Patent Description:
Aspects of the present disclosure relate to improved methods and systems for controlling a power delivery system, and particularly for controlling a plasma power delivery system. <CIT> is a document that describes a power delivery system configured to monitor characteristics of a generator, a match network, and a plasma load, via one or more sensors, and control these components via a local controller in order to improve power delivery accuracy and consistency to the plasma load. <CIT> discloses an RF power generator whose frequency is fine-tuned by an inter-pulse controller, whereby a system is obtained with similar performance to a true intra-pulse control system, but which is implemented using a lower speed and stable controller.

Plasma processing systems are used to deposit thin films on a substrate using processes such as chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and physical vapor deposition (PVD) as well to remove films from the substrate using etch processes. The plasma is often created by coupling radio frequency (RF) or direct current (DC) generators to a plasma chamber filled with gases injected into the plasma chamber at low pressure. Typically, a generator delivers RF power to an antenna in the plasma chamber, and power delivered at the antenna ignites and sustains a plasma. In some instances, the RF generator is coupled to an impedance matching network that may match the plasma impedance to a desired impedance, typically <NUM>Ω, at the generator output. DC power is typically coupled to chamber via one or more electrodes. The generator alone or the generator in combination with other pieces of equipment, such as the impedance matching network, other generators coupled to the same plasma, cables, etc., constitute a plasma power delivery system.

Modulation of the power delivered to the plasma system is often required. Most modulation schemes are repetitive, i.e., the same modulation waveform is repeated at a waveform repetition rate. The associated waveform repetition period is equal to one divided by the waveform repetition rate. The ability to follow a prescribed modulation waveform using a traditional control scheme requires high bandwidth from the controller and ultimately from the measurement system. Many plasma systems have power applied to the plasma at different frequencies. The nonlinear nature of the plasma load creates intermodulation products that can interfere with a generator's measurements system. Thus, it is sometimes advantageous to use a narrowband measurement system to limit such interference. In many applications, power delivered to the plasma load is not the only parameter that is being controlled. For example, in RF power delivery systems, the impedance presented to the generator by the plasma load can be controlled, either through controlling the frequency of the generator output or through controlling a variable impedance match network between the generator and the plasma load. In some cases, generator source impedance may also be controlled. Tracking and controlling power in light of these various issues presents ever greater control challenges.

It is with these observations in mind, among others, that aspects of the present disclosure were conceived.

According to one embodiment, a generator produces output, such as delivered power, voltage, current, forward power etc. that follows a prescribed pattern of output versus time where the pattern repeats with a repetition period, by controlling sections of the pattern based on measurements taken one or more repetition periods in the past. In one example, a power delivery system involves a generator that produces a repeating output pattern and a control element controls the repeating pattern based on a measurement of a value of the repeating pattern taken a period prior to a current period. The control element may further control the repeating output pattern based on the measurement of the repeating pattern taken a period prior to the current period combined with a measurement of a value of the repeating pattern during a current period. The repeating output pattern may follow a prescribed pattern of output versus time wherein the prescribed pattern repeats with a repetition period, and wherein the measurement of the value of the repeating pattern taken a period prior to the current period occurs one or more repetition periods in the past.

According to yet another example not covered by the claims, a variable impedance match network controls the impedance presented to a RF generator while the generator produces output, such as delivered power, voltage, current, forward power, etc., that follows a prescribed pattern of output versus time where the pattern repeats with a repetition period by controlling variable impedance elements in the match network during sections of the pattern based on measurements taken one or more repetition periods in the past. The generator may provide the delivered power, voltage, current, forward power, etc., to a plasma system in order to ignite and sustain a plasma, in various possible embodiments.

According to yet another embodiment, a generator produces output that follows a prescribed pattern of output versus time where the pattern repeats with a repetition period by controlling sections of the pattern based on measurements taken one or more repetition periods in the past; and combining this controller with an intra-period controller that calculates the control output based on measurements taken less than a repetition period in the past.

According to yet another example not covered by the claims, a variable impedance match network controls the impedance presented to a RF generator while the generator produces output, such as delivered power, voltage, current, forward power, etc., that follows a prescribed pattern of output versus time where the pattern repeats with a repetition period by controlling variable impedance elements in the match network during sections of the pattern based on measurements taken one or more repetition periods in the past; and combining this controller with an intra-period controller that calculates the control of the variable impedance elements in the match network based on measurements taken less than a repetition period in the past.

According to another embodiment, a generator produces output that follows a prescribed pattern of output versus time where the pattern repeats with a repetition period by controlling sections of the pattern based on measurements taken one or more repetition periods in the past while at the same time adjusting another parameter such as generator output frequency or variable impedance elements contained in the generator or in a variable impedance matching network coupled between the generator and the plasma based on measurements taken one or more repetition periods in the past where the correlation between the control inputs such as power control and generator frequency and control outputs such as delivered power and impedance presented to the generator is determined and used by the control system.

