Datasets:
chrom string | pos int64 | ref large_string | alt large_string | gene large_string | zygosity large_string | label int64 | genotype_pair large_string | diploid_token large_string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1,013,490 | C | G | ISG15 | het | 0 | CG | Ƈ |
1 | 1,013,490 | C | G | ISG15 | hom | 0 | GG | G |
1 | 1,013,541 | T | C | ISG15 | het | 0 | TC | Ƭ |
1 | 1,013,541 | T | C | ISG15 | hom | 0 | CC | C |
1 | 1,014,042 | G | A | ISG15 | het | 0 | GA | Ğ |
1 | 1,014,042 | G | A | ISG15 | hom | 0 | AA | A |
1 | 1,014,199 | G | T | ISG15 | het | 0 | GT | Ǧ |
1 | 1,014,199 | G | T | ISG15 | hom | 0 | TT | T |
1 | 1,014,228 | G | A | ISG15 | het | 0 | GA | Ğ |
1 | 1,014,228 | G | A | ISG15 | hom | 0 | AA | A |
1 | 1,014,274 | A | G | ISG15 | het | 0 | AG | Ã |
1 | 1,014,274 | A | G | ISG15 | hom | 0 | GG | G |
1 | 1,014,385 | C | T | ISG15 | het | 0 | CT | Ć |
1 | 1,014,385 | C | T | ISG15 | hom | 0 | TT | T |
1 | 1,014,451 | C | T | ISG15 | het | 0 | CT | Ć |
1 | 1,014,451 | C | T | ISG15 | hom | 0 | TT | T |
1 | 1,014,457 | A | G | ISG15 | het | 0 | AG | Ã |
1 | 1,014,457 | A | G | ISG15 | hom | 0 | GG | G |
1 | 1,020,183 | G | C | AGRN | het | 0 | GC | Ǥ |
1 | 1,020,183 | G | C | AGRN | hom | 0 | CC | C |
1 | 1,020,217 | G | T | AGRN | het | 0 | GT | Ǧ |
1 | 1,020,217 | G | T | AGRN | hom | 0 | TT | T |
1 | 1,020,511 | G | T | AGRN | het | 0 | GT | Ǧ |
1 | 1,020,511 | G | T | AGRN | hom | 0 | TT | T |
1 | 1,022,260 | C | T | AGRN | het | 0 | CT | Ć |
1 | 1,022,260 | C | T | AGRN | hom | 0 | TT | T |
1 | 1,022,425 | C | T | AGRN | het | 0 | CT | Ć |
1 | 1,022,425 | C | T | AGRN | hom | 0 | TT | T |
1 | 1,022,518 | G | T | AGRN | het | 0 | GT | Ǧ |
1 | 1,022,518 | G | T | AGRN | hom | 0 | TT | T |
1 | 1,035,037 | A | C | AGRN | het | 0 | AC | Á |
1 | 1,035,037 | A | C | AGRN | hom | 0 | CC | C |
1 | 1,035,075 | G | A | AGRN | het | 0 | GA | Ğ |
1 | 1,035,075 | G | A | AGRN | hom | 0 | AA | A |
1 | 1,035,307 | C | T | AGRN | het | 0 | CT | Ć |
1 | 1,035,307 | C | T | AGRN | hom | 0 | TT | T |
1 | 1,035,456 | G | A | AGRN | het | 0 | GA | Ğ |
1 | 1,035,456 | G | A | AGRN | hom | 0 | AA | A |
1 | 1,041,134 | C | A | AGRN | het | 0 | CA | Ç |
1 | 1,041,134 | C | A | AGRN | hom | 0 | AA | A |
1 | 1,041,158 | A | C | AGRN | het | 0 | AC | Á |
1 | 1,041,158 | A | C | AGRN | hom | 0 | CC | C |
1 | 1,041,174 | C | G | AGRN | het | 0 | CG | Ƈ |
1 | 1,041,174 | C | G | AGRN | hom | 0 | GG | G |
1 | 1,041,183 | C | T | AGRN | het | 0 | CT | Ć |
1 | 1,041,183 | C | T | AGRN | hom | 0 | TT | T |
1 | 1,041,218 | C | T | AGRN | het | 0 | CT | Ć |
1 | 1,041,218 | C | T | AGRN | hom | 0 | TT | T |
1 | 1,041,249 | C | T | AGRN | het | 0 | CT | Ć |
1 | 1,041,249 | C | T | AGRN | hom | 0 | TT | T |
1 | 1,041,583 | A | G | AGRN | het | 0 | AG | Ã |
1 | 1,041,583 | A | G | AGRN | hom | 0 | GG | G |
1 | 1,041,773 | G | T | AGRN | het | 0 | GT | Ǧ |
1 | 1,041,773 | G | T | AGRN | hom | 0 | TT | T |
