Patent Description:
As cellular networks are densified, the inter-cell interference become a major issue and the topology of the network may have to be changed; a conventional cellular architecture with co-located antennas is not necessarily optimal. Cell-free massive MIMO (also known as "distributed antenna system" or "distributed massive MIMO") technology can be applied to this situation. In such a system, many physically separated access points can be deployed within a conventional cell and there might be no explicit cell boundaries. Each user is served by phase-coherent transmission from a subset of such access points, typically the ones that provide a sufficiently high SNR to the user.

<CIT> describes the use of an over-the-air synchronization method wherein multiple anchors may be synchronized with each other, in a pairwise manner, and to a common reference clock. The anchors may be used e.g. to localize a tag using Time of Arrival measurements.

An hierarchical synchronization method for <NUM> base stations associated with indoor hotspots is described in a paper entitled "<NPL>.

In a traditional MIMO system, with antenna elements physically confined to a localized antenna array, it is relatively straightforward to control transmissions from the different antenna elements to be coherent in phase. The inventors have realized that, in a distributed MIMO system, such as a distributed massive MIMO system, on the other hand, timing errors between transmissions from different access points to a given wireless communication device may deteriorate the degree of coherence and thereby the obtainable throughput. Aspects of the present disclosure relate to synchronization procedures that can facilitate phase-coherent transmissions in a distributed MIMO system.

According to a first aspect, there is provided a method of operating a distributed MIMO system, such as a distribute massive MIMO system. The distributed MIMO system is configured to serve a plurality of wireless communication devices. The distributed MIMO system comprises a number of access points, each comprising a time circuit configured to keep track of a local time of the access point. The method comprises performing an intra-group synchronization procedure for a group of at least three access points, which do not have access to a central time reference. The intra-group synchronization procedure comprises, for each access point in the group, transmitting, from that access point, a synchronization signal and obtaining a transmission time indicator indicating a transmission time of that synchronization signal in the local time of that access point. Furthermore, the intra-group synchronization procedure comprises receiving, by each of the other access points in the group, the synchronization signal and obtaining reception time indicators indicating reception times, in the local times of the other access points, when the synchronization signal was received by the other access points in the group.

The intra-group synchronization procedure comprise obtaining, based on the obtained transmission time indicators and reception time indicators, timing adjustment parameters for counteracting time differences between the local times of the access points in the group.

The method further comprises phase-coherently transmitting a signal to a wireless communication device served by the distributed MIMO system.

The method may comprise performing the intra-group synchronization procedure for each of a plurality of groups of at least three access points. The method may further comprise performing an inter-group synchronization procedure for the plurality of groups.

The inter-group synchronization procedure may comprise transmitting, from a first group, a synchronization signal and obtaining a transmission time indicator indicating a transmission time of that synchronization signal in a local time of the first group. The inter-group synchronization procedure may further comprise receiving, by a second group, the synchronization signal and obtaining a reception time indicator indicating a reception time, in a local time of the second group, when the synchronization signal was received by the second group.

In some embodiments, the inter-group synchronization procedure comprises obtaining, based on the obtained transmission time indicator and reception time indicator, a timing adjustment parameter for counteracting time differences between the local times of the first and the second group.

The method may comprise transmitting, from a plurality of the access points, a signal to a wireless communication device served by the distributed MIMO system. The mutual timing of the transmissions of the signal from the individual access points of the plurality of access points may be controlled based on the above-mentioned timing adjustment parameters.

According to a second aspect, there is provided a distributed MIMO system. The distributed MIMO system comprises a plurality of access points, each comprising a time circuit configured to keep track of a local time of the access point. Furthermore, the distributed MIMO system comprises a control circuit configured to control the MIMO system to perform the method of the first aspect.

According to a third aspect, there is provided a computer program product comprising computer program code for performing the method of the first aspect when said computer program code is executed by a programmable control circuit of the distributed MIMO system.

According to a fourth aspect, there is provided a computer readable medium, such as a non-transitory computer-readable medium, storing a computer program product comprising computer program code for performing the method of the first aspect when said computer program code is executed by a programmable control circuit of the distributed MIMO system.

