You need to agree to share your contact information to access this model

This repository is publicly accessible, but you have to accept the conditions to access its files and content.

Log in or Sign Up to review the conditions and access this model content.

Inkling Abliterated (scale 2.5 on main, scale 3.0 on scale-3.0)

Distributed Cognition

Responsible use

This is an uncensored research model. Its built-in refusals were removed permanently at the weight level, so it answers prompts the base model declines, including chemical and biological synthesis, cybercrime, weapons, harassment, and fraud. Use it for red-teaming, offensive-security research, and refusal-rate evaluation. It has no guardrails of its own: if you deploy it, add your own input and output moderation (for example Llama Guard).

What this is

Abliterated variant of thinkingmachines/Inkling (975B total / 41B active, multimodal MoE, 66 layers). The refusal direction was removed with norm-preserving biprojected abliteration (grimjim 2025), a weight-space refinement of directional ablation (Arditi et al. 2024), applied to the attention output projection (attn.wo_ud) and the shared-expert down projection (mlp.shared_experts.shared_w2) across layers 9–58, using per-layer directions.

Both evaluated scales ship as git branches (HF is git+LFS — switching branches is free; identical LFS objects are shared):

Item Path / branch Notes
Scale 2.5 (default) main Judge refusals 98 → 10/100, GSM8K 65%
Scale 3.0 scale-3.0 branch Judge refusals 98 → 16/100, GSM8K 75%

The repo mirrors the upstream NVFP4 checkpoint (same 33-shard layout, same tokenizer). Only the 100 abliterated tensors differ; everything else is byte-identical to upstream — the attention and shared-expert weights are stored unquantized (BF16) in NVFP4, so the 4-bit routed experts are untouched. refusal_directions.pt holds all 66 measured per-layer directions, so you can re-ablate at any scale in seconds without re-measuring. abliteration_config.json records the final parameters and evaluation results.

Load

Load it exactly like upstream — the official models/inkling implementation ships in transformers ≥5.16, and vLLM/SGLang/unsloth recipes all work unchanged:

from transformers import AutoModelForMultimodalLM, AutoProcessor

model = AutoModelForMultimodalLM.from_pretrained(
    "distributedcognition/Inkling-abliterated", trust_remote_code=True, device_map="auto")
processor = AutoProcessor.from_pretrained("distributedcognition/Inkling-abliterated")
# vLLM / SGLang serve the NVFP4 checkpoint like upstream
vllm serve distributedcognition/Inkling-abliterated

Evaluation (both scales)

The standard abliteration-community protocol (the one Heretic made automatic): 100 held-out harmful prompts (mlabonne/harmful_behaviors test split) with unicode/emphasis-normalized keyword detection plus an LLM judge (the unmodified base model classifying REFUSAL/COMPLIANT), KL divergence vs base on 100 harmless prompts (mlabonne/harmless_alpaca), and a GSM8K spot check (20-problem, chat, greedy). Eval mode: chat, greedy, measured on the exact NVFP4 artifact weights on H200×4.

Metric Base Abliterated 2.5 (main) Abliterated 3.0 (scale-3.0)
Refusals (keyword, X/100) 58 5 11
True refusals (LLM judge, X/100) 98 10 16
KL divergence (100 harmless) 0 1.106 1.591
GSM8K (20-problem spot check) 18/20 (90%) 13/20 (65%) 15/20 (75%)

The honest number is the judge's 10/100 at scale 2.5; the residual 10 are mostly hedged or dodged answers to the most dangerous CBRN/synthesis prompts rather than hard refusals. Determinism was verified: an independent re-run of the 3.0 candidate reproduced its metrics byte-identically.

Unlike Inkling-Small and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (where abliteration was essentially free), the 975B model pays a measurable cost at these strengths: KL 1.106 at 2.5 and GSM8K 65% (base 90%; n=20 is noisy but the KL corroborates real distribution shift). If you need more preserved capability, use the scale-3.0 branch (75% GSM8K) or re-ablate a shallower layer band from the shipped directions — the ablation is rank-1 and norm-preserving but not linear in scale, so always start from the un-ablated base tensors.

Method

Per-layer refusal directions were measured at the residual stream (each layer's attn_norm input) on 128 harmful vs 128 harmless prompts, as the diff-in-means orthogonalized against the harmless mean direction (projected abliteration), then applied as norm-preserving biprojected edits to wo_ud and shared_w2 rows across layers 9–58. The edits are surgical swaps in the NVFP4 checkpoint — the affected tensors are stored unquantized (BF16) there, so the routed experts, vision tower, audio encoder, and MTP heads are byte-identical to upstream.

Downloads last month
-
Safetensors
Model size
553B params
Tensor type
I64
·
F32
·
BF16
·
F8_E4M3
·
U8
·
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. 🙋 Ask for provider support

Model tree for distributedcognition/Inkling-abliterated

Finetuned
(14)
this model

Collection including distributedcognition/Inkling-abliterated

Paper for distributedcognition/Inkling-abliterated