Datasets:
text stringlengths 19 21 |
|---|
patch_0001_0003_80N |
patch_0002_0005_S_80S |
patch_0004_0000_S_80S |
patch_0005_0000_S_80S |
patch_0006_0001_80N |
patch_0007_0000_S_80S |
patch_0008_0002_S_80S |
patch_0000_0001_80N |
patch_0001_0003_S_80S |
patch_0002_0006_S_80S |
patch_0004_0001_80N |
patch_0005_0001_80N |
patch_0006_0001_S_80S |
patch_0007_0001_80N |
patch_0008_0003_80N |
patch_0000_0001_S_80S |
patch_0001_0004_S_80S |
patch_0002_0007_S_80S |
patch_0004_0001_S_80S |
patch_0005_0002_80N |
patch_0006_0002_80N |
patch_0007_0002_80N |
patch_0008_0004_S_80S |
patch_0000_0002_80N |
patch_0001_0005_S_80S |
patch_0002_0008_80N |
patch_0004_0002_80N |
patch_0005_0002_S_80S |
patch_0006_0002_S_80S |
patch_0007_0002_S_80S |
patch_0008_0006_80N |
patch_0000_0004_S_80S |
patch_0001_0006_80N |
patch_0002_0008_S_80S |
patch_0004_0003_80N |
patch_0005_0003_80N |
patch_0006_0003_S_80S |
patch_0007_0003_80N |
patch_0008_0006_S_80S |
patch_0000_0005_80N |
patch_0001_0006_S_80S |
patch_0003_0000_80N |
patch_0004_0003_S_80S |
patch_0005_0003_S_80S |
patch_0006_0004_80N |
patch_0007_0003_S_80S |
patch_0008_0007_80N |
patch_0000_0005_S_80S |
patch_0001_0007_80N |
patch_0003_0003_80N |
patch_0004_0004_80N |
patch_0005_0004_80N |
patch_0006_0004_S_80S |
patch_0007_0004_S_80S |
patch_0008_0007_S_80S |
patch_0000_0006_S_80S |
patch_0001_0008_80N |
patch_0003_0003_S_80S |
patch_0004_0004_S_80S |
patch_0005_0004_S_80S |
patch_0006_0005_80N |
patch_0007_0005_80N |
patch_0008_0008_S_80S |
patch_0000_0007_80N |
patch_0002_0000_80N |
patch_0003_0004_S_80S |
patch_0004_0005_80N |
patch_0005_0005_80N |
patch_0006_0005_S_80S |
patch_0007_0006_80N |
patch_0002_0000_S_80S |
patch_0003_0005_80N |
patch_0004_0005_S_80S |
patch_0005_0005_S_80S |
patch_0006_0006_80N |
patch_0007_0007_80N |
patch_0002_0001_80N |
patch_0003_0005_S_80S |
patch_0004_0006_80N |
patch_0005_0006_80N |
patch_0006_0006_S_80S |
patch_0007_0007_S_80S |
patch_0001_0000_80N |
patch_0002_0002_S_80S |
patch_0003_0006_80N |
patch_0004_0006_S_80S |
patch_0005_0007_80N |
patch_0006_0007_80N |
patch_0007_0008_80N |
patch_0001_0000_S_80S |
patch_0002_0003_80N |
patch_0003_0006_S_80S |
patch_0004_0008_80N |
patch_0005_0007_S_80S |
patch_0006_0007_S_80S |
patch_0001_0001_80N |
patch_0002_0003_S_80S |
patch_0003_0007_S_80S |
patch_0004_0008_S_80S |
patch_0005_0008_80N |
SomBench Benchmark: Polar Ice Prospectivity Regression
Science theme: Polar volatiles
Task: Regression
Dataset Summary
A polar, multi-layer benchmark for predicting near-surface water-ice
prospectivity within ~10° latitude of each pole at 240 m/pixel. Following
the ice-prospectivity workflow of Coyan et al. (2025), the dataset includes a
group of physically motivated evidential layers (thermophysical,
illumination, and terrain) alongside a continuous prospectivity target. Each
polar patch is stored as a set of individual GeoTIFF layers, for both the
north (80N) and south (80S) poles, with train/val/test split
lists.
Task framing: regression of the prospectivity value (0–1) from the evidential layers.
