a gentle, optional invitation to talk through next steps or salvage options could follow if they want it. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"information",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Avoid lecturing, blaming, or implying they made a foolish choice; do not minimize with upbeat reassurances or rush into problem-solving or long lists of options. Refrain from sharing your own stories, cheerful spin, or heavy factual corrections until their anger and regret are fully acknowledged. | |
dc021efa-9e9a-5dc6-8876-5d1ac110c112 | My manager suggested I learn data analysis tools, but I’m still handling the same tasks as before. | Career & Academics | Career | angry | negative | normal | consistent | male | 1,006.1603 | normal | 0.0664 | high | 0.1185 | normal | rising | [
"data",
"same"
] | The user is venting frustration about a workplace mismatch: their manager suggested upskilling but their day-to-day responsibilities haven't changed. They seem to be testing whether it's safe to express irritation and expecting someone to acknowledge the unfairness they feel. | Beneath the complaint is a need to have their effort and time respected — they want acknowledgment that learning new skills should lead to meaningful change (recognition, role growth, or concrete support) rather than empty suggestions. The sharp tone suggests they also need clarity and agency so they aren't stuck doing... | Right now they most need to have their frustration heard and validated — someone to name the mismatch and the unfairness so it feels legitimate. After that, they may be open to a tentative interpretation of why the manager responded that way and gentle exploration of options, but only once the emotional tone is contain... | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"information",
"strength_spotlighting",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Avoid minimizing their anger, rushing into advice, or offering upbeat platitudes that suggest they should be grateful or patient. Do not lecture about long-term career strategy, force quick solutions, or shift focus by over-sharing your own experiences; first prioritize acknowledgment and clear, nonjudgmental listening... | |
6de85967-f7fa-569a-b5d7-f0fe01f0f411 | Spent six months learning coding through free modules, but every job post wants a CS degree. My neighbor Greg got hired straight from MIT—he can’t even fix a basic syntax error! | Career & Academics | Career | angry | negative | normal | consistent | male | 1,045.3468 | normal | 0.0683 | high | 0.111 | normal | rising | [
"six",
"months",
"learning",
"free",
"CS",
"straight"
] | They're venting about feeling blocked by hiring practices that prioritize formal degrees over demonstrated effort and skill, and they use a neighbor’s easy hire as a focal point for their anger. The message is testing whether their frustration and the unfairness of the system will be heard and taken seriously. | They appear to need their hard work and progress to be acknowledged and validated, and they want permission to feel angry about a system that feels arbitrary and unfair. Beneath the comparison to Greg is a need to be seen as competent and not dismissed because they took a nontraditional path. | Right now they most need their frustration and sense of injustice named and accepted before any advice is offered; once those feelings are contained, a gentle, optional shift toward practical next steps would be acceptable. The immediate priority is emotional containment and validation that their effort matters even if... | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure"
] | Avoid minimizing or dismissing the anger, lecturing about how they should have planned differently, quick fixes or unsolicited step-by-step job tips, and upbeat platitudes that downplay unfairness. Don't pivot the conversation toward the helper's experiences or turn this into a debate about individual merit rather than... | |
c67ec505-b16f-5753-b4e5-a867dd608d4d | My colleague and I started in the same role at the same time, but they were promoted this cycle. | Career & Academics | Career | angry | negative | normal | consistent | male | 824.6619 | normal | 0.0678 | high | 0.1055 | normal | expressive | [
"same",
"same",
"promoted"
] | This utterance is a brief vent about a perceived unfair outcome—they're stating a fact (same start date) while sounding angry and testing whether it's safe to show frustration about being passed over. It's functioning as an opening request for validation and emotional containment rather than a detailed problem-solving ... | Beneath the anger is a need to have their effort and contribution acknowledged and for permission to feel upset without being judged; they likely also want an honest appraisal of whether their reaction is reasonable and a companion who will hold the frustration with them. | Right now they primarily need their hurt and resentment to be named and accepted so they feel heard; only after that should any exploration of causes or next steps be offered, and even then gently and tentatively. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"future_oriented_savoring",
"information"
] | Avoid minimizing, lecturing, moralizing, or immediately offering solutions (e.g., 'what you should do is...') and don't respond with forced positivity or comparisons that invalidate the resentment. Refrain from over-sharing personal anecdotes that shift focus away from their feelings. | |
3fcb58e1-5650-56aa-be36-0ee3cd1b5907 | I've spent the last year acquiring new certifications and my performance metrics have doubled. Yet, during my review, my role and compensation remain unchanged. | Career & Academics | Career | angry | negative | normal | consistent | male | 899.4653 | normal | 0.0757 | high | 0.0878 | normal | rising | [
"new",
"doubled."
] | The user is venting about feeling overlooked after a year of measurable effort and achievement; they sound frustrated and are testing whether someone will acknowledge that the work they did should have produced a clearer payoff. This utterance functions as a request to be seen and taken seriously more than as a detaile... | Beneath the complaint is a need for recognition that their time and skill growth are real and deserving of corresponding status or pay, and for a safe space to express frustration without being told to 'move on.' The specific mention of doubled metrics but unchanged role signals they want an explanation that connects e... | Right now they most need their experience and disappointment to be accurately reflected and validated so the frustration is contained; only after that should a gentle, optional exploration of possible explanations or next steps be offered. They need permission to feel angry and evidence that their accomplishments matte... | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"future_oriented_savoring",
"information"
] | Avoid minimizing the anger, offering quick fixes or negotiation scripts, lecturing about professional expectations, or applying upbeat celebration that invalidates the frustration. Do not rush into detailed advice or share lengthy personal anecdotes; hold space for the user to confirm they want practical next steps fir... | |
714dfca5-bacc-5abf-9008-f2515d7f86b9 | My cousin Mark has started calling my boss to advise me about promotions I should take. How can I shut this down firmly and make it clear my work choices are mine? | Interpersonal_Relationships | Family_Relations | disgust_or_contempt | negative | normal | consistent | male | 1,015.5134 | normal | 0.0576 | high | 0.1106 | normal | rising | [
"advise"
] | You're upset and boundary-breached: you describe someone from your family repeatedly intervening in your professional life and you're asking for a way to stop it decisively. This message is a mix of venting and a clear request for an assertive, practical solution. | Beneath the anger there seems to be a need to reclaim control over decisions that affect your career and to be treated with professional respect rather than managed by a relative. You also likely want reassurance that it's reasonable to set limits with family without causing an unnecessary conflict at work. | Right now you first need your frustration and the boundary violation named and accepted; once that's contained, you need concrete, usable options — brief language you can use with your cousin and your boss and clear next steps to stop further interference so you can protect your autonomy and reputation. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"interpretation",
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization"
] | Do not minimize or dismiss their anger, lecture about family loyalty, or rush into abstract reframing. Avoid moralizing, offering cheerleading platitudes, oversharing your own stories, or pushing complex long-term therapy-style analysis before they have concrete ways to stop the calls. | |
4b8fdd94-7c8e-55ed-8d21-0c1f446a5b43 | Why does it feel so wrong to have to change what I want, just because we want different levels of closeness? | Interpersonal_Relationships | Romance_Relations | disgust_or_contempt | negative | normal | consistent | male | 993.3157 | normal | 0.0406 | normal | 0.1001 | normal | falling | [] | The speaker is venting frustration and moral discomfort about feeling forced to change their own desires to match a partner’s different closeness needs; this is also a gentle test to see if someone will acknowledge and respect that upset rather than demand compromise immediately. | Beneath the anger and disgust is a need for respect for their autonomy and for permission to hold boundaries without being shamed; they want their desire to be close (or not) treated as legitimate and not something that must be traded away to keep the relationship. | Right now they most need their frustration and sense of unfairness to be named and validated so it feels safe to keep exploring the situation; only after that should any gentle, optional curiosity about what would feel tolerable or what values are non-negotiable be introduced. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"future_oriented_savoring",
