laya-bangla

A model that makes fixed decisions about Bangla text: which option fits, yes or no, and how much. It reads Bangla script, Banglish (Bangla written in English letters), and Bangla-English mixed text.

বাংলা, বাংলিশ বা মিশ্র ভাষার লেখা পড়ে নির্দিষ্ট প্রশ্নের উত্তর দেয়: কোন বিভাগে যাবে, লেখাটি কি বিদ্বেষমূলক, অনুভূতি কেমন। প্রতিটি উত্তরের সাথে সম্ভাবনাও দেখায়।

Try it live · Source code · Full benchmark report · Dataset guide

What it does

You give the model a piece of text and one or more questions, each with its own answer options. It answers every question at once and tells you how likely each option is. It does not write text; it only picks among the options you give it, so the output is always one of your labels.

Good fits:

• Routing: send a message to the right team, or a voice command to the right action.
• Moderation: flag hate speech, personal attacks, or abusive comments.
• Triage and feedback: citizen-complaint sector, sentiment, severity.

laya-bangla is convaiinnovations/laya-multilingual fine-tuned on six published Bangla datasets. It keeps the same Laya question format and Python API, so code written for Laya works unchanged.

Quick start

pip install "laya==0.4.11"

import laya

agent = laya.load("algolyzer/laya-bangla", revision="v2")

questions = {
    "sector": {
        "type": "choice",
        "instructions": "নাগরিকের এই সমস্যাটি কোন সেবা খাতের?",
        "criteria": {
            "water": "পানি সরবরাহ বা জলাবদ্ধতা",
            "electricity": "বিদ্যুৎ বা লোডশেডিং",
            "waste": "ময়লা, আবর্জনা বা পরিচ্ছন্নতা",
        },
    },
    "abusive": {
        "type": "noul",
        "instructions": "লেখাটি কি অশ্লীল গালি দেয় বা মারধরের কথা বলে?",
        "criteria": {"false": "না", "true": "হ্যাঁ"},
    },
}

result = agent.predict("আমাদের এলাকায় তিন দিন ধরে পানি নেই", questions)
print(result["answers"]["sector"]["choice"])         # water
print(result["answers"]["sector"]["probabilities"])  # {"water": 0.99, "electricity": 0.003, ...}
print(result["answers"]["abusive"]["noul"])          # 0.31: probability of "yes", so "no"

For many texts at once, use agent.predict_batch(texts, questions, batch_size=32). The model runs on CPU, an NVIDIA GPU, or Apple Silicon (MPS) and needs about 1.3 GB of memory.

No code? Open the playground Space. The model runs inside your browser (WebGPU or WASM), so nothing you type is sent anywhere. The first visit downloads about 640 MB, which the browser then caches.

Choose a version

Version	Best for	Size	Where to get it
laya-bangla v2 (recommended)	Python, servers; fully benchmarked	644 MB	this repository, revision="v2"
v2 · ONNX fp32	Node.js, servers without PyTorch	1.3 GB	this repository, onnx/fp32/
v2 · ONNX int8	Web browsers (WebGPU or WASM)	640 MB	this repository, onnx/int8/
laya-bangla-lora	Also asking new yes/no questions: keeps more of the base model's reasoning (sample-tested)	644 MB	algolyzer/laya-bangla-lora
LoRA · ONNX fp32 / int8	The same, in Node.js or browsers	1.3 GB / 640 MB	algolyzer/laya-bangla-lora, onnx/
laya-bangla-llm (GGUF, safetensors)	Ollama, llama.cpp, LM Studio, vLLM		Not trained yet (why)

All versions answer the same questions in the same format, and every ONNX file was checked against PyTorch: the same answer for 99.6% (fp32) and 99.1% (int8) of 1,284 test decisions, with the same accuracy. The collection lists every version, the demo, and the datasets.

