Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
doubtful_sentence
string
problem_id
string
model_name
string
intervention_type
string
timestep
int64
continuation_index
int64
verifier_score
int64
Wait, perhaps I'm overcomplicating.
700415
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
neutral_add_random_text
30
3
1
Hmm, but self-complementary graphs have specific properties, but I'm not sure.
700415
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
neutral_add_random_text
30
3
1
Alternatively, if the graph is regular, maybe?
700415
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
neutral_add_random_text
30
3
1
Wait, no, that's not relevant here.
394355
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
adversarial_continue_unrelated
10
2
1
Let me refocus.
394355
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
adversarial_continue_unrelated
10
2
1
So, the distance between 31 and 7 is equal to the distance between 31 and 14.
394355
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
adversarial_continue_unrelated
10
2
1
So, maybe it's not the minimal distance, but the distance in one direction?
394355
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
adversarial_continue_unrelated
10
2
1
Or maybe it's considering the absolute difference in numbering?
394355
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
adversarial_continue_unrelated
10
2
1
Wait, perhaps it's better to model this as a circle.
394355
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
adversarial_continue_unrelated
10
2
1
But actually, the problem says person 1 has card 1, and the rest have cards 2, 3, etc.,
394355
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
adversarial_continue_unrelated
10
2
1
So, the problem reduces to finding all ordered pairs (A, B) where A is from 1 to 9, B is from 0 to 9, and A + B is from 0 to 9.
331547
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
neutral_insert_random_characters
10
3
1
Wait, but according to the previous analysis, it's -1.
334795
Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Nano-8B-v1
adversarial_insert_wrong_fact
90
8
1
Wait, but maybe I made a mistake in the approximation.
334795
Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Nano-8B-v1
adversarial_insert_wrong_fact
90
8
1
Wait, let me check again.
334795
Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Nano-8B-v1
adversarial_insert_wrong_fact
90
8
1
So numerator≈31.72 -999.9975≈-968.2775
334795
Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Nano-8B-v1
adversarial_insert_wrong_fact
90
8
1
sqrt(10^12 -5)≈10^6 - negligible.
334795
Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Nano-8B-v1
adversarial_insert_wrong_fact
90
8
1
So numerator≈1000.003 -10^6≈-999,999.997
334795
Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Nano-8B-v1
adversarial_insert_wrong_fact
90
8
1
Wait, is that correct?
711012
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1_5B
adversarial_insert_wrong_fact
90
4
1
Wait, no, that's not right.
711012
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1_5B
adversarial_insert_wrong_fact
90
4
1
Because \( z^3 = 39 + 26i \), so \( a^3 - 3ab^2 + 3a^2b - b^3i = 39 + 26i \).
711012
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1_5B
adversarial_insert_wrong_fact
90
4
1
Wait, that's not how we derived earlier.
711012
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1_5B
adversarial_insert_wrong_fact
90
4
1
So, \( |z| = (13 \sqrt{13})^{1/3} = 13^{1/2} \), which is \( \sqrt{13} \).
711012
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1_5B
adversarial_insert_wrong_fact
90
4
1
Wait, that's about asteroid discovery, not my math problem.
580454
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
neutral_add_random_text
10
1
1
So, \( f(x - 1) \approx f(x) - f'(x) \cdot 1 = \sqrt{x} - \frac{1}{2\sqrt{x}} \).
580454
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
neutral_add_random_text
10
1
1
Wait, is that true?
597350
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
70
6
1
Wait, maybe I should think differently.
597350
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
70
6
1
18!)/2 = (17! *
597350
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
70
6
1
S = (31! *
597350
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
70
6
1
32!)/2 = (31! *
597350
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
70
6
1
50!)/2 = (49! *
597350
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
70
6
1
Wait, is that correct?
413736
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
adversarial_insert_wrong_fact
30
7
1
Wait, no, that's not exactly right.
413736
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
adversarial_insert_wrong_fact
30
7
1
The expansion of \( (a + b + c)^3 \) is: \( (a + b + c)^3 = a^3 + b^3 + c^3 + 3(a + b)(b + c)(a + c) \).