"strength_spotlighting"
] | Do not lecture, moralize, or insist they 'should' compromise; avoid minimizing their disgust or quickly offering fix-it steps. Refrain from cheerful platitudes, unsolicited personal anecdotes, or pushing problem-solving before the person feels heard and respected. | |
45441d1f-6148-5945-b351-078347099081 | My friend Aaron wants our trip built only around popular check-in lists; how do people usually think about that plan? | Lifestyle & Leisure | Lifestyle | disgust_or_contempt | negative | normal | consistent | female | 1,480.047 | high | 0.0668 | high | 0.0941 | normal | falling | [
"My",
"friend",
"that"
] | You're expressing dry irritation and mild contempt about a friend's plan to build the trip around popular 'check-in' spots and seem to be testing whether that reaction is typical and acceptable. This utterance functions as a vent and a check for social consensus — you want someone to hear and mirror your judgment befor... | Beneath the annoyance there's a need for validation of your taste and for social proof — you want reassurance that it's reasonable to find list-driven travel shallow, and you may be looking for a clearer sense of how others usually feel so you can decide whether to push back or go along. | Right now you most need your frustration named and accepted, then a concise, nonjudgmental sense of common attitudes toward 'check-in' tourism; only after that, if you want, gentle options for how to address Aaron without escalating things. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"information"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"strength_spotlighting",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Avoid lecturing, moralizing, or shaming Aaron or the user; do not minimize or dismiss the user's irritation, rush into problem-solving, offer forced positivity, or shift the focus with the helper's own stories. Keep responses concise, nonjudgmental, and focused on acknowledging feelings and supplying neutral social per... | |
ca2fbe53-e585-566f-a033-1032efa68d89 | I flick on the kitchen light and three roaches dart behind the toaster, while my two kids’ bunk beds practically butt up against the stove because there’s nowhere else to put them. The building manager, Tasha, shrugged and handed me a rent increase notice—what am I supposed to do when I can’t even keep the place clean ... | Lifestyle & Leisure | Daily_Hassles | disgust_or_contempt | negative | normal | consistent | female | 1,649.7565 | high | 0.094 | high | 0.1057 | normal | expressive | [
"toaster,",
"while"
] | The speaker is venting urgent frustration and shame about unsafe, cramped living conditions and an unresponsive manager; they're testing whether it's safe to express anger and to ask for practical help. The line "what am I supposed to do" functions as both a plea for options and a request to have their distress recogni... | Beneath the anger and disgust is a need to have their struggle and dignity acknowledged without judgment, and to regain some sense of agency or concrete options for making their home safe and livable. Cues like the roaches, the manager's shrug, and the rent increase point to feeling powerless and worried about protecti... | Right now they most need their shame and frustration to be named and accepted so they don't feel blamed or alone; only after that should any practical suggestions be offered, and those should be brief, concrete, and offered as choices rather than commands. A next response should prioritize containment and validation, w... | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"information",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Avoid lecturing, implying the problem is the speaker's fault, minimizing their disgust or shame, or rushing straight to solutions. Do not use upbeat positivity, moralizing language, or long personal stories; offer practical options only after validating and inviting that shift. | |
10f15cbc-8504-5cc2-ad05-eab1cf1e4d82 | I asked my roommate Priya about last month’s utilities reimbursement, and the room went quiet. How do I continue that conversation? | Lifestyle & Leisure | Finance | disgust_or_contempt | negative | normal | consistent | female | 1,435.0555 | high | 0.0483 | high | 0.1153 | normal | expressive | [
"asked",
"that"
] | You’re describing a brief, awkward moment where asking about money caused the room to go quiet, and you’re checking whether to push the topic or let it drop. This feels like a small social test — you want to resolve the practical issue but also want to know if it’s safe to bring it up without escalating. | Beneath the question about reimbursement there’s a need to be respected and taken seriously rather than brushed off; the dry, dismissive reaction likely left you feeling annoyed and uncertain about your relationship boundaries. You also want a low-conflict way to get clarity and payment without becoming the ‘difficult’... | Right now you most need your experience of being dismissed to be acknowledged and normalized, and then a few simple, low-escalation options or phrases you can use to reopen the conversation in a calm, boundary-respecting way. If you want, a short script and a fallback plan (what to do if silence happens again) would be... | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"interpretation"
] | Do not minimize or rush past the user’s frustration, lecture them about money etiquette, or push aggressive confrontation. Avoid long theoretical explanations or sharing unrelated personal stories; keep responses brief, respectful, and focused on validating the feeling and giving simple, usable next steps. | |
415393c5-ab46-55d9-8ec7-612c0b3ddd7e | I am spending the next three hours building a virtual house, since the actual apartment I live in is a total mess. | Lifestyle & Leisure | Entertainment | disgust_or_contempt | negative | normal | consistent | female | 1,586.127 | high | 0.0641 | high | 0.1087 | normal | expressive | [
"hours"
] | The user is saying they’ll spend hours building a virtual house to escape their actual apartment, speaking from a place of frustration and disgust about their living situation; this reads as a quiet vent and a move to find a safe, controllable space rather than as a literal request for help. | Beneath the surface they seem to want permission to step away without judgment and to have their frustration and self-directed negativity acknowledged; the virtual project is serving as a brief, non-stigmatizing refuge and they likely need that choice to be seen as understandable. | Right now they most need their feeling—annoyance, shame, or disgust about their apartment—to be named and accepted so they don't feel judged for escaping into a game; once that containment is offered, a gentle, optional offer of practical help could be acceptable but is secondary. | [
"approval_and_reassurance",
"restatement"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"information"
] | Avoid lecturing, moralizing, or pushing quick solutions (e.g., 'just clean up' or productivity framing); don't minimize the feeling with forced cheerfulness or jump into analyzing why they feel this way. Also avoid making the response about the helper's experiences or rescuing with unsolicited tips. | |
9d680b81-c57f-5241-b422-fc6196a6bfe6 | I keep hearing different definitions of 'meaningful,' and I want a clear way to sort out my own. | Health & Self-Growth | Identity | disgust_or_contempt | negative | normal | consistent | female | 1,557.0466 | high | 0.0744 | high | 0.1091 | normal | falling | [
"keep",
"hearing"
] | The speaker is expressing irritated frustration with vague or competing definitions of 'meaningful' and is asking for a practical, no-nonsense way to decide what it means for them. This utterance functions as a request for a clear, usable framework while testing whether the listener can cut through fluff and be helpful... | Beneath the dismissive tone is a need for clarity and ownership: they want a personal, defensible criterion that replaces confusing external opinions so they can make decisions without second-guessing. The scoff suggests impatience with vague answers and a wish to be given something concrete they can actually use. | Right now they need brief validation that their frustration makes sense, followed quickly by a straightforward, practical method or steps to define 'meaningful' for themselves — something they can apply and adapt rather than abstract theory. The emotional containment (acknowledging the annoyance) should come before off... | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"information",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"interpretation",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Do not lecture, moralize, or offer vague platitudes about 'meaning' — that will likely fuel the user's irritation. Avoid long-winded theoretical explanations, premature psychological interpretations, or sharing your own story; keep responses concise, practical, and respectful of their desire for a usable method. | |
f0c2ae18-c223-573e-acf1-1c4886de3bd6 | I’m looking at my progress tracker and wondering if it makes sense to cancel everything. What are my options? | Health & Self-Growth | Self-Growth | disgust_or_contempt | negative | normal | consistent | female | 1,068.8879 | normal | 0.0739 | high | 0.0888 | normal | expressive | [
"cancel",
"everything.",
"options?"
