Cerebellum

North-Mini-Code 1.0 — Cerebellum GGUF

Coding-ablation-guided mixed-precision quantization of CohereLabs/North-Mini-Code-1.0 (cohere2moe, 128-expert MoE).

Variant File Size
Cerebellum v1 North-Mini-Code-Cerebellum-v1.gguf 13.57 GB

Cerebellum measures, per tensor group, what actually breaks the model's coding ability when crushed to Q2_K — using real HumanEval pass@1 deltas, not perplexity (perplexity is blind to code generation). It then writes one GGUF that protects the groups that matter and crushes the rest. On North, the per-group HumanEval ablation found exactly one coding-critical group — the routed down-projection experts — so v1 keeps those at Q4_K_M and crushes everything else to Q2_K.

Benchmarks

Measured directly on this GGUF with llama.cpp (current master). --parallel 1, temperature 0.

Benchmark North-Mini-Code-Cerebellum-v1 (13.57 GB)
HumanEval base (thinking on / off) 86.6% / 84.8%
HumanEval+ (thinking on / off) 82.9% / 79.3%
ARC-Challenge (1172) 92.2%
MMLU-Redux (250) 78.0%
HellaSwag (250) 55.2%

Important: measuring HumanEval correctly

North-Mini-Code is a reasoning-native model — it emits its full chain-of-thought in the response content (no <think> delimiter for llama.cpp to split on). A naive EvalPlus/HumanEval harness extracts the reasoning prose instead of the final code and massively under-scores the model (~51% on a stock extractor). The numbers above use a reasoning-aware extractor that recovers the model's actual final code block before execution; on inspection, the remaining failures are genuine logic errors plus a small number of reasoning-overflow cases, not extraction noise. If you bench this model, strip the reasoning to the final code block, or disable thinking (below).

Per the project's standing rule, comparisons are to the base model and same-size baselines only.

v1 Allocation

Built from the complete per-group HumanEval coding ablation (baseline = uniform Q4_K_M, 8 groups, real pass@1 deltas):

Group Precision Why
ffn_down_exps (routed) Q4_K_M The one coding-critical group — Q2_K here dropped HumanEval ~37 pts. Protected.
ffn_(gate|up)_exps (routed) Q2_K Crushing it improved coding; ~4.5 GB of the savings
attn_q / attn_k / attn_v / attn_output Q2_K Free or beneficial at Q2_K per the ablation
token_embd (tied) Q2_K Free / beneficial
blk.0 dense ffn Q2_K Free

Norms protected (default). Base type Q4_K_M; only the groups above are overridden.

Requirements

This is a cohere2moe model — it needs a llama.cpp build with cohere2-MoE support (merged to master, PR #24260 / commit 4988f6e). The GGUF uses the tiny_aya pre-tokenizer; older/PR-head builds that expect cohere2moe will fail to load. Build from current ggml-org/llama.cpp master.

Usage

# default (reasoning on — the model performs best with thinking enabled)
llama-server --model North-Mini-Code-Cerebellum-v1.gguf -ngl 99 -c 8192 --jinja

# no-thinking (faster, clean final output)
llama-server --model North-Mini-Code-Cerebellum-v1.gguf -ngl 99 -c 8192 --jinja \
  --reasoning off --reasoning-budget 0
# (also pass chat_template_kwargs {"enable_thinking": false} in the request)

Fits a 16 GB card. The model reasons in the content channel; for agent loops, pass the reasoning content forward between turns (per the base model's guidance).

Evidence

Per-benchmark detail and the coding-ablation results are in benchmark_results/.

Downloads last month
486
GGUF
Model size
30B params
Architecture
cohere2moe
Hardware compatibility
Log In to add your hardware

We're not able to determine the quantization variants.

Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. 🙋 Ask for provider support

Model tree for deucebucket/North-Mini-Code-Cerebellum-GGUF

Quantized
(33)
this model