Hugging Face's logo

openvivo
/
BluePixel-Turbo

Image-to-Image
Diffusers
Safetensors
English
FluxKleinPipeline
image-editing
instruction-based-image-editing
4k
distillation
dcae
Model card Files
xet
 Community
3

Inquiry: License tag discrepancy (Apache-2.0 vs FLUX Non-Commercial)

#3
by iori61 - opened
Discussion
iori61

Hello Vivo team,

First of all, thank you for open-sourcing BluePixel-Turbo and your great contribution to the community!

I am writing to gently point out a potential licensing compliance issue that might inadvertently mislead users. The model card mentions that this model builds on FLUX.2-klein-9B, which is released under the FLUX Non-Commercial License. However, the repository is tagged with the Apache-2.0 license.

Because the base 9B model is restricted to non-commercial use, displaying the Apache-2.0 tag might cause developers to mistakenly use this model for commercial purposes, leading to unintended license violations with Black Forest Labs.

Could you please double-check the license tag or add a clarification note in the model card? This would greatly help the community avoid potential legal risks.

Thank you for your time and understanding!
01
02
nodexy
 vivo org

Hi @iori61
Thanks for your kind feedback about it. We will review it internally right now.

Chris YANG
nodexy
 vivo org

Hi @iori61 ,
After careful inspection and review, we have updated and improved the project's compliance.
Thank you again for your professional advice and attention to this project.
I look forward to having more communication with you in the community in the future.

Chris YANG

iori61

Hi @nodexy
Thank you for the swift update and clarification. I really appreciate the Vivo team's responsiveness and your commitment to open-source compliance. It's great to see the community working together to ensure projects are legally sound. Looking forward to seeing more great work from your team!
iori61 changed discussion status to closed

Sign up or log in to comment