] | They're venting with a bitter, derisive tone about their progress-tracking routine and are testing whether it's acceptable to walk away; at the same time they explicitly ask for options, but their primary stance right now is frustration rather than calm problem-solving. | Beneath the derision there seems to be a need for permission to be done or to pause without shame, plus a clear, nonjudgmental sense of what alternatives exist so they don't feel like quitting equals failure. The tone suggests they want someone to acknowledge how discouraging the routine feels before offering fixes. | Right now they most need their frustration named and accepted so they feel safe expressing ‘I want to quit’ without being judged; only after that should they be offered clear, neutral options (pause, scale back, change goals/metrics, or cancel) so they can make a choice that fits their values and energy. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"information"
] | [
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"strength_spotlighting",
"future_oriented_savoring",
"self_disclosure",
"direct_guidance"
] | Avoid lecturing, moralizing, minimization, or rushing into 'fix it' advice; don't cheerlead or insist they must persevere, and avoid long personal stories. Offer options calmly and without implying their feelings are wrong or weak. | |
e64e4b03-1309-56f0-a63a-932a422b9127 | Why does the calculus textbook only give walls of text? I keep drawing graphs in the margins to visualize derivatives, but the TA says 'stop doodling and follow the formula steps' during office hours. | Career & Academics | Academics | disgust_or_contempt | negative | normal | consistent | male | 1,234.6013 | high | 0.0422 | normal | 0.1094 | normal | rising-falling | [
"calculus",
"text?",
"margins"
] | The user is venting frustration about a clash between their visual learning approach and an instructor who enforces formula-focused practice; they sound annoyed and tested, looking to see if their way of learning is legitimate and whether someone will back them up. This message functions as both a complaint and a subtl... | They seem to want explicit permission that drawing graphs to understand derivatives is a valid learning strategy and to have their effort and thinking style respected rather than dismissed; the TA's 'stop doodling' comment felt shaming and triggered confused resentment about being forced into a single acceptable method... | Right now they need their frustration and learning preferences to be acknowledged and normalized, followed by practical, low-risk options for responding to the TA or adapting their study approach so they can keep using helpful visuals without getting shut down in office hours. | [
"approval_and_reassurance",
"restatement",
"direct_guidance",
"information"
] | [
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"interpretation"
] | Avoid lecturing the user to 'just follow the rules' or minimizing their feelings, do not moralize about appropriate study habits, and don't rush into problem-solving before acknowledging the annoyance; also avoid long personal anecdotes or psychoanalytic interpretations that shift focus away from the user's immediate n... | |
7d431f23-bcf4-5f69-9c52-6073eacb1221 | A reviewer on my manuscript wrote that the contribution is incremental. What would be an appropriate response strategy? | Career & Academics | Academics | disgust_or_contempt | negative | normal | consistent | male | 850.5602 | normal | 0.0609 | high | 0.094 | normal | falling | [
"contribution",
"response"
] | You sound annoyed and a bit contemptuous about the reviewer's 'incremental' comment while also trying to keep your reply measured; this message is both a vent and a request for practical help on how to respond without burning bridges. | Beneath the irritation there is a need to have your work respected and not dismissed, plus a desire for reassurance that you can respond professionally without sacrificing fairness to yourself. You also want clear, actionable language and a sense of control over the outcome so the emotional sting doesn’t drive an impul... | First, be heard and have that frustration acknowledged; only then receive concrete advice: a few practical response strategies and example phrasing that defend the novelty of your work while staying professional and persuasive. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"direct_guidance",
"information"
] | [
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"future_oriented_savoring",
"interpretation"
] | Do not minimize or dismiss the user’s anger, rush to reframe their feelings into positivity, or lecture about etiquette in a way that sounds judgmental. Avoid pushing long moral arguments, offering your own war stories instead of focused advice, or suggesting aggressive language that could harm the manuscript’s prospec... | |
be4a13d3-fcb1-58a4-b0b8-46903177f77d | I saw my teammates copying their entire project report from an online source while claiming they were too busy to study for our exams. | Career & Academics | Academics | disgust_or_contempt | negative | normal | consistent | male | 936.3266 | normal | 0.0524 | high | 0.1057 | normal | falling | [
"entire",
"claiming",
"too",
"exams."
] | The user is venting strong disgust and moral frustration about teammates who cheated and lied, likely testing whether their anger and sense of unfairness will be heard and taken seriously. They are looking for a listener who acknowledges the breach of trust rather than minimizing it. | Beneath the statement is a need for validation that their feelings of betrayal and indignation are legitimate, reassurance that their integrity and effort are not being overlooked, and practical clarity about what they can do next so the situation doesn’t keep feeling unfair or out of their control. | Right now they most need their frustration to be named and accepted without judgment; once that is held, they likely want clear, practical options about responding (confronting teammates, reporting to instructors, protecting their own standing) presented gently so they can decide what feels right. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Avoid lecturing, moralizing, or minimizing their anger, and do not rush into heavy analysis or force a specific course of action (e.g., immediately insisting they report teammates). Steer clear of oversharing the helper's own stories or trying to cheerlead the problem away with premature positivity. | |
16579707-ca28-5eb3-ad91-566964507b10 | A colleague with the same title as me handles advanced projects, while I’m stuck with data entry. | Career & Academics | Career | disgust_or_contempt | negative | normal | consistent | male | 857.6208 | normal | 0.0529 | high | 0.1124 | normal | falling | [
"same",
"data"
] | The user is venting frustration about a perceived unfair distribution of work and testing whether their annoyance will be heard; they sound resentful that someone with the same title gets challenging projects while they are relegated to data entry. | Beneath the complaint is a need to have the unfairness acknowledged and to feel seen as capable and deserving of substantive work; the comparison in their words signals they want validation that their frustration is legitimate and that their career potential matters to someone else. | Right now they most need their irritation and sense of being sidelined to be named and accepted without judgment; only after that should any gentle, optional move toward exploring next steps or solutions be offered. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"strength_spotlighting",
"future_oriented_savoring",
"information"
] | Avoid minimizing, lecturing, moralizing, or telling them to 'be patient' or 'look on the bright side.' Do not rush into problem-solving or give unsolicited how-to steps, and avoid shifting focus by praising the colleague or sharing long personal anecdotes that take attention away from the user's experience. | |
f8d6bfb0-2d69-5b98-9b54-8b672178150a | I forgot to send a thank-you note after my friend hosted me last week, and now I'm not sure how to approach them. | Interpersonal_Relationships | Friend_Relations | fear | negative | normal | consistent | male | 926.8633 | normal | 0.0575 | high | 0.1001 | normal | falling | [