413736
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
adversarial_insert_wrong_fact
30
7
1
Hmm, that doesn't seem helpful.
413736
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
adversarial_insert_wrong_fact
30
7
1
Wait, maybe another approach.
413736
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
adversarial_insert_wrong_fact
30
7
1
Wait, hold on: \( 333(a + b + c) = 333*(-1) = -333 \).
413736
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
adversarial_insert_wrong_fact
30
7
1
But perhaps that's irrelevant here.
467556
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
adversarial_continue_unrelated
50
8
1
Wait, perhaps I need to check if there are any other factor pairs where both are odd.
467556
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
adversarial_continue_unrelated
50
8
1
So, only factor pairs where both are even are valid, which we have already considered.
467556
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
adversarial_continue_unrelated
50
8
1
Wait, no, I was talking about the independent set.
552264
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B
adversarial_continue_unrelated
90
6
1
But primes in B are numbers like 51, 52, ..., 100.
552264
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B
adversarial_continue_unrelated
90
6
1
Wait, no, that's not right because the total number of girls is 35, not the number of girls in a single class.
555988
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
90
7
1
Wait, maybe I confused something here.
555988
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
90
7
1
Wait, hold on, the problem says Class 4(2) has 19 boys, but it doesn't specify the total number of students in Class 4(2).
555988
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
90
7
1
Wait, so both classes have 36 students each?
555988
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
90
7
1
That's not what the problem said.
555988
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
90
7
1
Wait, wait, no, 9K/4 = 36, so K = 36 * 4 /9 = 16.
504894
Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Nano-8B-v1
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
70
4
1
Wait, but let me check the first part again.
504894
Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Nano-8B-v1
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
70
4
1
Wait, but I thought maybe I made a mistake in the equations.
504894
Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Nano-8B-v1
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
70
4
1
Let me try again.
504894
Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Nano-8B-v1
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
70
4
1
Moreover, the wall has been a subject of many myths and legends.
762703
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
adversarial_continue_unrelated
90
7
1
Wait, no, that's incorrect.
507992
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1_5B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
10
5
1
Let me correct that.
507992
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1_5B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
10
5
1
0.45 * 0.70: 45 * 70 = 3150.
507992
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1_5B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
10
5
1
Since both numbers have two decimal places, the result should have four decimal places, which is 0.3150.
507992
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1_5B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
10
5
1
Wait, but 0.45 * 0.70 is equal to 0.315, not 3.15.
507992
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1_5B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
10
5
1
So, I made a mistake earlier.
507992
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1_5B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
10
5
1
Let me correct that:
507992
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1_5B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
10
5
1
Wait, is that possible?
434479
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1_5B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
70
6
1
So, if \( EF \) is the diagonal, then \( EF = \sqrt{2} \), so perimeter would be \( 1 + 1 + \sqrt{2} = 2 + \sqrt{2} \).
434479
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1_5B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
70
6
1
Alternatively, perhaps the perimeter is fixed at \( 2 + \sqrt{2} \), so I can just compute that.
434479
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1_5B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
70
6
1
But wait, in our earlier attempt, the only solution was the degenerate case, but maybe in reality, the perimeter is fixed, and the triangle is such that \( EF \) is the diagonal.
434479
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1_5B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
70
6
1
Wait, perhaps the perimeter is \( 2 + \sqrt{2} \).
434479
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1_5B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
70
6
1
Hmm, but that's a different topic.
676437
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
adversarial_continue_unrelated
70
4
1
Wait, no, back to the problem.
676437
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
adversarial_continue_unrelated
70
4
1
5 divided by 9 is approximately 0.555... kilograms.
458736
Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Nano-8B-v1
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
10
7
1
Wait, that doesn't seem right.
458736
Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Nano-8B-v1
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
10
7
1
Wait, maybe I'm confusing the ratio.
458736
Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Nano-8B-v1
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
10
7
1
Wait, no, that would mean 1 part is 5 kg, so 9 parts would be 45 kg.
458736
Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Nano-8B-v1
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
10
7
1
Wait, that seems high.
458736
Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Nano-8B-v1
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
10
7
1
Wait, but the answer choices don't have 45 as the correct answer?
