The dataset viewer is not available because its heuristics could not detect any supported data files. You can try uploading some data files, or configuring the data files location manually.
- Variational Quantum Control for Zero Trust Protection of the Tactile Internet
- Model Description
- Authors
- Model Architecture
- Input
- Output
- Dataset and Experimental Data
- Evaluation Protocols
- Training Procedure
- Evaluation Results
- Ablation Study
- Zero-Trust Integration
- Intended Uses
- Out-of-Scope Uses
- Limitations
- Reproducibility
- Downloading from Hugging Face
- Paper
- Citation
- License
- Acknowledgment
- Contact
VQC-ZTI
Variational Quantum Control for Zero Trust Protection of the Tactile Internet
Paper: VQC-ZTI: Variational Quantum Control for Zero Trust Protection of the Tactile Internet
Hugging Face Paper: huggingface.co/papers/2608.18572
Code: github.com/msudipto/VQC-ZTI_Framework
DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2608.18572
Venue: Accepted at IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM 2026)
Primary arXiv Category: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
Cross-lists: Machine Learning (cs.LG), Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI)
Model Description
VQC-ZTI is a hybrid quantum-classical anomaly-evidence model developed for a split-plane zero-trust architecture targeting Tactile Internet services.
The framework separates:
- Off-path evidence generation, where encrypted-flow telemetry is processed by a hybrid Variational Quantum Classifier / Quantum Neural Network; and
- On-path deterministic enforcement, where Policy Enforcement Points (PEPs) apply cached grant, restrict, step-up, or deny actions.
The design prevents probabilistic VQC inference from being placed directly in the latency-critical Tactile Internet control path.
The released implementation uses PyTorch and PennyLane and evaluates the hybrid model on CESNET-derived aggregated encrypted-flow traffic records.
Model Sources
- Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18572
- Hugging Face Paper Page: https://huggingface.co/papers/2608.18572
- Source Code: https://github.com/msudipto/VQC-ZTI_Framework
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18572
Authors
Mubassir Serneabat Sudipto
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Iowa State University
Ames, Iowa, USA
Email: msudipto@iastate.edu
Shakil Ahmed
Computer Science, College of Computing
Grand Valley State University
Allendale, Michigan, USA
Email: ahmeshak@gvsu.edu
Ashfaq Khokhar
Carl R. Ice College of Engineering
Kansas State University
Manhattan, Kansas, USA
Email: akhokhar@k-state.edu
Model Architecture
The full-hybrid VQC-ZTI anomaly model contains the following stages:
Feature preprocessing
- Payload-independent encrypted-flow statistics
- Robust feature preparation
- 12 input features
Classical embedding
- A trainable classical embedder maps the processed feature vector into a 12-dimensional representation.
Quantum feature encoding
- Number of qubits: 12
- Initial state: all-zero state
- Feature encoding: single-qubit Pauli-Y rotations (
RY)
Variational Quantum Circuit
- Number of variational layers: 2
- Trainable single-qubit rotations
- Nearest-neighbor CNOT entanglement
Quantum measurement
- Pauli-Z expectation values are measured from two output qubits.
Classical classification head
- Quantum measurements are mapped into two class logits.
- The class-1 probability is used as the continuous anomaly score.
The complete architecture is trained end-to-end through the PyTorch-PennyLane computational graph.
Input
The model operates on structured, payload-independent network-traffic features derived from CESNET aggregated traffic.
The evaluated implementation uses:
- 12 numerical features
- packet and byte statistics
- destination diversity
- traffic ratios
- average flow duration
- average time-to-live
- related aggregated flow characteristics
The model is therefore a tabular binary-classification model, not a natural-language, image, or generative model.
Output
The model produces a continuous anomaly score:
0 <= anomaly_score <= 1
The binary experimental classes are:
0 = normative record
1 = suspicious or high-anomaly record
The score represents evidence with respect to the statistical anomaly-labeling procedure used in the study.
It must not be interpreted as a calibrated probability that a network flow is malicious.
Dataset and Experimental Data
The evaluation reported in the associated paper uses 4,875 CESNET-derived aggregated traffic records with 12 payload-independent features.
Experimental labels are generated through a controlled statistical-anomaly procedure based on robust-scaled feature norms and empirical quantiles.
The labeling scheme separates:
- normative records,
- suspicious records, and
- high-anomaly records.
For binary evaluation, suspicious and high-anomaly records are combined into the anomaly class.
Important Data Qualification
These labels are statistical pseudo-labels, not verified attack annotations.
Consequently:
- reported anomaly-detection performance measures agreement with the constructed statistical benchmark;
- false-positive rate is measured relative to the quantile-derived normative class; and
- the reported results must not be interpreted as verified intrusion-detection performance against confirmed cyberattacks.
The full data preparation and reproducibility workflow is documented in the GitHub repository:
https://github.com/msudipto/VQC-ZTI_Framework
Evaluation Protocols
Three evaluation protocols are used.
