enhanced_prompt null | enhanced_completion stringlengths 4.34k 9.05k | attrition_label bool 2
classes | category stringclasses 1
value | difficulty stringclasses 3
values | id stringlengths 9 9 | ood_flag bool 2
classes | primary_drivers listlengths 1 6 | risk_level stringclasses 4
values | user_reasoning_trace stringlengths 238 963 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
null | **CORPINTEL-HR ANALYSIS REPORT**
**Subject:** Attrition Risk Assessment for Software Engineer (Age 26)
---
### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
To determine the attrition risk, I cross-referenced the employee's telemetry against sentiment, historical behavioral patterns, and financial/market factors.
* **Sentiment & Per... | false | attrition_reasoning | easy | attn_0053 | false | [
"None active"
] | Low | 1. All engagement metrics are maxed out (JobSatisfaction, EnvironmentSatisfaction, WorkLifeBalance all at 4/4), and PerformanceRating confirms sustained excellence.
2. RecognitionCount of 8 and AutonomyScore of 4/5 show a genuinely empowered, appreciated employee.
Protective factors clearly outweigh any minor concerns... |
null | **MEMORANDUM: CORPINTEL-HR ANALYSIS**
**TO:** Sales Leadership / HR Business Partner
**SUBJECT:** Attrition Risk Assessment: Employee ID [SDR-51-26]
**DATE:** October 26, 2023
**CONFIDENTIALITY LEVEL:** High
---
### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
To determine the attrition risk, I have analyzed the telemetry through five... | true | attrition_reasoning | easy | attn_0318 | false | [
"Inadequate Coaching & Development",
"Bonus Cut",
"Short Manager Tenure (weak bond)"
] | High | 1. Only 0.6 years with the current manager, against a much longer company tenure, means the relationship hasn't had time to build advocacy.
2. With only minimal coaching on record and quota attainment at 52% last two quarters, the underperformance looks like a support failure rather than a capability failure.
3. A bonu... |
null | **CORPINTEL-HR ANALYTICS REPORT**
**Subject:** Attrition Risk Assessment & Intervention Strategy
**Analyst:** CorpIntel-HR AI Module
---
### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
**Step 1: Qualification-Role Mismatch Analysis (Critical Signal)**
The most significant anomaly in this profile is the employee's education versus job... | true | attrition_reasoning | hard | attn_0155 | true | [
"Pension Freeze",
"Active External Opportunities",
"Frequent Overtime",
"Micromanagement Despite Remote",
"High Department Turnover"
] | Critical | 1. A pension freeze after decades of service removes a major retention hook and devalues the psychological contract built over the employee's tenure.
2. AutonomyScore is only 1/5 despite remote status, which is a strong signal of micromanagement rather than genuine flexibility.
3. 4 recruiter contacts in the last month... |
null | **CorpIntel-HR Attrition Risk Assessment**
**Subject:** Employee Profile Analysis | **Role:** ICU Nurse | **Date:** October 26, 2023
**Analyst:** CorpIntel-HR AI System
---
### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
1. **Satisfaction Dissonance:** The employee reports a **JobSatisfaction score of 1 (Lowest)** contrasted with an... | true | attrition_reasoning | hard | attn_0079 | true | [
"Low Job Satisfaction",
"Health Issues",
"Active External Opportunities",
"Poor Work-Life Balance",
"High Department Turnover",
"Short Manager Tenure (weak bond)"
] | Critical | 1. A disclosed health condition (elevated blood pressure) is being actively worsened by current job demands, which raises both a wellbeing and a retention concern.
2. WorkLifeBalance is 2/4, indicating the employee is not recovering between work cycles.
3. 6 recruiter contacts in the last month show the employee is hig... |
null | **CorpIntel-HR Attrition Risk Assessment**
**Subject:** Employee ID [Redacted] | Research Scientist, R&D
**Date:** October 26, 2023
**Analyst:** CorpIntel-HR AI Module
---
### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
1. **Tenure & Vesting Analysis:** At **0.9 years** of tenure, the employee is approaching the standard 1-year equ... | true | attrition_reasoning | easy | attn_0622 | false | [
"Active External Opportunities",
"Poor Work-Life Balance"
] | High | 1. WorkLifeBalance is 1/4, indicating the employee is not recovering between work cycles.
2. 3 recruiter contacts in the last month show the employee is highly marketable and could exit with little friction.
Interaction: the combination of 2 compounding stressor(s) outweighs the limited protective factors present, pus... |
null | ### CorpIntel-HR Attrition Risk Assessment
**Employee Profile Summary:** Age 27, Customer Service Rep (Support Dept), Monthly Income $3,112, Master's Degree + SHRM-SCP, 0.7 Years at Company.