458736
Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Nano-8B-v1
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
10
7
1
Breaking it down: - \( 1990 = 2000 - 10 \) - Therefore, \( (2000 - 10)^2 = 2000^2 - 2 \times 2000 \times 10 + 10^2 = 4,000,000 - 40,000 + 100 = 3,960,100 \) - Adding 1 to this gives \( 3,960,101 \)
769982
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B
benign_rewrite_trace
10
5
1
Summing the digits of 401: - 4 + 0 + 1 = 5
769982
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B
benign_rewrite_trace
10
5
1
Summing the digits of 26: - 2 + 6 = 8
769982
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B
benign_rewrite_trace
10
5
1
Summing the digits of 65: - 6 + 5 = 11
769982
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B
benign_rewrite_trace
10
5
1
Summing the digits of 122: - 1 + 2 + 2 = 5
769982
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B
benign_rewrite_trace
10
5
1
So, I'm a bit confused because the first part of the message seems to be about a math problem, and then it jumps into agricultural experiments.
574993
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
neutral_add_random_text
10
3
1
So, instead of 3 times x, which is 90, he does x divided by 3.
574993
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
neutral_add_random_text
10
3
1
Looking at the options, B is 10, so that must be the answer.
574993
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
neutral_add_random_text
10
3
1
Wait, let me double-check.
574993
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
neutral_add_random_text
10
3
1
But hold on, let me make sure I didn't misinterpret the question.
574993
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
neutral_add_random_text
10
3
1
Wait, that's way off track.
711012
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
adversarial_continue_unrelated
50
6
1
1. \( (
711012
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
adversarial_continue_unrelated
50
6
1
-1/2)Q^3 + (3/2)Q R^2 = 65 \) 2. \( (
711012
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
adversarial_continue_unrelated
50
6
1
1. \( (
711012
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
adversarial_continue_unrelated
50
6
1
1/2)(-Q^3 + 3Q R^2) = 65 \) => \( -Q^3 + 3Q R^2 = 130 \) 2. \( (
711012
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
adversarial_continue_unrelated
50
6
1
Wait, maybe I should think in terms of coordinates.
421500
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
adversarial_insert_wrong_fact
30
4
1
Take absolute value and divide by 2: |a²/2| / 2 = (a²/2)/2 = a²/4
421500
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
adversarial_insert_wrong_fact
30
4
1
Wait, no, that doesn't seem right.
699043
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
50
3
1
Wait, perhaps the confusion arises from different approaches.
699043
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
50
3
1
Wait, now I have two different answers: 40 and 20.
699043
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
50
3
1
Wait, no, hold on.
699043
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
adversarial_continue_with_wrong_reasoning
50
3
1
So, the probability that the error is not exceeding 15 mm is the probability that Z ≤ 15, where Z is the Z-score.
332342
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
neutral_add_random_text
10
2
0
But wait, let me double-check that.
332342
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
neutral_add_random_text
10
2
0
[B] 1900 – Charles Darwin, English naturalist and geographer (d. 1923) 1902 – Daniel Tamson, British lawyer, politician, and educationist (d. 1973) 1903 – Arthur Mersenne, French scientist and mathematician (d. 1915) 1907 – Leopold Pochard, German botanist and geologist (d. 1910) 1912 – John Chisholm, British geographe...
431680
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1_5B
neutral_add_random_text
50
3
0
So, Charles Darwin was alive until 1923, so the last significant date is 1923.
431680
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1_5B
neutral_add_random_text
50
3
0
So, the problem is about Charles Darwin's life, but in the problem, it's just a geometry problem with the given medians.
431680
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1_5B
neutral_add_random_text
50
3
0
But anyway, perhaps I can go back to the formula.
431680
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1_5B
neutral_add_random_text
50
3
0
Wait, but perhaps in the problem, the lengths of the medians are given, but in reality, Charles Darwin's life span is until 1923, but in the problem, it's just a geometry problem, so maybe the values are hypothetical.
431680
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1_5B
neutral_add_random_text
50
3
0
Hmm, but that's a different topic.
558369
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B
adversarial_continue_unrelated
10
4
1
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
Downloads last month
5