KAT-Coder-V2.5-Dev vs Qwen 3.6-35B-A3B

#4
by Kirin1997 - opened

Kat vs stock Qwen β€” my mini benchmark

I ran kat against stock Qwen on a custom 6-task suite (miniSkillbench): constraint retention, dependency graphs, state machines, decoy bugfixes β€” it's not exactly syntax trivia, but rather reasoning depth and procedural reliability. Pi agent was used in all the tests

Additionally, the repo also includes runs on Composer 2.5, I ran it just because I felt like it)

Takeaway: on these tests, kat consistently looked genuinely stronger than stock Qwen. Recommended temperature 1.0 performed worse than base 0.6 in this benchmark. KAT's quantisation is slightly worse than stock's, but that is rather minus to the stock

Caveats (important):
I wrote the tasks and graders myself;
very few runs: 2Γ— kat, 1Γ— stock Qwen;
tasks target intellectual depth, no API/syntax knowledge check

The repo is open β€” reproduce it and push back if you disagree

image

image

What's really interesting here - KAT was able to match Composer 2.5 in the raw reasoning and details attention in this test, but it wrote obviously worse code leaving alone time it took to complete the tasks

Kirin1997 changed discussion status to closed
Kirin1997 changed discussion status to open

Interesting, thanks for sharing the results. Could you please also share the quantization used (I assume you have use GGUFs, right) and the exact serving parameters (llama.cpp?). Thank you. Regards

What presence-penalty do you test with? The upstream model says 1.5 but I'm sceptical

Sign up or log in to comment