id stringlengths 9 43 | source stringclasses 7
values | family stringclasses 104
values | group stringclasses 19
values | split stringclasses 1
value | input stringlengths 1 7.7k | answer stringlengths 0 1.78k ⌀ | options listlengths 2 4 ⌀ | tier stringclasses 3
values | label_source stringclasses 11
values | audit_accuracy float32 0.95 1 ⌀ | provenance stringlengths 105 484 | record stringlengths 171 13.4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
cid:df265eb343a2184a | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Dear Ms. Castell, our HR policy says that employees assigned to the overnight shift receive a meal voucher. I read that as meaning employees who aren’t assigned to the overnight shift don’t receive a meal voucher, so Chen Forde, who works days, shouldn’t get one. —Gus Abara
Gus, if the policy is intended as a complete... | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario",
"Burden of Proof",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an HR team applying a workplace policy", "genre": "a reader's letter and an advice columnist's reply", "seed_word": "inlay"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0000", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0000", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:df265eb343a2184a"} |
cid:328a44b8226340fa | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | To: Farah Ivers
From: Ana Castell
Subject: Reading section 18
Ivo’s conduct falls outside the class section 18 describes: he did not frighten an occupant. The section imposes a fine when a person frightens an occupant, and its wording presents that class as exhaustive. On that reading, the statute does not impose a fi... | A Contrario | [
"Beyond a Reasonable Doubt",
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "lawyers arguing over how to read a statute", "genre": "an internal memo", "seed_word": "frighten"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0001", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0001", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:328a44b8226340fa"} |
cid:529384f17590d9af | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Dear Chen, my lease says that if a tenant’s balcony faces the courtyard, the tenant may install a window box. Gus’s balcony does not face the courtyard, so he may not install one. —Eli Forde
Dear Eli, read as an exhaustive rule, that clause gives permission only to courtyard-facing balconies; on that reading, Gus is n... | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario",
"Balancing Test",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a landlord and tenant disputing a lease", "genre": "a reader's letter and an advice columnist's reply", "seed_word": "disinfectant"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0002", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0002", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:529384f17590d9af"} |
cid:b22c1b2d5dd141ec | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | In her ruling in Luis Ivers’s contract case, Judge Hana Hollis said, “The contract provides that if the seller installs dampers, then the seller receives a calibration fee. Read as covering every case, that means a seller who does not install dampers does not receive that fee.” Ivo Brandt, the seller’s lawyer, had conf... | A Contrario | [
"Reasonable Person Standard",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a judge explaining a ruling in a contract case", "genre": "a quoted statement in a news story", "seed_word": "dampers"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0003", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0003", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:b22c1b2d5dd141ec"} |
cid:f9b1aadd39dd9eaa | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Dara Forde: “The policy says employees who miss the annual safety training are suspended, and this section gives the complete rule for suspensions. So an employee who attended the training isn’t suspended under this section.” Farah Brandt: “That’s how I’ll apply it when I review the cases.” | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"Distinguishing a Precedent",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an HR team applying a workplace policy", "genre": "a short dialogue between two people", "seed_word": "flyby"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0005", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0005", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:f9b1aadd39dd9eaa"} |
cid:429f052d12976238 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Gus Engel: “The court’s rule awards compensation for an injury that causes a deformity, and it treats that rule as exhaustive.” Ana Abara: “Then Chen Duarte’s injury, which caused no deformity, does not qualify for compensation under that rule.” | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario",
"Reasonable Person Standard",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a civil trial about an injury", "genre": "a short dialogue between two people", "seed_word": "deformity"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0006", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0006", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:429f052d12976238"} |
cid:2e38d437932cd375 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Ben Brandt noted that the reimbursement rule says claims filed within ten days receive reimbursement, and that this is the complete rule on reimbursement eligibility. Farah Duarte concluded that claims filed after ten days do not receive reimbursement. | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius",
"Reasonable Person Standard",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a compliance officer reviewing company rules", "genre": "meeting minutes", "seed_word": "clary"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0007", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0007", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:2e38d437932cd375"} |
cid:0689c9428f2f2024 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Hi Ana, the policy says that if an employee is on approved medical leave, the employee receives paid leave. The policy lists approved medical leave as the exhaustive category for paid leave, so employees outside that category do not receive it. Best, Dara | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori",
"Reasonable Person Standard",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an HR team applying a workplace policy", "genre": "an email", "seed_word": "layoff"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0008", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0008", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:0689c9428f2f2024"} |
cid:f6a7b955e76c0f61 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | In a textbook exercise, Kira Galvan told Gus Abara that their HR team treated the relocation policy as exhaustive: employees on approved relocation assignments receive a company-paid hotel room, and no other category qualifies. Luis Castell was not on an approved relocation assignment, Kira said, so he would not receiv... | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Elements Test",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an HR team applying a workplace policy", "genre": "a textbook exercise written as a short story", "seed_word": "hangover"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0009", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0009", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:f6a7b955e76c0f61"} |
cid:bd24818526bc003f | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | In a statement quoted in the news story, appellate judge Ana Ivers said, “The rule, read as exhaustive, attaches the late-filing penalty to current officeholders. People who are not current officeholders lack that penalty under the rule.” | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"Analogy to Precedent",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an appellate court opinion", "genre": "a quoted statement in a news story", "seed_word": "unsteady"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0011", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0011", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:bd24818526bc003f"} |
cid:40c839402b8e7aa0 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | In a note to Chen Ivers, compliance officer Gus Engel says the handbook imposes a late fee when a supplier submits an invoice after the deadline, and that this is the complete rule governing late fees. That seems like a sensible bright line: a supplier who does not submit an invoice after the deadline does not incur a ... | A Contrario | [
"Reasonable Person Standard",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a compliance officer reviewing company rules", "genre": "a paragraph from an opinion column", "seed_word": "pika"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0012", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0012", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:40c839402b8e7aa0"} |
cid:d11d3a10c43553be | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | “The contract says a notice sent after thirty days is void, and that this is the exhaustive rule for when a notice is void,” Judge Eli Ivers told Chen Hollis. “Your notice arrived within thirty days, so it isn’t void under the contract.” | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario",
"Preponderance of the Evidence",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a judge explaining a ruling in a contract case", "genre": "a short dialogue between two people", "seed_word": "icicle"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0013", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0013", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:d11d3a10c43553be"} |
cid:3617cacc322ec7f5 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Dear Farah Castell, I’m deciding whether to penalize a food stall, and the regulation assigns an enforcement penalty to unlicensed kiosks. Kira Duarte says this stall has a license, so it is not an unlicensed kiosk; does that mean I should take no enforcement action? —Hana Ivers. Dear Hana, read that rule as exhaustive... | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"Reasonable Person Standard",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulator deciding an enforcement action", "genre": "a reader's letter and an advice columnist's reply", "seed_word": "gatekeeper"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0014", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0014", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:3617cacc322ec7f5"} |
cid:292bd18d3ee4a4c3 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | In a textbook exercise, Luis Abara messages Ana Duarte from the HR team: “Our policy’s complete eligibility rule says employees whose requests arrive within 30 days receive a paid review. Farah Engel’s request arrived after 30 days, so she does not receive a paid review.” | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"Clear and Convincing Evidence",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an HR team applying a workplace policy", "genre": "a textbook exercise written as a short story", "seed_word": "askew"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0015", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0015", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:292bd18d3ee4a4c3"} |
