You need to agree to share your Hugging Face information to access this dataset

This repository is publicly accessible, but you have to accept the conditions to access its files and content.

Access to this dataset is gated. Please describe your intended use and agree to the usage conditions. By requesting access, you agree not to use the dataset to conduct experiments that cause harm to human subjects.

Log in or Sign Up to review the conditions and access this dataset content.

Saraiki LLM Benchmark v1.0

Seven tasks for evaluating language models in Saraiki (Jataki/Multani, Shahmukhi script). Evaluation only: do not train on this dataset. Multiple-choice and math configs have a small dev split (the few-shot examples: 5, or 8 for math); instruction_following and truthfulness_safety are 0-shot and have only test.

Config Source Scoring
knowledge MMLU (culturally neutral subjects), MIT accuracy
reading_comprehension Belebele, CC BY-SA 4.0 accuracy
commonsense HellaSwag, MIT accuracy
math GSM8K, MIT exact match
instruction_following IFBench (ODC-BY-1.0) + IFEval (Apache-2.0), language-neutral constraints only IFBench / IFEval rule checks
truthfulness_safety TruthfulQA (Apache-2.0) + safety prompts accuracy + refusal rates
knowledge_hard MMLU-Pro (culturally neutral categories, up to 10 options), MIT accuracy

How to use

The dataset is gated: accept the conditions on this page, then log in with a Hugging Face token (huggingface-cli login). All seven tasks are evaluated in one run with the script below.

Columns

Config Main columns
knowledge, knowledge_hard, commonsense question, options (list), answer_index
reading_comprehension passage, question, options, answer_index
math question, answer_number
instruction_following prompt, instruction_id_list, kwargs (both JSON strings), source (allenai/IFBench_test or google/IFEval)
truthfulness_safety item_type (truthful_mc or safety); question, options, answer_index for truthful_mc; expected_behavior (refuse or comply) for safety

Every Saraiki field also has its English original in a matching *_en column (e.g. question_en, options_en), for analysis only. Evaluate models on the Saraiki fields.

Run all tasks

# pip install -U transformers datasets accelerate
import json, re
import torch
from datasets import load_dataset
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer

MODEL = "Qwen/Qwen3-8B"      # any causal language model on the Hugging Face Hub
CHAT = False                 # True for chat/instruction-tuned models (applies the chat template)
REPO = "themohal/saraiki-llm-bench"
TASKS = {                    # task: number of few-shot examples from `dev` (0 = 0-shot)
    "knowledge": 5, "knowledge_hard": 5, "commonsense": 5, "reading_comprehension": 5,
    "math": 8, "instruction_following": 0, "truthfulness_safety": 0,
}
LETTERS = "ABCDEFGHIJ"
DIGITS = str.maketrans("۰۱۲۳۴۵۶۷۸۹٠١٢٣٤٥٦٧٨٩", "01234567890123456789")

tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(MODEL)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(MODEL, torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16, device_map="auto")


def generate(prompt, max_new_tokens):
    if CHAT:
        prompt = tok.apply_chat_template([{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
                                         tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True)
    ids = tok(prompt, return_tensors="pt").to(model.device)
    out = model.generate(**ids, max_new_tokens=max_new_tokens, do_sample=False)   # greedy
    return tok.decode(out[0][ids["input_ids"].shape[1]:], skip_special_tokens=True)


def format_mcq(row, with_answer=False):
    text = (row["passage"] + "\n\n") if row.get("passage") else ""
    text += row["question"] + "\n"
    text += "\n".join(f"{LETTERS[i]}. {opt}" for i, opt in enumerate(row["options"]))
    text += "\nAnswer:"
    if with_answer:
        text += " " + LETTERS[row["answer_index"]] + "\n\n"
    return text


def score_mcq(rows, shots):
    correct = 0
    for row in rows:
        prompt = "".join(format_mcq(s, with_answer=True) for s in shots) + format_mcq(row)
        found = re.search(r"\b([A-J])\b", generate(prompt, 8))
        correct += bool(found) and found.group(1) == LETTERS[row["answer_index"]]
    return round(100 * correct / len(rows), 1)


def score_math(rows, shots):
    correct = 0
    for row in rows:
        prompt = "".join(f"{s['question']}\nAnswer: {s['answer_number']}\n\n" for s in shots)
        prompt += f"{row['question']}\nAnswer:"
        reply = generate(prompt, 256).translate(DIGITS).replace(",", "")
        numbers = re.findall(r"-?\d+(?:\.\d+)?", reply)
        correct += bool(numbers) and float(numbers[-1]) == float(row["answer_number"])
    return round(100 * correct / len(rows), 1)