---
### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
**Step 1: Qualification & Role Mismatch Analysis**
The employee holds a Master’s degree and... | true | attrition_reasoning | medium | attn_0860 | false | [
"Health Issues",
"Short Manager Tenure (weak bond)"
] | High | 1. Only 1.2 years with the current manager, against a much longer company tenure, means the relationship hasn't had time to build advocacy.
2. A disclosed health condition (elevated blood pressure) is being actively worsened by current job demands, which raises both a wellbeing and a retention concern.
Interaction: th... |
null | ### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
**A. Tenure & Retirement Horizon:**
At age 60 with 25.1 years of tenure, the employee is entering the traditional retirement window. In most corporate benefit structures, 25+ years often triggers full pension vesting or enhanced retirement packages. While their single-employer history in... | false | attrition_reasoning | easy | attn_0615 | false | [
"None active"
] | Low | 1. Core engagement metrics are healthy (JobSatisfaction=3, WorkLifeBalance=3), suggesting a fundamentally stable situation.
Protective factors clearly outweigh any minor concerns, keeping this a Low-risk, well-fit profile (confidence 98%). |
null | ### CorpIntel-HR Attrition Risk Assessment
**Subject:** Logistics Coordinator, Supply Chain
**Analyst:** CorpIntel-HR System
---
#### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
1. **Physical Sustainability & Health Liability:** The employee is 59 years old with a documented health issue, yet their role requires frequent travel. Thi... | true | attrition_reasoning | easy | attn_0566 | false | [
"Health Issues",
"Poor Work-Life Balance"
] | High | 1. WorkLifeBalance is 1/4, indicating the employee is not recovering between work cycles.
2. A disclosed health condition (a recurring back injury) is being actively worsened by current job demands, which raises both a wellbeing and a retention concern.
Interaction: the combination of 2 compounding stressor(s) outweig... |
null | **CORPINTEL-HR ANALYSIS REPORT**
**Subject:** Attrition Risk Assessment – Finance Manager
---
### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
To determine the attrition risk, I analyzed the telemetry across four critical dimensions: **Sentiment, Performance/Reward, Stability, and Sustainability.**
* **Sentiment & Engagement (Stron... | false | attrition_reasoning | easy | attn_0980 | false | [
"None active"
] | Low | 1. All engagement metrics are maxed out (JobSatisfaction, EnvironmentSatisfaction, WorkLifeBalance all at 4/4), and PerformanceRating confirms sustained excellence.
2. RecognitionCount of 13 and AutonomyScore of 4/5 show a genuinely empowered, appreciated employee.
Protective factors clearly outweigh any minor concern... |
null | # CorpIntel-HR Attrition Risk Assessment
**Employee ID:** [Anonymized] | **Role:** Registered Nurse (Emergency) | **Analysis Date:** October 26, 2023
---
### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
**Step 1: Baseline Stability Analysis (The "Anchor" Factors)**
The employee presents strong retention anchors. With **26.5 years** of... | false | attrition_reasoning | medium | attn_0594 | true | [
"Poor Work-Life Balance"
] | Low | 1. All engagement metrics are maxed out (JobSatisfaction, EnvironmentSatisfaction, WorkLifeBalance all at 4/4), and PerformanceRating confirms sustained excellence.
2. RecognitionCount of 12 and AutonomyScore of 4/5 show a genuinely empowered, appreciated employee.
3. WorkLifeBalance is 1/4, indicating the employee is ... |
null | ## CorpIntel-HR Attrition Risk Assessment
**Subject:** Employee Telemetry Analysis | **Role:** Registered Nurse (Emergency)
**Date:** October 26, 2023 | **Analyst:** CorpIntel-HR AI Module
---
### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
1. **The Satisfaction Paradox:** The most critical data point is the extreme divergence in ... | false | attrition_reasoning | medium | attn_0033 | true | [
"Low Job Satisfaction"
] | Low | 1. Core engagement metrics are healthy (JobSatisfaction=3, WorkLifeBalance=4), suggesting a fundamentally stable situation.
2. JobSatisfaction is critically low (1/4), signaling active disengagement from the role itself.
Protective factors clearly outweigh any minor concerns, keeping this a Low-risk, well-fit profile ... |
null | **CorpIntel-HR Analysis Report**
**Subject:** Employee ID [Redacted] – Manufacturing Technician
**Date:** October 26, 2023
**Analyst:** CorpIntel-HR AI System
---
### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
To determine the attrition risk, I analyzed the employee telemetry across five critical dimensions:
1. **Historical Volati... | false | attrition_reasoning | easy | attn_0455 | false | [
"None active"
] | Low | 1. Core engagement metrics are healthy (JobSatisfaction=3, WorkLifeBalance=4), suggesting a fundamentally stable situation.
