Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
category
stringclasses
4 values
domains
int64
104
380
source
stringclasses
1 value
shopify_unavailable
380
recheck.py console tally, 2026-08-05, recovered 2026-09-20
robots_style
181
recheck.py console tally, 2026-08-05, recovered 2026-09-20
other_text
160
recheck.py console tally, 2026-08-05, recovered 2026-09-20
genuine_map
104
recheck.py console tally, 2026-08-05, recovered 2026-09-20

The llms.txt corpus

Measurement data on the llms.txt convention, collected in one run on 5 August 2026.

llms.txt is a plain-text file at a site's root, proposed as a curated map telling AI systems what the site contains. This is a measurement of what is actually being published under that name.

Canonical release: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22859104 This repository mirrors that deposit. Cite the DOI, which always resolves to the newest version.

Two observations, six weeks apart

The identical 1,563 files were re-fetched on 20 September 2026 with the same code and user agent. llms.txt health got worse.

2026-08-05 2026-09-20
Broken at file level 245 (15.7%) 265 (17.0%)

Healthy in both runs 1,280 · broken in both runs 227 · newly broken 38 · fixed 18.

227 files have been broken for at least six weeks. Files serving an HTML page instead of text nearly doubled, 32 to 60, while outright bot-blocking fell from 54 to 30. An HTML fallback returns 200 and looks healthy to anything that only checks a status code.

Link validation was not repeated, so every link-level figure below remains the 2026-08-05 observation.

What was measured

Ecosystem. All 1,563 llms.txt files registered in the convention's own public directories (llmstxt.site, directory.llmstxt.cloud, llmstxthub.com) were fetched, and 19,039 of the links inside the healthy ones were validated across 1,147 sites.

Shopify. 10,858 storefronts were checked for what they serve at /llms.txt: 8,951 custom-domain stores plus 1,907 canonical *.myshopify.com stores as a cross-check.

Findings

Measure Value
Files broken at file level 15.7%
Files returning healthy text 84.3%
Files serving 403 to a research crawler 54
Links validated 19,039 across 1,147 sites
Links resolving cleanly 93.9%
Links dead 2.8%
Links blocked 2.1%
Sites linking to at least one dead page 18.2%
Healthy files containing no links at all 13.0%, about 1 in 8
Most links in a single file 11,137

Shopify storefronts. 7,133 of 10,858 returned a file. 6,016 of those are byte-identical: the file Shopify injects automatically. Among canonical *.myshopify.com stores it is 98%.

That file is not a content map. It is an Agent Instructions manifest describing how an agent should check out. Of the 7,133 files retrieved, 104 are a genuine curated content map, which is 1.5%.

File type Share of 7,133
Shopify auto-file (Agent Instructions + Store Unavailable) 89.7%
HTML page, not a text file 3.9%
Misplaced robots.txt content 2.5%
Other or empty 2.4%
Genuine curated content map 1.5%

Configs

Config Rows What it is
llmstxt_files 1,563 one row per llms.txt fetched, with status and link count
llmstxt_links 19,039 one row per validated link, with its response status
shopify_stores 10,858 one row per storefront, with its sampling frame
content_map_reclassification 4 tally of the hand re-check, see limitations

Also in the repo: code/ with the collection and validation scripts, METHODS.md with the full limitations section, CHECKSUMS.txt.

How it was collected

Every fetch identified itself:

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; SEMPITE-research/1.0; +https://sempite.com/research/)

A file counts as healthy when it returns HTTP 200 and the body is not HTML. An HTML body at /llms.txt is a fallback page, not an llms.txt file.

Links are checked HEAD first, GET on a HEAD-hostile response. Two tiers: every link up to a cap of 400 for roughly a hundred widely recognised documentation sites, and a seeded random sample of 15 links for every other site.

Limitations

Read METHODS.md for all eight. The four that matter most:

  1. The ecosystem frame is self-selected. These are files someone registered in a public directory, skewed heavily toward developer documentation. This does not estimate llms.txt adoption across the web.

  2. The Shopify frame is a sample, not a census. Public store lists over-represent active mid-market merchants and skew regionally.

  3. Link health is a two-tier estimate. Long-tail sites contribute 15 sampled links each, so per-site figures for those carry real sampling error. The pooled rates are the defensible ones.

  4. The Shopify file-type split rests on a recovered tally. The 825 stores first classified content_map were re-fetched and re-classified by a second pass that printed its result to a console rather than writing per-domain rows. The tally survived and ships as data/content_map_reclassification.csv, and the five percentages re-derive from it exactly, but you cannot look up which specific store was judged a genuine content map.

Every other figure re-derives from the raw rows here. The build script that produces this package recomputes all 25 published figures and refuses to package if any of them fails to match.

Citation

@dataset{gerrish_llmstxt_corpus_2026,
  author    = {Gerrish, Jacob Ezra},
  title     = {The llms.txt corpus: ecosystem health, file contents,
               and the Shopify platform default},
  year      = {2026},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.22859104},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22859104}
}

Write-ups

Data CC BY 4.0, code MIT. Produced by SEMPITE.

Downloads last month
48