cid:e67bad5f24af0fd0 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Jun Ivers posted to the trial forum: “Ivo, the statute states the full sentencing rule: defendants who voluntarily return stolen property receive a reduced sentence. So defendants who do not voluntarily return stolen property lack a reduced sentence.” | A Contrario | [
"Distinguishing a Precedent",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a criminal trial's closing arguments", "genre": "a forum post", "seed_word": "precondition"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0016", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0016", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:e67bad5f24af0fd0"} |
cid:a059a570e74b89f4 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Meeting minutes, closing arguments: Luis Ivers told the court that the statute’s exhaustive rule convicts anyone who knowingly configures the alarm to conceal a burglary. Ana Duarte argued that Chen Brandt did not knowingly configure the alarm to conceal a burglary, so the statute does not convict Chen. | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori",
"Reasonable Person Standard",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a criminal trial's closing arguments", "genre": "meeting minutes", "seed_word": "jaundice"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0017", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0017", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:a059a570e74b89f4"} |
cid:f0fa0b04dff16eb2 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Jun Galvan posted to Dara Hollis: “The court’s exhaustive rule says that if the injury happened on an unguarded stair, then the property owner must pay medical costs. Since Hana Brandt’s injury did not happen on an unguarded stair, the property owner does not have to pay medical costs under that rule.” | A Contrario | [
"Analogy to Precedent",
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a civil trial about an injury", "genre": "a forum post", "seed_word": "cowgirl"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0019", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0019", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:f0fa0b04dff16eb2"} |
cid:deb3a91ec82a0371 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | To Eli Ivers
Subject: Closing argument
Eli, in closing, I’ll point out that the statute says the sentencing enhancement applies to aggravated assaults, and it sets out that rule as exhaustive. The conduct here is not an aggravated assault, so the sentencing enhancement does not apply. We should ask the jury to reject ... | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"Distinguishing a Precedent",
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a criminal trial's closing arguments", "genre": "an email", "seed_word": "wallop"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0022", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0022", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:deb3a91ec82a0371"} |
cid:e54ddfdc5f59ef21 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | In the regulator’s office, Hana Abara asked Jun Galvan whether Kira Forde could be fined for releasing dye into the river. Jun opened the enforcement manual: “A fine applies to unlicensed discharges of untreated dye, and this rule is exhaustive.” Kira had a license, Jun noted, so her discharge was not an unlicensed dis... | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"Reasonable Person Standard",
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulator deciding an enforcement action", "genre": "a textbook exercise written as a short story", "seed_word": "spinster"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0024", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0024", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:e54ddfdc5f59ef21"} |
cid:3acb3cc54848f349 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | I’m trying to settle the bike-storage dispute under the lease. Ana Forde says the lease’s complete rule is that if Dara Duarte has written permission from Gus Hollis, Dara may store a bicycle in the hall; Dara has no such permission. So Dara may not store a bicycle in the hall. | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"Analogy to Precedent",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a landlord and tenant disputing a lease", "genre": "a forum post", "seed_word": "tarp"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0025", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0025", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:3acb3cc54848f349"} |
cid:e2cc7114fededca8 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Subject: Enforcement review
Hi Dara,
The regulation imposes a fine on facilities that intentionally discharge untreated waste, and its penalty rule is exhaustive. Since Ben’s facility’s discharge was not intentional, we should not impose that fine. Chen | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"Analogy to Precedent",
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulator deciding an enforcement action", "genre": "an email", "seed_word": "betrothal"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0027", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0027", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:e2cc7114fededca8"} |
cid:6cc8028b5e655ce8 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Dear Kira, Judge Ben Brandt ruled that my contract does not receive automatic renewal. In his written explanation, he said, “If the contract was signed before January 1, the contract receives automatic renewal. The clause is exhaustive, so if the contract was not signed before January 1, the contract does not receive a... | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius",
"Clear and Convincing Evidence"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a judge explaining a ruling in a contract case", "genre": "a reader's letter and an advice columnist's reply", "seed_word": "absinthe"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0028", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0028", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:6cc8028b5e655ce8"} |
cid:b6ff841ba7e2c6c6 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | In a statement quoted in the news story about the civil trial, Dara Castell told Eli Galvan, “The ordinance makes a proprietor liable for an injury caused in an unlit stairwell, and it exhaustively lists the situations in which liability attaches. Chen Abara was injured in a lit stairwell, so the ordinance does not mak... | A Contrario | [
"Reasonable Person Standard",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a civil trial about an injury", "genre": "a quoted statement in a news story", "seed_word": "subtlety"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0030", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0030", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:b6ff841ba7e2c6c6"} |
cid:2bb44baa4ac78a32 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Eli Castell’s reading, recorded by Jun Forde: “The statute says that if a case is a cardiopulmonary emergency, then the case receives expedited review. Read as exhaustive, that means a case that is not a cardiopulmonary emergency does not receive expedited review.” Gus Abara agreed to use that reading in the meeting’s ... | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori",
"Balancing Test"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "lawyers arguing over how to read a statute", "genre": "meeting minutes", "seed_word": "cardiopulmonary"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0031", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0031", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:2bb44baa4ac78a32"} |
cid:cf58730db7c5068b | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | In a textbook exercise, compliance officer Ivo Galvan asked Dara Abara to review the company’s filing rule. Dara replied, “If an application is filed after the deadline, then a late fee is due; the rule lists every case in which a late fee is due. So if an application is not filed after the deadline, then a late fee is... | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"Burden of Proof",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a compliance officer reviewing company rules", "genre": "a textbook exercise written as a short story", "seed_word": "stamen"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0032", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0032", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:cf58730db7c5068b"} |
cid:8045ca62d00e6385 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | In a news story about the HR team’s policy, Jun Ivers said, “Our complete rule on meal stipends grants one to employees assigned overnight shifts. Kira Galvan isn’t assigned an overnight shift, so she doesn’t receive a meal stipend.” | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"Preponderance of the Evidence",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an HR team applying a workplace policy", "genre": "a quoted statement in a news story", "seed_word": "bloodhound"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0033", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0033", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:8045ca62d00e6385"} |
cid:05b902f852cf1778 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Ben Hollis, speaking for the landlord, told the court, “Your Honor, the lease says tenants who give written notice are exempt from the early-termination fee, and its notice provision is exhaustive. Farah Engel gave oral notice, not written notice, so she is not exempt from the fee.” | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"Reasonable Person Standard",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a landlord and tenant disputing a lease", "genre": "an exchange in a courtroom", "seed_word": "enamelled"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0034", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0034", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:05b902f852cf1778"} |
cid:1c945cac8f85b010 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | To Eli, for closing, the statute defines this offense exhaustively: anyone who knowingly enters the evidence room after receiving a warning commits trespass. So a person who enters without receiving a warning does not commit this trespass offense. Best, Kira. | A Contrario | [
"Burden of Proof",
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a criminal trial's closing arguments", "genre": "an email", "seed_word": "countermeasure"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0036", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0036", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:1c945cac8f85b010"} |
cid:a00aeb00d7afef8f | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Subject: Jun’s review
Hi Chen, the policy’s exhaustive suspension rule says that employees who disclose customer records outside approved channels receive a two-day suspension. Jun sent the records through an approved channel, so that conduct does not carry a two-day suspension. Best, Dara | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"Analogy to Precedent"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a compliance officer reviewing company rules", "genre": "an email", "seed_word": "nosy"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0037", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0037", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:a00aeb00d7afef8f"} |
