YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card

Check out the documentation for more information.

Fixed-dose grid graphs (2026-09-22)

Source: ../260922_fixed_dose_grid (data/grid.json = 06_grade.py output; data/dose_tables.md = full tables). Render: /root/venvs/sdf_b200/bin/python3 plot.py โ†’ figs/.

What was run: seed-0 organism per family; SFT, DPO, NPO+R, CWS with each method's previously tuned hyper-parameters and original trainer; exactly 1/2/3 passes over the 300-row repair set (60 rows/step, steps 5/10/15); three data-order runs per method (same organism); retention-only one run. 78 arms on a fixed one-third of the held-out set (six behaviours, nine unseen wrappers) + 360-row caught-behaviour set. All provenance and row-set checks passed.

  • figA_unseen_by_method_epoch.png โ€” unseen collusion % (mean of medical, code, sabotage, furlong) by method and epoch, both families, untreated baseline dashed.
  • figB_per_behaviour_epoch3.png โ€” every behaviour at 3 epochs, per family (rubric gaming = trained behaviour).
  • figC_dose_curves.png โ€” unseen collusion vs epochs (band = minโ€“max over data-order runs).
  • figD_trained_behaviour_by_epoch.png โ€” the trained behaviour's own repair vs epochs.

Caveats to state: seeds are data orders on ONE organism (organism seeds 1โ€“2 running next); Llama SFT under-dosed at 5e-6; Qwen SFT/CWS clean-cell honesty on the selection set drops to ~70 by epochs 2โ€“3 (see data/dose_tables.md caught-behaviour table); CWS = two branches = 2ร— exposure; NPO+R includes retention, others do not; 60 vs 64 rows/step vs the tuning runs.

Downloads last month

-

Downloads are not tracked for this model. How to track
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. ๐Ÿ™‹ Ask for provider support