The term "access point" is used in this disclosure. Sometimes, "antenna" or "antenna element" is used in the field of MIMO transmissions with the same meaning as the term "access point" has in this disclosure.

In a traditional MIMO system, with antenna elements physically confined to a localized antenna array, it is relatively straightforward to control transmissions from the different antenna elements to be coherent in phase. In a distributed MIMO system, such as a distributed massive MIMO system, on the other hand, timing errors between transmissions from different access points to a given wireless communication device can reduce the degree of coherence and, consequently, the obtainable throughput and/or data rate. Due to the physical distance between the different access points, as opposed to the relatively closely spaced antenna elements in an antenna array, the access points typically cannot operate with a common time reference, but will typically each have their own local time reference (or "clock"). Differences between local times in the different access points give rise to the timing errors mentioned above. For example, if a number of access points are to be transmitting a coordinated transmission at time t = <NUM>, but their local time references are slightly unsynchronized, they will start transmitting at slightly different times, which can reduce the degree of coherence in the coordinated transmission. This disclosure relates to methods and apparatuses that can alleviate such problems to enable and/or facilitate coherent transmission among widely spaced access points.

<FIG> is a block diagram of a distributed MIMO system according to an exemplary embodiment. The system comprises a plurality of access points A<NUM>,. , AK that form a cluster <NUM> of access points. The distributed MIMO system further comprises a central unit <NUM>. The central unit <NUM> can provide backhaul and implement functionalities in higher layer protocols (TCP/IP, PDCP, RLC, MAC), and can also perform a large part of the base-band physical layer processing such as channel coding and decoding, modulation, etc. The central unit <NUM> can also coordinate calculations that are performed relatively seldom; such as determining which access points that should serve which users; ensure that the nodes are properly calibrated; assign pilots to users to be used for channel estimation; make handover decisions to other central units in the vicinity; etc..

In the example shown in <FIG>, the distributed MIMO system can serve a number N of wireless communication devices (or "wireless devices" for short) u<NUM>,. Examples of such wireless device include what is generally referred to as a user equipment (UE). The wireless devices u<NUM>,. , uN are depicted in <FIG> as mobile phones, but can be any kind of devices with cellular communication capabilities, such as a tablet or laptop computers, machine-type communication (MTC) devices, or similar.

In such a distributed MIMO system, communication between wireless device uk and the distributed MIMO system may take place as outlined in the following. First, the wireless device uk transmits a pilot signal. Each of the access points A<NUM>-AK that receives the pilot signal can utilize it to estimate a channel between itself and the wireless device uk. Let gk,m denote the estimated channel between the wireless device uk and the access point Am. The access points A<NUM>-AK can then, jointly, send a signal sk to the wireless device uk using so-called conjugate beamforming, where the signal sent from the access point Am is <MAT>, where <MAT> denotes the complex conjugate of gk,m. Conjugate beamforming is, per se, well known to those skilled in the relevant art and not further discussed herein. Notably, the scheme described above can facilitate a relatively large portion of the required signal processing to be performed locally in the access points A<NUM>-AK, since each access point Am can estimate the channel gk,m and derive its conjugate gk,m independently. It should be noted that, in some exemplary embodiments, only a subset of the access points A<NUM>-AK are involved in the joint transmission to the wireless device uk. For instance, in some exemplary embodiments, only the access points for which the SNR (signal-to-noise ratio) or SINR (signal-to-interference-and-noise ratio) between the access point and the wireless device uk exceeds a threshold are involved in said joint transmission. If the estimated channels gk,m exactly corresponds to the actual channel, the combined signal received at the wireless device is s Σm|gk,m|, where the summation is made over the indices m corresponding to the access points Am that are involved in the joint transmission.

In order to avoid degradation of the joint transmissions from the access points A<NUM>-AK, it is desirable the there is a relatively high degree of coherence between the individual transmissions from the different access points A<NUM>-AN. In order to accomplish this, some exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure can include techniques for synchronizing the access points A<NUM>,. , AK, or subsets thereof, in time.

