CTO Drug Approval Prediction Baseline
A pre-trial LightGBM classifier trained on the CTO dataset to predict clinical trial success outcomes from structured trial metadata alone.
What's honest about this model
- Uses ONLY features known at trial registration time (phase, enrollment, sponsor type, DMC presence, title keywords)
- Temporal split: trained on trials registered before 2020, tested on 2020+
- No leakage from completion status or post-trial results
- No LLM reasoning β pure structured features + gradient boosting
Performance (temporal holdout)
| Metric |
Value |
| ROC-AUC |
0.869 |
| PR-AUC |
0.640 |
| Brier |
0.141 |
Test set: 4,359 trials registered 2020+, 24.6% success rate.
Feature importance (top 10)
- title_length β proxy for trial complexity
- enrollment_log β trial size
- study_year β temporal drift in success rates
- num_arms β design complexity
- phase_num β later phases have higher success rates
- is_fda_regulated β regulated trials differ
- has_dmc β data monitoring committee presence
- is_industry β industry vs academic sponsor
- cond_cancer β oncology trials
- cond_alzheimer β neurodegenerative indication
Caveats
- Labels are weakly supervised (derived from trial linkage + status, not direct FDA approval tracking)
- Title-based condition classification is crude
- No molecular features, no competitive landscape, no regulatory designations
- This is a research baseline, not investment advice
Citation
Gao et al. "Automatically Labeling Clinical Trial Outcomes: A Large-Scale Benchmark" (arXiv:2406.10292)