Datasets:
_idx int64 0 9.51k | instruction stringlengths 2.17k 40.2k | input stringclasses 1
value | output stringlengths 1.03k 11.8k | system stringclasses 3
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | # Task: smallmol (molecule)
The optimization task is for KRAS G12D small-molecule candidates. The activity objective is based on a target-specific model trained from public KRAS G12D IC50 records, and the docking objective evaluates binding with AutoDock Vina.
Public medicinal-chemistry literature has shown that small... | <think>
Looking at the 29 evaluated molecules, a clear pattern emerges: the strongest performers all share a fused heterocyclic core—either an isoxazolone or thiazolone ring system—bearing an isopropoxy group, a nitrile, and an N-substituent such as cyanopropyl or methyl. The top hits, with neural activity around 8.0–8... | You are a scientific search agent proposing candidate molecules under an iterative multi-objective Bayesian optimization loop. Return ONLY the JSON action. Never predict docking score, activity, EHVI, uncertainty, or rank. | |
20 | # Task: nanogpt (training_program)
Autoresearch task context:
- `train.py` is the single editable file. It contains the full GPT model, optimizer, and training loop.
- Everything inside `train.py` is fair game: architecture, hyperparameters, optimizer details, batch size, schedule, and training-loop choices.
- The benc... | <think>
I’ve now evaluated 18 combinations of HEAD_DIM and WINDOW_PATTERN, and all results are recorded. The best configuration is HEAD_DIM=64 with WINDOW_PATTERN=SSLL, reaching 0.984556, but looking closely, the spread across all results is only about 0.0002—so small that it’s likely just run-to-run noise. On top of t... | You are a scientific search agent proposing edits to a training program under an iterative model-based (Bayesian) optimization loop. You may either propose edits within the current design space or expand that space. Return ONLY the JSON action. Never predict objective values, surrogate mean/variance, acquisition, or ra... | |
18 | # Task: nanogpt (training_program)
Autoresearch task context:
- `train.py` is the single editable file. It contains the full GPT model, optimizer, and training loop.
- Everything inside `train.py` is fair game: architecture, hyperparameters, optimizer details, batch size, schedule, and training-loop choices.
- The benc... | <think>
Looking at the current state, the best result so far is state_2271 with a score of 0.980087, achieved by raising EMBEDDING_LR from 0.6 to 0.8 and increasing WEIGHT_DECAY from 0.05 to 0.1. This combination has been replicated multiple times in the history and consistently lands around 0.980, which suggests it's ... | You are a scientific search agent proposing edits to a training program under an iterative model-based (Bayesian) optimization loop. You may either propose edits within the current design space or expand that space. Return ONLY the JSON action. Never predict objective values, surrogate mean/variance, acquisition, or ra... | |
15 | # Task: smallmol (molecule)
The optimization task is for KRAS G12C small-molecule candidates. The activity objective is based on a target-specific model trained from public KRAS G12C IC50 records, and the docking objective evaluates binding with AutoDock Vina.
Public medicinal-chemistry literature has shown that small... | <think>
Looking at the observed history, a clear pattern emerges: the search started with simple alkyl amines like `CCC(C)N` and `CCCCN` (Vina around -3.4), then progressively introduced longer chains and additional functional groups. The core scaffold `CC(C)CCCOCCN` appears repeatedly, and modifications to it consiste... | You are a scientific search agent proposing candidate molecules under an iterative multi-objective Bayesian optimization loop. Return ONLY the JSON action. Never predict docking score, activity, EHVI, uncertainty, or rank. | |
11 | # Task: nanogpt (training_program)
Autoresearch task context:
- `train.py` is the single editable file. It contains the full GPT model, optimizer, and training loop.
- Everything inside `train.py` is fair game: architecture, hyperparameters, optimizer details, batch size, schedule, and training-loop choices.
- The benc... | <think>
Looking at the recent history, I see a lot of crashes, which makes me cautious. The failures tend to cluster around combinations involving `HEAD_DIM`, `WINDOW_PATTERN`, or changes to `EMBEDDING_LR` and `WEIGHT_DECAY` together. In particular, whenever `HEAD_DIM` is set to 128, many configurations blow up, sugges... | You are a scientific search agent proposing edits to a training program under an iterative model-based (Bayesian) optimization loop. You may either propose edits within the current design space or expand that space. Return ONLY the JSON action. Never predict objective values, surrogate mean/variance, acquisition, or ra... | |
19 | # Task: smallmol (molecule)
The optimization task is for KRAS G12D small-molecule candidates. The activity objective is based on a target-specific model trained from public KRAS G12D IC50 records, and the docking objective evaluates binding with AutoDock Vina.