<FIG> illustrates an exemplary arrangement of how access points Ai can be grouped into groups Gj of at least three access points. In <FIG>, the groups Gj are illustrated as disjoint. However, in other exemplary embodiments, one or more access points Ai can belong to more than one group. Furthermore, in <FIG>, each group Gj has exactly three access points Ai. However, in some exemplary embodiments, some or all groups Gj can have more than three access points Ai. In <FIG>, access points A<NUM>-A<NUM> belong to group G<NUM>, access points A<NUM>-A<NUM> belong to group G<NUM>, and access points A<NUM>-A<NUM> belong to group G3.

Due to the physical distribution of the access points over a relatively large area, it may not be feasible to only rely on a central clock (e.g. in the central unit <NUM>) keeping track of a central time of the distributed MIMO system for timing of events, such as transmissions. According to embodiments of the present disclosure, each access point Ai can comprise a time circuit configured to keep track of a local time of the access point Ai. This local time can be used in each access point Ai for timing events, such as transmissions, from the access point.

<FIG> is a block diagram of an access point Ai according to some exemplary embodiments. The exemplary access point comprises the above-mentioned time circuit labeled with the reference number <NUM>. The exemplary access point can also comprise a transmitter (Tx) circuit <NUM> and a receiver (Rx) circuit <NUM>. In <FIG>, the Tx circuit <NUM> and the Rx circuit <NUM> are shown as connected to a common antenna <NUM>. The Tx circuit <NUM> can comprise a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) for converting a signal to be transmitted from a digital to an analog representation. It may also comprise one or more mixers, filters, power amplifiers, etc. to transform the signal to be transmitted to a physical signal suitable to drive the antenna <NUM>. The design of Tx circuits is, per se, well known to persons skilled in the relevant art and not discussed herein in any further detail. The Rx circuit <NUM> can comprise an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) for converting received signal from an analog to a digital representation. It can also comprise one or more mixers, filters, low-noise amplifiers (LNAs), etc. to transform a signal received at the antenna <NUM> to a physical signal suitable to be input to said ADC. The design of Rx circuits is, per se, well known to persons skilled in the relevant art and not discussed herein in any further detail.

In <FIG>, the exemplary access point Ai also comprises a digital signal processing (DSP) circuit <NUM>. The DSP circuit <NUM> can be configured to perform conjugate beamforming processing operations locally in the access point Ai, on signals to be transmitted via the Tx circuit <NUM> and/or on signals received via the Rx circuit <NUM>. It can also be configured to derive channel estimates gk,i of the channels between the access point Ai and wireless devices Uk.

In the following, a mathematical basis for embodiments of the disclosure is presented. Reference is made to the group G<NUM> (<FIG>), but applies to any group Gj. Some exemplary embodiments comprise an intra-group synchronization procedure that synchronizes the access points within one of the groups (such as the access points A<NUM>-A<NUM> within the group G<NUM>, etc.) with each other.

In <FIG>, it is assumed that an absolute, or central, time (or phase) reference is maintained centrally, but the access points A<NUM>-A<NUM> are unsynchronized - they do not have access to this time reference. The central time reference can be maintained by the central unit <NUM>. In addition, in <FIG> it is also assumed that the Tx circuit <NUM> and the Rx circuit <NUM> in each access point Ai are unsynchronized. This means that effectively, the Tx circuit <NUM> and Rx circuit <NUM> of each access point Ai have their own local time references. For instance, the time circuit <NUM> can keep track of separate local times for the Tx circuit <NUM> and the Rx circuit <NUM>. Although the time circuit is described as being configured to keep track of a local time, in some exemplary embodiments the time circuit <NUM> can keep track of more than one local time, e.g. a separate local time for the Tx circuit <NUM> and a separate local time for the Rx circuit <NUM>. Alternatively, the local time can be viewed as a vector quantity, or tuple, having separate scalar components representing a separate local times for the Tx circuit <NUM> and the Rx circuit <NUM>). Alternatively, the time circuit <NUM> can keep track of a common local time for the Tx circuit <NUM> and the Rx circuit <NUM>, but these can nevertheless be unsynchronized due to factors such as signal propagation delays within the Tx circuit <NUM> and Rx circuit <NUM>, and there may thus effectively be different local times for the Tx circuit <NUM> and the Rx circuit <NUM> also in this case.

