Sovereign Byte Firewall โ€” Transformer backbone (gs75000)

A 528K-parameter causal Transformer trained to predict raw network traffic one byte at a time. It is not a classifier: it learns the structural grammar of benign traffic, and anomalies are scored by surprise โ€” how improbable each byte is given the bytes before it. Attacks it has never seen produce improbable byte sequences.

๐Ÿ“„ Paper: 10.5281/zenodo.21546151 ๐Ÿ’ป Code: github.com/TheSPST/sovereign-byte-firewall (MIT)

This is the checkpoint reported as the Transformer arm of the paper, and the one the reference daemon deploys by default.


โš ๏ธ Verify what you download

Checkpoint filenames in this project are reused across training runs and do not uniquely identify a set of weights. Always verify:

file:   checkpoints/latest_patcher_ep0_gs75000_mid_epoch.pt
sha256: 2116ab1b0d3c4415โ€ฆ
import hashlib
h = hashlib.sha256(open(path,'rb').read()).hexdigest()
assert h.startswith('2116ab1b0d3c4415'), f'unexpected weights: {h[:16]}'

Verified results

Trained on benign traffic only (Monday-WorkingHours.pcap, CIC-IDS2017). Scored on a held-out split of 34,043 benign and 7,572 zero-day attack windows, neither used for training or calibration. Calibrated against 24 attack families. Window length 512 bytes, top-10% surprise aggregation.

Threshold rule Calibration TPR Held-out benign FPR Held-out zero-day detection
Youden 48.5% <0.05% 18.7%
Target 1% FPR 46.9% 0.038% 14.9%
EVT / Peak-Over-Threshold โ€” 0.038% 15.0%

Calibration ROC-AUC: 0.7962.

Do not select on calibration AUC. The paper documents four cases in this project where AUC ranked models opposite to their deployed performance. Report and compare detection at a stated false-alarm budget instead.


Usage

pip install torch scapy huggingface_hub
git clone https://github.com/TheSPST/sovereign-byte-firewall.git
cd sovereign-byte-firewall
from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download
ckpt = hf_hub_download(
    repo_id="spst01/sovereign-byte-firewall-v2-masking-v2",
    filename="checkpoints/latest_patcher_ep0_gs75000_mid_epoch.pt",
    local_dir="ckpt_best")

Reproduce the numbers above:

python evaluate_zero_day.py \
  --ckpt ckpt_best/checkpoints/latest_patcher_ep0_gs75000_mid_epoch.pt \
  --pcap <benign_calibration.pcap> \
  --benign_holdout_pcap <benign_holdout.pcap> \
  --attack_dir <dir of 24 attack pcaps> \
  --holdout_attack_pcap <held_out_attack.pcap> \
  --score_agg topk --topk_frac 0.1 --max_sequence_length 512

Live monitoring with a dashboard:

./start_dashboard.sh --learning_time 3600

Architecture

Pre-LN causal Transformer, d_model=128, 4 heads, 2 layers, 512-byte context, 256-way next-byte output. 528,128 parameters, of which 65,536 (12.4%) are the positional-embedding table.

Input is masked before scoring: MAC/IP addresses, ports, checksums and always-encrypted payloads (TLS application data with cross-packet record tracking, QUIC, WireGuard, SSH transport) are zeroed so the model learns protocol structure rather than memorising identifiers or ciphertext noise.


Intended use

Complementary detection layer for novel/zero-day payloads that match no signature. Passive and read-only โ€” a span/mirror port or a pcap file. No agents, no log pipeline, no network egress. Self-calibrates to a network in about an hour.

Out of scope

  • Not a replacement for signature IDS, EDR, or firewalls.
  • Encrypted payloads. Content inside an established TLS/QUIC tunnel is not visible. Signal is limited to handshake metadata and size/timing envelope.
  • Slow-and-low attackers. A patient adversary pacing every window below threshold evades a memoryless per-window detector by construction.
  • Semantic attacks. This detects structural improbability. A valid-looking command with malicious intent looks perfectly normal at the byte level.
  • Line rate. Deployment envelope is span-port/pre-filter scale, not core router.

Absolute per-window recall is modest (~15% at a 0.038% false-alarm rate). Campaign-level detection is considerably higher, since a sustained attack generates many windows โ€” on CIC-IDS2017 the fused system caught 5/5 campaigns at roughly one false alarm per hour. The per-window figure is the honest primitive and is what's reported above.

See LIMITATIONS.md.


Training data

CIC-IDS2017 Monday-WorkingHours.pcap โ€” benign traffic only, no attacks.

Sharafaldin, I., Habibi Lashkari, A., Ghorbani, A. A. (2018). Toward Generating a New Intrusion Detection Dataset and Intrusion Traffic Characterization. ICISSP 2018, 108โ€“116.

Single training corpus from one capture; performance on a materially different network baseline is untested.


Citation

@misc{tomar2026sovereign,
  author    = {Tomar, Shubham},
  title     = {Sovereign Byte Firewall: Comparing Transformer and Mamba-2 Backbones
               for Tokenization-Free Zero-Day Network Anomaly Detection},
  year      = {2026},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.21546151}
}
Downloads last month

-

Downloads are not tracked for this model. How to track
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. ๐Ÿ™‹ Ask for provider support