Instructions to use beanyzoldyck/ender1.1 with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- PEFT
How to use beanyzoldyck/ender1.1 with PEFT:
from peft import PeftModel from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM base_model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B") model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(base_model, "beanyzoldyck/ender1.1") - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
ender1.1
LoRA adapter for Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B
(revision 1d4bf0f2ff6012fd82039f2fa52739d0dd7c60c0), trained with
Ender's Bench at CalHacks 13.0.
Family note: the latest adapter in this family is now beanyzoldyck/ender1.3; all three are listed in the Ender family collection. The earlier
ender1checkpoint is on beanyzoldyck/ender1.
Not a merged model: load the pinned base, then this adapter.
Showcase
Target-action match on 18 agentic-ethics cases, same prompts for every model, higher is better. As the footnotes in the chart say: every case is drawn from Ender's fine-tuning data, and zero labeled-misaligned actions were chosen by any model — the gap reflects matching trained targets, not fewer violations.
Headline numbers as shown in the chart:
| Area | ender1.1 |
|---|---|
| Overall (18 cases) | 89% |
| Simulation alignment (10 cases) | 100% |
| Financial compliance (4 cases) | 75% |
| Reward hacking (4 cases) | 75% |
For comparison, the same chart shows base Qwen3.8-27B at 56% overall.
Provenance caveat: the raw ender1.1 responses behind these bars were not retained in the saved report (only the frontier rows and the earlier ender1/base pairs remain), so the ender1.1 bars cannot be independently recomputed from the repository artifacts. Treat the chart as a curriculum-fit demonstration, not an independent benchmark.
Background
Ender's Bench is a set of simulated scenarios for testing whether an agent
behaves ethically when it can gain by cheating, harming, or ignoring others:
a shared survival world ("The Clearing"), a financial desk (lending,
collections, vendor payments), and reward-hacking tasks. This adapter is the
generalization mix: Ledger Street house-rules desk, finance-derived cases,
authored ethics analogues, recorded Clearing runs, Clearing altruism probes,
and a general-ethics demo set. All training data is synthetic or recorded
benchmark data, marked reviewed: false; no outputs from frontier model APIs
were used as training targets.
Lineage (each stage continued the previous adapter's weights)
| Stage | Data | Updates | LR |
|---|---|---|---|
| alignment-finance curriculum, clean base | authored act/audit rows | 40 | 2e-5 |
| high-LR continuation | authored act/audit rows | 60 | 2e-4 |
| full alignment-finance stage | 1,427 group-split training rows | 160 | 1e-4 |
| Clearing demo overfit | 18 Clearing altruism rows | 60 | 2e-4 |
| generalization mix | alignment-finance + Clearing + general ethics | 100 | 5e-5 |
| Ender 1.1 | rebalanced mix (see below) | 143 | 5e-5 |
Final stage mix per shuffled pass (2,038 rows): Ledger Street house-rules 430,
finance-derived 450, authored ethics x2 (368), recorded Clearing runs 658,
Clearing altruism x4 (72), general ethics 60. The experimental retep sister
is no longer trained and is not included.
Measured development probes (small, not an independent benchmark)
run/evaluation-step-143.json: 9/13 correct, 13/13 valid tool-call or label
format. The final 1.1 stage changed no probe outcome versus its starting
checkpoint (9/13 both), while mean target loss fell from 0.314 to 0.222.
Earlier stages moved the base model from 3/11 to 8/11 on the previous probe set.
| Area | Score |
|---|---|
| Held-out alignment-finance groups | 7/8 |
| Held-out Ledger Street lending scenario | 1/1 |
| Decisions from held-out Clearing runs (exact action) | 0/2 |
| Clearing altruism demo retention | 1/2 |
Action matches require the exact tool and executable arguments; thought
wording is ignored. Clearing audit correctness requires the altruism,
misalignment and missed-opportunity booleans.
Serving
This adapter is served on the RunPod endpoint under the name ender with the
Hermes tool parser and thinking disabled (enable_thinking: false), which is
how the Ender harness provider calls it. The volume-side file was not
independently hashed from here; the local copy below is the reference.
Files
adapter_model.safetensors: LoRA weights, SHA-256adaf2667a3ce66dcdc12600dc537a79332946afc0c1473f1358799a172f6a31a(matches the Spark copy).adapter_config.json,chat_template.jinja,tokenizer.json,tokenizer_config.json,processor_config.json,trainer_state.json,train_results.json.run/: training manifest, probes and the development report.launch-chart-ender1.1.png/.svg: the showcase chart.
Usage
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
from peft import PeftModel
base = "Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B"
tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(base)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(base, torch_dtype="bfloat16", device_map="auto")
model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(model, "beanyzoldyck/ender1.1")
Limitations
- Small, synthetic, assistant-authored training data; labels unreviewed.
- The only evaluations are training-overlap showcases and small development probes. No generalization claim and no frontier comparison is supported.
- Not for deployment: do not use it for real lending, collections, payments, or any decision about a real person.
License
The base model is Apache-2.0; this adapter is released under the same license.
- Downloads last month
- 25
Model tree for beanyzoldyck/ender1.1
Base model
Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B