Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct (Q4_K_M) for AMD Loom

A Loom package (.loom programs and a model.json card) for the unmodified GGUF checkpoint bartowski/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-GGUF (Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf), generated on an AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 "Strix Halo" with the loom-skills workflow.

Quick start

pip install "hrx-loom[hf]"
loom-fetch https://huggingface.co/loom-fun/bartowski-Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-loom/resolve/main/model.json --materialize=copy --output=Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct
loom-serve --model=Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct/model.json --device=amdgpu --memory_bytes=14000000000

The server listens on 127.0.0.1:8080 and answers OpenAI-style /v1/chat/completions requests.

Performance vs llama.cpp

metric llama.cpp Loom margin roofline Loom % of roofline DevLab llama.cpp DevLab Loom local ÷ DevLab (llama.cpp, Loom)
decode tok/s, short prompt 45.0 48.6 +8 % 54.8 89 % 41.4 48.1 ¹ 1.09, 1.01
decode tok/s, 2k context 36.1 47.8 +32 % 59.3 81 % 36.8 50.9 ¹ 0.98, 0.94
decode tok/s, 32k context 27.9 38.0 +36 % 69.6 55 % 27.4 38.1 ¹ 1.02, 1.00
prefill tok/s, 1k document 1207.8 1881.6 +56 % 4452.4 42 % 1218.2 1797.8 ¹ 0.99, 1.05
prefill tok/s, 2k document 1100.5 1958.8 +78 % 4386.0 45 % 1123.5 1873.5 ¹ 0.98, 1.05
prefill tok/s, 8k document 984.3 1754.1 +78 % 4025.6 44 % 999.4 1693.3 ¹ 0.98, 1.04
prefill tok/s, 16k document 741.0 1575.3 +113 % 3628.1 43 % 746.3 1469.9 ¹ 0.99, 1.07
prefill tok/s, 32k document 531.2 1255.0 +136 % 3029.8 41 % 531.6 1150.0 ¹ 1.00, 1.09
4 streams, aggregate decode tok/s 137.5 126.6 -8 % 213.1 59 % 137.2 122.6 ¹ 1.00, 1.03
speculative decoding, drafted tokens accepted — 10 % ² — n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
  • llama.cpp: build llamacpp-rocm/b1369, server arguments -ngl 99 -cram 0 --spec-type ngram-simple -c 33792 -kvu -np 4.
  • Loom: speculative decoding on (n-gram prompt lookup, depth 2).
  • Same GGUF on both engines, tokens per second. Loom: client-side timing; llama.cpp: server-side timings. Runs per value: decode and prefill 2 (mean), 4 streams 3 (median).
  • Measured 2026-11-07; device AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S, AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics, Ubuntu 26.04; hrx-loom 0.1.0 (hrx-system d01d1c1); source: local run.
  • ¹ Measured 2026-11-07; device AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S, AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics, Ubuntu 24.04; hrx-loom 0.1.0 (hrx-system d01d1c1); source: DevLab Dispatch run 42342192972.
  • ² Measured 2026-11-08; device AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S, AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics, Ubuntu 24.04; hrx-loom 0.1.0 (hrx-system d01d1c1); source: DevLab Dispatch run 42419939771.
  • DevLab: the same measurement on an AMD DevLab Dispatch Strix Halo runner; local ÷ DevLab is the local value over the DevLab value of each engine, recorded for comparison, not a verdict.
  • Drafted tokens accepted: the share of the drafter's proposed tokens the model accepted during the spec gate's requests.
  • Roofline: the hardware ceiling for this GGUF on AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 "Strix Halo" (gfx1151) at 216 GB/s and 59 TFLOP/s, from loom-roofline roofline.py (loom-skills a05730e); decode and 4 streams with speculative decoding: verify passes × (1 + acceptance × depth 2) tokens per pass, the drafter's cost not counted; acceptance measured in the row's own session: decode 5 %, decode at 2k 12 %, decode at 32k 50 %, 4 streams 6 %.
  • — not measured; n/a not applicable.

Features

feature status detail
API ✅ OpenAI-style /v1/chat/completions
tool calling ✅ OpenAI-style tools and tool_calls
reasoning / thinking ❌ not supported
reasoning effort ❌ not supported
speculative decoding ✅ n-gram prompt lookup, depth 2, on by default
image input ❌ not supported
audio input / output ❌ not supported
sampling ✅ temperature, top_p, top_k, seed
context size ✅ 32,768 tokens per request
concurrency ✅ 4 concurrent requests
max output tokens ✅ 4,096 (preset max_tokens)

Correctness

gate description result
kernel_tests Unit tests of the generated kernels against reference implementations ✅ pass (37/37) ¹
golden llama.cpp reference recorded on the same GGUF: greedy tokens and top-5 log-probs, short prompts and 1k-32k documents ✅ pass ²
compare Greedy output vs the llama.cpp reference, token by token; every divergence is a near-tie ✅ pass ²
vision Image input vs llama.cpp with the same projector: identical prompt tokens, replies equal up to near-ties — not applicable
consistency Concurrent requests give the same output as the same requests run alone ✅ pass ²
spec Speculative decoding on gives exactly the output of speculative decoding off ✅ pass ²
agent Multi-turn tool-calling loop: exact prompt rendering, history reuse, valid tool calls, output vs llama.cpp ✅ pass ²
agent_think_off The tool-calling loop with thinking off — not applicable
sampling temperature, top_k and seed behave as specified; first-token distribution matches llama.cpp ✅ pass ²
needle Needle-in-a-haystack prompt at up to half the context, compared with llama.cpp; over-capacity prompt refused ✅ pass ³
needle_full Needle-in-a-haystack prompt at the full context is served ✅ pass ²
decision Decision answers (choice, score, noul probabilities) vs llama.cpp on the same prompts — not applicable
  • ¹ DevLab Dispatch run 42342192972, 2026-11-07; device AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S, AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics, Ubuntu 24.04; hrx-loom 0.1.0 (hrx-system d01d1c1).
  • ² DevLab Dispatch run 42419939771, LEVEL=full, 2026-11-08; device AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S, AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics, Ubuntu 24.04; hrx-loom 0.1.0 (hrx-system d01d1c1).
  • ³ DevLab Dispatch run 42342192972, LEVEL=full, 2026-11-07; device AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S, AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics, Ubuntu 24.04; hrx-loom 0.1.0 (hrx-system d01d1c1).
  • Gates are the loom-benchmark correctness gates (gates.sh); a gate without a recorded run shows no evidence.

Files

  • model.json / model.json.lock: the card and the pinned source files (sha256 checked by loom-fetch).
  • program/*.loom, weights.loom: the generated Loom programs.
  • tokenizer.json: the tokenizer.
  • llm_config.json: the configuration the programs were generated from.
  • info.json: the measurements, gate evidence and versions this card shows; everything else comes from the files above.
  • REPORT.md: how the values above were measured: setup, commands and the value of every run.

Versions: card schema loom-card/2; loom-skills ca6ae88; hrx-loom 0.1.0 (hrx-system d01d1c1); card generator fc6b3b1.

Source files, fetched by loom-fetch from their own repositories:

Downloads last month

-

Downloads are not tracked for this model. How to track
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. 🙋 Ask for provider support

Model tree for loom-fun/bartowski-Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-loom

Base model

Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B
Finetuned
(1)
this model