cid:0547a7feed38c204 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | In a news conference, Judge Hana Forde said, “The contract grants reimbursement to buyers who submit written notice within 30 days, and that clause exhaustively defines who qualifies. Buyers who do not submit written notice within 30 days therefore do not qualify for reimbursement.” | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori",
"Balancing Test",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a judge explaining a ruling in a contract case", "genre": "a quoted statement in a news story", "seed_word": "stockpile"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0038", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0038", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:0547a7feed38c204"} |
cid:88c98eaf55a6c2b9 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | In a textbook exercise about an injury trial, Dara tells Eli that the statute gives city indemnity for injuries caused by registered cranes, and that this is its complete rule for indemnity. Ben’s injury was caused by an unregistered crane, so Dara concludes that Ben’s case does not receive city indemnity. | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"Beyond a Reasonable Doubt",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a civil trial about an injury", "genre": "a textbook exercise written as a short story", "seed_word": "unmask"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0039", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0039", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:88c98eaf55a6c2b9"} |
cid:4a0f95b84be516fd | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | In my view, the lease dispute between Chen Galvan and Dara Hollis turns on the city ordinance’s defined remedy: it grants rent suspension to tenants whose homes have been formally condemned by a city inspector. Dara’s apartment was never formally condemned; Farah Castell’s inspection found it habitable, despite needed ... | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario",
"Balancing Test"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a landlord and tenant disputing a lease", "genre": "a paragraph from an opinion column", "seed_word": "promulgation"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0042", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0042", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:4a0f95b84be516fd"} |
cid:9a25e29e3a7c162e | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Dear Farah, Section 18 grants priority review to applications filed by June 1, and says that this is its complete rule for priority review. So applications filed after June 1 do not receive priority review. —Jun Forde
Jun, on that exhaustive reading, your conclusion follows: the statute grants the benefit to the stated... | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"Analogy to Precedent",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "lawyers arguing over how to read a statute", "genre": "a reader's letter and an advice columnist's reply", "seed_word": "cocky"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0043", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0043", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:9a25e29e3a7c162e"} |
cid:5d571968776a3813 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | From chambers, Eli Forde emails Dara Engel: “Gus Duarte, the jubilant claimant, argues that the statute awards a filing-fee refund to applicants who submit within ten days. The statute states that the refund goes to applicants who submit within ten days; read as exhaustive, that rule means applicants who do not submit ... | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori",
"Reasonable Person Standard"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an appellate court opinion", "genre": "an email", "seed_word": "jubilant"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0044", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0044", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:5d571968776a3813"} |
cid:ffc421066888c456 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | The minutes record Farah Galvan’s reading: “The statute’s exhaustive list says that if an applicant is an exhibitor, then the applicant receives a fee waiver. So if an applicant is not an exhibitor, then the applicant does not receive a fee waiver.” Jun Castell agreed that this was the reading to take forward. | A Contrario | [
"Clear and Convincing Evidence",
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "lawyers arguing over how to read a statute", "genre": "meeting minutes", "seed_word": "secularism"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0046", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0046", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:ffc421066888c456"} |
cid:47ec84a15234533f | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Dear Farah, the regulation says that a facility with a confirmed discharge must pay a cleanup fee. Our inspection found no confirmed discharge at Chen Abara’s facility, so I believe the regulation means it owes no cleanup fee, and the agency should close the enforcement action. —Ana Brandt
Dear Ana, if that is all the ... | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Preponderance of the Evidence"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulator deciding an enforcement action", "genre": "a reader's letter and an advice columnist's reply", "seed_word": "normalcy"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0047", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0047", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:47ec84a15234533f"} |
cid:0750fe5c05b43353 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Hi Chen, I checked the handbook’s complete rule on late fees: if a submission is filed after the deadline, it incurs the late fee. Since that rule covers all cases, a submission that is not filed after the deadline does not incur the late fee. Best, Jun | A Contrario | [
"Balancing Test",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a compliance officer reviewing company rules", "genre": "an email", "seed_word": "palatable"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0048", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0048", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:0750fe5c05b43353"} |
cid:da6263a035599a60 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Subject: Re: Training allowance
Hi Chen,
The policy says employees assigned to the concierge desk receive the annual training allowance. It treats that as the complete rule for the allowance, so employees not assigned to the concierge desk do not receive it. Jun Brandt is not assigned to the concierge desk, so Jun do... | A Contrario | [
"Preponderance of the Evidence",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an HR team applying a workplace policy", "genre": "an email", "seed_word": "concierge"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0049", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0049", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:da6263a035599a60"} |
cid:5006bb7ce9c2dabd | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Gus Ivers posted to Chen Castell: “The regulation says that licensed street vendors must file a weekly sales report. It sets that requirement for licensed street vendors, so it does not impose that reporting consequence on businesses that are not licensed street vendors. Kira Hollis’s shop is not a licensed street vend... | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Reasonable Person Standard",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulator deciding an enforcement action", "genre": "a forum post", "seed_word": "hassle"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0050", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0050", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:5006bb7ce9c2dabd"} |
cid:2748320a9614ba7b | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Dara Galvan: “The regulation says that a vessel used to take fish during the closed season is subject to a $500 penalty, and it says that this is the complete class of conduct covered by that penalty.” Jun Castell: “Farah Abara’s vessel was used outside the closed season, so it is not in that class and lacks the $500 p... | A Contrario | [
"Elements Test",
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulator deciding an enforcement action", "genre": "an exchange in a courtroom", "seed_word": "poacher"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0051", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0051", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:2748320a9614ba7b"} |
cid:cea19f8ab5a3c752 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Eli Abara asked Judge Farah Engel, “May the buyer terminate because delivery was 20 days late?” Farah replied, “The contract states its complete termination rule: the buyer may terminate when delivery is more than 30 days late. Since this delivery was only 20 days late, the buyer has no right to terminate under that ru... | A Contrario | [
"Distinguishing a Precedent",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a judge explaining a ruling in a contract case", "genre": "a short dialogue between two people", "seed_word": "crescendo"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0052", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0052", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:cea19f8ab5a3c752"} |
cid:37ae1ba67b578072 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | A news report quoted compliance officer Kira Engel telling Chen Ivers, “I reviewed the company rules, and the complete rule on hazard reports says contractors handling clinker must file one. Since that rule is exhaustive, employees who aren’t contractors handling clinker don’t have to file a hazard report.” | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Analogy to Precedent",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a compliance officer reviewing company rules", "genre": "a quoted statement in a news story", "seed_word": "clinker"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0053", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0053", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:37ae1ba67b578072"} |
cid:a6985f2604050111 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Ana Abara said to Kira Castell, “The regulation says that facilities storing curative substances must file a monthly safety report. It gives no such requirement for facilities storing other substances, so we should dismiss the enforcement action against Chen Duarte’s facility, which stores an expectant preparation.” Ki... | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"Distinguishing a Precedent",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulator deciding an enforcement action", "genre": "a short dialogue between two people", "seed_word": "curative"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0054", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0054", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:a6985f2604050111"} |