In any case, the difference in time reference between the Tx circuit <NUM> and Rx circuit <NUM> in a given access point Ai represents a (uplink-downlink) reciprocity calibration error. The difference in, e.g., Tx circuit time reference between any pair of access points represents a synchronization error between these two access point. A priori, all reciprocity and synchronization errors are assumed to be unknown.

In the discussion below, the Tx circuit <NUM> of access point Ai has a clock bias of ti from central time, i.e., its local time is zero at central time ti. The receiver of access point Ai has a clock bias of ri from central time, i.e., its local time is zero at central time ri.

If the access point A<NUM> transmits a known pulse, below referred to also as a synchronization signal, at its local time zero, this pulse will in central time be transmitted at time t<NUM> (per definition). The (Rx circuit <NUM> of the) access point A<NUM> will receive the pulse at time δ<NUM> = t<NUM> - r<NUM> in its local time. Similarly, the (Rx circuit <NUM> of the) access point A<NUM> will receive the pulse at time δ<NUM> = t<NUM> - r<NUM> in its local time.

Furthermore, if the access point A<NUM> transmits the pulse at its local time zero, this pulse will in central time be transmitted at time t<NUM> (again, per definition). The (Rx circuit <NUM> of the) access point A<NUM> will receive the pulse at time δ<NUM> = t<NUM> - r<NUM> in its local time. Similarly, the (Rx circuit <NUM> of the) access point A<NUM> will receive the pulse at time δ<NUM> = t<NUM> - r<NUM> in its local time.

Moreover, if the access point A<NUM> transmits the pulse at its local time zero, this pulse will in central time be transmitted at time t<NUM> (again, per definition). The (Rx circuit <NUM> of the) access point A<NUM> will receive the pulse at time δ<NUM> = t<NUM> - r<NUM> in its local time. Similarly, the (Rx circuit <NUM> of the) access point A<NUM> will receive the pulse at time δ<NUM> = t<NUM> - r<NUM> in its local time.

Thus, by transmitting synchronization signals at known time instants (in local time) from each of the access points A<NUM>-A<NUM>, and listening for these synchronization signals in the other access points A<NUM>-A<NUM>, it is possible to measure the parameters δij = ti - rj. It should be noted that local time zero was used above for transmission merely as an example. If access point Ai instead transmits the pulse at local time τi, the (Rx circuit <NUM> of the) access point Aj will receive the pulse at time δij + τi (in its local time), and δij can be obtained by simply subtracting τi from this value.

The following exemplary linear equation system can be used to describe the relationship between the different δij, and the different ti and ri <MAT>.

This system has six measurements (i.e., δij) and six unknown variables (i.e., ti and ri). It is straightforward to show that the matrix is singular such that not all of the variables t<NUM>, r<NUM>, t<NUM>, r<NUM>, t<NUM>, r<NUM> can be obtained from this system. However, the reciprocity errors (ti - ri) and synchronization errors (ti - tj, i ≠ j) can be recovered as: <MAT> <MAT> <MAT> <MAT> <MAT> <MAT>.

Alternative methods can be used to recover the reciprocity and synchronization errors from the measurements. For example, a least-squares solution, or similar, can instead be used. Such a solution can be more effective in the presence of a relatively high degree of measurement noise.

For a group with N nodes, there will be N(N - <NUM>) measurements and 2N unknown variables. If N ≥ <NUM>, the matrix in the linear system of equations has rank 2N - <NUM>, which is always one smaller than what is needed to obtain all the variables. In contrast, for N = <NUM>, there are <NUM> unknown parameters, but the matrix rank is <NUM> since there is only two measurements. Hence, one cannot resolve all the parameters, but for N ≥ <NUM> one can obtain all variables except one.

