Quick report: tests on some complex and mundane images (historical posters and GUI screenshots)

#2
by Manamama - opened

Tested this GGUF build on some complex and mundane images (historical posters and GUI screenshots).

Key Findings:

  • Surgical Precision: This 3B model is a 'perception specialist'. It excels at finding exact coordinates for high-contrast symbols (e.g. icons, specific UI switches) using its Parallel Box Decoding (PBD) architecture.
  • State Awareness: Successfully distinguished between 'ON' (blue) and 'OFF' (gray) switches in Android Developer Options.
  • Cognitive Limits: It is an 'eye', not a 'mind'. Fails at abstract reasoning (e.g. 'discuss ideology') and 'hidden' objects. For cognitive analysis, it works best as a 'spatial worker' for a larger reasoning model (like Qwen 9B or GPT-4).

Setup Tip: To avoid the 'unknown projector type' error in some llama.cpp builds, ensure LD_LIBRARY_PATH points to the folder containing the forked libmtmd.so.

Plus:

2. Head-to-Head: The specialist vs. The Generalist

We contrasted LocateAnything-3B (The Eye) with Qwen3.5-9B-Neo-heretic (The Brain).

Feature LocateAnything-3B (The Specialist) Qwen3.5-9B (The Generalist)
Speed πŸš€ Blazing Fast (PBD Architecture) 🐒 Slower (Autoregressive)
Precision 🎯 Pinpoint Bounding Boxes πŸ” Approximate "Areas"
Reasoning ❌ None (Keyword-driven) βœ… Deep (Philosophical/Logical)
UI Testing Best for Click-point detection Best for Behavioral analysis
Poetry/Humor πŸ€– "I am a scanner." 🎭 "Let me tell you about Lenin..."

βœ… Successes (The "Cerebellum" at work)

  1. Iconography Recognition: Flawlessly identifies high-contrast symbols (e.g., the Dove of Peace).
  2. Noun Grounding: High precision finding specific body parts or objects (e.g., worker's clenched fist, gray cap).
  3. Spatial Awareness: Understands relative positioning commands (e.g., "Locate the most prominent object in the bottom right").
  4. UI State Awareness: Distinguishes "blue on" vs "gray off" switches with 100% factual accuracy.

❌ Failures (Where the "Frontal Lobe" is missing)

  • Conceptual Reasoning: It cannot "Discuss Ideology." It treats abstract concepts as search queries for objects.
  • Occlusion/Inference: It fails at "hidden" objects. It lacks the "imagination" to infer what it cannot physically see (unlike Qwen3.5, which catches the "hidden guy").
  • Linguistic Noise: Highly sensitive to prompt clutter. It performs best with Atomic Nouns.

Sign up or log in to comment