Public medicinal-chemistry literature has shown that small... | <think>
Looking at the observed history, the early candidates were mostly simple benzothiazolone or benzoxazolone cores with small substituents. The molecules that really stood out, however, were those that introduced an isopropoxy group, a cyano group, and alkyl substitution on the nitrogen. The most striking result c... | You are a scientific search agent proposing candidate molecules under an iterative multi-objective Bayesian optimization loop. Return ONLY the JSON action. Never predict docking score, activity, EHVI, uncertainty, or rank. | |
10 | # Task: smallmol (molecule)
The optimization task is for KRAS G12D small-molecule candidates. The activity objective is based on a target-specific model trained from public KRAS G12D IC50 records, and the docking objective evaluates binding with AutoDock Vina.
Public medicinal-chemistry literature has shown that small... | <think>
Looking at the observed history, the core scaffold has evolved from the simple benzothiazolone to more elaborate isoindolinone derivatives. A clear pattern emerges: introducing isopropoxy and cyano substituents consistently improves both activity and docking scores. For instance, the molecule with isopropoxy, c... | You are a scientific search agent proposing candidate molecules under an iterative multi-objective Bayesian optimization loop. Return ONLY the JSON action. Never predict docking score, activity, EHVI, uncertainty, or rank. | |
7 | "# Task: nanogpt (training_program)\nAutoresearch task context:\n- `train.py` is the single editable(...TRUNCATED) | "<think>\nLooking at the history so far, the best result came from state_0019 with a val_bpb of 0.98(...TRUNCATED) | "You are a scientific search agent proposing edits to a training program under an iterative model-ba(...TRUNCATED) | |
5 | "# Task: smallmol (molecule)\nThe optimization task is for KRAS G12D small-molecule candidates. The (...TRUNCATED) | "<think>\nLooking at the observed history, the search has clearly stalled: the last several rounds k(...TRUNCATED) | "You are a scientific search agent proposing candidate molecules under an iterative multi-objective (...TRUNCATED) | |
14 | "# Task: smallmol (molecule)\nThe optimization task is for KRAS G12D small-molecule candidates. The (...TRUNCATED) | "<think>\nLooking at the optimization task, I need to generate candidate compounds for KRAS G12D wit(...TRUNCATED) | "You are a scientific search agent proposing candidate molecules under an iterative multi-objective (...TRUNCATED) |
LDM-CoT-SFT-16K
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) corpus for Large Discovery Models (LDM): a dataset that distils an acquisition-guided, test-time search policy into a language-model proposer so that a single forward pass emulates a full model-based optimization loop.
Dataset Summary
An LDM couples three components in a recurrent generate → select → evaluate → update
loop: an LLM that proposes candidate experiments, a probabilistic surrogate that maps
observations to a posterior mean and uncertainty, and an acquisition function that selects
the next experiment under that uncertainty. Running this loop at high budget yields
trajectories of proposal decisions; each decision, together with the reasoning that
justifies it, is rendered as one training example. Fine-tuning on this corpus compiles the
expensive search policy into the proposer's weights.
This release provides the chain-of-thought variant in which the surrogate's numerical outputs are withheld from the prompt. The model receives only the observed history and must therefore infer the epistemic state — which regions are exhausted, which remain uncertain or informative, and whether to exploit or explore — from experience rather than by reading acquisition values. We refer to this objective as value-to-language distillation.
Supported Tasks
Examples are pooled from three discovery domains under a shared action schema:
| Domain | Search space | Objective |
|---|---|---|
| AutoResearch (nanoGPT) | training-code and hyperparameter edits | validation bits-per-byte |
| Small molecule | SMILES candidates (KRAS) | Vina docking score and predicted activity |
| Antibody | CDRH3 amino-acid sequences | Absolut binding energy |
Dataset Structure
Each record follows the Alpaca schema:
{
"instruction": "round context: evaluated history, constraints, and task specification",
"input": "",
"output": "<think> research-progress reasoning </think>{ JSON action }",
"system": "system prompt defining the proposer's role and output contract"
}
instruction— the search state presented to the proposer at one round.output— a chain-of-thought trace followed by the emitted action (proposed candidates).- A single training split is provided (
train.jsonl).
Data Collection and Processing
High-budget LDM rollouts and the accompanying reasoning traces were produced by a self-hosted DeepSeek teacher operating inside the LDM framework, then filtered by the empirical acquisition-tilted policy and rendered into the Alpaca schema. Reasoning traces were translated into English.
Related Datasets
| Dataset | Reasoning target | Surrogate values in prompt |
|---|---|---|
| LDM-TTS-Base-SFT-19K | direct action, no reasoning | — |
| LDM-CoT-Acq-SFT-16K | chain-of-thought | shown |
| LDM-CoT-SFT-16K (this) | chain-of-thought | withheld |
Intended Use
Full-parameter SFT of an instruction model as a discovery proposer; the intended base is
Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B with the qwen3_5 chat template. The resulting model is deployed inside
the LDM acquisition loop, where the surrogate and acquisition function remain external.
Limitations
- Reasoning traces are model-generated and machine-translated; a small fraction of records retain residual non-English text.
- Objective values reflect the specific oracles used during collection (Vina, an activity model, and Absolut) and should not be read as experimental ground truth.
Loading
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("Yangtze-ailab/LDM-CoT-SFT-16K")
- Downloads last month
- 35