Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
Search is not available for this dataset
image
imagewidth (px)
333
5.34k
label
class label
2 classes
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
0cost
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
1repair
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

The 150 conflict slices — the reuse-vs-recraft repair/damage test set

The standing conflict-slice metric of the reuse-vs-recraft programme (program-wide fix, 2026-08-16). 150 items: for each of three benchmarks, 25 repair-side items the untrained model (Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct, greedy, 48 new tokens) answers WRONGLY — it follows the misleading text — and 25 cost-side items it answers CORRECTLY — it resists. A trained model is scored on both sides:

  • fixed — repair-side items it now answers correctly (of 25)
  • broken — cost-side items it now answers wrongly (of 25)
  • reported per benchmark, exactly 3 numbers: net percentage (= fixed% − broken%), then (fixed / broken) raw counts. Never pooled raw across benchmarks.

The earlier 75-item version measured only the repair side and was structurally blind to cost; that is why this set exists.

The three benchmarks

benchmark what the misleading text is source
blind_faith a false single-turn text description beside a document photograph dal-289/word_or_vision (DocVQA pictures)
mmhal_snowball a hallucinated claim built up over prior conversation turns (the history is part of the item) MM-Hallu/MMHalSnowball
phd a paragraph asserting a wrong fact about a natural photograph, followed by the benchmark's fixed "follow the image" instruction AIMClab-RUC/PhD

Files

  • items.jsonl — one line per item: item_id, benchmark, side (repair / cost), gold, options, meta, and request (kind, system, history as a list of {role, text, image_files} turns, final text, image_files). The prompt fields are verbatim what the model receives; nothing is re-rendered.
  • images/<benchmark>/<side>/… — every image, original encoding kept.
  • ids.json — the 150 item ids grouped benchmark → side, verbatim from the frozen selection.

Provenance

Selection frozen 2026-08-06, seed 0, deterministic and stratified, from the untrained model's own baseline records (slices.json groups repair and damage_conflict in saketh-chervu/reuse-vs-recraft-substrate, which also carries these items in the programme's runnable pickle form under slice_bundle/). Verified 2026-08-16: the untrained model is wrong on 25/25/25 of the repair side and right on 25/25/25 of the cost side in the banked baseline records. Items derive from the three public benchmarks named above; their original licenses apply to the underlying images and questions.

Downloads last month
567