dapack — language pack (graded precision, 10.7 GB)

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B compressed for language and general-text work: 10.7 GB instead of 21.2 GB, with every expert still present. The 143 experts this domain routes to are kept at q2_K; the remaining 113 are held at IQ2_XXS (2.06 bpw) under an importance matrix — graded, not deleted, so the pack degrades out of domain instead of breaking.

⚠️ This file requires the dapack runtime

Graded packs carry two expert tensors per layer at different precisions (ffn_*_exps_cold + dapack.hot_experts_per_layer). Stock llama.cpp / ollama / LM Studio cannot load them. Build the runtime from:

https://github.com/R3n3r0/dapack — ready-to-run binaries under Releases (Linux x86_64, ROCm), nothing to compile:

tar xzf dapack-v0.1.0-linux-x86_64-rocm-gfx1151.tar.gz
cd dapack-v0.1.0-* && ./dapack serve ~/catalog.dapack   # web chat + OpenAI API + routing

On other GPUs, build from the same repo (one command, scripts/rebuild_fork.sh --apply after a recursive clone).

Measured capabilities

These numbers are behavioural measurements, not estimates. They ship in the pack's manifest, and the dapack router treats them as hard constraints — a request needing a capability this pack has lost is routed to a pack that has it.

capability this pack full model (21.2 GB)
reasoning (GSM8K convergence, 4096-token budget, n=100) 82.0% 77.0%
tool calling (8 probes) 8/8 8/8
translation en→it 100% 100%
instruction following 100% 80%
long context (needle @ 3k tokens) 100% 100%
structured output (JSON) 100% 100%
code generation 17% ⚠️ 100%

What it lost — on purpose, and declared: code generation collapsed (100% → 17%), because the experts that write code were held at 2 bits by a language calibration. Under the dapack router, code requests never reach this pack. If you serve this file standalone, do not use it for code.

Why graded instead of pruned

On the identical expert selection, we measured:

mechanism Qwen3.5-35B Qwen3-30B tools
surplus experts deleted 79.0% 40.0% 7/8
surplus experts at 2 bits 82.0% 93.3% 8/8

On the second architecture deletion loses 53 points and grading loses none — 93.3% equals the uncompressed base. Measured on two models, same selection.

Deletion costs ~1 point of reasoning per 1% of experts chosen wrongly and is unrecoverable. A 2-bit expert is present and merely imprecise. Compute cost is unchanged: the top-k budget is partitioned across the two banks, so exactly 8 experts run per token.

Files

file size needs
graded_language.gguf 10.7 GB dapack fork
manifest-fragment.json capability manifest for the catalogue

Full documentation, tools to build your own domain packs, and every measurement behind this card: https://github.com/R3n3r0/dapack

Downloads last month
178
GGUF
Model size
35B params
Architecture
qwen35moe
Hardware compatibility
Log In to add your hardware

We're not able to determine the quantization variants.

Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. 🙋 Ask for provider support

Model tree for R3n3r0/dapack-language

Quantized
(287)
this model