Dataset Structure
Directory layout
prospectivity_dataset/
├── README.md # data source overview
├── band_statistics.json # per-layer normalization statistics
├── train_filtered.txt # train split patch lists
├── val_filtered.txt # val split patch lists
├── test_filtered.txt # test split patch lists
└── patch_{RRRR}_{CCCC}[_S]_{80N|80S}_{LAYER}.tif # patch files
- Patch naming:
patch_{row}_{col}_{pole}_{LAYER}.tif, where the pole tag is80Nfor the north pole andS_…_80Sfor the south pole. Each patch index therefore has one GeoTIFF per layer. band_statistics.json: per-layer statistics for normalization.train_filtered.txt/val_filtered.txt/test_filtered.txt: patch-id lists defining the splits.
Layers (one GeoTIFF per layer, per patch)
| Suffix | Layer | Group |
|---|---|---|
DICE |
Diviner ice stability depth | Thermophysical |
TMAX |
Maximum surface temperature | Thermophysical |
LPSR |
Permanently shadowed regions (PSR) mask | Illumination |
LPSR_DIS |
Distance to nearest PSR | Context |
LPSR_DEN |
PSR density (local areal density) | Context |
SLOPE |
Slope | Terrain |
CUR |
Curvature | Terrain |
ASP_SIN_COS |
Aspect (sine + cosine) | Terrain |
ONLYCOS |
Aspect (cosine-only variant) | Terrain |
PRO |
Ice prospectivity, regression target/label | Target |
These correspond to the nine evidential layers described in the SOMBench paper
(ice stability depth, maximum temperature, PSRs, slope, curvature, aspect,
distance to PSRs, and PSR density) plus the prospectivity target. Aspect is
provided in two versions with different input channels (ASP_SIN_COS, ONLYCOS); choose
the input channels appropriate to your model.
Contents
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Resolution | 240 m/pixel |
| Extent | within ~10° latitude of each pole (north 80N, south 80S) |
| Layer format | single-band GeoTIFF, one file per layer per patch |
| Files | 1,782 GeoTIFFs ≈ 162 patches × 11 layers (both poles) |
| Splits | Train 108 · Val 24 · Test 25 patches (162 total), listed in train_filtered.txt / val_filtered.txt / test_filtered.txt |
| Regression target | PRO (continuous prospectivity, 0–1) |
Known Limitations
- Prospectivity is a model-derived, tunable product: weights encode assumed relationships between ice concentration and the evidential layers and may evolve as in-situ constraints improve.
- Extreme polar illumination and sparse ground truth make evaluation sensitive to metric choice and label assumptions.
Citation
@article{fraccaro2026lfm,
title = {Multimodal-Multiresolution Foundation Model for Lunar Remote Sensing},
author = {Fraccaro, Paolo and Nyirjesy, Gabby and Szwarcman, Daniela and Patil, Himanshu
and Gaur, Vishal and Lal, Rohit and Slank, Rachel A. and Dawson, Geoffrey
and Debary, Hiyam and Dionelis, Nikolaos and Barker, Michael K. and Annex, Andrew
and Viswanathan, Vishnu and Morse, Zachary and Schaefer, Ethan I. and Kumar, Ankur
and Watson, Campbell D. and Dawson-Rigas, Rebekah I. and Maskey, Manil
and Roy, Sujit and Ramachandran, Rahul and Bernab\'e-Moreno, Juan},
year = {2026}
howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/collections/nasa-ibm-ai4science/nasa-ibm-lunar-fm-and-downstream-models}}
}
@misc{sombench2026collection,
author = {Patil, Himanshu and Nyirjesy, Gabby and Slank, Rachel A. and Gaur, Vishal
and Szwarcman, Daniela and Fraccaro, Paolo and Dionelis, Nikolaos and Barker, Michael K.
and Annex, Andrew and Viswanathan, Vishnu and Morse, Zachary and Schaefer, Ethan I.
and Debary, Hiyam and Kumar, Ankur and Lal, Rohit and Dawson, Geoffrey
and Watson, Campbell and Dawson-Rigas, Rebekah I. and Maskey, Manil
and Bernab\'e-Moreno, Juan and Ramachandran, Rahul and Roy, Sujit},
title = {{SomBench}: Benchmark Dataset for Advancing Machine Learning in Lunar Science},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/collections/nasa-ibm-ai4science/lunar-fm-ml-ready-benchmark-dataset-sombench}}
}
License
Released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
- Downloads last month
- 6