ag_notice_deadline string | ag_notice_threshold string | cra_notice_threshold string | derived_fields list | encryption_safe_harbor string | id string | individual_notice_days string | individual_notice_deadline string | notes string | source string | source_quote string | state string | statute_citation string | url string | verified_fields list |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
within forty-five days after the determination | more than one thousand individuals | more than one thousand individuals | [
"encryption_safe_harbor",
"individual_notice_days",
"notes"
] | yes | arizona | 45 | within forty-five days after the determination | GLBA-covered entities and HIPAA covered entities and business associates are exempt (subsection N). AG notice and notice to the three largest nationwide consumer reporting agencies are both required at the same threshold: more than one thousand individuals affected. Notice to both the attorney general and the Director ... | https://www.azleg.gov/ars/18/00552.htm | B. If the investigation results in a determination that there has been a security system breach, the person that owns or licenses the computerized data, within forty-five days after the determination, shall: 1. Notify the individuals affected pursuant to subsection E of this section and subject to the needs of law enfo... | Arizona | A.R.S. § 18-552 | https://referencesource.org/data-breach-notification-clocks/arizona/ | [
"ag_notice_deadline",
"ag_notice_threshold",
"cra_notice_threshold",
"individual_notice_deadline",
"state"
] |
within 15 calendar days of notifying affected consumers of the security breach | 500 California residents | null | [
"encryption_safe_harbor",
"individual_notice_days",
"notes"
] | yes | california | 30 | within 30 calendar days of discovery or notification of the data breach | GLBA-regulated entities and HIPAA-covered entities are not expressly exempted by this section. The safe harbor covers unencrypted personal information — encrypted personal information is outside the definition of breach unless the encryption key was also acquired. | https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=1798.82.&lawCode=CIV | 500 California residents as a result of a single breach of the security system shall electronically submit a single sample copy of that security breach notification, excluding any personally identifiable information, to the Attorney General within 15 calendar days of notifying affected consumers of the security breach. | California | Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.82 | https://referencesource.org/data-breach-notification-clocks/california/ | [
"ag_notice_deadline",
"ag_notice_threshold",
"state"
] |
in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay, but not later than thirty days after the date of determination that a security breach occurred | five hundred Colorado residents or more | more than one thousand Colorado residents | [
"encryption_safe_harbor",
"individual_notice_days",
"notes"
] | yes | colorado | 30 | in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay, but not later than thirty days after the date of determination that a security breach occurred | Record taken from the Colorado Revised Statutes 2023 Title 6 text (C.R.S. § 6-1-716). The 30-day deadline and 500-resident AG threshold were added by HB 21-1130 (2021 session). GLBA-covered entities are exempt from the CRA notice requirement (subsection 2(d)). CRA notice requires anticipated date of notification and ap... | https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/images/olls/crs2023-title-06.pdf | A covered entity that maintains, owns, or licenses computerized data that includes personal information about a resident of Colorado shall, when it becomes aware that a security breach may have occurred, conduct in good faith a prompt investigation to determine the likelihood that personal information has been or will ... | Colorado | C.R.S. § 6-1-716 | https://referencesource.org/data-breach-notification-clocks/colorado/ | [
"ag_notice_deadline",
"individual_notice_deadline",
"state"
] |
no later than 30 days after the determination of the breach or reason to believe a breach occurred | 500 or more individuals in this state | more than 1,000 individuals at a single time | [
"encryption_safe_harbor",
"individual_notice_days",
"notes"
] | yes | florida | 30 | no later than 30 days after the determination of a breach or reason to believe a breach occurred | Notice goes to the 'department' (Florida Department of Legal Affairs), not the Attorney General by name. GLBA-regulated entities that comply with federal regulator notice procedures are deemed in compliance. CRA notice threshold of 1,000 is stated in subsection (5). | https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2023/501.171 | (3)  NOTICE TO DEPARTMENT OF SECURITY BREACH. — (a)  A covered entity shall provide notice to the department of any breach of security affecting 500 or more individuals in this state. Such notice must be provided to the department as expeditiously as practicable, but no later than 30 days after the... | Florida | Fla. Stat. § 501.171 | https://referencesource.org/data-breach-notification-clocks/florida/ | [