More precisely, from the measurements one can obtain all variables up to a common bias term. t<NUM>, t<NUM>, t<NUM> can be written in terms of the bias of access point A<NUM> (denoted b for future use): <MAT> <MAT> <MAT>.

Similar arguments are possible for groups of <NUM>, <NUM>,. access points.

In line with the mathematical description above, some exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure comprise a method of operating the distributed MIMO system. The method comprises performing an intra-group synchronization procedure for the group G<NUM>. The intra-group synchronization method and/or procedure, which is illustrated in <FIG> with a flow chart, comprises, for each access point Ai in the group Gi:.

The transmissions steps T<NUM>, T<NUM>, and T<NUM> can be carried out in any order. For instance, step T<NUM> can be carried out first, then step T<NUM>, then step T<NUM>. However, any other order can be used as well.

In line with the mathematical description above, the transmission time indicators and reception time indicators can include sufficient information to enable determination of the reciprocity errors and the synchronization errors. Hence, the transmission time indicators and the reception time indicators can be used as a basis for obtaining timing adjustment parameters for counteracting time differences between the local times of the access points Ai-A<NUM> in the group G<NUM>. The timing adjustment parameters can be numbers indicating said time differences, expressed in a suitable unit. Counteracting the time differences can be done in several different ways. One exemplary technique is to adjust the local times within the access points A<NUM>-A<NUM> such that these are essentially the same. Another exemplary technique is to leave the local times as they are, but adjust the transmission times (in local times) of data transmissions from the access points A<NUM>-A<NUM> such that these transmissions are coherent. Regardless of how the time differences are counteracted, the access points A<NUM>-A<NUM> in the group G<NUM> can be considered to have a common local time after the intra-group synchronization procedure. Below, this is referred to as the local time of G<NUM>. The local time of G<NUM> can be the local time that is kept track of by the time circuit <NUM> in one of the access points A<NUM>-A<NUM>. The bias of the local time of G<NUM> is referred to as b<NUM> below. That is, the local time of G<NUM> is zero at central time b<NUM>.

According to some exemplary embodiments, the method of operating the distributed MIMO system comprises performing the intra-group synchronization procedure for each of a plurality of groups (such as G<NUM>, G<NUM>, G<NUM>) of at least three access points (such as A<NUM>-A<NUM>, A<NUM>-A<NUM>, A<NUM>-A<NUM>).

Generalizing on the above discussion regarding a common local time of Gi, the access points Ai in the group Gj can be considered to have a common local time after the intra-group synchronization procedure. Below, this is referred to as the local time of Gj. The local time of G<NUM> can be the local time that is kept track of by the time circuit <NUM> in one of the access points Ai in the group Gj. The bias of the local time of Gj is referred to as &, below. That is, the local time of Gj is zero at central time bj.

<FIG> shows a flowchart for an exemplary embodiment a synchronization procedure <NUM>, which can be included in embodiments of the method and/or procedure of operating the distributed MIMO system. Operation of the synchronization procedure is started in step <NUM>. In step <NUM>, an intra-group synchronization procedure, e.g. as described above, is performed for one or more groups Gj. As illustrated in <FIG>, some exemplary embodiments of the synchronization procedure can comprise performing an inter-group synchronization procedure in step <NUM>, i.e., synchronizing the access points of two or more different groups.

Operation of the synchronization procedure is ended in step <NUM>.

<FIG> is a flowchart of a method and/or procedure of operating the distributed MIMO system according to an exemplary embodiment. It includes the synchronization procedure <NUM> described above. As indicated in <FIG>, the exemplary method and/or procedure can also comprise step <NUM> of transmitting, from a plurality of the access points Ai, a signal to a wireless communication device uk (or to multiple such communication devices) served by the distributed MIMO system. The mutual timing of the transmissions of the signal from the individual access points Ai of the plurality of access points can be controlled based on timing adjustment parameters obtained in the synchronization procedure <NUM>. Thereby, coherent transmission from the different access points Ai is facilitated.