1 | 1,041,823 | G | C | AGRN | het | 0 | GC | Ǥ |
1 | 1,041,823 | G | C | AGRN | hom | 0 | CC | C |
1 | 1,041,914 | G | A | AGRN | het | 0 | GA | Ğ |
1 | 1,041,914 | G | A | AGRN | hom | 0 | AA | A |
1 | 1,041,950 | T | C | AGRN | het | 0 | TC | Ƭ |
1 | 1,041,950 | T | C | AGRN | hom | 0 | CC | C |
1 | 1,042,190 | G | A | AGRN | het | 0 | GA | Ğ |
1 | 1,042,190 | G | A | AGRN | hom | 0 | AA | A |
1 | 1,043,594 | G | A | AGRN | het | 0 | GA | Ğ |
1 | 1,043,594 | G | A | AGRN | hom | 0 | AA | A |
1 | 1,044,057 | C | T | AGRN | het | 0 | CT | Ć |
1 | 1,044,057 | C | T | AGRN | hom | 0 | TT | T |
1 | 1,044,134 | C | G | AGRN | het | 0 | CG | Ƈ |
1 | 1,044,134 | C | G | AGRN | hom | 0 | GG | G |
1 | 1,044,265 | C | G | AGRN | het | 0 | CG | Ƈ |
1 | 1,044,265 | C | G | AGRN | hom | 0 | GG | G |
1 | 1,044,310 | G | A | AGRN | het | 0 | GA | Ğ |
1 | 1,044,310 | G | A | AGRN | hom | 0 | AA | A |
1 | 1,044,368 | A | T | AGRN | het | 0 | AT | Ă |
1 | 1,044,368 | A | T | AGRN | hom | 0 | TT | T |
1 | 1,044,455 | G | A | AGRN | het | 0 | GA | Ğ |
1 | 1,044,455 | G | A | AGRN | hom | 0 | AA | A |
1 | 1,045,060 | G | A | AGRN | het | 0 | GA | Ğ |
1 | 1,045,060 | G | A | AGRN | hom | 0 | AA | A |
1 | 1,045,080 | G | A | AGRN | het | 0 | GA | Ğ |
1 | 1,045,080 | G | A | AGRN | hom | 0 | AA | A |
1 | 1,045,387 | T | C | AGRN | het | 0 | TC | Ƭ |
1 | 1,045,387 | T | C | AGRN | hom | 0 | CC | C |
1 | 1,045,393 | C | T | AGRN | het | 0 | CT | Ć |
1 | 1,045,393 | C | T | AGRN | hom | 0 | TT | T |
1 | 1,045,444 | G | C | AGRN | het | 0 | GC | Ǥ |
1 | 1,045,444 | G | A | AGRN | het | 0 | GA | Ğ |
1 | 1,045,444 | G | C | AGRN | hom | 0 | CC | C |
1 | 1,045,444 | G | A | AGRN | hom | 0 | AA | A |
1 | 1,045,568 | C | T | AGRN | het | 0 | CT | Ć |
1 | 1,045,568 | C | T | AGRN | hom | 0 | TT | T |
1 | 1,045,707 | A | G | AGRN | het | 0 | AG | Ã |
1 | 1,045,707 | A | G | AGRN | hom | 0 | GG | G |
1 | 1,045,751 | A | G | AGRN | het | 0 | AG | Ã |
1 | 1,045,751 | A | G | AGRN | hom | 0 | GG | G |
1 | 1,045,863 | G | A | AGRN | het | 0 | GA | Ğ |
1 | 1,045,863 | G | A | AGRN | hom | 0 | AA | A |
1 | 1,045,965 | C | T | AGRN | het | 0 | CT | Ć |
1 | 1,045,965 | C | T | AGRN | hom | 0 | TT | T |
1 | 1,046,488 | C | T | AGRN | het | 0 | CT | Ć |
1 | 1,046,488 | C | T | AGRN | hom | 0 | TT | T |
ClinVar Diploid SNV — mode-of-inheritance-aware genotype benchmark
A zygosity-sensitive relabelling of high-confidence ClinVar SNVs. Each variant is instantiated in both a heterozygous and a homozygous state, and the label is assigned at the genotype level under simplified dominant/recessive inheritance rules. A pathogenic recessive variant is therefore negative as a heterozygous carrier and positive as a homozygote — so variant identity alone is insufficient to predict the label, and a model must represent allele dosage.
Built for the diploid genomic language models at scrc-dnai and run through GFMBench-API.
