id int64 2 20k | original_id stringlengths 2 56 | source stringclasses 10
values | prompt stringlengths 692 29.5k | actual_score stringclasses 9
values | r1_reasoning_trace stringlengths 703 34k | r1_response stringlengths 274 4.51k | r1_score stringclasses 9
values | extracted_r1_response stringlengths 228 2.31k | r1_raw_sft stringlengths 992 35.2k | r1_reasoning_trace_summarized stringlengths 421 18.1k | r1_raw_sft_summarized stringlengths 992 18.8k | token_length int64 257 4.3k | num_correct_qwen3_4b int64 0 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
19,087 | 227414 | ace-code-pairwise | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, two responses, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Your task is to evaluate two responses and select the one that contains correct, working code. If both responses are correct, choose the one that is more e... | Response 1 | We are given two responses. We must choose the one with correct, working code. If both are correct, choose the more efficient one.
Let's analyze the problem statement:
We have a function `update_student_names(names: List[str], new_names: List[str]) -> List[str]` that updates the list of student names.
Requirements:
... | {
"explanation": "Response 1 correctly implements the requirements by updating the original list in-place for the first `min(len(names), len(new_names))` elements. This preserves the original list's length: when `new_names` is shorter, the remaining elements are retained; when `new_names` is longer, only the elements... | Response 1 | {
"explanation": "Response 1 correctly implements the requirements by updating the original list in-place for the first `min(len(names), len(new_names))` elements. This preserves the original list's length: when `new_names` is shorter, the remaining elements are retained; when `new_names` is longer, only the elements... | <think>We are given two responses. We must choose the one with correct, working code. If both are correct, choose the more efficient one.
Let's analyze the problem statement:
We have a function `update_student_names(names: List[str], new_names: List[str]) -> List[str]` that updates the list of student names.
Require... | We are given two responses. We must choose the one with correct, working code. If both are correct, choose the more efficient one.
Let's analyze the problem statement:
We have a function `update_student_names(names: List[str], new_names: List[str]) -> List[str]` that updates the list of student names.
Requirements:
... | <think>We are given two responses. We must choose the one with correct, working code. If both are correct, choose the more efficient one.
Let's analyze the problem statement:
We have a function `update_student_names(names: List[str], new_names: List[str]) -> List[str]` that updates the list of student names.
Require... | 4,297 | 0 |
18,228 | 136280 | ace-code-pairwise | Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, two responses, and evaluation rubric.
Provide a fair and detailed assessment following the rubric.
### TASK
Your task is to evaluate two responses and select the one that contains correct, working code. If both responses are correct, choose the one that is more e... | Response 1 | We are evaluating two responses for a function that returns distinct elements present in either list but not in both, with order preserved (first list order then second list order).
Response 1:
- Uses sets to find the symmetric difference (elements unique to each list).
- Then combines the unique elements from the fir... | {
"explanation": "Response 1 is preferred because it passes the provided test case and is efficient, while Response 2 contains a logical error that causes it to fail the test. Response 1 computes the symmetric difference using sets, which correctly identifies elements unique to each list. However, it does not preserv... | Response 1 | {
"explanation": "Response 1 is preferred because it passes the provided test case and is efficient, while Response 2 contains a logical error that causes it to fail the test. Response 1 computes the symmetric difference using sets, which correctly identifies elements unique to each list. However, it does not preserv... | <think>We are evaluating two responses for a function that returns distinct elements present in either list but not in both, with order preserved (first list order then second list order).
Response 1:
- Uses sets to find the symmetric difference (elements unique to each list).
- Then combines the unique elements from ... | We are evaluating two responses for a function that returns distinct elements present in either list but not in both, with order preserved (first list order then second list order).
Response 1:
- Uses sets to find the symmetric difference (elements unique to each list).
- Then combines the unique elements from the fir... | <think>We are evaluating two responses for a function that returns distinct elements present in either list but not in both, with order preserved (first list order then second list order).
Response 1:
- Uses sets to find the symmetric difference (elements unique to each list).
