Datasets:
Pi traces preview
Mon, May 18
New Pinet messages:
[thread a2a:93da777c:da032c85-ffd6-478b-95de-236b4486b706] [steering] 93da777c (The Broker Rhino): inbox_id=2571 pointer=pinet action=read args.thread_id=a2a:93da777c:da032c85-ffd6-478b-95de-236b4486b706 args.unread_only=true
Read pointer(s) before acting; reply via pinet action=send. 3
messages 110
tools New Pinet messages:
[thread a2a:93da777c:45728a5a-a0ce-410e-99f8-b6685ac71817] [steering] 93da777c (The Broker Rhino): inbox_id=2561 pointer=pinet action=read args.thread_id=a2a:93da777c:45728a5a-a0ce-410e-99f8-b6685ac71817 args.unread_only=true
Read pointer(s) before acting; reply via pinet action=send. 4
messages 104
tools New Pinet messages:
[thread a2a:93da777c:e3b73c2f-5814-4df6-96fc-2d2165e22b58] [steering] 93da777c (The Broker Rhino): inbox_id=2560 pointer=pinet action=read args.thread_id=a2a:93da777c:e3b73c2f-5814-4df6-96fc-2d2165e22b58 args.unread_only=true
Read pointer(s) before acting; reply via pinet action=send. 4
messages 232
tools New Pinet messages:
[thread a2a:93da777c:e3b73c2f-5814-4df6-96fc-2d2165e22b58] [steering] 93da777c (The Broker Rhino): inbox_id=2560 pointer=pinet action=read args.thread_id=a2a:93da777c:e3b73c2f-5814-4df6-96fc-2d2165e22b58 args.unread_only=true
Read pointer(s) before acting; reply via pinet action=send. 4
messages 113
toolsSat, May 16
New Pinet messages:
[thread a2a:93da777c:9ea9f95f-2ad3-4b42-878a-a3745695e03d] [steering] 93da777c (The Broker Rhino): inbox_id=2342 pointer=pinet action=read args.thread_id=a2a:93da777c:9ea9f95f-2ad3-4b42-878a-a3745695e03d args.unread_only=true
Read pointer(s) before acting; reply via pinet action=send. 4
messages 59
tools New Pinet messages:
[thread a2a:93da777c:9ea9f95f-2ad3-4b42-878a-a3745695e03d] [steering] 93da777c (The Broker Rhino): inbox_id=2342 pointer=pinet action=read args.thread_id=a2a:93da777c:9ea9f95f-2ad3-4b42-878a-a3745695e03d args.unread_only=true
Read pointer(s) before acting; reply via pinet action=send. 2
messages 71
toolsSat, Apr 25
<file name="/tmp/pinet-phase1-settings-worker-prompt.md">
You are an implementation worker for `gugu91/extensions` executing the Pinet transport-agnostic implementation plan.
ACK/WORK/ASK/REPORT workflow:
- First, briefly report in your terminal that you are starting and which phase you own.
- Work autonomously, but stop and report blockers immediately.
- When implementation is done, invoke an independent reviewer running `openai-codex/gpt-5.5` with `--thinking xhigh`; address or explicitly decline findings before opening/finalizing PR.
- Final report must include branch/worktree, commits, PR URL(s), validation, cleanup checks, review file, and unresolved blockers.
Your phase: Phase 1 — settings envelope and adapter config contract.
Base plan:
- Read `/Users/thomasmustier/projects/gugu91-extensions/.worktrees/pinet-refactor-audit/plans/pinet-transport-agnostic-implementation-plan.md`.
- Follow the phase exactly, especially cleanup and validation requirements.
Stacked PR requirements:
- Use stacked PRs; do not wait for lower docs PR #602 to merge if you can stack correctly.
- Install/check gh-stack if needed: `gh extension install github/gh-stack`.
- Optional agent skill if available: `gh skill install github/gh-stack`.
- Current environment previously could not push to `origin` (`gugu91/extensions`) and must push to `tmustier` unless upstream write access is available.
- If `gh stack` cannot create a native upstream stack from fork branches, stop and report the blocker. Do not fake a stack.
- Desired branch/layer name: `pinet/01-settings-envelope`.
- Base should be the current planning branch `tmustier/docs/pinet-refactor-audit` or its upstream PR equivalent if available; if GitHub stack constraints make that impossible, report before opening a misleading PR.
Worktree rule:
- Do not work in the main checkout.
- Create/use an isolated worktree under `/Users/thomasmustier/projects/gugu91-extensions/.worktrees/`.
- Suggested setup:
`cd /Users/thomasmustier/projects/gugu91-extensions && git fetch tmustier docs/pinet-refactor-audit && git worktree add .worktrees/pinet-01-settings -b pinet/01-settings-envelope FETCH_HEAD && cd .worktrees/pinet-01-settings`
Implementation requirements from Phase 1:
1. Add a Pinet-owned settings module, likely in `pinet-core` or `pinet-extension`, with the `pinet.*` envelope:
- `runtimeMode`, `instance`, `mesh`, `broker`, `transports`, `tools`, `security`, `observability`.