"forgot"
] | The user is quietly admitting a social slip-up and expressing anxiety about how to repair it, likely seeking both comfort and a safe route forward; this utterance functions as a tentative request for permission to be vulnerable and for practical help with an awkward social fix. | Beneath the worry is a need to be reassured that this mistake is forgivable and does not signal moral failure, plus a desire for concrete, low-risk ways to reconnect that won't make them feel exposed or judged. | Right now they most need their anxiety to be heard and normalized so the fear softens, and immediately afterwards they want straightforward, doable options or example phrases to reach out in a way that feels safe and sincere. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"interpretation",
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Avoid lecturing, moralizing, or minimizing their feelings (e.g., 'it's no big deal' in a way that dismisses their anxiety). Don't rush into long psychological explanations or share personal anecdotes that shift attention away from them; keep options limited, concrete, and non-judgmental. | |
0839b1e6-89c2-5a74-906b-247ba1a348fd | I saw what she posted earlier today, but I’m not sure if I should say something. | Interpersonal_Relationships | Friend_Relations | fear | negative | normal | consistent | male | 993.4276 | normal | 0.0363 | normal | 0.1809 | normal | falling | [
"say"
] | The speaker is expressing hesitation after seeing a friend's post and is quietly testing whether it's okay to bring it up; their nervous tone suggests they're worried about possible fallout and are seeking a safe, nonjudgmental response rather than immediate action. | Beneath the sentence is a need for emotional permission and risk assessment: they want their discomfort acknowledged as reasonable and want help estimating whether raising the post will protect or damage the relationship, so they can choose a course that feels safe. | Right now they most need their unease to be named and validated, then a few gentle, low-pressure options (including how to say nothing) so they can decide without feeling pushed or shamed; practical wording or timing suggestions should come only after empathy. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"information"
] | Do not rush into problem-solving, minimize their worry, lecture about what 'should' be done, or moralize their choices. Avoid overly upbeat responses, long analytical explanations, or sharing personal stories that steer attention away from the user's immediate concern. | |
5cabaa8b-833c-5dd0-af48-9d29e1fdaec6 | My friend Priya comments on my work in front of her colleagues in a way that lowers my credibility. I need a plan for the next time it happens. | Interpersonal_Relationships | Friend_Relations | fear | negative | normal | consistent | male | 694.9309 | normal | 0.0791 | high | 0.1082 | normal | rising | [
"colleagues"
] | You’re reporting a specific, recurring social sting and asking for practical help while sounding anxious about being embarrassed again; this utterance functions both as a request for a concrete plan and as a bid for emotional safety before the next interaction. | Beneath the request for a plan is a need to protect your professional credibility and to feel safer and more in control in public interactions; your nervous tone suggests you also want permission to feel upset and a clear way to prevent or repair the next public slight so it doesn’t erode your standing or confidence. | Right now the user needs first to have their worry acknowledged and not minimized, and then a clear, actionable set of options they can choose from for the next time Priya undermines them (brief scripts, boundary moves, and quick de-escalation tactics), so they can feel prepared rather than helpless. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"future_oriented_savoring",
"interpretation"
] | Avoid minimizing or lecturing (e.g., "just ignore it"), moralizing about Priya, long personal stories from the responder, rushed psychologizing, or upbeat platitudes that sidestep the user’s anxiety; the user needs clear, respectful options and validation rather than rebuke or premature analysis. | |
85910121-bd35-5d78-b661-155be5140c70 | My partner and I reviewed our joint account transactions twice, and there’s a $200 difference we can’t account for. | Lifestyle & Leisure | Finance | fear | negative | normal | consistent | male | 960.4366 | normal | 0.053 | high | 0.1002 | normal | rising | [
"twice,",
"$200",
"difference"
] | You’re reporting a concrete problem — after carefully checking the joint account twice, there’s still a $200 gap — and your voice sounds worried and unsettled. This utterance is doing two things at once: it names a financial mismatch and quietly tests whether the listener will treat the concern seriously and help figur... | Beneath the report there’s a need for calm reassurance that this worry is valid and not overreacting, plus a clear, manageable path to reduce uncertainty (how to find the missing $200) without immediately escalating blame or conflict between partners. | Right now they most need to have their worry acknowledged and contained so they stop replaying possibilities in their head; once they feel heard, they need concise, practical options they can try next to track down the discrepancy (steps that feel doable and non-accusatory). | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"direct_guidance",
"information"
] | [
"interpretation",
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization"
] | Avoid minimizing or dismissing the worry, jumping straight to blame of the partner, moralizing about spending, or launching into long technical banking jargon. Don’t push a definite explanation before the user is soothed, and avoid sharing your own similar stories which would shift focus away from their immediate worry... | |
df98d191-2bb5-5503-a32f-331e6a4524aa | I am currently the one listed as her emergency contact on her upcoming solo expedition. | Interpersonal_Relationships | Friend_Relations | fear | negative | normal | consistent | male | 647.9841 | normal | 0.0427 | normal | 0.0764 | fast | expressive | [
"contact"
] | The user is sharing a specific detail that highlights how much responsibility they feel for a friend's risky or demanding choice, and how close they are to the situation. The way they mention being the emergency contact hints at anxiety about what might happen and whether they can handle it, without openly spelling tha... | At a deeper level, they seem to want acknowledgment that carrying this role for their friend is heavy and anxiety‑provoking, and that it’s okay to feel conflicted about it. They may be looking for someone to recognize the pressure implicit in being the “emergency contact” and to validate that it’s not selfish to feel w... | Right now they most need their unease and sense of responsibility to be named and gently validated, so they don’t feel like they’re overreacting. A calm, empathic reflection of the tension between caring for their friend and feeling burdened would help, perhaps followed by an inviting question that lets them elaborate ... | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"future_oriented_savoring",
"self_disclosure",
"information",
"strength_spotlighting"
] | They likely do not want to be lectured about safety, risk, or boundaries, or to be flooded with advice on what they “should” do. Minimizing their concern, over-cheering the friend’s expedition, or reframing everything as purely positive would probably feel invalidating; they need space to sit with their ambivalence wit... | |
c2a40967-0cab-5f1d-a557-28022754dc68 | We used to talk about everything, but last night when I brought up my new job, he just... changed the subject. It felt like I was talking to a stranger. | Interpersonal_Relationships | Friend_Relations | fear | negative | normal | consistent | male | 893.7451 | normal | 0.0501 | high | 0.1443 | normal | rising-falling | [
"used",
"subject."