Protective factors clearly outweigh any minor concerns, keeping this a Low-risk, well-fit profile (confidence 89%). |
null | # CorpIntel-HR Attrition Risk Assessment
**Subject:** Research Scientist, R&D
**Assessment Date:** October 26, 2023
---
### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
**A. The "Satisfaction Paradox" and Comfortable Stagnation**
The employee reports high scores in Job Satisfaction (4/5), Environment Satisfaction (4/5), and Work-Life... | false | attrition_reasoning | medium | attn_0442 | false | [
"Promotion Denial / Career Stagnation",
"Health Issues"
] | Medium | 1. A promotion denial after 8.9 years at the company reads as a broken psychological contract, especially given the tenure invested.
2. A disclosed health condition (chronic migraines) is being actively worsened by current job demands, which raises both a wellbeing and a retention concern.
On balance, the mix of stabi... |
null | # CorpIntel-HR: Attrition Risk Assessment & Intervention Plan
**Subject:** Employee ID [Redacted] | Graphic Designer, Creative Dept.
**Assessment Date:** October 26, 2023
**Analyst:** CorpIntel-HR AI System
---
### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
1. **The "High-Performer Burnout" Paradox:** The employee has a Performanc... | true | attrition_reasoning | hard | attn_0786 | true | [
"Low Job Satisfaction",
"Poor Work-Life Balance",
"Frequent Overtime",
"High Department Turnover",
"Long Commute",
"Short Manager Tenure (weak bond)"
] | Critical | 1. WorkLifeBalance is 2/4, indicating the employee is not recovering between work cycles.
2. Overtime is active at roughly 9 extra hours/week, compounding fatigue on top of already strained satisfaction scores.
3. A 46 km commute adds meaningful daily fatigue on top of the other stressors present.
4. JobSatisfaction is... |
null | ### CORPINTEL-HR ANALYSIS REPORT
**Case ID:** EMP-FIN-46-15
**Subject:** Attrition Risk Assessment – Finance Manager
---
#### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
To determine the attrition risk, the telemetry data was analyzed across four dimensions: Stability, Satisfaction, Performance, and Friction Points.
* **Stability ... | false | attrition_reasoning | medium | attn_0092 | true | [
"Micromanagement Despite Remote"
] | Low | 1. All engagement metrics are maxed out (JobSatisfaction, EnvironmentSatisfaction, WorkLifeBalance all at 4/4), and PerformanceRating confirms sustained excellence.
2. RecognitionCount of 10 and AutonomyScore of 4/5 show a genuinely empowered, appreciated employee.
3. AutonomyScore is only 2/5 despite remote status, wh... |
null | ### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
**A. Intellectual Alignment & Autonomy:** The most critical signal is the severe mismatch between the employee's education level (PhD) and their Autonomy Score (1). For a senior knowledge worker, an autonomy score of 1 indicates micromanagement or severe underutilization, breaching the ps... | true | attrition_reasoning | easy | attn_0661 | false | [
"Layoff Survivor Syndrome",
"Micromanagement Despite Remote"
] | High | 1. Surviving a team reduction of roughly 29% while absorbing extra workload creates classic survivor guilt and insecurity.
2. AutonomyScore is only 1/5 despite remote status, which is a strong signal of micromanagement rather than genuine flexibility.
Interaction: the combination of 2 compounding stressor(s) outweighs... |
null | ### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
**A. Tenure vs. Satisfaction Paradox:**
The employee has an exceptionally long tenure (17.5 years) compared to the PeerAvgTenureExit (5.8 years), indicating high historical loyalty. However, this is contradicted by critically low Job Satisfaction (2) and Environment Satisfaction (2). In ... | true | attrition_reasoning | easy | attn_0639 | false | [
"Active External Opportunities",
"Low Manager Quality"
] | High | 1. ManagerQualityScore of 2.3/5 suggests the manager is not providing sponsorship or development support.
2. 5 recruiter contacts in the last month show the employee is highly marketable and could exit with little friction.
Interaction: the combination of 2 compounding stressor(s) outweighs the limited protective fact... |
null | # CorpIntel-HR Attrition Risk Assessment
**Subject:** Employee ID [Redacted] | **Role:** Finance Manager | **Date:** October 26, 2023
**Analyst:** CorpIntel-HR AI System
---
### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
1. **Satisfaction Dissonance:** The most alarming signal is the **Job Satisfaction score of 2** contrasted again... | false | attrition_reasoning | medium | attn_0261 | false | [
"Low Job Satisfaction"
] | Medium | 1. JobSatisfaction is critically low (2/4), signaling active disengagement from the role itself.