"ag_notice_deadline",
"ag_notice_threshold",
"individual_notice_deadline"
] |
null | more than 500 Illinois residents | null | [
"encryption_safe_harbor",
"notes"
] | yes | illinois | null | in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay | The private-entity rule (§ 10) requires AG notice for breaches affecting more than 500 Illinois residents; notice must be made in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay but no later than when notice is sent to consumers. State agency rule (§ 12) has a separate, stricter requirement: the state a... | https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=2702&ChapterID=67 | (815 ILCS 530/10) Sec. 10. Notice of breach; notice to Attorney General. (a) Any data collector that owns or licenses personal information concerning an Illinois resident shall notify the resident at no charge that there has been a breach of the security of the system data following discovery or notification of the bre... | Illinois | 815 ILCS 530/10 | https://referencesource.org/data-breach-notification-clocks/illinois/ | [
"individual_notice_deadline",
"state",
"statute_citation"
] |
as soon as practicable and without unreasonable delay | null | null | [
"encryption_safe_harbor",
"notes"
] | yes | massachusetts | null | as soon as practicable and without unreasonable delay | Notice must be provided concurrently to the Attorney General and the Director of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation, not just the AG. The Director then identifies relevant consumer reporting agencies and state agencies, and the notifying party must also notify those identified agencies as soon as practicable and ... | https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleXV/Chapter93H/Section3 | (b) A person or agency that owns or licenses data that includes personal information about a resident of the commonwealth, shall provide notice, as soon as practicable and without unreasonable delay, when such person or agency (1) knows or has reason to know of a breach of security or (2) when the person or agency know... | Massachusetts | M.G.L. c. 93H § 3 | https://referencesource.org/data-breach-notification-clocks/massachusetts/ | [
"ag_notice_deadline",
"individual_notice_deadline"
] |
null | null | more than 500 persons at one time | [
"encryption_safe_harbor",
"notes"
] | yes | minnesota | null | in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay | CRA notice must be provided within 48 hours of discovering circumstances requiring notification of more than 500 persons. Financial institutions as defined by 15 U.S.C. § 6809(3) are exempt (Subd. 4). The attorney general enforces this section under Minn. Stat. § 8.31 but no separate AG notification deadline is stated ... | https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/325E.61 | Any person or business that conducts business in this state, and that owns or licenses data that includes personal information, shall disclose any breach of the security of the system following discovery or notification of the breach in the security of the data to any resident of this state whose unencrypted personal i... | Minnesota | Minn. Stat. § 325E.61 | https://referencesource.org/data-breach-notification-clocks/minnesota/ | [
"individual_notice_deadline"
] |
null | more than one thousand consumers | more than one thousand consumers | [
"encryption_safe_harbor",
"notes"
] | yes | missouri | null | without unreasonable delay | AG notice and CRA notice are triggered simultaneously at the same threshold (more than 1,000 consumers). Financial institutions compliant with GLB Act, Federal Interagency Guidance, or NCUA 12 CFR Part 748 are deemed in compliance and effectively exempt from this section's requirements. | https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=407.1500&bid=52524&hl= | Missouri shall provide notice to the affected consumer that there has been a breach of security following discovery or notification of the breach. The disclosure notification shall be: (a) Made without unreasonable delay; | Missouri | RSMo § 407.1500 | https://referencesource.org/data-breach-notification-clocks/missouri/ | [
"individual_notice_deadline",
"state"
] |
null | null | more than 1,000 persons at any one time | [
"encryption_safe_harbor",
"notes"
] | yes | nevada | null | in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay | No AG notification requirement and no numeric hard deadline are stated in NRS 603A.220. GLBA-covered entities in compliance with GLB privacy and security requirements are deemed in compliance. Persons licensed under NRS Chapter 675 are exempt (subsection 7). | https://www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-603A.html#NRS603ASec220 | a data collector that owns or licenses computerized data which includes personal information shall disclose any breach of the security of the system data following discovery or notification of the breach to any resident of this State whose unencrypted personal information was, or is reasonably believed to have been, ac... | Nevada | NRS 603A.220 | https://referencesource.org/data-breach-notification-clocks/nevada/ | [
"individual_notice_deadline"
