qwertyqwerty070806/LawSummBart
Text Generation • 0.4B • Updated • 23
doc_id int64 0 499 | summary stringlengths 457 154k | judgment stringlengths 1.91k 521k |
|---|---|---|
15 | The State of Uttar Pradesh has under the U. P. Excise Act, 1910 the exclusive right or privilege of manufacturing and selling liquor in that State. Section ''4 of the Act provides that subject to the provisions of section 31 the Excise Commissioner may grant to any person a licence for the exclusive privilege of manuf... | 616, 643, 617, 644/74 and Civil Misc Writ Nos 2268,448,2280,2254,2255/69 and Special Appeal Nos 730 752, 647,615,611,648,645605,610/71 and Civil Misc. Writ number 149/68 and Special Appeal number 86, 796. 775/71 and W. P number 450 69 and Writ No 451, 218, 5706 2915/69,S. A. number . 690/71 C. Misc Writ number 303... |
1 | The appellant were registered partnership firms carrying on business of dealing in wines and spirits and were licensed to import and store liquors in their bounded warehouse at Bombay. They were also holders of licence issued under the Maharashtra Foreign Liquor (Import and Export) Rules, 1963 framed under the Procedur... | From the Judgment and Order dated 25. 11. 1987 of the Bombay High Court in Appeal number 217 of 1986; WITH SL. P. (Civil) numbers 2617 & 2618 of 1988. From the Judgment and Order dated 25. 11. 1987 of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition number 948 of 1982 and Appeal number 591 of 1986. Soli J. Sorabjee, C. E. Ve... |
0 | The appellant appointed the 1st respondent as a Welfare Officer as required by the Factories Act, 1948 and the Punjab Welfare Officers Recruitment and Conditions of Service Rules, 1952. The letter of appointment stated that the 1st respondent was liable to be transferred from one unit of the appellant to another and th... | Appeal by special leave from the order dated July 4, 1962, of the Government of Punjab (Labour Department) in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule 6 of the Punjab Welfare Officers (Recruitment and Service Conditions) Rules, 1952. M. C. Setalvad, J. B. DadachanJi, 0. C. Mathur and Ravinder Narain, for the app... |
16 | "The respondent filed a Writ Petition in-the High Court questioning the inclusion in the list of Dep(...TRUNCATED) | "(Appeal by Special Leave from the Judgment and Order dated 11-11-1974 of the Andhra Pradesh High Co(...TRUNCATED) |
6 | "The appellants filed suit under the U. P Tenancy Act, 1939 for the ejectment of the respondents w(...TRUNCATED) | "Appeals by special leave from the judgement and order dated August 6, 1954, of the U. P. Board of (...TRUNCATED) |
18 | "To provide medical facilities to the workers in factories a statutory body called the Employees Sta(...TRUNCATED) | "Appeals by Special Leave from the Judgment and Order dated the 26-8-75 of the Joint Judge at Thana (...TRUNCATED) |
2 | "The rule of estopple has gained new dimensions in recent years and a new class of estoppel, videlic(...TRUNCATED) | "Appeal from the judgment and decree dated June 23rd/24th, 1969 of the Calcutta High Court in Appeal(...TRUNCATED) |
13 | "Section 32(iv) of the Payment of Bonus Act provides that nothing in the Act shall apply to employee(...TRUNCATED) | "Appeal by Special Leave from the Judgment and Order dated 27-2-1979 of the Delhi High Court in Civi(...TRUNCATED) |
10 | "In the general election to the State Assembly held in 1982 the appellants and the respondents were (...TRUNCATED) | "From the Judgment and Order dated 3. 6. 1983 of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in E. P. 13/82. Ka(...TRUNCATED) |
3 | "The question for decision in this appeal by the Commissioner of Income-tax was whether a sum of rup(...TRUNCATED) | "165 of 1954. Appeal from the judgment and order dated May 27, 1953, of the Calcutta High Court in I(...TRUNCATED) |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
No dataset card yet
- Downloads last month
- 6
Models trained or fine-tuned on qwertyqwerty070806/Fire_Dataset