Model Card β€” albert. (Albert-MoE-13)

Version: v3.0 (ternary MoE)
Maintainer: RFI-IRFOS, contact@ternlang.com
Repository: https://github.com/eriirfos-eng/ternary-intelligence-stack
License: LGPL-3.0-or-later (model weights, training code, inference runtime). Platform infrastructure (API server, MCP tooling, HDL) is BSL-1.1. See README Β§Licensing for the full tier breakdown.
Last updated: 2026-05-16
Training status: Active β€” ep1441+, epoch ATL 10.1067, batch ATL 10.0556


Model Overview

albert. is a research-grade language model trained from scratch using a ternary weight representation (-1, 0, +1) with a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture. It is developed by RFI-IRFOS as a demonstration that high-quality language modelling is achievable without 32-bit floating-point weights, targeting inference on edge hardware and low-power devices.

Property Value
Architecture Ternary MoE (Mixture of Experts)
Layers 17
Hidden size 256
Experts 12 (Top-3 routing per token)
Context length 256 tokens
Vocabulary 32,000 tokens (custom BPE)
Weight representation Ternary {-1, 0, +1} with STE training
Gate linear F32
Positional encoding RoPE (rotate_half)
Optimizer AdamW, cosine LR decay
Parameters (total stored) ~58M ternary
Parameters (active per token) ~13M effective (Top-3 of 12 experts)

The central technical innovation is the @sparseskip primitive β€” a learned sparse-skip layer that dynamically bypasses computation paths based on token-level activation patterns, enabling sub-linear inference scaling without pruning.


Intended Use

Intended uses:

  • Research into ternary and low-precision neural network architectures
  • Benchmarking inference performance on CPU and edge GPU hardware
  • Academic study of Mixture-of-Experts routing dynamics
  • Demonstration platform for the SPRIND AI funding initiative (Germany)

Out-of-scope uses:

  • Production deployment as a general-purpose assistant without further fine-tuning and safety evaluation
  • Safety-critical applications (medical, legal, financial decisions)
  • Any use requiring factual accuracy guarantees
  • Deployment to users without appropriate transparency disclosure

Training Data

See DATA_PROVENANCE.md for full source documentation and governance details.

Summary:

albert. is trained on a curated multilingual corpus composed of:

Tier Content Approximate Share
Core Project Gutenberg (public domain books, multilingual) ~30%
Core Wikipedia (15 languages: EN, DE, FR, HU, ZH, AR, KO, SV, FI, NL, PL, RU, JA + more) ~25%
Core OpenWebText (filtered Common Crawl) ~15%
Technical GitHub issues, developer blogs, HN discussions ~10%
Chaos Synthetic noise, adversarial patterns, mixed-language text ~10%
Structured Code samples, structured data (JSON/YAML/TSV) ~5%
Multilingual Additional EU language samples ~5%

The 10% chaos layer is a structural invariant enforced by the training pipeline (train_tokenizer_v3.py). It exists to prevent the model from over-fitting to clean text distributions and to improve robustness to noisy inputs.


Evaluation

Primary metric: Cross-entropy loss on a held-out WikiText-2 sample (eval_sample.txt, not seen during training).

Benchmark results (benchmark suite v2.0.0):

Epoch Loss (avg) Epoch ATL Batch ATL Tok/s (T4 GPU)
Ep54 ~10.35 10.35 β€” 11.24 (CPU)
Ep111 ~10.36 10.36 β€” 18.52
Ep849 ~10.22 10.2050 β€” pending
Ep1177 10.2076 10.2059 (ep1158) 10.1738 (ep1155) pending
Ep1390 10.1212 10.1212 (ep1390) 10.0670 (ep1385) pending
Ep1435 10.1113 10.1113 (ep1435) 10.0556 (ep1435) pending
Ep1438 10.1071 10.1071 (ep1438) 10.0556 (ep1435) pending
Ep1441 10.1067 10.1067 (ep1441) 10.0556 (ep1435) pending

The benchmark suite runs 5 fixed prompts covering English, German, multilingual, narrative, and technical domains. Results are reproducible via the open-source moe-test binary.

Known limitations:

  • At current training depth (~1435 epochs), output quality is pre-fluency: the model produces partially coherent text in familiar domains but lacks consistent grammatical structure across longer sequences.
  • Context window of 256 tokens is shorter than contemporary LLMs; cannot maintain coherence over longer passages.
  • Ternary quantization trades weight precision for size β€” at this scale, some representational capacity is lost relative to F32 equivalents.
  • No instruction-following fine-tuning has been applied.
  • No RLHF, Constitutional AI, or safety fine-tuning of any kind.
  • Bias evaluation is pending (see below).