cid:3319fb86e3247da5 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Eli Galvan said, “The statute’s complete reimbursement rule grants reimbursement to claimants who submit receipts within 30 days.” Luis Castell replied, “Then claimants who do not submit receipts within 30 days do not receive reimbursement.” | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"Preponderance of the Evidence",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "lawyers arguing over how to read a statute", "genre": "a short dialogue between two people", "seed_word": "offal"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0055", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0055", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:3319fb86e3247da5"} |
cid:78b7d03c34e7a04f | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Meeting minutes: Jun Abara said the lease provides that a tenant who gives thirty days’ written notice before leaving is entitled to a refund of the cleaning fee, and that this clause states the complete rule for that refund. Ben Forde noted that Dara Castell gave only ten days’ notice. Jun concluded that Dara is not e... | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario",
"Beyond a Reasonable Doubt"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a landlord and tenant disputing a lease", "genre": "meeting minutes", "seed_word": "nutter"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0056", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0056", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:78b7d03c34e7a04f"} |
cid:a5634e2ad68fb440 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | “Ms. Duarte, what does the HR policy say about employees who complete the certified safety drill?” Dara Galvan asked in court. “It grants them a paid recovery day,” Hana Duarte replied. “And the policy is the complete list of circumstances in which HR grants that day,” Dara said. “Then employees who have not completed ... | A Contrario | [
"Distinguishing a Precedent",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an HR team applying a workplace policy", "genre": "an exchange in a courtroom", "seed_word": "mannequin"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0057", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0057", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:a5634e2ad68fb440"} |
cid:632a4708a7bf8ae6 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | In the textbook exercise, Ivo Engel tells Chen Duarte that the HR handbook’s exhaustive rule says employees who have completed the data-security course may handle archived personnel files. Gus Castell has not completed the course, Ivo notes, so under that rule Gus may not handle the archived files. | A Contrario | [
"Analogy to Precedent",
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an HR team applying a workplace policy", "genre": "a textbook exercise written as a short story", "seed_word": "opacity"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0058", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0058", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:632a4708a7bf8ae6"} |
cid:c4e1d0ea1a31b2f6 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Jun Galvan addressed Ivo Brandt in court: “The regulation says that if a case involves a turbojet, the case carries an enforcement penalty. Its listed categories are exhaustive. This case does not involve a turbojet, so it does not carry an enforcement penalty, and the regulator should dismiss the action.” | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario",
"Beyond a Reasonable Doubt"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulator deciding an enforcement action", "genre": "an exchange in a courtroom", "seed_word": "buckler"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0059", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0059", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:c4e1d0ea1a31b2f6"} |
cid:e9bb79510a5dd569 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | In a report on the lease dispute, Hana Hollis said, “Our lease grants tenants who give 60 days’ written notice the right to end the lease without a penalty. That rule is exhaustive, so tenants who don’t give 60 days’ written notice don’t have the right to end the lease without a penalty.” | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"Balancing Test",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a landlord and tenant disputing a lease", "genre": "a quoted statement in a news story", "seed_word": "bogey"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0063", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0063", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:e9bb79510a5dd569"} |
cid:ac030dd6152d7047 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Ben Castell told Farah Abara that the ordinance awards doubled damages when an injury results from an unlit stairwell, and that the court treats this as the complete rule for doubled damages. Hana Forde’s injury resulted from a loose handrail, not an unlit stairwell, so she is not entitled to doubled damages under that... | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius",
"Clear and Convincing Evidence",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a civil trial about an injury", "genre": "meeting minutes", "seed_word": "pompadour"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0070", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0070", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:ac030dd6152d7047"} |
cid:cdb3c94b107027fc | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Ana, the enforcement schedule says depots storing flammable solvents owe the special containment fee, and the schedule is complete. Kira’s depot stores no flammable solvents, so it owes no special containment fee; I recommend closing the enforcement case. | A Contrario | [
"Clear and Convincing Evidence",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulator deciding an enforcement action", "genre": "a forum post", "seed_word": "unholy"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0072", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0072", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:cdb3c94b107027fc"} |
cid:f515fdee59115637 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Dara Abara: Your Honor, the lease says that when a tenant gives written notice of a leak, the landlord must inspect within twenty-four hours. It also says that this is the complete rule governing the landlord’s inspection duty. Luis Duarte gave no written notice before the leak was repaired, so the lease imposed no twe... | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"Preponderance of the Evidence",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a landlord and tenant disputing a lease", "genre": "an exchange in a courtroom", "seed_word": "libertine"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0075", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0075", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:f515fdee59115637"} |
cid:711fe1fd2171ff6c | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | In her closing argument, Farah Duarte tells Ivo Abara that the statute makes the mandatory fine apply to a defendant who used a forged seal, and that this rule covers every case eligible for the fine. Dara Brandt did not use a forged seal, Farah says, so Dara does not receive the mandatory fine. That clear boundary may... | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"Distinguishing a Precedent",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a criminal trial's closing arguments", "genre": "a paragraph from an opinion column", "seed_word": "allure"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0077", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0077", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:711fe1fd2171ff6c"} |
cid:86f883fad7405910 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | The minutes record Judge Luis Galvan’s ruling on the contract dispute: “The contract grants a thirty-day cure period to a breach notice delivered by certified mail, and I read that provision as exhaustive of the notices entitled to a cure period. Ivo Hollis’s notice was delivered by ordinary mail, so it is not entitled... | A Contrario | [
"Burden of Proof",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a judge explaining a ruling in a contract case", "genre": "meeting minutes", "seed_word": "stepdaughter"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0078", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0078", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:86f883fad7405910"} |
cid:0305dc83fbaa6666 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | In a news conference, Judge Ben Brandt explained his ruling to Eli Hollis: “Jun Abara’s contract says the daily fee applies to deliveries made after the agreed date, and this clause sets out the complete list of deliveries that incur that fee. Eli’s delivery was made on the agreed date, so it does not incur the daily f... | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario",
"Beyond a Reasonable Doubt"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a judge explaining a ruling in a contract case", "genre": "a quoted statement in a news story", "seed_word": "heathen"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0080", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0080", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:0305dc83fbaa6666"} |
cid:50f7e6a06340bab5 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | “The statute says, in an exhaustive rule, that applications filed before the deadline receive expedited review,” Farah Galvan told Eli Abara. “So an application filed after the deadline does not receive expedited review.” | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori",
"Burden of Proof"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "lawyers arguing over how to read a statute", "genre": "a short dialogue between two people", "seed_word": "ventriloquist"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0082", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0082", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:50f7e6a06340bab5"} |
cid:fb587a8e4b1f3a44 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Farah Galvan said to Jun Abara, “Your Honor, the diversion statute makes a defendant under eighteen eligible for diversion, and age is its complete test. Ana Castell was nineteen when the offense occurred, so she is outside that class and is not eligible for diversion.” | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"Distinguishing a Precedent",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a criminal trial's closing arguments", "genre": "an exchange in a courtroom", "seed_word": "undress"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0083", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0083", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:fb587a8e4b1f3a44"} |
cid:866823166fbd058e | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | “The policy says employees who complete the safety training by Monday qualify for the paid certification course, and it says this rule covers every employee,” Ben Engel told Kira Castell. “So employees who don’t complete the training by Monday don’t qualify for the course.” | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario",