] |
without delaying notice to affected New York residents | null | more than five thousand New York residents | [
"encryption_safe_harbor",
"notes"
] | yes | new-york | null | in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay | AG notice (and notice to the Department of State and Division of State Police) is required whenever any New York residents are to be notified — there is no resident-count threshold for AG notice. The CRA notice threshold is 5,000 residents notified at one time. GLBA- and HIPAA-regulated entities are exempt from the ind... | https://legislation.nysenate.gov/pdf/bills/2019/S5575B | Such notice shall be made without delaying 24 notice to affected New York residents. 25 (b) In the event that more than five thousand New York residents are 26 to be notified at one time, the person or business shall also notify 27 consumer reporting agencies as to the timing, content and distribution 28 of the notices... | New York | N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 899-aa | https://referencesource.org/data-breach-notification-clocks/new-york/ | [
"ag_notice_deadline",
"cra_notice_threshold",
"state"
] |
without unreasonable delay | null | more than 1,000 persons at one time | [
"encryption_safe_harbor",
"notes"
] | yes | north-carolina | null | without unreasonable delay | AG notice goes to the 'Consumer Protection Division of the Attorney General's Office', not the AG directly. AG notice is required for every breach that triggers individual notice (subsection e1), with no minimum resident-count threshold for AG notification. The CRA notice at 1,000+ (subsection f) also requires concurre... | https://www.ncleg.net/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/HTML/BySection/Chapter_75/GS_75-65.html | (a) Any business that owns or licenses personal information of residents of North Carolina or any business that conducts business in North Carolina that owns or licenses personal information in any form (whether computerized, paper, or otherwise) shall provide notice to the affected person that there has been a securit... | North Carolina | G.S. § 75-65 | https://referencesource.org/data-breach-notification-clocks/north-carolina/ | [
"ag_notice_deadline",
"cra_notice_threshold",
"individual_notice_deadline",
"state"
] |
null | null | more than one thousand residents of this state involved in a single occurrence of a breach of the security of the system | [
"encryption_safe_harbor",
"individual_notice_days",
"notes"
] | yes | ohio | 45 | in the most expedient time possible but not later than forty-five days following its discovery or notification of the breach in the security of the system | CRITICAL SCOPE LIMIT: This section (ORC § 1347.12) applies ONLY to state agencies and agencies of political subdivisions — not to private businesses. The private-sector Ohio breach notification law is at ORC § 1349.19. No AG notification requirement is stated in this section (the AG may bring enforcement actions under ... | https://codes.ohio.gov/ohio-revised-code/section-1347.12 | The state agency or agency of a political subdivision shall make the disclosure described in division (B)(1) of this section in the most expedient time possible but not later than forty-five days following its discovery or notification of the breach in the security of the system, subject to the legitimate needs of law ... | Ohio | ORC § 1347.12 | https://referencesource.org/data-breach-notification-clocks/ohio/ | [
"individual_notice_deadline"
] |
either in writing or electronically | exceeds 250 | more than 1,000 consumers | [
"encryption_safe_harbor",
"individual_notice_days",
"notes"
] | yes | oregon | 45 | in the most expeditious manner possible, without unreasonable delay, but not later than 45 days after discovering or receiving notification of the breach of security | The AG threshold applies to consumers to whom the covered entity must send individual notice (i.e., 250+ affected consumers). The CRA notice (at 1,000+) must be given without unreasonable delay and must not delay individual consumer notification. Vendors have a separate 10-day deadline to notify covered entities of a b... | https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors646a.html | ����� (a) A public corporation, including the Oregon Health and Science University and the Oregon State Bar, or a public body, as defined in ORS 174.109; ����� (b) Protected health information that a covered entity or business associate processes in accordance with, or documents that a covered entity or business associ... | Oregon | ORS 646A.604 | https://referencesource.org/data-breach-notification-clocks/oregon/ | [
"state"
] |
null | more than one thousand persons | more than one thousand persons | [
"encryption_safe_harbor",
"notes"