Run it on any platform

Python

The quick start above: pip install "laya==0.4.11", then laya.load("algolyzer/laya-bangla", revision="v2"). CPU, NVIDIA GPU (CUDA), and Apple Silicon (MPS) all work. Use revision="v2" so an update never changes your results.

HTTP API (JavaScript, PHP, Java, Go, anything that can send a request)

Laya ships a production server. Register laya-bangla and start it:

pip install "laya[serve]==0.4.11"
LAYA_EXTRA_MODELS='{"bangla": "algolyzer/laya-bangla"}' LAYA_MODELS=bangla LAYA_DEFAULT_MODEL=bangla LAYA_REVISION=v2 LAYA_PORT=8000 laya-serve

curl -s http://localhost:8000/v1/systemone -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{
  "model": "bangla",
  "state": "আমাদের এলাকায় তিন দিন ধরে পানি নেই",
  "questions": {"sector": {"type": "choice", "instructions": "কোন সেবা খাতের সমস্যা?",
    "criteria": {"water": "পানি", "electricity": "বিদ্যুৎ", "waste": "ময়লা"}}}
}'

The reply holds the same answers as the Python API. /v1/systemone/batch answers many texts at once, /health shows the loaded revision, and LAYA_API_KEY=<secret> requires Authorization: Bearer <secret>.

Docker

The same server in a container (this Dockerfile is a starting point; it was not built in this project):

FROM python:3.12-slim
RUN pip install --no-cache-dir "laya[serve]==0.4.11" --extra-index-url https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cpu
ENV LAYA_EXTRA_MODELS='{"bangla": "algolyzer/laya-bangla"}' LAYA_MODELS=bangla
ENV LAYA_DEFAULT_MODEL=bangla LAYA_REVISION=v2 LAYA_PORT=8000
EXPOSE 8000
CMD ["laya-serve"]

Web browser, no server

The playground runs entirely in the browser with laya-ts, Laya's TypeScript runtime, and ONNX Runtime Web. Copy its web/ folder to any static host (GitHub Pages, Netlify, a Hugging Face static Space) and it loads the model from this repository:

import { Agent } from "./vendor/laya-ts/index.js"; // plus an import map for onnxruntime-web
const agent = await Agent.load("algolyzer/laya-bangla", { subfolder: "onnx/int8", revision: "7c8ad162a66c05409f9278e047e3ee80c24017a8" });
const result = await agent.predict("আমাদের এলাকায় তিন দিন ধরে পানি নেই", questions);

Node.js

The same laya-ts code with onnxruntime-node, on the onnx/fp32 or onnx/int8 folder:

hf download algolyzer/laya-bangla --include "onnx/fp32/*" --local-dir laya-bangla

const agent = await Agent.load("./laya-bangla/onnx/fp32", { device: "cpu" });

Go, Rust, Java, .NET

Laya has ONNX Runtime ports for Go, Rust, Java, and .NET. Point them at the onnx/ files (each port's README says which layout it reads). These ports were not tested with laya-bangla.

Ollama, llama.cpp, LM Studio, vLLM

These tools run chat language models. laya-bangla is not one: it is a text encoder with Laya's decision head, which these tools cannot load, so a GGUF conversion would lose the part that makes the decisions. Until the LLM version exists, use the HTTP API above from those apps.

A separate LLM version, laya-bangla-llm (Qwen3-1.7B fine-tuned with QLoRA to answer the same questions as JSON), is fully prepared but not trained yet. Its training, benchmark, GGUF export, and Ollama files are in the GitHub repository. When it is published, it will run with:

ollama run hf.co/algolyzer/laya-bangla-llm-GGUF:Q4_K_M     # Ollama
llama-server -hf algolyzer/laya-bangla-llm-GGUF:Q4_K_M     # llama.cpp
vllm serve algolyzer/laya-bangla-llm                       # vLLM

Step-by-step versions of every option are in the deployment guide.