Exemplary embodiments of the inter-group synchronization step <NUM> are discussed below in some more detail. Consider first inter-group synchronization between group G<NUM> and group G<NUM>. In this context, it is assumed that both group G<NUM> and group G<NUM> have been subject to intra-group synchronization. Thus, the reciprocity errors and synchronization errors within each of the groups are considered to be zero. As above, it is considered that the access points A<NUM>-A<NUM> share a common local time, which is the local time of G<NUM>. Similarly, it is considered that the access points A<NUM>-A<NUM> share a common local time, which is the local time of G<NUM>.

If the group G<NUM> transmits a known pulse, below referred to also as a synchronization signal, at its local time zero, this pulse will in central time be transmitted at time b<NUM> (per definition). The transmission from the group G<NUM> can be a transmission from any one of the access points A<NUM>-A<NUM>, or a coherent transmission from any combination of the access points A<NUM>-A<NUM>. The group G<NUM> will receive the pulse at time d<NUM> = b<NUM> - b<NUM> in its local time. The reception by the group G<NUM> can be a reception by any one of the access points A<NUM>-A<NUM>, or a coherent reception by any combination of the access points A<NUM>-A<NUM>. It should be noted that d<NUM> represents the synchronization error between group G<NUM> and group G<NUM>. Transmission time zero was selected for illustration. If the pulse is transmitted at a given time τG1 in the local time of G1, it will instead be received at time d<NUM> + τG1 in the local time of G<NUM>. The synchronization error d<NUM> can then readily be derived by subtracting τG1 from this reception time.

<FIG> illustrates a flow chart for some exemplary embodiments of the inter-group synchronization procedure between the group G<NUM> and the group G<NUM>. The same flowchart can be generalized to a inter-group synchronization procedure between two arbitrary groups Gi and Gj by simply replacing the index <NUM> with i and the index <NUM> with j. The inter-group synchronization procedure illustrated in <FIG> comprises.

The transmission time indicator obtained in step OG<NUM> and the reception time indicator obtained in step OG<NUM> can be used as a basis for obtaining a timing adjustment parameter for counteracting time differences between the local times of the group G<NUM> and the group G<NUM>. The timing adjustment parameter can be a number indicating said time difference, expressed in a suitable unit. It may, for instance, be the synchronization error d<NUM> mentioned above. This timing adjustment parameter can be used in step <NUM>, in combination with the timing adjustment parameters from the intra-group synchronization in step <NUM>, to control the mutual timing of the transmissions from the individual access points to facilitate coherent transmissions.

The inter-group synchronization procedure can be extended to N ≥ <NUM> groups G<NUM>-GN in several different ways. According to an exemplary embodiment, group G<NUM> is first synchronized with group G<NUM> as above. Then, group G<NUM> can be synchronized with group G<NUM> in the same way. After that, group G<NUM> can be synchronized with group G<NUM> in the same way, etc. According to another exemplary embodiment, each of a plurality of groups Gj, j = <NUM>,. , N, can receive, in a step R<NUM>j the synchronization signal transmitted from group G<NUM> in step TG<NUM> and can obtain, in a step OG<NUM>j, a reception time indicator indicating a reception time, in the local time of that group Gj, when the synchronization signal was received by that group Gj. An example of this is illustrated in <FIG> for N = <NUM>, where it is indicated that the flowchart may also include steps RG<NUM> and OG<NUM>. In this way, all the groups Gj, j = <NUM>,. , N, can be synchronized with the group G<NUM>, and thus also with each other.