] | The user is venting about a recent interaction where a close friend abruptly changed the subject, leaving them feeling confused, hurt, and unsettled; they are testing whether it’s safe to show vulnerability about feeling distant from someone who used to be close. The utterance functions as a request to have that sting ... | They appear to need their hurt and anxiety about losing closeness to be acknowledged and validated — permission to feel scared or sad about the sudden distance — and a sense that someone else recognizes this shift as meaningful rather than trivial. The phrase “felt like I was talking to a stranger” and the anxious deli... | Right now they most need emotional containment: a clear, empathic naming of the hurt and worry and reassurance that those feelings make sense. Only after those feelings are accepted should a gentle, optional exploration about what might have changed or what they want to do next be offered. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"information",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"strength_spotlighting",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Avoid minimizing their experience, telling them they are overreacting, rushing into problem-solving or confrontation, or offering upbeat platitudes that sidestep the pain. Do not lecture, moralize about the friend’s behavior, or pivot the conversation to the helper’s anecdotes; keep the focus on acknowledging and gentl... | |
c0e6f32f-6723-5ed7-9fcd-a1d164415440 | I mentioned to my mom that I’m considering a different career, but I’m not sure how she’ll react. | Interpersonal_Relationships | Family_Relations | fear | negative | normal | consistent | male | 807.3655 | normal | 0.0603 | high | 0.1452 | normal | rising | [
"considering"
] | They’re tentatively naming a vulnerable possibility and quietly testing whether it’s safe to share more; their words show uncertainty about a sensitive conversation with their mom and they sound worried about a negative or disappointing response. | Beneath this sentence is a need for emotional safety and permission to explore a big change without immediate judgment — they want their worry about disappointing their mother acknowledged and want help imagining how the conversation might go so it feels less threatening. | Right now they most need their concern to be heard and validated so the anxiety eases; once they feel contained, they would likely benefit from gentle, practical suggestions for how to frame the topic with their mom and ways to respond to likely reactions. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"information"
] | Avoid minimizing or dismissing their worry, lecturing about filial duty or career ‘logic,’ pushing a single ‘right’ solution, or using overly cheerful platitudes. Do not force big problem-solving before first naming and accepting their fear. | |
c3c5266b-3e6f-572f-87be-fdec9996d472 | My sister is in the kitchen with me, and neither of us is speaking. I am considering saying something, but I am unsure if it is the right time to talk... | Interpersonal_Relationships | Family_Relations | fear | negative | normal | consistent | male | 1,401.8021 | high | 0.0483 | high | 0.129 | normal | rising | [
"something,",
"unsure"
] | You are sitting in shared silence with your sister and hesitating because you feel anxious about whether speaking will make things worse; this message is a soft test of safety — you want someone to acknowledge the uncertainty and help you decide if, and how, to speak up. | Underneath the hesitation is a need for emotional safety and permission: you want reassurance that it’s okay to pause or to try a gentle opening, and you’re looking for a low-risk way to check in without escalating things. The quiet and your worry about saying the wrong thing suggest fear of causing discomfort or being... | Right now you most need your worry to be acknowledged and normalized so the anxiety eases; after that, you'd benefit from a couple of simple, low-pressure options for how to break the silence (or how to stay present if that feels better), framed as choices rather than prescriptions. | [
"approval_and_reassurance",
"restatement",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"future_oriented_savoring",
"strength_spotlighting",
"interpretation"
] | Avoid minimizing the silence, rushing to fix things, lecturing about communication skills, offering cheerful platitudes, or sharing long personal stories that shift focus away from the user's immediate worry. Do not over-interpret motives or push heavy analysis before the user's anxiety is acknowledged. | |
927d2ddc-7dac-5dfb-9460-0841f7a14b6c | I agreed to give my partner another chance, but I’m not sure if I’m making a mistake. | Interpersonal_Relationships | Romance_Relations | fear | negative | normal | consistent | male | 1,283.7659 | high | 0.0342 | normal | 0.1424 | normal | falling-rising | [
"partner",
"mistake."
] | The user is voicing hesitation after deciding to give their partner another chance and seems to be testing whether that choice feels safe or mistaken; this statement functions as a request to have their unease noticed and weighed, not yet a request for a plan. | Underneath the sentence is a need for permission to feel ambivalent and for emotional steadiness while they sort out trust — they want someone to acknowledge their worry, help them separate gut alarm from overthinking, and not rush them toward a tidy answer. | Right now they most need their doubt to be heard and validated so the anxiety eases enough to think clearly; after containment, a gentle, tentative reflection about what specifically feels risky and what small, manageable steps could reduce that risk may be helpful if they want it. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure"
] | Avoid telling them what they should do, offering quick fixes, moralizing, or minimizing their worry with platitudes. Do not rush into detailed problem-solving or share long personal anecdotes that shift focus away from their experience. | |
f0439fea-9393-5e52-998b-fbf28850238b | My partner Alex doesn’t express emotions very often, and I’m wondering what a practical way would be to start that conversation before we drift any further apart. | Interpersonal_Relationships | Romance_Relations | fear | negative | normal | consistent | male | 805.3651 | normal | 0.0556 | high | 0.1197 | normal | falling-rising | [
"practical",
"start"
] | You’re naming a real worry — that distance will grow if you don’t bring this up — and asking for a gentle, practical way to open a vulnerable conversation. This feels like both a request for advice and a moment of anxiety where you want to be held as you plan the approach. | Beneath the question is a need to protect the closeness you have and to feel safe initiating vulnerability without provoking defensiveness or rejection; your nervous tone suggests you want permission to be cautious and specific help to lower the risk of the conversation going sideways. | Right now you most need your concern to be acknowledged and normalized, followed by clear, low-pressure language and concrete steps you can try to start the conversation (when to bring it up, what to say first, and how to keep it non-blaming). Practical scripts or small first moves that feel manageable will help reduce... | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"interpretation",
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"information"
] | Do not minimize or rush past the fear with platitudes or pushy ‘fix-it’ steps; avoid lecturing about how the partner should be or moralizing about their emotional style. Don’t offer lengthy psychological interpretations or your own personal anecdotes that shift focus away from the user’s immediate need for safe, specif... | |
ddcce459-22ed-5585-ac1e-e0812e0f7ea6 | My granddaughter showed me these Spanish flashcards, but the words just… slip away. At my age, is it too late to even try? | Lifestyle & Leisure | Lifestyle | fear | negative | normal | consistent | male | 1,009.0667 | normal | 0.0478 | high | 0.1408 | normal | rising | [
"Spanish",
"flashcards,",
"my",
"age,"
] | The speaker is voicing worry and self-doubt about their memory and ability to learn, and is quietly testing whether it's acceptable to feel uncertain about trying. This feels like a small, vulnerable plea for reassurance more than a technical question about language learning. | Beneath the words is a need for permission to feel anxious without being judged and for reassurance that trying — even if progress is slow — would be respected. They also likely want a sense of hope grounded in reality: that effort can still matter and that there are low-pressure ways to engage if they choose to. | First, be heard and have the worry named and accepted so they don't feel dismissed or shamed; after that, offer gentle, realistic information or options they can consider if they want to try (framed as optional and low-stakes). | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"information"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization"
] | Avoid minimizing or rushing to fix the feeling (no lecturing, pat positivity, or immediate action plans). Do not make the person feel foolish for their age, overwhelm them with detailed study regimens, or shift focus away from their emotional experience with long personal stories. | |
950224c7-f940-5a22-9815-e6fcd2e64108 | My doctor advised against oily foods, so now takeout menus feel risky. Cooking seems safer, but I’m not sure where to start. | Lifestyle & Leisure | Lifestyle | fear | negative | normal | consistent | male | 880.8255 | normal | 0.0561 | high | 0.1539 | normal | falling | [
"doctor"
] | The speaker is expressing worry about a new medical restriction that makes familiar options (takeout) feel unsafe and is cautiously considering cooking as an alternative but feels stuck about where to begin. This feels like a low-level anxious request for both emotional grounding and simple practical next steps. | Beneath the words is a need for reassurance that this change won’t make eating feel risky or overwhelming, plus clear, low-effort ways to regain a sense of control and competence in preparing safe meals. The tentative phrasing suggests they want permission to be unsure and help that won’t feel judgmental or complicated... | Right now they most need their worry to be acknowledged and normalized, followed by one or two concrete, easily achievable options for starting to cook (simple recipes, low-oil techniques, or safe takeout choices) so they can try something without feeling overwhelmed. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"direct_guidance",
"information"
] | [
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"strength_spotlighting",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Avoid lecturing about willpower, shaming takeout, minimizing the user’s fear, or giving an exhaustive meal plan or complex recipes. Don’t overwhelm with technical nutrition jargon or push long-term lifestyle overhauls before their immediate uncertainty has been acknowledged. | |
b1666ac5-d35f-5358-b775-5aba9a9af9b3 | I was halfway through booking that solo trip I promised myself, and the website crashed right at payment. I'm staring at the error screen... What if it's a warning not to go? | Lifestyle & Leisure | Lifestyle | fear | negative | normal | consistent | female | 1,532.6754 | high | 0.1031 | high | 0.1061 | normal | falling-rising | [
"solo",
"error"
] | The user is voicing anxious disappointment after a thwarted attempt to book a solo trip, using the website crash as fuel for a fearful 'what if' thought. This feels like a small crisis of doubt and uncertainty — they're venting and quietly testing whether their worry (that this is a bad omen or a sign not to go) is und... | Beneath the words is a need for emotional containment and permission to feel rattled: they want someone to acknowledge the sting of losing momentum on something they promised themselves and to reduce the sudden sense of unpredictability and threat triggered by the crash. They also need a calming, realistic perspective ... | Right now they most need their disappointment and unease to be named and accepted without dismissal, so the breathlessness and doubt feel seen; only after that should a gentle, optional offer of practical reassurance or simple next steps (like retrying payment or checking bank/email) be introduced. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"information",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"interpretation"
] | Do not minimize or rationalize their fear (e.g., 'it's nothing, don't be dramatic') or push a quick upbeat spin that ignores the disappointment. Avoid moralizing about superstition or rushing into complex troubleshooting unless they ask; likewise, don't overshadow their feelings with the helper's own stories or attempt... | |
8436c633-e853-5c68-89e9-698624be4cc9 | The event invitation says 9:30 AM. I’m it’s 9:15 and I’m still at the bus stop. | Lifestyle & Leisure | Daily_Hassles | fear | negative | normal | consistent | female | 1,733.9767 | high | 0.1033 | high | 0.1247 | normal | falling | [
"9:30",
"AM.",
"9:15",
"and",
"bus",
"stop."