Writing questions

Type	The model returns	Example question
choice	the best option, plus a probability for every option	Which department should handle this?
noul	the probability that the answer is yes (0 to 1)	Is this comment hate speech?
score	a level on an ordered scale, plus a probability per level	How urgent is it: low, medium, or high?

• Write instructions and option descriptions in Bangla or English. Both were tested.
• noul questions use exactly two options, "false" and "true". score options are a list from lowest to highest.
• Keep option descriptions short and clearly different from each other.

Where it works best

Accuracy of laya-bangla on held-out test data, averaged over Bangla- and English-worded questions (base model in brackets). "Not tested" means no public test data exists.

Task	Bangla script	Banglish	English
Complaint service sector	93% (61%)	not tested	not tested
Voice-assistant routing, two steps	81% (18%)	often wrong (not trained on Banglish)	77% (40%)
Topic of a sentence	77% (57%)	not tested	87% (79%)
Hate speech	74% (58%)	77% (58%)	63% (57%)
Personal attack	not tested	81% (57%)	not tested
Sentiment of course comments	82% (46%)	83% (36%)	not tested
Sentiment of reviews and posts	49–63% (24–34%)	not tested	65–74% (33–54%)
Yes/no sentence logic (entailment)	51%, worse (64%)	not tested	64%, worse (80%)

• Works well (75% and up): routing requests and complaints, topics, Banglish moderation, course-feedback sentiment, in Bangla script and also in English.
• Use with care (60–75%): hate speech in Bangla script or English tweets, sentiment outside course comments. Check a sample first.
• Do not use for: general yes/no reasoning (use the base model), and Banglish voice commands.

How well it works

All numbers are from test data the model never saw, asked with question wording it never saw during training. Each question was asked twice, once in Bangla and once in English, so each cell shows accuracy with the Bangla question / with the English question. The better model on each row is in bold.

Overall, accuracy goes from 53% to 82% across the 42,576 test decisions of the six training datasets.

Tasks it was trained on

Task	Dataset	Text	Test size	Base model	laya-bangla
Voice-assistant routing, two steps	MASSIVE	Bangla	2,939	18% / 18%	81% / 80%
Voice-assistant scenario (18 options)	MASSIVE	Bangla	2,939	27% / 31%	88% / 87%
Complaint service sector (6)	BanglaPSG	Bangla	487	64% / 57%	93% / 93%
Complaint severity (3 levels)	BanglaPSG	Bangla	487	34% / 40%	43% / 40%
Hate speech	BanTH	Banglish	3,729	49% / 66%	78% / 77%
Personal attack	BanTH	Banglish	3,729	46% / 67%	81% / 81%
Abusive or violent language	BanTH	Banglish	3,729	44% / 78%	83% / 92%
Hate speech	BanHate	Bangla	2,720	61% / 55%	74% / 74%
Sentiment of course comments	eLearning	Bangla + Banglish	602	34% / 47%	82% / 83%
Topic of a sentence (7)	SIB-200	Bangla	204	57% / 58%	76% / 77%

Datasets it never trained on

Task	Dataset	Text	Test size	Base model	laya-bangla
Sentiment of social-media comments	SentNoB	Bangla	1,564	24% / 45%	48% / 49%
Sentiment of product reviews	IndicSentiment	Bangla	996	1% / 47%	59% / 66%
Does sentence A imply B? (yes/no)	IndicXNLI	Bangla	3,340	60% / 69%	50% / 53%

What else improved

• Trustworthy probabilities. On the trained tasks, the average gap between the reported probability and the real hit rate (expected calibration error) falls from 0.27 to 0.04. When the model says 80%, it is right about 8 times out of 10.
• Same answer in either language. The base model's accuracy could differ by up to 45 points depending on whether the question was in Bangla or English. For laya-bangla the largest gap is 9 points, and most are under 4.
• Banglish. Hate-speech and abuse detection on romanized comments improves by 11 to 39 points.
• Speed. About 4 ms per decision in batches on an RTX 4060; 0.1 to 0.7 seconds per message on 2 CPU threads.