] | yes | south-carolina | null | in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay | The AG notice goes to the Consumer Protection Division of the Department of Consumer Affairs, not directly the Attorney General. AG and CRA thresholds are the same (1,000 persons). Banks and financial institutions compliant with Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act or the federal Interagency Guidance are explicitly exempt (subsectio... | https://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t39c001.php | (K) If a business provides notice to more than one thousand persons at one time pursuant to this section, the business shall notify, without unreasonable delay, the Consumer Protection Division of the Department of Consumer Affairs and all consumer reporting agencies that compile and maintain files on a nationwide basi... | South Carolina | S.C. Code Ann. § 39-1-90 | https://referencesource.org/data-breach-notification-clocks/south-carolina/ | [
"ag_notice_threshold",
"cra_notice_threshold",
"individual_notice_deadline",
"state"
] |
not later than the 60th day after the date on which the person determines that the breach occurred | at least 250 residents of this state | null | [
"encryption_safe_harbor",
"individual_notice_days",
"notes"
] | yes | texas | 60 | not later than the 60th day after the date on which the person determines that the breach occurred | Source is HB 4390 (86th Legislature, 2019), the enrolled bill that amended § 521.053. The individual notice deadline text includes a bracketed deletion '[as quickly as possible]' reflecting the bill's amendment of existing law. | https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/86R/billtext/pdf/HB04390F.pdf | (b)AAA person who conducts business in this state and owns or 9 licenses computerized data that includes sensitive personal 10 information shall disclose any breach of system security, after 11 discovering or receiving notification of the breach, to any 12 individual whose sensitive personal information was, or is 13 r... | Texas | Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 521.053 | https://referencesource.org/data-breach-notification-clocks/texas/ | [
"ag_notice_deadline",
"individual_notice_deadline"
] |
without unreasonable delay | null | more than 1,000 persons at one time | [
"encryption_safe_harbor",
"notes"
] | yes | virginia | null | without unreasonable delay | AG notice (Office of the Attorney General) is concurrent with individual notice — no separate threshold for AG notification; both are required 'without unreasonable delay'. CRA notice at 1,000+ also triggers concurrent AG notice. GLBA-regulated financial institutions are exempt under subsection G. Statute applies only ... | https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title18.2/chapter6/section18.2-186.6/ | B. If unencrypted or unredacted personal information was or is reasonably believed to have been accessed and acquired by an unauthorized person and causes, or the individual or entity reasonably believes has caused or will cause, identity theft or another fraud to any resident of the Commonwealth, an individual or enti... | Virginia | Va. Code § 18.2-186.6 | https://referencesource.org/data-breach-notification-clocks/virginia/ | [
"ag_notice_deadline",
"cra_notice_threshold",
"individual_notice_deadline"
] |
no more than thirty days after the breach was discovered | more than five hundred Washington residents | null | [
"encryption_safe_harbor",
"individual_notice_days"
] | yes | washington | 30 | no more than thirty calendar days after the breach was discovered | null | https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=19.255.010 | Any person or business that is required to issue a notification pursuant to this section to more than five hundred Washington residents as a result of a single breach shall notify the attorney general of the breach no more than thirty days after the breach was discovered. (a) The notice to the attorney general shall in... | Washington | RCW 19.255.010 | https://referencesource.org/data-breach-notification-clocks/washington/ | [
"ag_notice_deadline",
"ag_notice_threshold",
"individual_notice_deadline",
"state"
] |
null | null | 1,000 or more individuals | [
"encryption_safe_harbor",
"individual_notice_days",
"notes"
] | yes | wisconsin | 45 | within a reasonable time, not to exceed 45 days after the entity learns of the acquisition of personal information | No AG notification requirement is stated in the statute. GLBA-covered entities in compliance with GLB privacy and security requirements are exempt (subsection 3m(a)). HIPAA-covered entities in compliance with 45 CFR Part 164 are exempt (subsection 3m(b)). CRA notice must be made 'without unreasonable delay' when 1,000 ... | https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/134/98 | 1,000 or more individuals that personal information pertaining to the individuals has been acquired, the entity shall without unreasonable delay notify all consumer reporting agencies that compile and maintain files on consumers on a nationwide basis, as defined in <https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/document/usc/15%20US... | Wisconsin | Wis. Stat. § 134.98 | https://referencesource.org/data-breach-notification-clocks/wisconsin/ | [
"cra_notice_threshold",
"individual_notice_deadline",
"state"
] |
US state data breach notification deadlines by state
Canonical, always-current version: https://referencesource.org/data-breach-notification-clocks/ Machine-readable: https://referencesource.org/data-breach-notification-clocks/data.json — this mirror is a point-in-time copy.
