Dataset Viewer
The dataset viewer is not available for this subset.
Cannot get the split names for the config 'default' of the dataset.
Exception:    SplitsNotFoundError
Message:      The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.
Traceback:    Traceback (most recent call last):
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 286, in get_dataset_config_info
                  for split_generator in builder._split_generators(
                                         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
                      StreamingDownloadManager(base_path=builder.base_path, download_config=download_config)
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  )
                  ^
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/eval/eval.py", line 41, in _split_generators
                  first_examples = list(
                      islice(
                  ...<2 lines>...
                      )
                  )
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/eval/eval.py", line 60, in _iter_samples_from_log_files
                  sample_files.sort(key=self._sort_samples_key)
                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/eval/eval.py", line 56, in _sort_samples_key
                  return (int(epoch_idx_str), int(sample_idx_str))
                                              ~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
              ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: 'step1gdx-react-baseline'
              
              The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:
              
              Traceback (most recent call last):
                File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/split_names.py", line 68, in compute_split_names_from_streaming_response
                  for split in get_dataset_split_names(
                               ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
                      path=dataset,
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                      config_name=config,
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                      token=hf_token,
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  )
                  ^
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 340, in get_dataset_split_names
                  info = get_dataset_config_info(
                      path,
                  ...<6 lines>...
                      **config_kwargs,
                  )
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 291, in get_dataset_config_info
                  raise SplitsNotFoundError("The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.") from err
              datasets.inspect.SplitsNotFoundError: The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.

Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.

OpenAI–Hugging Face Incident Replication

Raw agent transcripts behind the write-up "OpenAI–Hugging Face: A Reproduction and Lessons for Alignment". They capture attempts to elicit the four pivotal misaligned behaviours from the May–July 2026 incident that Hugging Face described here:

  1. Inappropriate writes to shared infrastructure (a mock model registry).
  2. Requesting help from other agents to get around a blocker.
  3. Sharing solutions/exploits with peers, including an SSRF/egress-share arm.
  4. Using a posted exploit to reach an external system (the HF "cheat chain").

Each behaviour is elicited three ways, one per top-level folder.

Layout

part1_docker/          Part 1 — manual replication in Docker
part2_petri/           Part 2 — automated auditing with a bare Petri auditor
part3_rudimentary_rl/  Part 3 — in-context "rudimentary RL" auditing (Step 2)
  <run_dir>/react__<model>__<mode>/shardN/<timestamp>_<task>_<id>.eval

Run directories are named <yymmdd>_step<N>_<slug>_<size> (e.g. 260909_step3_egress_share_n64). _jobs*.tsv files inside a run record the launched shards. Files are Inspect .eval logs — one scored evaluation set per file, holding the full trajectory, tool calls, and judge scores.

Models

The target is GLM 5.2, with a multi-model extension across GLM 5.3, Kimi K3, Qwen 3.8 Max, Grok 4.6, Muse Spark 1.3, and (where captured) GPT-5.6 and Opus 4.8. The judge is Opus 4.8. Frontier OpenAI/Anthropic models refuse this content out of the box, as Hugging Face also found.

Reading the logs

uv run inspect view --log-dir <run_dir>       # browse a run at http://localhost:7575

Or open any .eval file with the inspect_ai Python API. The transcripts are also browsable on Docent.

Provenance

Produced by the msp895/oai-hf-incident-reproduction repo; hf_data.yaml there maps every run directory to the figure it backs and notes which runs are superseded. Pull the logs with:

uv run python -m alignment_auditor.scripts.hf_data pull                     # everything
uv run python -m alignment_auditor.scripts.hf_data pull --part part1_docker # one part

Intended use

Alignment and red-teaming research: studying how agentic models drift into misaligned actions, and how well manual and automated auditing surface those behaviours. The scenarios are deliberately constructed elicitations in sandboxed mock environments, not records of real-world harm.

Downloads last month
53