2. Add adapter config validation contract:
- Pinet validates envelope and provider key presence;
- adapter packages validate values under `transports.<provider>`;
- unknown provider keys fail closed unless factory/plugin explicitly configured.
3. Add Slack transport settings validator in `slack-bridge`.
4. Add iMessage transport settings validator in `imessage-bridge`.
5. Delete or replace `autoConnect`, `autoFollow`, and Slack-owned Pinet runtime setting names where the new envelope covers them.
6. Add docs/examples showing `pinet.transports.slack` and `pinet.transports.imessage`.
Review requirement:
- Invoke an independent gpt-5.5 xhigh reviewer on your diff.
- Prefer the subagent tool if available; otherwise run:
`pi -p --model openai-codex/gpt-5.5 --thinking xhigh "Review this Phase 1 Pinet settings diff for correctness, architecture fit, tests, and cleanup residue. Do not edit files. Return blockers and non-blockers." > /tmp/pinet-01-settings-review.md`
- Save review output to `/tmp/pinet-01-settings-review.md` and mention it in the PR.
Validation minimum:
- Package-specific tests/typecheck you add or touch.
- `pnpm lint`, `pnpm typecheck`, `pnpm test` unless a documented dependency/install blocker prevents it.
- `git diff --check`.
- Cleanup check:
`rg -g '!**/*.test.ts' 'autoConnect|autoFollow|slack-bridge\.|source = "slack"|source \?\? "slack"'`
PR requirements:
- Use gh-stack if possible: `gh stack submit --draft --remote tmustier` or equivalent.
- If gh-stack cannot submit because fork/upstream limitations, push branch to `tmustier` and report the exact blocker instead of opening non-stacked PRs.
- PR body must include stack position, base branch, dependencies, tests, cleanup checks, and reviewer outcome.
</file> 2
messages 60
tools <file name="/tmp/pinet-stack-doc-worker-prompt.md">
You are an implementation-planning worker in repo `/Users/thomasmustier/projects/gugu91-extensions/.worktrees/pinet-refactor-audit` on branch `docs/pinet-refactor-audit` for PR #602.
ACK/WORK/ASK/REPORT workflow:
- First, briefly report in your terminal that you are starting.
- Do the work below.
- If blocked, say exactly what is blocked and stop.
- When done, report commit hash, files changed, validation, and PR comment URL if any.
Task: document stacked-PR execution and worker instructions for the Pinet transport-agnostic implementation plan.
Context:
- The implementation plan is `plans/pinet-transport-agnostic-implementation-plan.md`.
- The audit is `plans/pinet-transport-agnostic-refactor-audit.md`.
- The daemon PRD is `plans/420-broker-daemon-prd.md`.
- PR: https://github.com/gugu91/extensions/pull/602
- Direct push to `origin` is not available; push to remote `tmustier`.
- User wants implementation workers to submit stacked PRs using GitHub's `gh stack` workflow. They specifically pointed at https://github.github.com/gh-stack/.
Required doc changes:
1. Update `plans/pinet-transport-agnostic-implementation-plan.md` with a dedicated section for stacked PR execution.
2. Include gh-stack setup commands where relevant:
- `gh extension install github/gh-stack`
- optional agent skill: `gh skill install github/gh-stack`
- use `gh stack init`, `gh stack add`, `gh stack submit --draft`, `gh stack view`, `gh stack rebase`, `gh stack push`, and `gh stack link` where appropriate.
3. Explicitly document the fork/upstream constraint: this repo currently cannot push to `gugu91/extensions` from this environment, so workers must push branches to `tmustier` unless given upstream write access. If native gh-stack cannot create upstream stacked PRs from fork branches, workers should stop and report the blocker rather than faking a stack.
4. Add worker instructions covering:
- create isolated git worktrees; never work on main checkout;
- use branch names ordered by stack layer, e.g. `pinet/00-runway`, `pinet/01-settings`, etc.;
- each worker owns one stack layer unless explicitly assigned multiple;
- build layers on the previous branch, not on `main`;
- do not wait for lower PRs to merge before opening upper PRs;
- after implementation, run a gpt-5.5 xhigh review subagent before submitting or finalizing the PR;
- save review output locally and address/block/decline findings explicitly;
- PR descriptions must include stack position, base branch, dependencies, tests, cleanup checks, and reviewer outcome.
5. Add a concrete initial stack proposal mapping phases to stacked PR layers. Keep layers small enough to review but ensure every phase of the plan remains covered.
6. Update the audit and daemon PRD only if needed to point at the new stacked PR / worker-instructions section.
Review requirement before finalizing:
- Invoke an independent reviewer running model `openai-codex/gpt-5.5` with `--thinking xhigh` to review your doc changes.
- If you have the `subagent` tool, use it. If not, run a read-only `pi -p --model openai-codex/gpt-5.5 --thinking xhigh` review command and save output to `/tmp/pinet-stack-doc-worker-review.md`.
- Address important findings, then commit and push.
Validation:
- Run `git diff --check`.