"Elements Test"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an HR team applying a workplace policy", "genre": "a short dialogue between two people", "seed_word": "bloodshot"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0084", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0084", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:866823166fbd058e"} |
cid:bf52d3fa0ae02aa3 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Meeting minutes: Dara Brandt told Eli Abara that the lease says tenants with written consent may install a satellite dish, and that this clause exhaustively states who may do so. Dara concluded that tenants without written consent may not install a satellite dish. | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori",
"Preponderance of the Evidence"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a landlord and tenant disputing a lease", "genre": "meeting minutes", "seed_word": "puss"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0085", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0085", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:bf52d3fa0ae02aa3"} |
cid:1069f852e2170365 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | To Eli Engel: Ivo Abara’s contract dispute turns on the payment clause. The agreement says invoices countersigned by both parties are payable within 30 days, and the clause is exhaustive. I therefore rule that invoices not countersigned by both parties are not payable under this clause. | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"Balancing Test",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a judge explaining a ruling in a contract case", "genre": "an internal memo", "seed_word": "irreconcilable"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0089", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0089", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:1069f852e2170365"} |
cid:9347696c89c52f82 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | In its opinion, Judge Dara Galvan wrote, “The statute grants expedited review to applications from coastal clinics, and its list of eligible applications is exhaustive. Applications from inland clinics therefore do not receive expedited review.” Reporter Kira Hollis quoted the passage in her story. | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"Distinguishing a Precedent"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an appellate court opinion", "genre": "a quoted statement in a news story", "seed_word": "convolution"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0091", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0091", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:9347696c89c52f82"} |
cid:fbafb744b60992df | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Chen Ivers’s closing memo to Luis Duarte: “The ordinance says that anyone who enters the courthouse after hours without a permit commits a crime. Kira Brandt entered after hours, but the state proved she had a permit. The ordinance therefore leaves her outside the crime it defines, and the jury should find her not guil... | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario",
"Preponderance of the Evidence"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a criminal trial's closing arguments", "genre": "an internal memo", "seed_word": "infraction"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0093", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0093", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:fbafb744b60992df"} |
cid:b7b322166bea3d03 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | In a textbook exercise, regulator Farah Hollis reviews a rule with Luis Abara: “The regulator suspends sales of a product if it contains an unapproved stimulant. This rule exhaustively states every kind of product that can receive a sales suspension.” Ivo Duarte’s gummy contains no unapproved stimulant, so Farah conclu... | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Analogy to Precedent"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulator deciding an enforcement action", "genre": "a textbook exercise written as a short story", "seed_word": "gummy"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0094", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0094", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:b7b322166bea3d03"} |
cid:f75311cbab2411f2 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | To: Ana Galvan
From: Luis Ivers
Subject: Hana Abara’s deposit
The lease’s exhaustive deposit-timing rule says that when a tenant gives 30 days’ written notice, the landlord must return the security deposit within 14 days. Hana Abara did not give 30 days’ written notice, so the lease does not require us to return her d... | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"Clear and Convincing Evidence",
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a landlord and tenant disputing a lease", "genre": "an internal memo", "seed_word": "whetstone"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0099", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0099", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:f75311cbab2411f2"} |
cid:ede4a09936e1a9ed | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | In her closing argument, Chen Galvan told the jury, “The statute imposes a fine on anyone who enters the courthouse archive after hours, and it states this rule as the complete basis for that fine. Luis Ivers entered during the day, so he is not in the class covered by the rule. The statute therefore does not impose th... | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"Balancing Test",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a criminal trial's closing arguments", "genre": "a textbook exercise written as a short story", "seed_word": "impartiality"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0100", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0100", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:ede4a09936e1a9ed"} |
cid:553bec8a127a2871 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Farah Duarte, the rule in this contract says that if the agreement was signed after inspection, it qualifies for a refund. Read as exhaustive, it means that if the agreement was not signed after inspection, it does not qualify for a refund; that is why I denied Kira Castell’s refund request. | A Contrario | [
"Distinguishing a Precedent",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a judge explaining a ruling in a contract case", "genre": "a forum post", "seed_word": "shortfall"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0106", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0106", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:553bec8a127a2871"} |
cid:ce3e47696a311641 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | The minutes record Judge Ana Hollis’s ruling on Farah Ivers’s contract claim. She said, “The contract grants the renewal credit to every possessor, and Farah is not a possessor. The contract sets out that credit as the consequence for possessors, so Farah is not entitled to the renewal credit.” | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Burden of Proof",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a judge explaining a ruling in a contract case", "genre": "meeting minutes", "seed_word": "possessor"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0110", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0110", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:ce3e47696a311641"} |
cid:81690e19c6dd5085 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Hana, the statute’s exhaustive conviction rule says that if the case involves a forged antler seal, then the defendant is convicted. Farah’s case does not involve a forged antler seal, so the statute does not call for her conviction; the rule leaves cases outside that class without that consequence. | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"Reasonable Person Standard"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a criminal trial's closing arguments", "genre": "a paragraph from an opinion column", "seed_word": "wholesome"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0115", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0115", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:81690e19c6dd5085"} |
cid:f9e21d5375eacc67 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | I’m reviewing the company rules: the compliance code says equipment with a current inspection tag may remain operable, and it says its categories cover every case. So equipment without a current inspection tag may not remain operable. | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Burden of Proof"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a compliance officer reviewing company rules", "genre": "a forum post", "seed_word": "operable"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0122", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0122", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:f9e21d5375eacc67"} |
cid:7b1848dd38f86999 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Hana Galvan’s appellate opinion reads the ordinance as an exhaustive rule: replaceable field units receive expedited approval, and no other class does. That means units that are not replaceable field units do not receive expedited approval. Eli Hollis is right to treat the limit as part of the ordinance’s scope, not as... | A Contrario | [
"Burden of Proof",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an appellate court opinion", "genre": "a paragraph from an opinion column", "seed_word": "replaceable"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0123", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0123", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:7b1848dd38f86999"} |
cid:93558ce3ef88ca67 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | To: Eli Castell, from Farah Abara. The statute says that portable generators used at construction sites must carry a permit, and we should read that rule as exhaustive. Gus Ivers’s generator is used at a roadside food stall, not at a construction site, so it does not carry the permit requirement. | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario",
"Distinguishing a Precedent"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "lawyers arguing over how to read a statute", "genre": "an internal memo", "seed_word": "paraphernalia"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0124", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0124", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:93558ce3ef88ca67"} |
cid:7fafcee720aa9114 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Ben Engel noted that the regulation grants a reduced penalty to operators who file a complete safety report within ten days, and that this provision is exhaustive. Kira Abara therefore recommended no reduced penalty for operators who do not file a complete safety report within ten days. Jun Hollis recorded that the tea... | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"Analogy to Precedent",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulator deciding an enforcement action", "genre": "meeting minutes", "seed_word": "gracefully"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0125", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0125", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:7fafcee720aa9114"} |
