Benchmarks?

#2
by volodXYZ - opened

Have you run any benchmarks compared to the base model?
Otherwise what is the point?

benchies should be a requirement for posting any finetunes

benchies should be a requirement for posting any finetunes

Not in the HF community, you must https://tryitands.ee 😄

Running localbench full suite on a 48GB VRAM setup (RTX 5090+5060) via llama-server:

  1. Tess-4-27B (Q8 thinking on)
    81% (122/150) · 1h10m
  2. Qwen3.6-27B (Q8_0 MTP thinking on)
    80% (120/150) 47m
  3. Qwen3.6-27B (Q8_0 MTP thinking off)
    79% (119/150) · 37m49s
  4. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B (UD-Q8_K_XL)
    78% (117/150) · 20m24s
  5. Gemma-4-31B (Q6 · 180k ctx)
    78% (117/150) · 44m27s
  6. Qwopus3.6-27B Coder-Compat (Q6_K)
    77% (116/150) · 34m18s
  7. Qwen3.6-27B pi-tune (Q8)
    77% (115/150) · 27m42s
  8. Gemma-4-31B (Q8)
    77% (115/150) · 50m25s
  9. Gemopus-4-31B (Q8)
    76% (114/150) · 1h21m
  10. Gemopus-4-31B (Q8 · half context)
    76% (114/150) · 1h45m
  11. Gemma-4-31B QAT (UD-Q4_K_XL)
    75% (113/150) · 20m55s
  12. Gemopus-4-31B (Q8)
    75% (112/150) · 1h16m
  13. Ornith-1.0-35B (Q8)
    73% (110/150) · 31m45s
  14. Qwopus3.6-35B-A3B Coder (Q8)
    69% (103/150) · 14m23s
  15. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (UD-IQ4_XS · ik_llama)
    69% (103/150) · 1h30m
  16. Step-3.7-Flash (IQ4_XS)
    65% (97/150) · 2h00m
  17. Qwen3-Coder-Next (UD-Q4_K_M)
    61% (91/150) · 14m23s
  18. Gemopus-4-31B (Q8)
    61% (91/150) · 1h26m

Thanks @khronnuz ! If you can provide something more detailed (like the 122/150 breakdown) I will add this to the README.

@khronnuz Thanks my guy!

I have added the trained MTP head here: https://huggingface.co/migtissera/Tess-4-27B-EAGLE3

Will accelerate the speed 2x.

migtissera changed discussion status to closed

Sign up or log in to comment