Random Stratified Holdout
- Training records: 3,900
- Evaluation records: 975
- Binary-label distribution preserved
Entity-Group Holdout
- Training records: approximately 3,751-3,971
- Evaluation records: approximately 904-1,124
- Training and evaluation entity groups are disjoint
Temporal Holdout
- Training records: 3,887 earlier records
- Evaluation records: 988 later records
These protocols test performance under conventional random splitting as well as entity and chronological distribution shifts.
Training Procedure
The reported full-hybrid QNN configuration uses:
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Input features | 12 |
| Qubits | 12 |
| Variational layers | 2 |
| Epochs | 20 |
| Batch size | 32 |
| Learning rate | 2 x 10^-3 |
| Random seeds | 42-46 |
| Training runs | 5 |
| Quantum execution | Analytic expectation values |
| Quantum framework | PennyLane |
| ML framework | PyTorch |
Training uses a class-weighted negative log-likelihood objective.
Class weights are determined from the training partition and normalized to unit mean. The classical embedder, variational quantum circuit, and classical classification head are jointly optimized.
Quantum Execution Setting
The reported experiments use noiseless analytic expectation values.
The reported results therefore do not include:
- finite-shot uncertainty,
- quantum-hardware noise,
- physical-device connectivity constraints,
- transpilation overhead,
- hardware queueing delay, or
- other physical quantum-computing effects.
Evaluation Results
The full-hybrid QNN is compared against:
- ExtraTrees
- Random Forest
- Logistic Regression
- hybrid-model ablations
Full-Hybrid QNN Results
| Evaluation Split | ROC-AUC | Accuracy | FPR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entity-Group | 0.9974 +/- 0.0009 | 0.9762 +/- 0.0028 | 0.0241 +/- 0.0042 |
| Random | 0.9981 +/- 0.0004 | 0.9756 +/- 0.0042 | 0.0270 +/- 0.0050 |
| Temporal | 0.9941 +/- 0.0018 | 0.9747 +/- 0.0044 | 0.0248 +/- 0.0052 |
Across the three protocols, the full-hybrid QNN achieves the highest reported mean AUC and accuracy and the lowest mean FPR among the evaluated models.
Comparison with ExtraTrees
Relative to ExtraTrees, mean FPR is reduced by:
| Evaluation Split | FPR Reduction |
|---|---|
| Random | 44.6% |
| Entity-Group | 49.6% |
| Temporal | 67.9% |
These comparisons do not demonstrate quantum computational advantage because the classical baselines are not parameter- or compute-matched to the complete hybrid neural architecture.
Ablation Study
The associated study evaluates five model configurations:
| Variant | Description |
|---|---|
| Full Hybrid (FH) | Complete classical embedder + VQC + classification head |
| No Head (NH) | Classification head removed |
| Shallow Embedder (SE) | Reduced classical embedding architecture |
| No Embedder (NE) | Processed features encoded directly |
| PQC-only (PQC) | Restricted parameterized quantum circuit without the complete hybrid structure |
The full-hybrid configuration performs best across all reported evaluation protocols.
The ablation results indicate that the reported performance depends on the complete hybrid quantum-classical pipeline, rather than on the parameterized quantum circuit alone.
Zero-Trust Integration
The anomaly model is designed as an evidence source, not as a direct access-control mechanism.
VQC-ZTI separates two operational planes:
Evidence Plane
The asynchronous evidence plane performs:
Encrypted-Flow Telemetry
|
Feature Preparation
|
Classical Embedding
|
Quantum Encoding
|
VQC / QNN Inference
|
Classical Post-Processing
|
Risk Fusion
|
Policy Computation
Enforcement Plane
The latency-critical enforcement plane uses:
Request
|
Policy Enforcement Point (PEP)
|
Cached Deterministic Policy
|
Grant / Restrict / Step-Up / Deny
|
Protected Tactile Internet Service
VQC execution is therefore not an intermediate processing hop for the current Tactile Internet transaction.
Delayed anomaly scoring can postpone a future policy update, but does not directly add quantum-processing delay to the current enforcement decision.
Intended Uses
VQC-ZTI is intended for:
- research on hybrid quantum-classical machine learning;
- network anomaly-detection experimentation;
- zero-trust architecture research;
- Tactile Internet security research;
- quantum-enhanced cybersecurity experimentation;
- comparative classical/quantum model evaluation;
- reproducibility studies;
- controlled anomaly-scoring experiments;
- hybrid-model ablation studies; and
- research on off-path security-evidence generation.
Out-of-Scope Uses
The model should not currently be treated as:
- a production intrusion-detection system;
- a verified malware or attack detector;
- a calibrated probability-of-compromise estimator;
- an autonomous access-control authority;
- proof of quantum advantage;
- evidence of performance on physical quantum hardware;
- evidence of end-to-end Tactile Internet latency compliance; or
- a replacement for deployment-grade network-security validation.
Security-critical decisions should not be based solely on this experimental model.
Limitations
The evaluation has several important validity boundaries.