cid:2a31345d490168ea | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Kira Duarte posts: “Our lease says that when damage is obstructive, the landlord may charge a cleanup fee. Dara Ivers’s damage is not obstructive, so the landlord may not charge her a cleanup fee.” | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius",
"Beyond a Reasonable Doubt"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a landlord and tenant disputing a lease", "genre": "a forum post", "seed_word": "obstructive"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0126", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0126", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:2a31345d490168ea"} |
cid:94691cb47b8d1d9b | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | To Ana Galvan, from Judge Eli Duarte — Internal memo: The contract rule grants an extension to tenants who submit a notice before the deadline. I read that provision as exhaustive: tenants who do not submit a notice before the deadline lack an extension, so I denied Ivo Engel’s request because he submitted his notice a... | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"Balancing Test",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a judge explaining a ruling in a contract case", "genre": "an internal memo", "seed_word": "compulsion"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0127", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0127", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:94691cb47b8d1d9b"} |
cid:c525a27b9e4b00c5 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Jun Hollis, in a memo to Kira Engel, writes: “The appellate court should hold that section 8 exhaustively grants the overnight-call allowance to supervised housemen. Luis Castell’s client is not a supervised houseman, so the court should hold that the client is not entitled to the allowance.” | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius",
"Burden of Proof"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an appellate court opinion", "genre": "an internal memo", "seed_word": "houseman"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0129", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0129", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:c525a27b9e4b00c5"} |
cid:d2f3f7fd7d2da3fb | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Dara Castell writes: “The statute grants a filing-fee waiver to applicants younger than eighteen. Gus Duarte is eighteen or older, so he cannot receive the waiver.” Farah Engel replies: “Read as exhaustive, the statute grants the waiver to that age group and withholds it from everyone else.” | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"Elements Test",
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "lawyers arguing over how to read a statute", "genre": "a reader's letter and an advice columnist's reply", "seed_word": "kiddie"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0130", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0130", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:d2f3f7fd7d2da3fb"} |
cid:9ba9a8712d2a5329 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | “The code says that a contractor who dumps untreated runoff into a protected channel must pay a penalty,” regulator Chen Forde said in a quoted statement to Jun Hollis of the daily news. “So, because Eli Engel’s company discharged into an unprotected drainage ditch, it owes no penalty under that rule.” | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius",
"Balancing Test"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulator deciding an enforcement action", "genre": "a quoted statement in a news story", "seed_word": "ramada"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0131", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0131", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:9ba9a8712d2a5329"} |
cid:b656d08297c8f998 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Subject: Early-termination fee
Hi Dara,
The lease’s complete early-termination clause says that if Kira gives 30 days’ written notice before ending the lease, then Kira receives the early-termination fee waiver. So if Kira does not give 30 days’ written notice before ending the lease, then Kira does not receive the e... | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"Balancing Test",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a landlord and tenant disputing a lease", "genre": "an email", "seed_word": "dapper"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0132", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0132", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:b656d08297c8f998"} |
cid:65d9734099e5b0cd | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | “The rule imposes a reporting penalty on facilities that discharge above the limit, and its text treats that category as exhaustive,” Dara Brandt told Ben Castell. “This facility discharged below the limit, so it does not incur the reporting penalty.” | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"Burden of Proof",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulator deciding an enforcement action", "genre": "a short dialogue between two people", "seed_word": "homeroom"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0133", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0133", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:65d9734099e5b0cd"} |
cid:1d4205cf4f5ac23c | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Subject: Early termination fee
Hi Jun,
Clause 12 says the complete set of tenants who may end their lease without a fee is tenants who give 60 days’ notice. Ivo gave only 30 days’ notice, so he is not in that set and does not have the fee-free termination right. Please apply the early termination fee to his account.
... | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario",
"Distinguishing a Precedent"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a landlord and tenant disputing a lease", "genre": "an email", "seed_word": "strangulation"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0135", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0135", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:1d4205cf4f5ac23c"} |
cid:db6a540b678ac6d1 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Farah, my memo on Ana Hollis’s injury: Section 12 grants compensation for injuries caused by the collapse of a city-owned bridge, and the statute states that this is the exhaustive category eligible for that compensation. Ana was injured when a privately owned bridge collapsed, so her injury does not qualify for Sectio... | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario",
"Elements Test",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a civil trial about an injury", "genre": "an internal memo", "seed_word": "beaker"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0136", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0136", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:db6a540b678ac6d1"} |
cid:5c1525e437b3cb1a | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Dear Hana Duarte, I’m following Ivo Brandt’s criminal trial, where the closing arguments turned on the sentencing statute. The statute’s exhaustive rule authorizes a custodial sentence for anyone convicted of intentional evidence tampering; Ivo was convicted of accidentally damaging evidence, so the court cannot impose... | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"Elements Test",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a criminal trial's closing arguments", "genre": "a reader's letter and an advice columnist's reply", "seed_word": "refresher"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0137", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0137", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:5c1525e437b3cb1a"} |
cid:4ec8a6b3fc451a5b | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | The minutes record Ana Hollis’s reading of the statute: “The statute grants a filing extension to applicants displaced by a declared flood, so an applicant not displaced by a declared flood does not receive that extension.” Dara Forde noted that the statute’s list of eligible applicants is exhaustive, and Gus Duarte ag... | A Contrario | [
"Burden of Proof",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "lawyers arguing over how to read a statute", "genre": "meeting minutes", "seed_word": "cerebellum"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0138", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0138", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:4ec8a6b3fc451a5b"} |
cid:d94dc114bed209f2 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Dear Kira, our HR policy says that employees who submit expense reports after the deadline receive a written warning, and states that this rule is exhaustive. Ivo submitted his report on time, so the policy does not call for a written warning for him. What should I tell him? —Dara Hollis
Dear Dara, tell Ivo that under... | A Contrario | [
"Burden of Proof",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an HR team applying a workplace policy", "genre": "a reader's letter and an advice columnist's reply", "seed_word": "abdicate"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0139", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0139", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:d94dc114bed209f2"} |
cid:fefd991843fdb465 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | In a short story from the compliance textbook, Jun Forde asks officer Kira Duarte whether the badge rule covers Eli Abara’s visitor pass. Kira reads the rule aloud: “Employees who complete the safety course may enter the archive.” She treats the rule as exhaustive and concludes that visitors who do not complete the saf... | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"Beyond a Reasonable Doubt",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a compliance officer reviewing company rules", "genre": "a textbook exercise written as a short story", "seed_word": "schoolroom"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0140", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0140", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:fefd991843fdb465"} |
cid:859d12016efe065a | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Internal memo from Hana Engel to Ben Castell: For the closing, emphasize that the statute sets two years’ imprisonment as the consequence for anyone who knowingly brings a concealed firearm into the courthouse, and the statute treats that as the full class of conduct carrying that consequence. The evidence shows Luis A... | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Distinguishing a Precedent"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a criminal trial's closing arguments", "genre": "an internal memo", "seed_word": "secretarial"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0143", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0143", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:859d12016efe065a"} |
cid:c326e60c92465c58 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Subject: Early termination
Hi Jun,
The lease says that a tenant who gives 30 days’ written notice may end the lease without an early-termination charge. That provision is the lease’s complete rule for ending the lease without a charge. Since you did not give 30 days’ written notice, you cannot end the lease without a... | A Contrario | [