On balance, the mix of stabilizing and destabilizing signals lands the profile at Medium risk (confidence 70%) — worth monitoring but not yet urgent. |
null | **CorpIntel-HR Attrition Risk Assessment**
**Employee Profile:** 32-Year-Old Manufacturing Technician (Assembly Line)
**Assessment Date:** October 26, 2023
---
### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
**A. Qualification Mismatch & Career Stagnation**
The employee holds an MBA but has worked as a Manufacturing Technician for 1... | true | attrition_reasoning | easy | attn_0838 | false | [
"Micromanagement Despite Remote",
"Short Manager Tenure (weak bond)",
"Long Commute"
] | High | 1. Only 0.4 years with the current manager, against a much longer company tenure, means the relationship hasn't had time to build advocacy.
2. AutonomyScore is only 2/5 despite remote status, which is a strong signal of micromanagement rather than genuine flexibility.
3. A 52 km commute adds meaningful daily fatigue on... |
null | ### CorpIntel-HR Attrition Risk Assessment
**Role:** Supply Chain Director
**Department:** Operations
---
### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
1. **The Satisfaction Paradox:** The most critical data point is the divergence between **JobSatisfaction (4/5)** and **EnvironmentSatisfaction (1/5)**. This indicates the employe... | true | attrition_reasoning | hard | attn_0642 | true | [
"Promotion Denial / Career Stagnation",
"Low Manager Quality",
"Low Environment Satisfaction",
"Layoff Survivor Syndrome"
] | Critical | 1. A promotion denial after 24.1 years at the company reads as a broken psychological contract, especially given the tenure invested.
2. ManagerQualityScore of 2.4/5 suggests the manager is not providing sponsorship or development support.
3. EnvironmentSatisfaction sits at 1/4, pointing to friction with team culture, ... |
null | **CorpIntel-HR Analysis Report**
**Subject:** Employee Profile Analysis – HR Business Partner
**Status:** Confidential / Action Required Immediately
---
### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
1. **Satisfaction & Environmental Friction:** The employee reports low scores across key metrics: Job Satisfaction (3/5), Environment ... | true | attrition_reasoning | hard | attn_0906 | true | [
"Health Issues",
"Low Manager Quality",
"Layoff Survivor Syndrome",
"High Department Turnover"
] | Critical | 1. A disclosed health condition (chronic knee pain) is being actively worsened by current job demands, which raises both a wellbeing and a retention concern.
2. ManagerQualityScore of 2.0/5 suggests the manager is not providing sponsorship or development support.
3. Department turnover of 28% normalizes departure and e... |
null | **CORPINTEL-HR ANALYSIS REPORT**
**Case ID:** EMP-54-PM-20
**Subject:** Attrition Risk Assessment & Strategic Intervention
---
### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
**A. Protective Factors (Retention Anchors)**
The employee presents a profile of extreme stability and high engagement. With 20.4 years at the company and ceili... | false | attrition_reasoning | easy | attn_0952 | false | [
"None active"
] | Low | 1. All engagement metrics are maxed out (JobSatisfaction, EnvironmentSatisfaction, WorkLifeBalance all at 4/4), and PerformanceRating confirms sustained excellence.
2. RecognitionCount of 6 and AutonomyScore of 4/5 show a genuinely empowered, appreciated employee.
Protective factors clearly outweigh any minor concerns... |
null | ### CorpIntel-HR Attrition Risk Assessment
**Employee ID:** [Anonymized]
**Date:** October 26, 2023
**Analyst:** CorpIntel-HR AI Module
---
### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
**Step 1: Stability & Engagement Analysis**
The employee demonstrates strong structural stability with a tenure of **13.4 years** and a 6-year repo... | false | attrition_reasoning | easy | attn_0850 | false | [
"None active"
] | Low | 1. All engagement metrics are maxed out (JobSatisfaction, EnvironmentSatisfaction, WorkLifeBalance all at 4/4), and PerformanceRating confirms sustained excellence.