- Last verified: 2026-08-18
- Stale after: 2027-02-14 (past this date, prefer the canonical copy — it re-verifies on a cadence this snapshot does not)
- Records: 18
US state-by-state data breach notification requirements: how many days a business has to notify affected residents after discovering a breach, the deadline and resident-count threshold for notifying the state Attorney General (or equivalent regulator), and the resident-count threshold that triggers notice to consumer reporting agencies. Answers 'how many days to notify after data breach', 'data breach notification deadline [state]', 'when must a company notify the attorney general of a data breach', 'what is the breach notification law in [state]', 'how long does a company have to report a data breach to customers', 'data breach notification requirements by state'. Hard deadlines range from 30 days (California, Florida, Washington) through 45 days (Oregon, Wisconsin) to 60 days (Texas); most states require 'most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay' with no hard number. No single government page states all 50 states together — each state's statute is the authority — which is why aggregator surveys (Foley, IAPP, Perkins Coie) exist but cite the statutes we read directly. Each record covers one state and its primary breach notification statute.
Provenance — what every record carries
Every record carries source (the URL the value was read from) and
source_quote (a verbatim quote from that page stating it). A value you
cannot check against its page is indistinguishable from an invented one;
these can all be checked. Each record is also individually addressable on
the canonical site at its url.
Licence position
State statutes are edicts of government and are not subject to copyright under 17 U.S.C. § 105 (for federal government works) and the equivalent edict-of-government doctrine applied by courts to state legislative materials (Building Officials v. Code Technology, 628 F.2d 730 (1st Cir. 1980); Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 590 U.S. 255 (2020)). Short verbatim quotes taken from each statute, attributed to the state and statute citation, for the purpose of stating a fact about the law. No compilation is reproduced wholesale. Facts are not copyrightable (Feist, 1991).
Facts are not copyrightable; what this dataset takes from each source is a fact plus a short attributed quote linking back to the page that states it.
Sources
- https://www.azleg.gov/ars/18/00552.htm
- https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=1798.82.&lawCode=CIV
- https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/images/olls/crs2023-title-06.pdf
- https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2023/501.171
- https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=2702&ChapterID=67
- https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleXV/Chapter93H/Section3
- https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/325E.61
- https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=407.1500&bid=52524&hl=
- https://www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-603A.html#NRS603ASec220
- https://legislation.nysenate.gov/pdf/bills/2019/S5575B
- https://www.ncleg.net/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/HTML/BySection/Chapter_75/GS_75-65.html
- https://codes.ohio.gov/ohio-revised-code/section-1347.12
- https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors646a.html
- https://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t39c001.php
- https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/86R/billtext/pdf/HB04390F.pdf
- https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title18.2/chapter6/section18.2-186.6/
- https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=19.255.010
- https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/134/98
Fields
See any record in data/records.jsonl — field names are self-describing,
and the canonical page for each record renders them with labels:
https://referencesource.org/data-breach-notification-clocks/
- Downloads last month
- 53