"Clear and Convincing Evidence",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a landlord and tenant disputing a lease", "genre": "an email", "seed_word": "sleepless"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0144", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0144", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:c326e60c92465c58"} |
cid:ad2037dc0d8ded01 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | To: Gus Duarte
From: Ana Hollis
Subject: Mileage reimbursement
The policy says that if an employee uses a company conveyance for approved business, then the employee receives mileage reimbursement. It treats that category as exhaustive. So an employee who does not use a company conveyance for approved business does no... | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"Clear and Convincing Evidence",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an HR team applying a workplace policy", "genre": "an internal memo", "seed_word": "conveyance"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0145", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0145", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:ad2037dc0d8ded01"} |
cid:4ae009575d92bbfb | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | In this textbook example, Farah Abara tells Judge Eli Ivers that the civil statute’s exhaustive schedule awards compensation when an injury occurs during a paid ferry crossing. Ana Galvan was injured on a road, not during a paid ferry crossing. Reading the schedule as exhaustive, Eli concludes that Ana’s injury does no... | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"Elements Test",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a civil trial about an injury", "genre": "a textbook exercise written as a short story", "seed_word": "halter"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0146", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0146", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:4ae009575d92bbfb"} |
cid:aaa94f10cf01797e | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Ivo Hollis said, “The enforcement rule says that if the device is an authorized sealed dispenser, the regulator may impose a fine on it, and the rule exhaustively lists every class eligible for that fine. This device is not an authorized sealed dispenser, so the regulator may not impose a fine on it.” Luis Ivers replie... | A Contrario | [
"Burden of Proof",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulator deciding an enforcement action", "genre": "a short dialogue between two people", "seed_word": "incurable"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0147", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0147", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:aaa94f10cf01797e"} |
cid:04bbd7f6d19888d5 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | In a forum post about the ruling, Judge Ivo Duarte writes to Eli Ivers: “The contract makes the $500 charge applicable to deliveries after June 30, and says this is its exhaustive rule for the charge. If the delivery is after June 30, then the buyer owes the $500 charge. Jun Forde’s delivery was not after June 30, so t... | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario",
"Distinguishing a Precedent"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a judge explaining a ruling in a contract case", "genre": "a forum post", "seed_word": "eraser"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0149", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0149", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:04bbd7f6d19888d5"} |
cid:7b759c7d9011dec4 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Jun Hollis: The contract says tenants who deliver a signed renewal notice by May 1 receive an extra month, and I sent mine on May 3. Judge Chen Abara: I read that clause as exhaustive: tenants who do not deliver a signed renewal notice by May 1 do not receive an extra month. Since you sent yours after May 1, you do not... | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario",
"Beyond a Reasonable Doubt",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a judge explaining a ruling in a contract case", "genre": "a short dialogue between two people", "seed_word": "limpet"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0155", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0155", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:7b759c7d9011dec4"} |
cid:796aec70144a6e1e | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | “The injury schedule is exhaustive,” Ivo Abara told Gus Hollis. “It grants compensation to people injured by electrocution. Dara Brandt was injured when a shelf fell on her, not by electrocution, so she has no right to compensation under that schedule.” | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"Clear and Convincing Evidence",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a civil trial about an injury", "genre": "a short dialogue between two people", "seed_word": "electrocution"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0157", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0157", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:796aec70144a6e1e"} |
cid:512766c7f146feb3 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Dear Kira, I read the statute as a complete rule for this permit: it grants permits to licensed tradesmen, and no one outside that class gets one. I’m advising a client who is an unlicensed carpenter, so I take it that the statute gives him no right to a permit. —Chen Engel. Dear Chen, on that exhaustive reading, your ... | A Contrario | [
"Expressio Unius",
"Preponderance of the Evidence",
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "lawyers arguing over how to read a statute", "genre": "a reader's letter and an advice columnist's reply", "seed_word": "tradesman"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0158", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0158", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:512766c7f146feb3"} |
cid:448774f3837b6390 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | In the contract hearing, Judge Kira Castell told Chen Ivers that the agreement makes a signed change order enforceable. She said the contract lists every method by which a change can be approved, so an unsigned email is not an enforceable change order. The minutes record that the requested payment based on the email wa... | A Contrario | [
"Beyond a Reasonable Doubt",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a judge explaining a ruling in a contract case", "genre": "meeting minutes", "seed_word": "tarantula"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0159", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0159", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:448774f3837b6390"} |
cid:7ba76278cfea6dee | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Dear Farah Castell, our regulator’s rule says that a shop selling fireworks to minors must pay a $500 penalty. The rule says nothing about shops that give fireworks away, so those shops lack the penalty; please advise whether the regulator can fine a shop that gave fireworks to a minor. —Ben Forde
Dear Ben, on that re... | A Contrario | [
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius",
"Reasonable Person Standard",
"A Contrario"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulator deciding an enforcement action", "genre": "a reader's letter and an advice columnist's reply", "seed_word": "canticle"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0165", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0165", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:7ba76278cfea6dee"} |
cid:8a4a1ae727f62133 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Farah Hollis asked, “May the buyer rescind, Judge Abara?” Judge Dara Abara replied, “Section 8 grants rescission to contracts signed in person, and it exhaustively states who may rescind. This contract was signed remotely, so its buyer has no right to rescind under Section 8.” | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"Preponderance of the Evidence",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a judge explaining a ruling in a contract case", "genre": "a short dialogue between two people", "seed_word": "scanty"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0168", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0168", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:8a4a1ae727f62133"} |
cid:bdc80f1f2f43f17c | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Dear Farah, I’m reading the appellate court’s opinion about the statute’s exhaustive docketing categories. It says, “If the petition is filed by a public agency, then it receives priority docketing.” Since those categories are exhaustive, if the petition is not filed by a public agency, then it does not receive priorit... | A Contrario | [
"Clear and Convincing Evidence",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius",
"A Fortiori"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "an appellate court opinion", "genre": "a reader's letter and an advice columnist's reply", "seed_word": "workhorse"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0170", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0170", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:bdc80f1f2f43f17c"} |
cid:048392ab5eda4a98 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | Chen Ivers, the regulator’s counsel, told the court: “This section makes confiscation available for vessels that land undersized haddock, and it states that these are the complete grounds for confiscation. The vessel in this case did not land undersized haddock. So it cannot be confiscated under this section.” | A Contrario | [
"A Contrario",
"A Fortiori",
"Expressio Unius",
"Distinguishing a Precedent"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a regulator deciding an enforcement action", "genre": "an exchange in a courtroom", "seed_word": "haddock"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0172", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0172", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:048392ab5eda4a98"} |
cid:2122782f694f84c6 | constructs-1 | lemma.constructs.identify | legal | train | In this textbook exercise, landlord Hana Duarte writes to tenant Gus Galvan about their lease. “The lease rule attaches the right to renew to cases where the lease is for one year,” Hana says. “Since that is the complete rule for renewal, cases where the lease is not for one year do not carry a right to renew.” | A Contrario | [
"Distinguishing a Precedent",
"A Fortiori",
"A Contrario",
"Expressio Unius"
] | agreed | luna+blind-checks | 0.98 | {"model": "gpt-6-luna", "service_tier": "flex", "reasoning_effort": "low", "prompt_version": "constructs-gen-v4.1", "setting": "a landlord and tenant disputing a lease", "genre": "a textbook exercise written as a short story", "seed_word": "primeval"} | {"construct_id": "construct:a-contrario", "construct": "A Contrario", "kind": "legal_scheme", "group": "legal", "split": "train", "tier": "agreed", "unit_id": "c:a-contrario:0174", "lexeme_id": "c:a-contrario:0174", "task": "legal_scheme", "item_id": "cid:2122782f694f84c6"} |
OpenLemma v0.1: task items
One row per task item: the item behind the documents in
openlemma-v0.1-pretrain, for your own packing,
fine-tuning or analysis.