- This is docs-only; do not run full test suites unless you choose to.
- Commit message: `docs: add stacked PR worker workflow to Pinet plan`.
- Push to `tmustier docs/pinet-refactor-audit`.
- Post a PR comment summarizing the doc update and reviewer outcome using `gh pr comment 602 --repo gugu91/extensions`.
Do not implement runtime code in this task.
</file> 1
message 29
tools <file name="/tmp/pi-review-opus47-prompt.md">
You are reviewing PR #602 in gugu91/extensions: https://github.com/gugu91/extensions/pull/602
Task: perform a thoughtful architecture/product/codebase-maintainability review of this docs-only planning PR. The PR adds `plans/pinet-transport-agnostic-refactor-audit.md`, a long architecture audit for making Pinet transport-agnostic and clean-slate pre-release.
Context and constraints:
- Repo checkout: /Users/thomasmustier/projects/gugu91-extensions/.worktrees/pinet-refactor-audit
- This is a docs/planning PR only. Do not edit files.
- Use the repo docs/issues as needed. `gh pr diff 602 --repo gugu91/extensions` and local files are available.
- Focus on whether the plan sets up a clean future architecture for Slack/iMessage/cloud, whether the clean-slate stance is coherent, whether cleanup/dead-code/duplication discipline is strong enough, whether sequencing is practical, and whether any important open issue or risk is mishandled.
- Be concrete. Cite file/section names or line numbers where useful.
- If you find blockers, separate them from non-blocking suggestions.
Output requirement:
1. Write your review findings as a GitHub PR comment on PR #602 using `gh pr comment 602 --repo gugu91/extensions --body-file <file>`.
2. Prefix the comment title with: `Opus 4.7 xhigh review`.
3. Also save the exact comment body to `/tmp/pi-review-opus47-comment.md` so the orchestrator can inspect it.
4. Do not open a separate PR or modify tracked files.
Suggested command shape after drafting the review:
```bash
gh pr comment 602 --repo gugu91/extensions --body-file /tmp/pi-review-opus47-comment.md
```
Please proceed end-to-end and report when the PR comment has been posted.
</file> 1
message 34
tools <file name="/tmp/pi-review-gpt55-prompt.md">
You are reviewing PR #602 in gugu91/extensions: https://github.com/gugu91/extensions/pull/602
Task: perform a rigorous PR review of this docs-only planning PR. The PR adds `plans/pinet-transport-agnostic-refactor-audit.md`, a long architecture audit for making Pinet transport-agnostic and clean-slate pre-release.
Context and constraints:
- Repo checkout: /Users/thomasmustier/projects/gugu91-extensions/.worktrees/pinet-refactor-audit
- This is a docs/planning PR only. Do not edit files.
- Use the repo docs/issues as needed. `gh pr diff 602 --repo gugu91/extensions` and local files are available.
- Focus on correctness, internal consistency, missing issue coverage, architectural sequencing, risk, and whether the recommendation actually sets Pinet up cleanly for Slack/iMessage/cloud.
- Be concrete. Cite file/section names or line numbers where useful.
- If you find blockers, separate them from non-blocking suggestions.
Output requirement:
1. Write your review findings as a GitHub PR comment on PR #602 using `gh pr comment 602 --repo gugu91/extensions --body-file <file>`.
2. Prefix the comment title with: `GPT-5.5 xhigh review`.
3. Also save the exact comment body to `/tmp/pi-review-gpt55-comment.md` so the orchestrator can inspect it.
4. Do not open a separate PR or modify tracked files.
Suggested command shape after drafting the review:
```bash
gh pr comment 602 --repo gugu91/extensions --body-file /tmp/pi-review-gpt55-comment.md
```
Please proceed end-to-end and report when the PR comment has been posted.
</file> 1
message 25
tools Pi coding agent sessions for gugu91/pinet
Source project on GitHub: gugu91/pinet
This dataset contains 54 coding agent sessions recorded with pi while working on gugu91/pinet. The source project is MIT licensed.
Data description
Each *.jsonl file is one Pi session. Each line is one session entry: session headers, user and assistant messages, thinking, tool calls and results, model changes, compaction summaries and extension data.
Pi session files are tree-structured through id and parentId, so one file may contain several branches of work. See the session format documentation:
manifest.jsonl is the pi-share-hf index of the files in this dataset.
Redaction and review
Earlier sessions were exported with pi-share-hf, which redacts known secrets, scans with TruffleHog and uses a model review step. Sessions added or updated in October 2026 went through a stricter process:
- Every session was read in full by a model reviewer looking for private information, then scanned offline with TruffleHog.
- Sessions with private information that could not be removed cleanly were left out, as were trivial sessions such as greetings and smoke tests.
- A human spot check followed.
Removed text is replaced with a marker such as [REDACTED_CREDENTIAL] or [Image omitted from shared copy.].
Limitations
Redaction and review reduce risk but cannot prove that no sensitive information remains. Local paths, host names and the author's GitHub identity are left in. The sessions are not a representative sample of Pi use.
- Downloads last month
- -