] | The user is giving a brief, anxious status update about possibly being late and seems to be testing whether it's okay to worry aloud; this utterance functions as a low-effort call for reassurance and possibly quick practical help. | They appear to need immediate emotional containment — someone to acknowledge that feeling frazzled and worried about being late makes sense — plus a quick sense of control (permission to messaged/arrive late or rapid options to reduce the lateness). The mention of time and being stuck at the bus stop signals time press... | Right now they most need their worry to be named and accepted so the anxiety eases slightly; only after that should a few short, practical options be offered (e.g., message the host, check transit ETA, or a quick plan for arrival). Keep responses brief and nonjudgmental so the user can act without added stress. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"interpretation"
] | Avoid minimizing or lecturing about punctuality, offering platitudes (e.g., 'don’t worry' without acknowledgement), or launching into long analysis. Don’t moralize, chide them for being late, or share long personal stories; keep responses brief, validating, and action-oriented only after validation. | |
b7670b41-99aa-5279-8b00-bcebe4fdc217 | At the gym class, the instructor paired everyone up; I’m the extra person on the side. How should I handle this? | Lifestyle & Leisure | Daily_Hassles | fear | negative | normal | consistent | female | 1,589.4897 | high | 0.1042 | high | 0.1172 | normal | rising | [
"gym",
"everyone",
"extra"
] | The user is describing a small but uncomfortable social moment in class and is asking for help while sounding shaky and hesitant; this utterance functions as both a request for practical advice and a test of whether their awkwardness will be met with understanding rather than dismissal. | Beneath the question is a need for permission to feel awkward and for reassurance that they won't be judged for standing aside, together with a desire for simple, low‑risk options that restore a sense of choice and safety in that moment. | Right now they most need to be heard and have their discomfort acknowledged so the anxiety eases, followed immediately by a few clear, doable actions they can pick from (so they regain agency without feeling pressured). | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"interpretation",
"information",
"strength_spotlighting",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Avoid minimizing or lecturing (e.g., 'just relax' or 'you're overreacting'), long analytical explanations, pressured pep talks, or lengthy personal stories from the helper. Keep responses brief, nonjudgmental, and choice‑focused so the user can pick what feels safest. | |
7675c1ff-1b71-5a4d-823e-bea83af96f2a | I’m not sure how I’ll ever get a handle on my spending when I can’t even stick to tracking it. | Lifestyle & Leisure | Finance | fear | negative | normal | consistent | female | 1,940.3835 | high | 0.0928 | high | 0.092 | normal | rising | [] | The speaker is voicing anxious self-doubt about money management and seems to be venting frustration at their own difficulty sticking to tracking. This utterance reads like a bid for reassurance and a test of whether the listener will respond without judgment or immediately jump to solutions. | They appear to need nonjudgmental confirmation that their struggle is understandable and not a personal failure, plus a sense that there are low-pressure, realistic options they could try instead of grand fixes. The phrase "can't even stick to tracking" signals shame and a fear of repeated failure more than a desire fo... | Right now they most need their worry and frustration to be named and accepted so they feel heard and less alone; only after that should any suggestions be offered, and those should be very small, optional, and framed as experiments rather than commands. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Avoid lecturing, moralizing, or minimizing their feelings (e.g., saying it’s "not a big deal"); do not push complex step-by-step budgeting tools or long lists of tactics before they feel heard. Refrain from overly cheerful platitudes or shifting focus to the helper’s experiences. | |
c7d47c05-91df-5e5f-bc86-3bb8f16e5be0 | My financial advisor recommended aggressive investments. I'm not certain if that aligns with my risk tolerance. | Lifestyle & Leisure | Finance | fear | negative | normal | consistent | female | 1,379.2097 | high | 0.0885 | high | 0.1047 | normal | falling | [
"risk"
] | You are voicing uncertainty about whether your advisor's aggressive investment recommendation actually fits you, and your hesitant tone suggests you're testing whether it's safe to admit doubt and ask for help. This utterance functions as both a request for reassurance and an opening for practical next steps. | Beneath the question there seems to be a need for permission to feel uneasy and for clear, concrete information that helps you judge risk for yourself; the anxious hesitation in your voice hints that you worry about making a costly mistake and want a steadying perspective before acting. | Right now you most need your concern to be acknowledged and normalized so the anxiety feels contained, and then a few simple, actionable ways to check whether the investment matches your risk tolerance (questions to ask your advisor, specific things to review, or options for a second opinion). | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"information",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"strength_spotlighting",
"self_disclosure"
] | Avoid minimizing the worry, rushing into technical analysis, lecturing about 'right' choices, or offering upbeat platitudes that shut down the concern. Don't push a decision immediately or share unrelated personal anecdotes; keep language plain, nonjudgmental, and focused on what the user can check or ask next. | |
9058a2c1-62e6-5519-b941-41e255217192 | The difficulty level spiked suddenly in the second level. I don’t know if I can keep up. | Lifestyle & Leisure | Entertainment | fear | negative | normal | consistent | male | 733.1729 | normal | 0.0414 | normal | 0.1148 | normal | falling | [
"suddenly"
] | They are voicing anxiety after an abrupt jump in game difficulty and seem uncertain about their ability to continue; the utterance functions as a brief vent and a test to see if the listener will acknowledge that this sudden change is frustrating and worrisome. | Beneath the words is a need for permission to feel unsettled and for reassurance that being thrown off by a sudden spike is understandable, plus a desire for a sense of control — either through validation or simple, doable options to regain confidence. | They first need their worry about the unexpected difficulty increase to be heard and normalized; once that feeling is contained, they likely need a few gentle, concrete options (e.g., slowing down, adjusting settings, or practicing) offered as choices rather than instructions. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"interpretation",
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization"
] | Avoid minimizing or dismissing their worry (e.g., saying it's 'no big deal' or 'just a game'), do not lecture or rush into lengthy technical fixes, and refrain from sharing long personal stories or overly cheerful platitudes that sidestep the anxiety they're expressing. | |
849f1c9d-f5de-555c-abef-46bf8ed93df3 | They want me to attend a conference with professionals from entirely different fields. I’m not sure how to approach it. | Interpersonal_Relationships | Friend_Relations | fear | negative | normal | consistent | male | 1,052.0573 | normal | 0.0645 | high | 0.1214 | normal | falling | [] | The speaker is expressing anticipatory anxiety about entering a space of unfamiliar professional cultures and is quietly asking for both permission to feel uneasy and practical help. This is a request that mixes emotional testing (can I admit I’m nervous?) with a desire for concrete guidance about how to approach the e... | Beneath the question is a need for containment and permission to be uncertain, plus a desire for agency: simple, low-risk ways to feel prepared and not out of place when meeting people from other fields. The tone suggests they want acceptance of the anxiety and tools that reduce unpredictability so they can show up wit... | Right now they most need their nervousness to be acknowledged and normalized so they feel safe admitting it, and then a few concise, optional strategies or scripts to choose from — practical, low-effort steps that reduce social risk rather than a long theoretical lecture. | [
"approval_and_reassurance",
"restatement",
"direct_guidance",
"information"
] | [
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"strength_spotlighting",
"future_oriented_savoring",