Open research questions (scaling risks):

  • STE gradient approximation at scale: Straight-Through Estimation is the training mechanism for ternary weights. Its stability and convergence properties are well-characterised at current scale (~58M params). Whether STE remains stable through training runs at 500M–1B+ parameters is an open empirical question β€” no published work has demonstrated ternary STE convergence at frontier scale.
  • @sparseskip speedup baseline: The 83 tok/s inference figure is measured against albert.'s own F32-weight dense equivalent on the same hardware. It is not a direct comparison with INT4-quantized industry inference (TensorRT-LLM, llama.cpp Q4). The relevant claim is that ternary weights eliminate a quantization step entirely β€” the speedup over post-hoc INT4 quantization of a larger model is a separate, untested question.
  • Net2net surgery stability at scale: All five documented layer-addition surgeries were performed on a model in the 13M–58M parameter range. Whether the Fibonacci-gated surgery protocol remains stable when applied to models at 200M+ parameters has not been tested. The current plateau-gate mechanism assumes continued smooth descent after insertion β€” this assumption is unverified beyond current scale.

Bias and Fairness

A formal bias and fairness evaluation has not yet been conducted. Known risk factors:

  • Language imbalance: English-dominant corpus; non-English outputs will be lower quality.
  • Temporal bias: Training data has a knowledge cutoff; the model has no awareness of events after its corpus snapshot dates.
  • Domain gaps: Limited coverage of non-Western cultural contexts, legal jurisdictions outside EU/US/DE, and specialized professional domains.

A structured bias evaluation using standard benchmarks (WinoBias, BBQ, multilingual MMLU) is planned for the v3.1 milestone.


Human Oversight

albert. is a research model under active development. The following oversight mechanisms are in place:

  1. Training dashboard: Real-time monitoring of loss curves, expert routing, gradient norms, WALD dead-zone events, and anomaly events by the RFI-IRFOS team.
  2. Surgery governor: Architectural growth (layer addition via net2net) is fully autonomous — the EvolutionManager fires on a Fibonacci-gated plateau detector with no human intervention required. Five surgeries (12L→17L) have been executed autonomously to date.
  3. SPORE federated training (live): Collaborators contribute CPU-trained checkpoints as weight spores via the albert-spores private repository. The SporeManager blends accepted spores at Ξ±=0.08 each epoch boundary with fitness (loss gate) and architecture guards. Colony is active as of 2026-05-16 with external contributors. Spores are stored via Git LFS; each contributor runs albert-train locally and submits via albert-spore.
  4. Checkpoint promotion: No trained checkpoint is deployed to any external service without explicit human review and approval by the lead architect.
  5. Rollback capability: All checkpoints and best-loss weights are preserved on persistent storage. Any version can be reverted.

See SECURITY.md for the incident reporting process.


EU AI Act Compliance Notes

albert. is developed in the European Union and is subject to Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (EU AI Act). RFI-IRFOS self-classifies albert. as a General-Purpose AI (GPAI) model under Article 3(63).

Obligation Article Status
Technical documentation Annex XI This document
Training data summary Art. 53(1)(d) DATA_PROVENANCE.md
Copyright compliance summary Art. 53(1)(c) DATA_PROVENANCE.md
Human oversight measures Art. 53(1)(e) Described above
Incident reporting Art. 53(2) SECURITY.md
Bias/fairness assessment Art. 53(1)(b) Planned v3.1

For questions about compliance or to report concerns: contact@ternlang.com


Team

Name Role Contact
Simeon Kepp Lead Architect β€” full stack (compiler, BET VM, training, MCP) s.kepp@ternlang.com
Louis Paul Ehrig Head of Public Affairs, Dataset Curation, Corporate Secretary l.ehrig@ternlang.com
Lisa Scharler Head of Social Technology & Ecocentric Systems l.scharler@ternlang.com
Zabih Karimi Co-Founder, IT & Infrastructure, Stress-Testing z.karimi@ternlang.com
Nikoletta Csonka Global Reach, Fundraising & Fund Applications csonikoletta@ternlang.com
Claude (Anthropic) AI Collaborator β€” architecture, implementation, monitoring claude@ternlang.com

Organisation: Research Focus Institute β€” Interdisciplinary Research Facility for Open Sciences (RFI-IRFOS)
Address: Elisabethinergasse 25, 8020 Graz, Austria
Website: https://ternlang.com
Issues: https://github.com/eriirfos-eng/ternary-intelligence-stack/issues
General contact: contact@ternlang.com

Downloads last month
116
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. πŸ™‹ Ask for provider support