Statistical labels
- Labels are quantile-derived statistical anomalies rather than verified attack annotations.
Dataset scope
- CESNET aggregated traffic does not represent a hardware-in-the-loop Tactile Internet deployment.
Quantum simulation
- Experiments use noiseless analytic quantum simulation.
No finite-shot evaluation
- Shot noise and sampling uncertainty are excluded.
No physical quantum hardware
- Hardware noise, topology, transpilation, execution latency, and queueing are not evaluated.
No demonstrated quantum advantage
- Classical baselines are not parameter- or compute-matched to the complete hybrid architecture.
Zero-trust policy validation
- Risk-fusion functions and policy thresholds have not yet been calibrated against operational access-control outcomes.
Latency validation
- Prototype component measurements do not establish end-to-end Tactile Internet latency compliance.
Future work includes verified attack labels, capacity-matched neural baselines, finite-shot and noisy quantum execution, physical quantum devices, controlled attack experiments, and hardware-in-the-loop PDP/PEP evaluation.
Reproducibility
The complete experimental framework is available at:
GitHub:
https://github.com/msudipto/VQC-ZTI_Framework
The repository provides:
- preprocessing code;
- experiment configuration;
- PyTorch-PennyLane training workflow;
- classical baselines;
- hybrid-model ablations;
- evaluation scripts;
- result generation;
- manuscript figures;
- experiment artifacts; and
- reproducibility documentation.
Repository Installation
git clone https://github.com/msudipto/VQC-ZTI_Framework.git
cd VQC-ZTI_Framework
python -m venv .venv
On Windows:
.venv\Scripts\activate
pip install -r requirements.txt
.\run_pipeline.ps1
On compatible Unix-like environments, activate the environment with:
source .venv/bin/activate
pip install -r requirements.txt
See the GitHub repository for the current execution and data-placement instructions.
Downloading from Hugging Face
After replacing YOUR_HF_USERNAME with the owner of this model repository, the model repository can be cloned using:
git clone https://huggingface.co/YOUR_HF_USERNAME/VQC-ZTI
or downloaded with the Hugging Face CLI:
hf download YOUR_HF_USERNAME/VQC-ZTI
Model loading depends on the checkpoint format included with the release. Refer to the accompanying repository files and the official VQC-ZTI GitHub implementation for the exact reconstruction and inference procedure.
Paper
The model and experimental framework are described in:
Mubassir Serneabat Sudipto, Shakil Ahmed, and Ashfaq Khokhar.
“VQC-ZTI: Variational Quantum Control for Zero Trust Protection of the Tactile Internet.”
Accepted at IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM 2026).
arXiv:2608.18572, 2026.
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18572
- Hugging Face Papers: https://huggingface.co/papers/2608.18572
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18572
- Code: https://github.com/msudipto/VQC-ZTI_Framework
Citation
If you use VQC-ZTI, its implementation, experimental methodology, model checkpoints, or reported results in academic work, please cite the associated paper.
Paper Citation
@misc{sudipto2026vqczti,
title = {{VQC-ZTI}: Variational Quantum Control for Zero Trust Protection of the Tactile Internet},
author = {Sudipto, Mubassir Serneabat and Ahmed, Shakil and Khokhar, Ashfaq},
year = {2026},
eprint = {2608.18572},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
primaryClass = {cs.CR},
doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2608.18572},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18572},
note = {Accepted at IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM 2026)}
}
Software Repository Citation
If you specifically use or extend the accompanying software implementation, you may additionally cite:
@misc{vqc_zti_framework_2026,
author = {Sudipto, Mubassir Serneabat and Ahmed, Shakil and Khokhar, Ashfaq},
title = {{VQC-ZTI Framework}: Variational Quantum-Classical Zero-Trust Anomaly Detection and CESNET-Based Security Evaluation},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://github.com/msudipto/VQC-ZTI_Framework}},
note = {Code repository},
url = {https://github.com/msudipto/VQC-ZTI_Framework}
}
License
The VQC-ZTI software implementation is released under the MIT License.
See the accompanying LICENSE file and the official GitHub repository for complete terms:
https://github.com/msudipto/VQC-ZTI_Framework
Acknowledgment
This research supports ongoing work in:
- quantum-enhanced cybersecurity;
- hybrid quantum-classical machine learning;
- zero-trust system design;
- network anomaly detection;
- Tactile Internet security; and
- secure next-generation network evaluation.
The project emphasizes reproducible experimental methodology and careful separation between simulated anomaly-evidence performance and claims of operational security effectiveness or quantum advantage.
Contact
Mubassir Serneabat Sudipto
Iowa State University
msudipto@iastate.edu
Shakil Ahmed
Grand Valley State University
ahmeshak@gvsu.edu
Ashfaq Khokhar
Kansas State University
akhokhar@k-state.edu
Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18572
Hugging Face Paper: https://huggingface.co/papers/2608.18572
GitHub: https://github.com/msudipto/VQC-ZTI_Framework
- Downloads last month
- 12