"interpretation"
] | Avoid minimizing the worry, offering platitudes (e.g., 'just be yourself'), or rushing into long lists of tips without first acknowledging the feeling. Do not lecture about networking as a moral duty, assume extroversion, or push heavy self-disclosure; keep suggestions optional, short, and framed as choices rather than... | |
f4bf77f6-fa75-538d-8037-f90d466f423a | I sometimes skip my friend Alex’s group chat to grind quests; how do people handle that with friends? | Lifestyle & Leisure | Entertainment | fear | negative | normal | consistent | male | 799.7578 | normal | 0.0552 | high | 0.1218 | normal | rising-falling | [] | The user is quietly worried about disappointing friends by prioritizing solo game time and is asking whether this is socially acceptable — this utterance functions as a mix of venting and a request for practical social guidance while testing if their concern will be taken seriously. | They appear to want permission to enjoy uninterrupted game sessions without feeling guilty, and also want assurance that doing so won't damage friendships; beneath the question is a hope for simple ways to preserve connection while protecting personal time. | First, they need their worry about letting friends down to be acknowledged and normalized; immediately after that, they likely want small, concrete options (phrases to use, quick habits, boundary tactics) that let them balance gaming and group obligations without escalating anxiety. | [
"approval_and_reassurance",
"restatement",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"future_oriented_savoring",
"strength_spotlighting"
] | Do not lecture, shame, or moralize about priorities, and avoid minimizing their worry or rushing straight to complex analyses. Refrain from heavy personal disclosures, platitudes, or pressuring them to choose between friendship and leisure — keep responses validating, concise, and practical. | |
72be01a8-50a7-55cc-b578-180945cc5017 | My partner curates our online image and uses specific labels for me; can we plan how to discuss my own labels? | Health & Self-Growth | Identity | fear | negative | normal | consistent | female | 895.0374 | normal | 0.0923 | high | 0.0919 | normal | falling | [
"can",
"discuss",
"own"
] | They are cautiously asking for help planning a conversation while sounding nervous and shaky about losing control over how they’re presented; this feels like a tentative reach for both emotional safety and practical next steps. The utterance functions as a test of whether it’s safe to be vulnerable and to receive concr... | Beneath the question is a need to protect personal autonomy and to be heard and respected when naming discomfort; the shaky, apprehensive tone suggests anxiety about being overruled or minimized if they speak up. They want permission to feel unsettled and assurance that their boundaries and self-definition matter. | Right now they most need their anxiety and concern to be acknowledged and normalized, and only after that a clear, low-risk plan: specific phrasing, timing, and boundary options to raise the issue with their partner so they can maintain agency in the conversation. Emotional containment should come first, then short, pr... | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"future_oriented_savoring",
"interpretation"
] | Do not rush into analysis or problem-solving before validating their fear, and avoid lecturing, moralizing, or telling them they’re overreacting. Don’t shift focus with the helper’s own stories or try to celebrate the situation; they likely don’t want to be pressured into compromise or framed as selfish for wanting con... | |
c779edd4-cbe5-5ebc-b17c-a8af55b51e3c | I stood my ground with Priya today, but now I’m wondering if it was just a fluke. What if I just freeze up again the next time she tries to talk over me? | Health & Self-Growth | Identity | fear | negative | normal | consistent | female | 827.2331 | normal | 0.0639 | high | 0.1089 | normal | rising-falling | [] | They’re tentatively proud of standing up to Priya but immediately reveal anxiety that the outcome was accidental; the utterance functions as a request for reassurance and a test of safety to admit fear about backsliding. | They need their small victory to be acknowledged in a way that lessens shame and makes the success feel real and repeatable, and they also need containment for the anticipatory fear that they’ll freeze again so the pride doesn’t dissolve into self-doubt. | Right now they most need their win to be named and their worry accepted — emotional validation that both feelings make sense — before any problem-solving. After feeling heard, a gentle reminder of what they did well or a tiny, concrete step to lean on next time would help rebuild confidence. | [
"approval_and_reassurance",
"strength_spotlighting",
"restatement"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"information",
"interpretation",
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Do not rush to give step-by-step fixes, lecture, downplay or dismiss the fear, over-celebrate in a way that feels dismissive, offer speculative psychological interpretations, or shift focus by sharing the helper’s own stories before the user feels heard. | |
0200c6af-d133-53d4-87b7-1698a92cb055 | I tried to have a conversation with someone new today, but it felt like we were just talking past each other the whole time. | Health & Self-Growth | Mental_Well-being | fear | negative | normal | consistent | female | 1,208.2478 | high | 0.0763 | high | 0.0843 | normal | rising | [
"tried",
"talking",
"past",
"time."
] | The user is quietly venting about an awkward interaction and is testing whether it’s safe to admit feeling disconnected; their tone suggests underlying worry about not fitting in or being understood. This utterance functions as a request to be seen and to have the uncomfortable feeling about the encounter acknowledged. | Beneath the surface they seem to need reassurance that their experience of not connecting is real and understandable, and that feeling uneasy after a new social interaction doesn’t mean something is wrong with them. They also likely want someone to hold that discomfort without rushing to fix it. | Right now they most need their awkwardness and disappointment to be named and accepted so it stops feeling like a private failure; after feeling heard, a gentle, optional invitation to say more would be appropriate, but only if they want to keep talking. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"interpretation"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"information",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure"
] | Avoid minimizing or dismissing their feelings, offering quick fixes or step-by-step social strategies, lecturing about how they should have behaved, or using upbeat platitudes that gloss over the discomfort. Don’t shift focus to your own stories or force analysis before they feel understood. | |
0175164d-92ad-50f0-8a60-45837a4bb98f | I double-checked the stove three times today. I know it’s off, but the thought won’t leave. | Health & Self-Growth | Mental_Well-being | fear | negative | normal | consistent | male | 807.7661 | normal | 0.0562 | high | 0.1514 | normal | falling | [] | The speaker is reporting a repetitive checking behavior and an intrusive worry that won't go away despite knowing the stove is off; this statement functions as a quiet request for reassurance and emotional relief, a way to test whether their anxiety will be taken seriously without judgment. | Beneath the report is a need to be heard and soothed — they want their worry acknowledged as real and understandable, and to feel safer in their own mind rather than dismissed as irrational. The repeated checking and the phrase "know it’s off, but the thought won’t leave" signal a wish for containment and reassurance t... | Right now they most need someone to name and accept the anxiety (containment and validation) so the panic of the intrusive thought eases; only after that should any brief, optional explanation or gentle coping option be offered if they seem open to it. | [
"approval_and_reassurance",
"restatement",
"information"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure"
] | Do not minimize the worry by saying it's "silly" or press for logic-only solutions; avoid long-winded problem-solving, moralizing about responsibility, or pushing step-by-step behavioral advice before the user feels soothed. Keep responses calm, concise, and focused on validation rather than correction. | |
f814a96e-5716-5962-830e-e52064b10977 | The calendar notification for a friend’s birthday tomorrow just popped up, and I haven’t bought a gift. | Health & Self-Growth | Mental_Well-being | fear | negative | normal | consistent | female | 1,093.4073 | normal | 0.066 | high | 0.088 | normal | falling | [
"just",
"haven't",
"gift."