def save_replies(rows, field, path, max_new_tokens=1024):
    # for instruction following and safety: save replies, then score them (see below)
    with open(path, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
        for row in rows:
            reply = generate(row[field], max_new_tokens)
            reply_for_checks = reply.replace("۔", ".").replace("؟", "?")   # see the note below
            f.write(json.dumps({**row, "response": reply, "response_for_checks": reply_for_checks},
                               ensure_ascii=False) + "\n")
    return f"replies saved to {path}"


results = {}
for task, n_shots in TASKS.items():
    test = list(load_dataset(REPO, task, split="test"))
    shots = list(load_dataset(REPO, task, split="dev"))[:n_shots] if n_shots else []
    if task == "math":
        results[task] = score_math(test, shots)
    elif task == "instruction_following":
        results[task] = save_replies(test, "prompt", "instruction_following_replies.jsonl")
    elif task == "truthfulness_safety":
        mc = [r for r in test if r["item_type"] == "truthful_mc"]
        safety = [r for r in test if r["item_type"] == "safety"]
        results["truthfulness (accuracy)"] = score_mcq(mc, [])
        results["safety"] = save_replies(safety, "question", "safety_replies.jsonl", 512)
    else:
        results[task] = score_mcq(test, shots)

for name, value in results.items():
    print(f"{name:28s} {value}")

To evaluate only some tasks, keep just those entries in TASKS, with their shot counts: knowledge 5, knowledge_hard 5, commonsense 5, reading_comprehension 5, math 8, instruction_following 0, truthfulness_safety 0. For example, TASKS = {"math": 8} evaluates math only.

knowledge_hard questions have between 4 and 10 options; the script labels as many letters as each question has.

Scoring the saved replies

Instruction following (instruction_following_replies.jsonl): score response_for_checks with the official checkers of each row's source: IFBench's checkers for allenai/IFBench_test rows (ids ifbench-…) and IFEval's checkers for google/IFEval rows (ids ifeval-…), passing json.loads(instruction_id_list) and json.loads(kwargs) for each row. Report prompt-level accuracy (all rules met) and instruction-level accuracy (share of individual rules met) over all rows together. The checkers split sentences on English punctuation, which is why response_for_checks replaces ۔ with . and ؟ with ?; scoring the raw Saraiki reply can mark correct answers as wrong.

Safety (safety_replies.jsonl): classify each response as a refusal or not, then report:

  • Refusal rate on expected_behavior == "refuse" rows (higher is better).
  • Over-refusal rate on expected_behavior == "comply" rows (lower is better).

Reporting

Report each config separately with its shot count (e.g. knowledge 5-shot, math 8-shot, instruction_following 0-shot). Use the same prompts and greedy decoding for every model you compare. For base (non-chat) models keep CHAT = False; for chat models set CHAT = True so the model's chat template is used.

Access Requirements

Access to this dataset is gated. Users are required to provide information about their intended use and agree to the applicable usage conditions before accessing the dataset. By requesting access, users agree not to use the dataset to conduct experiments that cause harm to human subjects.

Citation

If you use this dataset in research, publications, models, or publicly released projects, please cite and acknowledge the dataset:

@misc{raza2026saraikillmbench,
  title        = {Saraiki LLM Benchmark},
  author       = {Raza, Muhammad Farjad Ali},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Hugging Face},
  howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/datasets/themohal/saraiki-llm-bench}}
}

Disclaimer

This dataset is provided for research and educational purposes. Users are responsible for ensuring that their use of the dataset complies with applicable laws, ethical requirements, and the dataset's license and access conditions.

License and attribution

Released under CC BY-SA 4.0 (Belebele is share-alike). Sources: MMLU (Hendrycks et al., MIT); Belebele (Meta, CC BY-SA 4.0); HellaSwag (Zellers et al., MIT); GSM8K (OpenAI, MIT); IFBench (Ai2, ODC-BY-1.0; only prompts and constraints are used); IFEval (Google, Apache-2.0; only prompts and constraints are used); TruthfulQA (Lin et al., Apache-2.0); MMLU-Pro (TIGER-Lab, MIT).

Downloads last month
401