In the above description, a simplification has been made, which is that a synchronization signal sent from one access point is received by the other access points at the same time as it is transmitted. In practice, the synchronization signal propagates with a finite speed (the speed of light) from the transmitting access point to the receiving access points. Hence, there is a nonzero propagation delay in the air for the synchronization signal. In theory, it would be possible to compensate for these propagation delays when performing the synchronization, provided that the propagation delays, or equivalently the propagation distances, between the access points were known. However, contrary to a conventional MIMO system, where the antenna elements are arranged in a neat array with well-defined distances between the antenna elements, such knowledge cannot generally be assumed to be available. Thus, in some exemplary embodiments, where the propagation delays are unknown, there can be some small residual synchronization errors caused by these unknown propagation delays. However, it should be noted that these synchronization errors can be so small that they do not, in practice, negatively influence the possibility to obtain phase-coherent transmissions. Such small synchronization errors can result in phase shifts in the estimated channels gk,m (compared with the estimated channels that would have been obtained with a perfectly synchronized distributed MIMO system). The application of conjugate beamforming, based on these estimated channels gk,m, automatically compensates for the small synchronization errors and results in overall phase-coherent transmissions from the distributed MIMO system to the wireless communication devices u<NUM>,.

According to some exemplary embodiments, the distributed MIMO system can comprise a control circuit configured to control the MIMO system to perform the method disclosed herein. The control circuit can be or be comprised in the central unit <NUM>. Alternatively, the control circuit can be distributed within the distributed MIMO system, e.g. partly residing within the central unit <NUM> and partly within the access points A<NUM>-AK, such as within the DSP circuits <NUM> within one or more of the access points A<NUM>-APK. Below, reference is made to the control circuit with reference number <NUM>.

In some exemplary embodiments, the control circuit <NUM> can be implemented as a dedicated application-specific hardware unit. Alternatively, said control circuit <NUM>, or parts thereof, can be implemented with programmable and/or configurable hardware units, such as but not limited to one or more field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), processors, or microcontrollers. Thus, the control circuit <NUM> can be a programmable control circuit <NUM>. Hence, embodiments of the present disclosure can be embedded in a computer program product, which enables implementation of the method and functions described herein. Therefore, according to embodiments of the present disclosure, there is provided a computer program product comprising computer program code that configures the control circuit <NUM> to perform any of the functions or method embodiments herein when said computer program code is executed by the programmable control circuit <NUM>. When the program code is executed by the control circuit <NUM>, the control circuit <NUM> can perform the method steps or functions directly, the control circuit <NUM> can cause other circuits or units to perform the method steps or functions, or a combination thereof. The computer program product can be stored on a computer-readable medium, such as a non-transitory computer-readable medium <NUM>, as illustrated in <FIG>, from which the program code can be loaded and executed by said programmable control circuit <NUM>.

The disclosure above refers to specific embodiments. However, other exemplary embodiments than the above described are possible within the scope of the disclosure. Different method steps than those described above, performing the method by hardware or software, can be provided within the scope of the disclosure.

Claim 1:
A method of operating a distributed MIMO system, wherein the distributed MIMO system is configured to serve one or more wireless communication devices (u<NUM>, ..., uN) and comprises:
a plurality of access points (A<NUM>, ..., AK), each comprising a time circuit (<NUM>) configured to keep track of a local time of the access point (A<NUM>, ..., AK);
and wherein the method comprises performing (<NUM>) an intra-group synchronization procedure for a group (G<NUM>) of at least three access points (A<NUM>-A<NUM>), which do not have access to a central time reference, said intra-group synchronization procedure comprising:
for each access point (Ai) in the group (Gi):
transmitting (T;), from that access point (Ai), a synchronization signal;
obtaining (Oi) a transmission time indicator indicating a transmission time of that synchronization signal in the local time of that access point (Ai);
receiving (Rim, Rin), by each of the other access points (Am, An) in the group, the synchronization signal; and
obtaining (Oim, Oin) reception time indicators indicating reception times, in the local times of the other access points (Am, An), when the synchronization signal was received by the other access points (Am, An) in the group;
and
obtaining, based on the obtained transmission time indicators and reception time indicators, timing adjustment parameters for counteracting time differences between the local times of the access points (A<NUM>-A<NUM>) in the group (Gi);
wherein the method further comprises phase-coherently transmitting (<NUM>) a signal to a wireless communication device (uk) served by the distributed MIMO system.