English text

The model was trained only on Bangla and Banglish, yet it also got better on English text. On six English test sets (13,476 items; four are the English originals of the Bangla tests above), pooled accuracy rises from 61% to 73%, run on CPU:

Task	Dataset	Test size	Base model	laya-bangla
Voice-assistant routing, two steps	MASSIVE en	2,970	31% / 49%	75% / 79%
Voice-assistant scenario (18 options)	MASSIVE en	2,970	45% / 64%	82% / 85%
Topic of a sentence (7)	SIB-200 eng_Latn	204	77% / 81%	86% / 88%
Sentiment of product reviews	IndicSentiment, English originals	996	9% / 58%	74% / 74%
Sentiment of tweets	TweetEval	3,000	52% / 55%	65% / 65%
Hate speech in tweets	TweetEval	2,966	53% / 61%	63% / 62%
Does sentence A imply B? (yes/no)	XNLI en	3,340	72% / 88%	51% / 76%

Macro-F1, calibration error, ordinal error, and results split by script (Bangla, Banglish, mixed) are in the full benchmark report. The metrics-only summaries are in this repository under benchmark/ (English: benchmark/english/).

Limitations

• New kinds of yes/no questions can get worse. All trained yes/no tasks are about moderation, so the model learned to answer "no" readily. On sentence entailment (IndicXNLI), which it never trained on, it falls below the base model to about chance. Check a sample of answers before relying on a new noul question, or compare with the base model. The same drop shows on English XNLI (80% to 64% averaged over both question languages).
• Rare cases are under-detected. Only about 8% of BanTH comments are abusive. Accuracy looks high (83–92%), but the model finds few of them: macro-F1 is only 0.51–0.59.
• Complaint severity is weak (40–43% over three levels). The source labels themselves may be hard to agree on.
• Sentiment outside course comments transfers only partly (48–66%).
• Voice-assistant routing was trained on Bangla script only (MASSIVE has no Banglish). Banglish commands such as "gaan chalao" are often routed to the wrong scenario.
• No real customer-support data was available. Support routing, threats to leave, and urgency were only checked on 36 synthetic messages, where threat-to-leave detection got slightly worse than the base model.
• Mixed Bangla-English text is rare in the training data (405 of 38,766 rows).
• One training run (seed 20261018); no confidence intervals. Small test sets (SIB-200 with 204 sentences, mixed-script text) can move by several points by chance.
• Like its training data, the model can reflect social biases in what is labeled hateful or abusive. Do not use it as the only signal for decisions about people.

Training data

Six published datasets, all real human-written Bangla text. Nothing is machine-generated.

Dataset	What the text is	What the model learned	Training rows	License
MASSIVE bn-BD (Amazon)	Voice-assistant requests	Scenario (18), intent within the scenario	10,954	CC BY 4.0
SIB-200 ben_Beng	News-style sentences (FLORES)	Topic (7)	701	CC BY-SA 4.0
BanglaPSG (DOI 10.17632/kcr8zfmtvb.1)	Citizen complaints from social media	Service sector (6), severity (3 levels)	4,156	CC BY 4.0
BanTH	YouTube comments in Banglish	Hate, personal attack, abusive	9,000	MIT
BanHate	YouTube comments in Bangla script	Hate	9,000	MIT
Bangla Sentiments in eLearning	Course comments, Bangla and romanized	Sentiment (3 levels)	4,955	Apache-2.0

That is 38,766 training rows with 70,884 question-answer pairs, plus 2,597 validation rows used only to pick the best epoch and calibrate probabilities.

Three more datasets are used only for testing: SentNoB (CC BY-ND 4.0, so it is never trained on), IndicSentiment (CC0), and IndicXNLI (CC BY 4.0).

