Instructions to use LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- Transformers
How to use LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B with Transformers:
# Use a pipeline as a high-level helper from transformers import pipeline pipe = pipeline("text-generation", model="LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B") messages = [ {"role": "user", "content": "Who are you?"}, ] pipe(messages)# Load model directly from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B") model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B", device_map="auto") messages = [ {"role": "user", "content": "Who are you?"}, ] inputs = tokenizer.apply_chat_template( messages, add_generation_prompt=True, tokenize=True, return_dict=True, return_tensors="pt", ).to(model.device) outputs = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=40) print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0][inputs["input_ids"].shape[-1]:])) - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
- Local Apps Settings
- vLLM
How to use LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B with vLLM:
Install from pip and serve model
# Install vLLM from pip: pip install vllm # Start the vLLM server: vllm serve "LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B" # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:8000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }'Use Docker
docker model run hf.co/LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B
- SGLang
How to use LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B with SGLang:
Install from pip and serve model
# Install SGLang from pip: pip install sglang # Start the SGLang server: python3 -m sglang.launch_server \ --model-path "LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B" \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 30000 # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }'Use Docker images
docker run --gpus all \ --shm-size 32g \ -p 30000:30000 \ -v ~/.cache/huggingface:/root/.cache/huggingface \ --env "HF_TOKEN=<secret>" \ --ipc=host \ lmsysorg/sglang:latest \ python3 -m sglang.launch_server \ --model-path "LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B" \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 30000 # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }' - Docker Model Runner
How to use LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B with Docker Model Runner:
docker model run hf.co/LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B
<|tool_call_start|> and <|tool_call_end|> The biggest problem with this model.
About 50% of my tool calls end with output <|tool_call_start|> and <|tool_call_end|>
I don't even know what to do with this. I'm using the official Jin template.
When it happens
Non-deterministic / context-dependent: the same prompt usually yields a clean text answer, but after several tool-call rounds in the conversation history (β5+), the model "gets stuck" in tool-calling mode and emits one more tool call instead of the final text answer β even when that round has no tools available.
The chat template is not the cause: it only renders tool_calls that already exist in the assistant history; the stray pair above is generated by the model itself.
Native tool calling works correctly when tools are passed: the server returns structured tool_calls with finish_reason: "tool_calls".
What would help
Is there a reliable way to force a text-only answer (a stop sequence, a system instruction, or a special token) so the model stops emitting tool calls once no tools are available?
Does the model have a known failure mode at low quantization (Q6_K) with tool-calling under --reasoning? Is a higher-precision checkpoint or a different reasoning setting expected to mitigate it?
Would you recommend a dedicated "final answer" prompt/template for rounds where tools must not be called?
Thanks for the report. One clarifying question: is there anything between the two tokens (a function name and arguments), or is it literally just the empty pair? Also could you share some conversations when this happens?
I get this behavior from time to time in Pi coding agent. It is hard to replicate.