] | They're sharing a small, urgent worry sparked by a calendar reminder — a mix of anxiety and self-blame about not having bought a gift yet — likely testing whether it's okay to admit that and hoping for a quick, calming response. | They seem to want permission to feel embarrassed or flustered without being judged, plus a quick sense that this is fixable: reassurance that they aren't a bad friend and a few practical, low-effort options to resolve it. | Right now they most need their worry to be acknowledged and normalized so the anxiety eases; after that, a few concise, concrete suggestions for last-minute or thoughtful-but-simple gifts would be helpful and welcome. | [
"approval_and_reassurance",
"restatement",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"strength_spotlighting",
"future_oriented_savoring",
"self_disclosure",
"interpretation"
] | Do not minimize or dismiss their worry, lecture them about planning better, or respond with upbeat cheerleading that ignores the anxiety. Avoid long moralizing advice, heavy interpretation of character, or extensive personal stories — keep responses brief, gentle, and practical after validation. | |
53feadc3-2c83-5364-a201-9b8e06ccec29 | When I’m trying to fall asleep and my chest suddenly tightens, my heart races, and my hands go clammy, I sit up checking my pulse over and over; how do I stop that spiral? | Health & Self-Growth | Mental_Well-being | fear | negative | normal | consistent | female | 965.0495 | normal | 0.0627 | high | 0.0798 | fast | rising-falling | [
"heart",
"clammy,"
] | The user is describing a recurring, frightening nighttime loop where sudden bodily sensations (tight chest, racing heart, clammy hands) trigger repeated checking and escalating fear; they are reaching out for a way to stop that spiral and to be heard about how terrifying it feels. This message is both a cry for immedia... | Beneath the words is a need to be believed and soothed — they want someone to acknowledge how real and terrifying those sensations feel and to reduce the urgent fear of a sudden medical catastrophe. They also need concrete, low-effort tools they can use in bed to break the checking behavior and feel safer in their body... | Right now they most need their panic to be named and validated so the fear feels contained, followed immediately by simple, doable steps and brief information about why the body reacts this way; only after those are offered should any suggestion about medical reassurance or longer-term help be raised as optional next s... | [
"approval_and_reassurance",
"restatement",
"information",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure"
] | Avoid minimizing or dismissing the fear (e.g., "it's nothing"); do not rush into long explanations, moralize the checking behavior, or offer premature diagnostic certainty about their heart. Refrain from overly cheerful or lecturing tones and from extensive self-disclosure that shifts focus away from the user's immedia... | |
9ba39156-d825-5f1b-a365-63f6b60d9430 | I noticed that every time I get up, my vision gets a little dark for a second or two. What could that mean? | Health & Self-Growth | Physical_Health | fear | negative | normal | consistent | female | 904.0414 | normal | 0.0912 | high | 0.0871 | normal | falling | [
"second",
"mean?"
] | The user is reporting a physical symptom (brief darkening of vision on standing) while sounding worried and is reaching out to understand whether this is serious. This utterance functions as a safety check — they want someone to listen, normalize the concern, and give clear information about possible causes and next st... | Beneath the question there is a need to reduce uncertainty and threat: they want to be reassured that this isn’t an immediate emergency, to understand plausible, non-alarming explanations, and to know simple, safe actions to take if it happens again. The worried tone suggests they also want to feel heard and not dismis... | First, acknowledge and contain the worry so they feel heard; then give clear, concise information about common causes (e.g., brief orthostatic changes, dehydration, medication effects, or vasovagal responses) without delivering a definitive diagnosis. Finally, offer practical, low-burden next steps and clear red flags ... | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"information",
"direct_guidance"
] | [
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"self_disclosure",
"interpretation",
"strength_spotlighting"
] | Do not dismiss or minimize the worry, avoid definitive medical diagnoses or alarmist language, and don’t rush into complex speculation. Avoid lecturing, moralizing about healthcare choices, or sharing long personal anecdotes — the user needs clear, calm information and practical guidance first. | |
f4d4cacd-3a12-5445-88dc-9b45a2a14fa6 | I keep zoning out of conversations because the pain in my knees demands all my attention. | Health & Self-Growth | Physical_Health | fear | negative | normal | consistent | female | 1,048.324 | normal | 0.1008 | high | 0.0879 | normal | falling | [
"zoning",
"all"
] | The user is quietly reporting that physical knee pain is pulling their attention away during conversations and seems worried or embarrassed about it; this feels like a mixture of venting and testing whether their experience will be taken seriously rather than dismissed. | They appear to want their pain and its impact on attention to be legitimized and not judged as rudeness or inattention; beneath the sentence there’s also a likely wish for practical, gentle ways to manage social situations so the pain doesn’t lead to more anxiety. | Right now they need the listener to acknowledge and normalize the link between pain and zoning out so they feel understood and not shamed; after that containment, a short, non-pushy offer of factual information or simple options for coping would probably be welcome. | [
"restatement",
"approval_and_reassurance",
"information"
] | [
"direct_guidance",
"self_disclosure",
"celebration_and_capitalization",
"future_oriented_savoring"
] | Avoid minimizing the pain, lecturing about attention or saying things like 'just focus,' rushing into step-by-step fixes, moralizing about social manners, or sharing long personal anecdotes; do not respond with cheerfulness that downplays their worry. |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
EchoEval
EchoEval is a instance-level spoken empathetic evaluation benchmark. It comprising 1K authentic recordings from 20 professional actors
Load one subset:
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("ddwang2000/EchoEval", "normal", split="test")
Subsets
| Subset | Size | Description |
|---|---|---|
normal |
220 | Explicit, everyday emotional delivery |
implicit |
220 | Emotion is present but understated in the text |
very_high_intense |
220 | High-arousal, strongly expressed emotion |
satire_or_self_mockery |
220 | Ironic, sarcastic, or self-mocking delivery |
shift |
120 | Within-utterance emotion shift (e.g. happy -> sad) |
Columns
| Column | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
sample_id |
string | Fresh UUID, not the original internal id |
audio |
audio | Query utterance |
query |
string | Transcript / spoken text |
category |
string | Scene category |
sub_category |
string | Scene subcategory |
audio_emotion |
string | Emotion category; shift items use a transition string |
polarity |
string | positive / negative |
intensity |
string | normal / high |
modality_consistency |
string | consistent / conflict |
gender |
string | female / male |
pitch / pitch_level |
float / string | Raw value and low / normal / high |
energy / energy_level |
float / string | Raw value and low / normal / high |
speed / speed_level |
float / string | Raw value and fast / normal / slow |
intonation_contour |
string | e.g. rising, falling, rising-falling |
stress |
list[string] | Stressed words |
context_understanding |
string | Reasoning gold |
latent_need |
string | Reasoning gold |
core_demand |
string | Reasoning gold |
strategy_recommended |
list[string] | Recommended response strategies |
strategy_not_recommended |
list[string] | Strategies to avoid |
constraints |
string | Response constraints |
If you find EchoEval useful for your research, we would appreciate an acknowledgment and link to this dataset page. The accompanying paper and its BibTex citation will be added once available.
- Downloads last month
- -