Diffusion Policy · PushT · sample-efficiency study

Four Diffusion Policy checkpoints for the PushT manipulation task (LeRobot / gym-pusht), from a controlled study: under a small budget of demonstrations, does aggressive regularization buy sample-efficiency for imitation-learning policies?

Trained & evaluated on AMD ROCm (Radeon AI PRO R9700, gfx1201).

Checkpoints

Each folder holds the final 150k-step policy (model.safetensors + config + pre/post-processors), loadable with LeRobot.

Folder Recipe Demos Success (pc_success, 100 eval eps)
standard-200demos standard 200 29%
enhanced-200demos enhanced 200 29%
standard-100demos standard 100 8%
enhanced-100demos enhanced 100 19%
  • standard = LeRobot defaults.
  • enhanced = aggressive regularization: weight decay 1e-3 + image-transform data augmentation.

Result

Demos Standard Enhanced Δ
200 (data-rich) 29% 29% 0 pts
100 (data-scarce) 8% 19% +11 pts

Preliminary evidence suggests that, under a 100-demo budget, enhanced regularization improves PushT success from 8% to 19% (+11 pts), while showing no gain at 200 demos (29% = 29%). This is consistent with regularization helping most when demonstrations are scarce (inspired by Konwoo et al. on data-constrained pre-training). Single seed — a strong signal, not yet a settled claim.

Training

  • Policy: Diffusion Policy · Task: PushT (sim)
  • 150,000 steps, seed 0, eval on 100 episodes
  • Hardware: AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 (ROCm), ~11 steps/s
  • results/ contains the raw eval CSVs (sweep_b*.csv).

Limitations

  • Single seed (0) — deltas are a signal, not yet a claim; multiple seeds + error bars pending.
  • Baseline below the published reference (~65%) — the remaining gap is batch size (8 vs ~64); addressable with gradient accumulation.
  • Preliminary: enough to show the effect, not yet to publish.

Links

Downloads last month

-

Downloads are not tracked for this model. How to track
Video Preview
loading