- Then combines the unique elements from ... | 4,260 | 0 |
19,356 | 251361 | ace-code-pairwise | "Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, two responses, and evaluation rubric. \nProv(...TRUNCATED) | Response 2 | "We are given two responses to the same problem. We must choose the one that is correct and more eff(...TRUNCATED) | "### Explanation\nThe task requires implementing a function to extract an answer from document token(...TRUNCATED) | Response 2 | "{\"explanation\": \"Response 2 is correct and more efficient. Response 1 incorrectly adds a charact(...TRUNCATED) | "<think>We are given two responses to the same problem. We must choose the one that is correct and m(...TRUNCATED) | "We are given two responses to the same problem. We must choose the one that is correct and more eff(...TRUNCATED) | "<think>We are given two responses to the same problem. We must choose the one that is correct and m(...TRUNCATED) | 4,167 | 0 |
19,158 | 234046 | ace-code-pairwise | "Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, two responses, and evaluation rubric. \nProv(...TRUNCATED) | Response 1 | "We are given two responses to the task of converting a string to a YAML pipe literal format.\n\nThe(...TRUNCATED) | "{\n \"explanation\": \"Response 1 is preferred because it correctly implements the YAML pipe liter(...TRUNCATED) | Response 1 | "{\n \"explanation\": \"Response 1 is preferred because it correctly implements the YAML pipe liter(...TRUNCATED) | "<think>We are given two responses to the task of converting a string to a YAML pipe literal format.(...TRUNCATED) | "We are given two responses to the task of converting a string to a YAML pipe literal format.\n\nThe(...TRUNCATED) | "<think>We are given two responses to the task of converting a string to a YAML pipe literal format.(...TRUNCATED) | 4,143 | 0 |
17,014 | 2013 | ace-code-pairwise | "Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, two responses, and evaluation rubric. \nProv(...TRUNCATED) | Response 2 | "We are evaluating two responses for the task of creating a function `file_cleanup`.\nThe function s(...TRUNCATED) | "{\n \"explanation\": \"The task requires the function to return the same list of files that would (...TRUNCATED) | Response 2 | "{\n \"explanation\": \"The task requires the function to return the same list of files that would (...TRUNCATED) | "<think>We are evaluating two responses for the task of creating a function `file_cleanup`.\nThe fun(...TRUNCATED) | "We are evaluating two responses for the task of creating a function `file_cleanup`.\nThe function s(...TRUNCATED) | "<think>We are evaluating two responses for the task of creating a function `file_cleanup`.\nThe fun(...TRUNCATED) | 4,131 | 0 |
17,831 | 90816 | ace-code-pairwise | "Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, two responses, and evaluation rubric. \nProv(...TRUNCATED) | Response 1 | "We are evaluating two responses for the task of implementing the `get_directions` function.\n\nThe (...TRUNCATED) | "### Evaluation\n\n**Correctness Analysis:**\n- **Response 1**: Correctly implements the logic by sp(...TRUNCATED) | Response 1 | "{\"explanation\": \"Response 1 is correct and passes the test case by properly validating the first(...TRUNCATED) | "<think>We are evaluating two responses for the task of implementing the `get_directions` function.\(...TRUNCATED) | "We are evaluating two responses for the task of implementing the `get_directions` function.\n\nThe (...TRUNCATED) | "<think>We are evaluating two responses for the task of implementing the `get_directions` function.\(...TRUNCATED) | 4,123 | 0 |
18,217 | 134729 | ace-code-pairwise | "Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, two responses, and evaluation rubric. \nProv(...TRUNCATED) | Response 2 | "We are evaluating two responses for the task of creating a function that returns sorted absolute va(...TRUNCATED) | "{\n \"explanation\": \"Response 2 is preferred because it correctly computes the absolute values o(...TRUNCATED) | Response 2 | "{\n \"explanation\": \"Response 2 is preferred because it correctly computes the absolute values o(...TRUNCATED) | "<think>We are evaluating two responses for the task of creating a function that returns sorted abso(...TRUNCATED) | "We are evaluating two responses for the task of creating a function that returns sorted absolute va(...TRUNCATED) | "<think>We are evaluating two responses for the task of creating a function that returns sorted abso(...TRUNCATED) | 4,077 | 0 |
17,279 | 30814 | ace-code-pairwise | "Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, two responses, and evaluation rubric. \nProv(...TRUNCATED) | Response 1 | "We are given two responses. We must choose the one that contains correct, working code. If both are(...TRUNCATED) | "{\n \"explanation\": \"Response 1 correctly processes every duplicate ID occurrence in the input, (...TRUNCATED) | Response 1 | "{\n \"explanation\": \"Response 1 correctly processes every duplicate ID occurrence in the input, (...TRUNCATED) | "<think>We are given two responses. We must choose the one that contains correct, working code. If b(...TRUNCATED) | "We are given two responses. We must choose the one that contains correct, working code. If both are(...TRUNCATED) | "<think>We are given two responses. We must choose the one that contains correct, working code. If b(...TRUNCATED) | 4,069 | 0 |
19,437 | 257971 | ace-code-pairwise | "Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, two responses, and evaluation rubric. \nProv(...TRUNCATED) | Response 2 | "We are given a task to evaluate two responses and select the one that contains correct, working cod(...TRUNCATED) | "{\n \"explanation\": \"Both responses have flaws, but Response 2 is preferred because it correctly(...TRUNCATED) | Response 2 | "{\n \"explanation\": \"Both responses have flaws, but Response 2 is preferred because it correctly(...TRUNCATED) | "<think>We are given a task to evaluate two responses and select the one that contains correct, work(...TRUNCATED) | "We are given a task to evaluate two responses and select the one that contains correct, working cod(...TRUNCATED) | "<think>We are given a task to evaluate two responses and select the one that contains correct, work(...TRUNCATED) | 4,059 | 2 |
19,574 | 269398 | ace-code-pairwise | "Evaluate the response based on the given task, input, two responses, and evaluation rubric. \nProv(...TRUNCATED) | Response 1 | "We are evaluating two responses for a function that collects stencils and sums times from a list of(...TRUNCATED) | "{\n \"explanation\": \"Both responses attempt to solve the problem, but only Response 1 correctly (...TRUNCATED) | Response 1 | "{\n \"explanation\": \"Both responses attempt to solve the problem, but only Response 1 correctly (...TRUNCATED) | "<think>We are evaluating two responses for a function that collects stencils and sums times from a (...TRUNCATED) | "We are evaluating two responses for a function that collects stencils and sums times from a list of(...TRUNCATED) | "<think>We are evaluating two responses for a function that collects stencils and sums times from a (...TRUNCATED) | 4,018 | 2 |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 6