How the data was cleaned:

1. Every dataset is pinned to an exact version (a Hub commit or a file checksum).
2. Text is Unicode-normalized; Bangla joiner characters are kept.
3. Duplicates are merged, and duplicates with conflicting labels are dropped.
4. Related texts stay in the same split: comments on the same video, or a Bangla comment and its romanized copy.
5. Any training text that also appears in a validation or test split, in any dataset, is removed (298 found).

The dataset guide has the exact versions and counts. No dataset text is included in this repository.

How it was trained

• Starting point: convaiinnovations/laya-multilingual at commit e4e9ddf21a7b1903b7acffd8814ad4307bf63a67 (mmBERT-base encoder with Laya's decision head).
• Method: full fine-tuning of the transformer layers and decision head (125M parameters). The token embedding (two thirds of the model) is frozen, which keeps every language the tokenizer knows intact.
• Questions: each training row is asked with one of three wordings (two Bangla, one English). Test questions use a fourth wording in each language that training never sees. Answer options are shuffled each epoch so the model cannot learn option positions.
• Settings: 2 epochs, AdamW, learning rate 3e-5 (encoder) and 1e-4 (head) with cosine decay, batch 64, label smoothing 0.05, 512-token inputs, mixed precision, seed 20261018.
• Model choice and calibration: the epoch with the lowest validation loss is kept (epoch 2), then one temperature per question type is fitted on validation data (choice 0.910, score 1.148, yes/no 1.178). Test data plays no part in either step.
• Hardware: one NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (8 GB): 53 minutes, peak 4.6 GB.
• Software: Laya 0.4.11 (laya.train), PyTorch 2.8.0, Transformers 4.57.6.

An earlier 4-epoch run (v1) scored slightly higher on the test sets, but it had a worse validation loss. Releasing it would mean choosing a model by its test score, so v2 was released by the rule fixed in advance.

Reproduce

git clone https://github.com/shamspias/laya-bangla.git && cd laya-bangla
uv sync --locked --all-extras
uv run --frozen laya-bangla prepare                                   # download and split the data
uv run --frozen laya-bangla train --output models/laya-bangla-v2      # about 1 hour on an 8 GB GPU
uv run --frozen laya-bangla benchmark --model base --output outputs/bench-base
uv run --frozen laya-bangla benchmark --model models/laya-bangla-v2 --output outputs/bench-v2
uv run --frozen laya-bangla compare outputs/bench-base/summary.json outputs/bench-v2/summary.json

GPU training is not bit-for-bit deterministic, so a rerun can differ slightly.

Files

File	Contents
model.safetensors	Weights (float16)
rl_agent_config.json	Model settings, fitted temperatures, and abstention thresholds
encoder/, tokenizer/	mmBERT-base encoder configuration and tokenizer
tasks.json	Every question used in training and testing, in Bangla and English
train_report.json	Data and config checksums, validation history, calibration report
benchmark/base/summary.json, benchmark/laya-bangla-v2/summary.json	Metrics-only test results for both models
benchmark/english/base/summary.json, benchmark/english/laya-bangla-v2/summary.json	The same for the English test sets
onnx/fp32/, onnx/int8/	ONNX exports for laya-ts (Node.js and browsers), checked against PyTorch
LICENSE, NOTICE	Apache 2.0 license and attribution

License and credits

Released under the Apache 2.0 license, the same as the base model and the Laya library.

• Laya and laya-multilingual are by Convai Innovations (source). The encoder is mmBERT-base by JHU CLSP.
• Training data, under its own licenses: MASSIVE (FitzGerald et al., 2022), SIB-200 (Adelani et al., 2024), BanglaPSG (Mendeley Data), BanTH (NAACL 2025), BanHate, and Bangla Sentiments in eLearning (Rahman et al., IEEE Access 2024). Test-only: SentNoB (Islam et al., 2021), IndicSentiment (Doddapaneni et al., 2023), and IndicXNLI (Aggarwal et al., 2022).

laya-bangla is an independent project and is not endorsed by Convai Innovations or the dataset authors. Bug reports and Bangla failure cases are welcome as GitHub issues.