Qwen3.8-27B (Q4_K_M) for AMD Loom

A Loom package (.loom programs and a model.json card) for the unmodified GGUF checkpoint bartowski/Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF (Qwen3.8-27B-Q4_K_M.gguf), generated on an AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 "Strix Halo" with the loom-skills workflow.

Quick start

pip install "hrx-loom[hf]"
loom-fetch https://huggingface.co/loom-fun/bartowski-Qwen3.8-27B-loom/resolve/main/model.json --materialize=copy --output=qwen3.8-27b
loom-serve --model=qwen3.8-27b/model.json --device=amdgpu --memory_bytes=52000000000

The server listens on 127.0.0.1:8080 and answers OpenAI-style /v1/chat/completions requests.

Performance vs llama.cpp

metric llama.cpp Loom margin roofline Loom % of roofline DevLab llama.cpp DevLab Loom DevLab llama.cpp Vulkan local ÷ DevLab (llama.cpp, Loom)
decode tok/s, short prompt 20.3 26.2 +29 % 32.3 81 % 21.8 27.0 ¹ 21.9 0.93, 0.97
decode tok/s, 2k context 19.3 24.4 +26 % 31.6 77 % 19.3 24.7 ¹ 21.0 1.00, 0.99
decode tok/s, 32k context 16.6 19.3 +16 % 28.3 68 % 17.2 19.8 ¹ 17.1 0.97, 0.97
prefill tok/s, 1k document 309.0 499.7 +62 % 1185.9 42 % 321.1 459.9 ¹ 283.5 0.96, 1.09
prefill tok/s, 2k document 313.1 502.9 +61 % 1181.2 43 % 323.8 458.6 ¹ 286.4 0.97, 1.10
prefill tok/s, 8k document 315.0 509.4 +62 % 1154.0 44 % 280.4 452.7 ¹ 284.0 1.12, 1.13
prefill tok/s, 16k document 288.9 484.9 +68 % 1119.5 43 % 263.4 418.8 ¹ 270.4 1.10, 1.16
prefill tok/s, 32k document 239.1 439.5 +84 % 1056.5 42 % 246.9 370.6 ¹ 245.4 0.97, 1.19
4 streams, aggregate decode tok/s 49.0 61.9 +26 % 123.4 50 % 51.7 62.7 ¹ 38.9 0.95, 0.99
speculative decoding, drafted tokens accepted — 76 % ² — n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
  • llama.cpp: build llamacpp-rocm/b1355, server arguments -ngl 99 -cram 0 --spec-type draft-dflash --spec-draft-model ~/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--z-lab--Qwen3.8-27B-DFlash2-GGUF/snapshots/2d9571f8ce46e151f61c6499c99dee6079e1d610/Qwen3.8-27B-DFlash2-Q4_K_M.gguf --spec-draft-n-max 3 -ngld 99 -c 65536 -kvu -np 4.
  • Loom: speculative decoding on (DFlash, depth 3).
  • Same GGUF on both engines, tokens per second. Loom: client-side timing; llama.cpp: server-side timings. Runs per value: decode and prefill 2 (mean), 4 streams 3 (median).
  • Measured 2026-11-06; device AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S, AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics, Ubuntu 26.04; hrx-loom 0.1.0 (hrx-system d01d1c1); source: local run.
  • ¹ Measured 2026-11-07; device not recorded; hrx-loom unknown; source: DevLab Dispatch run 42395970032.
  • ² Measured 2026-11-07; device AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S, AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics, Ubuntu 24.04; hrx-loom 0.1.0 (hrx-system d01d1c1); source: DevLab Dispatch run 42342529061.
  • DevLab: the same measurement on an AMD DevLab Dispatch Strix Halo runner; local ÷ DevLab is the local value over the DevLab value of each engine, recorded for comparison, not a verdict.
  • DevLab llama.cpp Vulkan: build not recorded, server arguments -ngl 99 -cram 0 --spec-type draft-dflash --spec-draft-model card:parameter/Qwen3.8-27B-DFlash2-Q4_K_M.gguf --spec-draft-n-max 3 -ngld 99 -c 65536 -kvu -np 4; same GGUF, prompts and settings as llama.cpp; measured 2026-11-09 in its own DevLab job (a different runner than the other DevLab columns: compare the engines through ratios, not across jobs); source: DevLab Dispatch run 42580835796. Differs from llama.cpp: decode, decode_2k, decode_32k measured with unified KV, draft, 4 slots: -ngl 99 -cram 0 --spec-type draft-dflash --spec-draft-model card:parameter/Qwen3.8-27B-DFlash2-Q4_K_M.gguf --spec-draft-n-max 3 -ngld 99 -c 65536 -kvu -np 4 (the original job, run 42569157613). Differs from llama.cpp: prefill_1k, prefill_2k, prefill_8k, prefill_16k, prefill_32k measured with 1 slot, no draft: -ngl 99 -cram 0 -c 36864 -np 1. Differs from llama.cpp: streams4 measured with 4 per-slot streams, no draft: -ngl 99 -cram 0 -c 147456 -np 4. Differs from llama.cpp: each metric is the highest of the Vulkan server configurations measured (b12211, separate DevLab jobs); the ROCm baseline's own configuration is the unified pool with drafting. b12211's Vulkan backend has no GPU kernel for the fused flash attention over K/V rows that a unified pool uses (the server logs the CPU fallback); configurations that did not win or did not run: 1 slot, draft.
  • Drafted tokens accepted: the share of the drafter's proposed tokens the model accepted during the spec gate's requests.
  • Roofline: the hardware ceiling for this GGUF on AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 "Strix Halo" (gfx1151) at 216 GB/s and 59 TFLOP/s, from loom-roofline roofline.py (loom-skills b086d86); decode and 4 streams with speculative decoding: verify passes × (1 + acceptance × depth 3) tokens per pass, the drafter's cost not counted; acceptance measured in the row's own session: decode 50 %, decode at 2k 49 %, decode at 32k 49 %, 4 streams 47 %.
  • — not measured; n/a not applicable.