inputandanswerare text, or JSON for structured inputs;optionslists the choices of multiple-choice items;tier,label_sourceandaudit_accuracysay how the answer was checked;recordkeeps the full source record, as JSON.
default
| Source | Rows | Tokens | What |
|---|---|---|---|
constructs-1 |
205,741 | Construct generation run 1: all 180 reasoning constructs (inference rules, equivalences, fallacies, schemes, techniques, quantifier, deontic and legal reasoning) as natural, varied arguments: identify, identify-and-correct, what-follows, valid-or-not. | |
gloss-run2 |
184,133 | OpenGloss task run 2: F1 mapping-rule induction, F2 label-set induction, F3 knowledge frames, F4 reverse dictionary, F5 passage QA. | |
gloss-run3 |
318,557 | OpenGloss task run 3: extraction, document QA, question generation, word problems, rewriting, error correction, instruction following, and the lexical T-families. | |
gloss-run4 |
577,301 | OpenGloss task run 4: 11K more F1/F2 induction task types (F1 after a gpt-6-sol pass over every rule). | |
gloss-run5 |
876,144 | OpenGloss task run 5: the high-value families on 12,005 new headwords, plus 10K more F1/F2 task types. | |
lemma-v0 |
430,697 | OpenLemma batch v0: procedural logic, structure, algorithms; CAS-checked math; certified puzzles. Label families repacked at the base rate. | |
lemma-v1 |
643,421 | OpenLemma batch v1: function induction, data structures and algorithms with traces, code (Python, SQL, regex), formats, word problems, the full logic and reasoning catalog. Label families repacked at the base rate. |
extended
| Source | Rows | Tokens | What |
|---|---|---|---|
gloss-run2 |
73,692 | OpenGloss task run 2: F1 mapping-rule induction, F2 label-set induction, F3 knowledge frames, F4 reverse dictionary, F5 passage QA. | |
gloss-run3 |
192,770 | OpenGloss task run 3: extraction, document QA, question generation, word problems, rewriting, error correction, instruction following, and the lexical T-families. | |
gloss-run5-a |
14,216 | ||
gloss-run5-b |
20,959 | ||
gloss-run5-pilot |
4,244 |
Provenance and verification
Every row comes from OpenLemma (code: MIT; the documentation in docs/ covers
every source).
- Generation: procedural generators and gpt-6-luna (OpenAI, flex, reasoning effort low). Some upstream retrieval material was written by gpt-5.4-mini.
- Auditing only: gpt-6-sol.
- Checks:
verified: an independent checker, solver (axeyum), CAS route or truth table recomputed the answer;constructed: the label is fixed by how the item was built (planted values, code corruptions, the sense a sentence was written for);agreed: a model-proposed label that independent blind model checks agreed with, in a family whose gpt-6-sol audit is >= 95% (default) or 80-95% (extended, withaudit_accuracyon every row);prose: model-written explanatory text about verified facts.
Anti-copy packing. k-shot documents (k in {0, 1, 3, 8}) never reward copying the previous answer:
- open answers are pairwise distinct;
- label answers repeat the last demonstration's label only at the base rate 1/n, with labels balanced over the demonstrations;
- copy traps and symbol labels appear on 10% of documents each.
Batches v0/v1 were originally packed so that "any label but the last one" was always right; this release repacks those families.
Plain text. Documents in default/extended contain no control tokens. ALEA-style
<|start|>/<|end|> boundaries are added at tokenization. Reasoning glyphs (① ∴ ∵ ⊢ ● ⚠ …)
are ordinary characters. The special_tokens config keeps the original ALEA control-token
renderings for replication.
Token counts use the ALEA tokenizer alea-p1-prefix-16k.
Licence and attribution
CC-BY-4.0. Attribute OpenLemma (https://github.com/mjbommar/openlemma). Upstream sources:
- axeyum (MIT OR Apache-2.0): curriculum, facts, scenarios, CAS and solver checks;
- OpenGloss v2.4 (CC-BY-4.0): lexical seeds and grounding;
- WordNet 3.0: rows derived from WordNet senses carry the WordNet licence, included as
LICENSE-WordNet.txt; - alea-quality-model: the 93 foundational reasoning constructs.
Generated text was produced with OpenAI models and is subject to the provider's terms.
Known limitations
agreedlabels are model-checked, not proven; readaudit_accuracyand the per-family audits in the repository docs.- OpenGloss v2.4 has known defects (about 10% of common senses invalid, unreliable etymologies). Etymology tasks are excluded, and seed senses were validity-checked for the newer runs.
- Two deontic constructs are thin (Permission Operator, Prohibition Operator).
- This release was published before any model was trained on it. It makes no claim about downstream gains.
Citation
@misc{openlemma2026,
title = {OpenLemma: verified, bottom-up synthetic data for logic, reasoning, algorithms and language},
author = {Bommarito, Michael J.},
year = {2026},
note = {Version 0.1},
url = {https://github.com/mjbommar/openlemma}
}
- Downloads last month
- 93