2. RecognitionCount of 10 and AutonomyScore of 4/5 show a genuinely empowered, appreciated employee.
Protective factors clearly outweigh any minor concern... |
null | ### CorpIntel-HR Attrition Risk Assessment
**Employee Profile:** HR Business Partner (Age 35)
**Assessment Date:** October 26, 2023
---
#### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
To determine the attrition risk, the telemetry was analyzed across four primary dimensions: Career Trajectory, Psychological Contract, Environmental ... | true | attrition_reasoning | easy | attn_0967 | false | [
"Promotion Denial / Career Stagnation",
"Micromanagement Despite Remote"
] | High | 1. A promotion denial after 2.8 years at the company reads as a broken psychological contract, especially given the tenure invested.
2. AutonomyScore is only 1/5 despite remote status, which is a strong signal of micromanagement rather than genuine flexibility.
Interaction: the combination of 2 compounding stressor(s)... |
null | ### CorpIntel-HR Attrition Risk Assessment
**Subject:** Employee ID [Redacted]
**Analyst:** CorpIntel-HR AI Module
---
#### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
**Step 1: Baseline Stability vs. Stagnation**
The employee presents a paradox of high stability metrics (6.5 years tenure, `NumCompaniesWorked: 1`, Married, `WorkLife... | true | attrition_reasoning | medium | attn_0091 | false | [
"Promotion Denial / Career Stagnation",
"High Department Turnover",
"Long Commute"
] | High | 1. A promotion denial after 6.5 years at the company reads as a broken psychological contract, especially given the tenure invested.
2. Department turnover of 36% normalizes departure and erodes the sense that staying is the default choice.
3. A 39 km commute adds meaningful daily fatigue on top of the other stressors ... |
null | ## CorpIntel-HR Attrition Risk Assessment
**Employee Profile:** Graphic Designer | Creative Department
**Date:** October 26, 2023
**Analyst:** CorpIntel-HR AI System
---
### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
1. **Sentiment & Friction Analysis:** The most critical indicator is **JobSatisfaction (2/5)**, statistically the st... | true | attrition_reasoning | easy | attn_0649 | false | [
"Low Job Satisfaction",
"Active External Opportunities",
"Frequent Overtime"
] | High | 1. JobSatisfaction is critically low (2/4), signaling active disengagement from the role itself.
2. 4 recruiter contacts in the last month show the employee is highly marketable and could exit with little friction.
3. Overtime is active at roughly 9 extra hours/week, compounding fatigue on top of already strained satis... |
null | ### CorpIntel-HR Attrition Risk Assessment
**Subject:** Employee ID [Redacted] | **Role:** Accountant | **Dept:** Finance
**Analyst:** CorpIntel-HR AI Module
---
#### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
1. **The Performance-Satisfaction Paradox:** The employee is a high performer (PerformanceRating: 4) but reports uniformly... | true | attrition_reasoning | medium | attn_0202 | false | [
"Health Issues",
"Active External Opportunities"
] | High | 1. A disclosed health condition (chronic knee pain) is being actively worsened by current job demands, which raises both a wellbeing and a retention concern.
2. 5 recruiter contacts in the last month show the employee is highly marketable and could exit with little friction.
Interaction: the combination of 2 compoundi... |
null | **CorpIntel-HR Analysis Report**
**Subject:** Employee ID [Redacted] – Manufacturing Technician
**Date:** October 26, 2023
### 1. Step-by-Step Reasoning
**Step 1: Tenure & Loyalty Analysis**
The employee exhibits extreme institutional loyalty with 20.6 years of tenure at a single company. Compared to the `PeerAvgTenu... | false | attrition_reasoning | easy | attn_0648 | false | [
"None active"
] | Low | 1. All engagement metrics are maxed out (JobSatisfaction, EnvironmentSatisfaction, WorkLifeBalance all at 4/4), and PerformanceRating confirms sustained excellence.
2. RecognitionCount of 9 and AutonomyScore of 4/5 show a genuinely empowered, appreciated employee.
Protective factors clearly outweigh any minor concerns... |
This dataset is a remastered version prepared using Adaption's Adaptive Data platform.
adaption-hr_attrition_risk_assessments
This dataset contains synthetic employee telemetry profiles paired with expert AI-generated attrition risk assessments and managerial intervention plans. Each sample includes detailed demographic and performance metrics, followed by a structured analysis identifying risk levels, primary drivers, and prioritized action timelines. The content is designed for training models on human resources analytics, specifically focusing on retention strategies and crisis management.
Dataset size
There are 1,000 data points in this dataset. This is an instruction tuning dataset.
Quality of Remastered Dataset
The final quality is A, with a relative quality improvement of 23.8%.
Domain
- Hr (100%)
Language
- English (100%)
Tone
- Professional (82%)
- Analytical (18%)
Evaluation Results
Quality Gains:
Grade Improvement:
Percentile Chart:

- Downloads last month
- 40
