image imagewidth (px) 333 5.34k | label class label 2
classes |
|---|---|
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
0cost | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair | |
1repair |
The 150 conflict slices — the reuse-vs-recraft repair/damage test set
The standing conflict-slice metric of the reuse-vs-recraft programme (program-wide fix, 2026-08-16). 150 items: for each of three benchmarks, 25 repair-side items the untrained model (Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct, greedy, 48 new tokens) answers WRONGLY — it follows the misleading text — and 25 cost-side items it answers CORRECTLY — it resists. A trained model is scored on both sides:
- fixed — repair-side items it now answers correctly (of 25)
- broken — cost-side items it now answers wrongly (of 25)
- reported per benchmark, exactly 3 numbers: net percentage (= fixed% − broken%), then (fixed / broken) raw counts. Never pooled raw across benchmarks.
The earlier 75-item version measured only the repair side and was structurally blind to cost; that is why this set exists.
The three benchmarks
| benchmark | what the misleading text is | source |
|---|---|---|
blind_faith |
a false single-turn text description beside a document photograph | dal-289/word_or_vision (DocVQA pictures) |
mmhal_snowball |
a hallucinated claim built up over prior conversation turns (the history is part of the item) | MM-Hallu/MMHalSnowball |
phd |
a paragraph asserting a wrong fact about a natural photograph, followed by the benchmark's fixed "follow the image" instruction | AIMClab-RUC/PhD |
Files
items.jsonl— one line per item:item_id,benchmark,side(repair/cost),gold,options,meta, andrequest(kind,system,historyas a list of{role, text, image_files}turns, finaltext,image_files). The prompt fields are verbatim what the model receives; nothing is re-rendered.images/<benchmark>/<side>/…— every image, original encoding kept.ids.json— the 150 item ids grouped benchmark → side, verbatim from the frozen selection.
Provenance
Selection frozen 2026-08-06, seed 0, deterministic and stratified, from the
untrained model's own baseline records (slices.json groups repair and
damage_conflict in saketh-chervu/reuse-vs-recraft-substrate, which also
carries these items in the programme's runnable pickle form under
slice_bundle/). Verified 2026-08-16: the untrained model is wrong on
25/25/25 of the repair side and right on 25/25/25 of the cost side in the
banked baseline records. Items derive from the three public benchmarks named
above; their original licenses apply to the underlying images and questions.
- Downloads last month
- 567