Phocinae-Largha-150M-v1 — test scores (specialist: fitted on train split) + reproduction

#15
by perrylink - opened

Edited 2026-10-10: rewritten to the corrected v1.1 framing and figures; the correction comment below preserves the update record.

Tiny model. Big decisions.

We're releasing Phocinae-Largha-150M-v1 (model card), a 144.3M bilingual (zh/en) decision model for structured decisions — state / criteria / options in, one verdict out. mmBERT-small base, 256k vocab, runs on CPU. For local, open-source use — we don't run a service.

Scores (test, same protocol):

Model typed accuracy
Phocinae-Largha-150M-v1 — en, typed-decisions (400 cases / 2,000 decisions) 0.906 §
Phocinae-Largha-150M-v1 — zh, 400 cases (machine-translated) 0.848 §
Laya (published) 0.766
JEV (published) 0.727
meraGPT Decider1 (published) 0.768

Mode: specialist (fitted on the typed-decisions train split; not a zero-shot generalist). The training mix includes machine-translated Chinese (≈2,400 rows) and native Chinese (≈1,400 rows) of its 10,000 items; the zh score is measured on machine-translated test cases — an in-mix (fitted) evaluation, not zero-shot Chinese transfer.

§ = self-scored on the official test split, per the card's reporting rules (maintainer-scored leaderboard rows are unmarked).

What we think is the real story: shuffle the options, and the answer basically doesn't move — option-order flip rate is 0.0217 (reversed; flip400 protocol; 0.0200 on flip150) / 0.0144 (random-mean) / 0.0283 (any), lower is better, bought by training on reordered-option mixtures. Calibration: shipped-column ECE 0.2519 (en; an optional calibration column bundled in calib/ reaches 0.0168; zh 0.1941 → 0.0152). CPU p50 ≈1.64 s per case.

Our misses are public, too: JevBench public-231 aggregate 0.5455 (126/231) vs the 58.4% acceptance gate — not passed, disclosed as-is. Pre-registered gates G1–G4 all passed.

Reproduce: harness + frozen seed/row protocol · model card · landing page: https://phocinae.github.io/Phocinae-Largha-150M-v1/. Happy to take community head-to-heads on the same rows.

LocalLLaMA org

This is an official hf benchmark now, you can add the results to your model card and it should show up on the board, see - https://huggingface.co/docs/hub/en/eval-results

Correction — an earlier version of this post said "generalist" and "no native Chinese training rows", and used 0.797 / 0.789 from the previous release. Updated wording and figures (v1.1, 2026-10-09) follow.

Tiny model. Big decisions.

We're releasing Phocinae-Largha-150M-v1 (model card), a 144.3M bilingual (zh/en) decision model for structured decisions — state / criteria / options in, one verdict out. mmBERT-small base, 256k vocab, runs on CPU. For local, open-source use — we don't run a service.

Scores (test, same protocol):

Model typed accuracy
Phocinae-Largha-150M-v1 — en, typed-decisions (400 cases / 2,000 decisions) 0.906 §
Phocinae-Largha-150M-v1 — zh, 400 cases (machine-translated) 0.848 §
Laya (published) 0.766
JEV (published) 0.727
meraGPT Decider1 (published) 0.768

Mode: specialist (fitted on the typed-decisions train split; not a zero-shot generalist). The training mix includes machine-translated Chinese (≈2,400 rows) and native Chinese (≈1,400 rows) of its 10,000 items; the zh score is measured on machine-translated test cases — an in-mix (fitted) evaluation, not zero-shot Chinese transfer.

§ = self-scored on the official test split, per the card's reporting rules (maintainer-scored leaderboard rows are unmarked).

What we think is the real story: shuffle the options, and the answer basically doesn't move — option-order flip rate is 0.0217 (reversed; flip400 protocol; 0.0200 on flip150) / 0.0144 (random-mean) / 0.0283 (any), lower is better, bought by training on reordered-option mixtures. Calibration: shipped-column ECE 0.2519 (en; an optional calibration column bundled in calib/ reaches 0.0168; zh 0.1941 → 0.0152). CPU p50 ≈1.64 s per case.

Our misses are public, too: JevBench public-231 aggregate 0.5455 (126/231) vs the 58.4% acceptance gate — not passed, disclosed as-is. Pre-registered gates G1–G4 all passed.

Reproduce: harness + frozen seed/row protocol · model card · landing page: https://phocinae.github.io/Phocinae-Largha-150M-v1/. Happy to take community head-to-heads on the same rows.

perrylink changed discussion title from Phocinae-Largha-150M-v1 — test scores (generalist) + reproduction to Phocinae-Largha-150M-v1 — test scores (specialist: fitted on train split) + reproduction

Sign up or log in to comment