Labelling rule
| ClinVar class | Inheritance | het label | hom label |
|---|---|---|---|
| Benign / Likely benign | any | 0 | 0 |
| Pathogenic / Likely pathogenic | dominant (AD, XL-dom) | 1 | 1 |
| Pathogenic / Likely pathogenic | recessive (AR, XL-rec) | 0 (carrier) | 1 (affected) |
These are benchmark labels, not revisions to ClinVar. A pathogenic recessive variant remains pathogenic in a heterozygous carrier; the label encodes an expected genotype-level clinical outcome under a deliberately simplified model. Penetrance, variable expressivity, hypomorphic alleles, compound heterozygosity and gene-specific exceptions are all omitted.
Composition
170,284 genotype instances = 85,142 unique SNVs x {het, hom}, across 4,121 genes on chr1–22, X and Y. chrX contributes 5,464 instances; chrY contributes exactly 2 (one variant).
That single chrY variant is worth knowing about: its het row is biologically meaningless, since Y
is hemizygous. It is a consequence of the construction instantiating every retained variant in both
zygosity states without a sex-chromosome exception, and it mirrors the encoding-level limitation
that hemizygous calls are folded into homozygous states. Two rows out of 170,284 will not move a
metric, but drop chrY if you want the set to be strictly interpretable.
| instances | label 0 | label 1 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| train (all chromosomes except 19–22) | 147,894 | 140,972 | 6,922 |
| test (chr19, 20, 21, 22) | 22,390 | 21,414 | 976 |
| total | 170,284 | 162,386 | 7,898 |
Split is by chromosome, so no genomic position is shared across train and test.
Positive prevalence is 4.6%. Report AUPRC alongside AUROC; the reference runs used inverse-frequency class rebalancing (weighted random sampler, power 1.0).
Label breakdown by zygosity — note the asymmetry that makes the task zygosity-sensitive:
| zygosity | label 0 | label 1 |
|---|---|---|
| het | 82,663 | 2,479 |
| hom | 79,723 | 5,419 |
The 2,940 extra positives in the homozygous arm are exactly the pathogenic recessive variants, which flip label between the two zygosity states.
Columns
| Column | Description |
|---|---|
chrom, pos |
GRCh38 coordinates (1-based, VCF convention) |
ref, alt |
single-base alleles |
gene |
ClinVar gene symbol |
zygosity |
het or hom — which genotype this row instantiates |
label |
genotype-level outcome (0/1) per the rule above |
genotype_pair, diploid_token |
provenance only — see the warning below |
Source and filters
ClinVar January 2026 release: variant_summary_2026-01.txt.gz for variants,
ClinVarVCVRelease_2026-01.xml.gz for mode of inheritance.
- assembly GRCh38;
OriginSimple != somatic; canonical chromosomes Type == single nucleotide variant- clinical significance collapsed to binary; conflicting/uncertain records dropped
- review status >= 2 gold stars (multiple concordant submitters, expert panel, or practice guideline)
- mode of inheritance normalised to dominant/recessive from VCV
ModeOfInheritanceattributes; variants without a resolvable class dropped (one MOI kept per variant, dominant preferred) refandaltrestricted to A/C/G/T
Encoding these genotypes for a diploid model
Each row is a genotype, not a variant: zygosity plus ref/alt fully determine the diploid
state to render. To feed the DNT checkpoints, build the two
haplotypes and encode them with the shipped token table:
# het -> hap0 = ref, hap1 = alt ; hom -> both haplotypes carry alt
hap0 = ref if row.zygosity == "het" else alt
hap1 = alt
then place that pair at the variant offset inside a reference-derived window and encode with
diploid_encode.encode_diploid(...) from any DNT model repo. diploid_tokens.tsv here is the
same table (sha256[:16] 9664edd161cc156d) those models were trained against.
Do not use the
diploid_token/genotype_paircolumns for that. They were written with the phased (ordered-symbol) rows of the token table — e.g.CG->Ƈrather than the unphasedĈ— and the released DNT checkpoints never saw those symbols during pretraining (zero observed count). The benchmark task code ignores these columns and re-derives the encoding fromzygosity/ref/alt; do the same. They are retained only for provenance.
Reproduce
create_diploid_snv_parquet.py (included) regenerates this file from the ClinVar releases. The
benchmark task expects it at data/clinvar_zygosity/clinvar_heritable_diploid_benchmark.parquet;
that exact file is kept under original/ here.
Citation
Manuscript in preparation: A Diploid Genomic Foundation Model, Leib, Zinger, Ofer, Kellerman, Nayshool et al. Please also cite ClinVar (Landrum et al.) and GFMBench-API (Larey et al., 2026).
- Downloads last month
- 45