Features

feature status detail
API ✅ OpenAI-style /v1/chat/completions
tool calling ✅ OpenAI-style tools and tool_calls
reasoning / thinking ✅ on by default; chat_template_kwargs: {"enable_thinking": false} turns it off
reasoning effort ✅ reasoning_effort: low, medium, xhigh (default xhigh)
speculative decoding ✅ DFlash, depth 3, on by default; drafter z-lab/Qwen3.8-27B-DFlash2-GGUF
image input ✅ OpenAI-style image_url parts; projector mmproj-Qwen3.8-27B-f16.gguf
audio input / output — not applicable
sampling ✅ temperature, top_p, top_k, seed
context size ✅ 262,144 tokens per request
concurrency ✅ 4 concurrent requests
max output tokens ✅ 4,096 (preset max_tokens)

Correctness

gate description result
kernel_tests Unit tests of the generated kernels against reference implementations ✅ pass (66/66) ¹
golden llama.cpp reference recorded on the same GGUF: greedy tokens and top-5 log-probs, short prompts and 1k-32k documents ✅ pass ²
compare Greedy output vs the llama.cpp reference, token by token; every divergence is a near-tie ✅ pass ²
vision Image input vs llama.cpp with the same projector: identical prompt tokens, replies equal up to near-ties ✅ pass ²
consistency Concurrent requests give the same output as the same requests run alone ✅ pass ²
spec Speculative decoding on gives exactly the output of speculative decoding off ✅ pass ²
agent Multi-turn tool-calling loop: exact prompt rendering, history reuse, valid tool calls, output vs llama.cpp ✅ pass ²
agent_think_off The tool-calling loop with thinking off ✅ pass ³
sampling temperature, top_k and seed behave as specified; first-token distribution matches llama.cpp ✅ pass ²
needle Needle-in-a-haystack prompt at up to half the context, compared with llama.cpp; over-capacity prompt refused ✅ pass ³
needle_full Needle-in-a-haystack prompt at the full context is served ✅ pass ²
decision Decision answers (choice, score, noul probabilities) vs llama.cpp on the same prompts — not applicable
  • ¹ local run, 2026-11-06; device AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S, AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics, Ubuntu 26.04; hrx-loom 0.1.0 (hrx-system d01d1c1, recovered).
  • ² DevLab Dispatch run 42315858300, LEVEL=full, 2026-11-07; device AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S, AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics, Ubuntu 24.04; hrx-loom 0.1.0 (hrx-system d01d1c1).
  • ³ DevLab Dispatch run 42342529061, LEVEL=quick, 2026-11-07; device AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S, AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics, Ubuntu 24.04; hrx-loom 0.1.0 (hrx-system d01d1c1).
  • Gates are the loom-benchmark correctness gates (gates.sh); a gate without a recorded run shows no evidence.

Files

  • model.json / model.json.lock: the card and the pinned source files (sha256 checked by loom-fetch).
  • program/*.loom, weights.loom: the generated Loom programs.
  • tokenizer.json: the tokenizer.
  • llm_config.json: the configuration the programs were generated from.
  • info.json: the measurements, gate evidence and versions this card shows; everything else comes from the files above.
  • REPORT.md: how the values above were measured: setup, commands and the value of every run.

Versions: card schema loom-card/2; loom-skills af9f2a0 (recovered); hrx-loom 0.1.0 (hrx-system d01d1c1, recovered); card generator 1ed9a3e.

Source files, fetched by loom-fetch from their own repositories:

Downloads last month

-

Downloads are not tracked for this model. How to track
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. 🙋 Ask for provider support

Model tree for loom-fun/bartowski-Qwen3.8-27B-loom

Base model

Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B
Finetuned
(1)
this model