According to yet another embodiment, a generator produces output that follows a prescribed pattern of output versus time where the pattern repeats with a repetition period by controlling a section of the pattern based on measurements taken for the same section one or more repetition periods in the past; as well as such measurements for other sections in the pattern by perturbing the control input, determining the response to the perturbation, and using the response to the perturbation to compensate for coupling between adjacent or closely located time periods in the waveform.

The various features and advantages of the technology of the present disclosure will be apparent from the following description of particular embodiments of those technologies, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings. It should be noted that the drawings are not necessarily to scale; however the emphasis instead is being placed on illustrating the principles of the technological concepts. Also, in the drawings the like reference characters may refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings depict only typical embodiments of the present disclosure and, therefore, are not to be considered limiting in scope.

Embodiments of the present disclosure provide a plasma power delivery system that produces an output, such as delivered power, voltage, current, and forward power, that follows a prescribed pattern of output versus time where the pattern repeats with a repetition period by controlling sections of the pattern based on measurements taken one or more repetition periods in the past as opposed to within the current period. Compared to a conventional controller, such an inter-period controller can reproduce output more accurately utilizing a lower bandwidth measurement and control system. The benefits provided by the inter-period controller can be advantageous in various contexts including in the presence of plasma generated mixing and intermodulation products. In additional embodiments, the inter-period controller can be combined with a conventional intra-period controller. In additional embodiments, parameters, such as generator output frequency, may be adjusted together with the main output based on measurements taken one or more repetition periods in the past where the correlation between the control inputs, such as power control and generator frequency, and control outputs, such as delivered power and impedance presented to the generator are determined and used by the control system. In additional embodiments, a generator produces output that follows a prescribed pattern of output versus time where the pattern repeats with a repetition period by controlling a section of the pattern based on measurements taken for the same section one or more repetition periods in the past; as well as such measurements for other sections in the pattern by perturbing the control input, determining the response to the perturbation, and using the response to the perturbation to compensate for coupling between adjacent or closely located time periods in the waveform.

While primarily described with reference to a controller for a generator, aspects of the present disclosure are applicable to switch mode power supplies, and controllers for the same, which may be used in eV source applications such as to provide a bias to a substrate as part of an overall power delivery system, as well as other substrate biasing schemes. The controller and control schemes discussed herein may also be used to control variable impedance elements (such as vacuum variable capacitors or switched variable reactance elements) of impedance matching networks. In such instances, aspects of the present disclosure may or may not also be used in the controlling of an RF supply to the impedance matching network as part of the overall power delivery system. The controller may reside in any part of the power delivery system (e.g., in the generator or in the matching network) and may or may not receive information from and control other parts of the power delivery system. For example, a controller residing in the generator may control both a generator and a match that are part of the power delivery system with information obtained only from the generator, only from the match or from both the generator and the match. The controller and control schemes discussed herein may also be used in other systems with or without delivering power in a plasma power delivery environment.

<FIG> (prior art) illustrates a simple analog intra-period, and <FIG> (prior art) illustrates a simple digital intra-period control systems that may be used to control a plasma power delivery system. In <FIG> the difference between an input <NUM> and output <NUM> produces an error signal <NUM> that a controller <NUM> uses to produce a control input <NUM> to a plant <NUM>. In this illustration, the controller is a simple integrator with a gain of k. In an actual implementation, the control input <NUM>, c, may be a drive level to a power amplifier, and the plant <NUM>, P, a power amplifier. To illustrate the performance differences between this controller and the disclosed inter-period controller, the plant <NUM>, P, is a unity gain block, i.e. y = c. With these assumptions, the loop gain has unity gain at k rad/s or k/(2π) Hz, the time constant of the system step response is <NUM>/k s and the integral of the impulse response of the system reaches <NUM>% (<NUM> - <NUM>/e) in <NUM>/k s. In <FIG>, an input <NUM> is sampled at a sampling rate of <NUM>/Ts and digitized by a sampler <NUM>. (In some applications the input is already a digital data stream and the sampler <NUM> is not present in the system. ) The output <NUM> is sampled and digitized by a sampler <NUM> and the difference between the input and output produces an error signal <NUM> that a controller <NUM> uses to produce a control input <NUM> which is converted to an analog control signal by a digital to analog converter <NUM> which is fed to a plant <NUM>. As for <FIG>, to illustrate the performance differences between this controller and the disclosed inter-period controller, the plant <NUM>, P, is a unity gain block. The same statements regarding relationship between k and the unity gain frequency and response times hold as for the analog controller of <FIG> provided that k is much less than 2π/Ts.

<FIG> (prior art) shows the response <NUM> of the simple intra-period controller such as shown in <FIG> to a periodic input with period Tp, <NUM>. In this example a host of different set points (e.g., a set point power of <NUM>, followed by <NUM>, followed by <NUM>, with a ramp to <NUM>) defines one period of the input. The output, <NUM>, follows the input, <NUM> with visible inaccuracy (where the output does not match the input set point). The time constant of the closed loop response for this illustration is <NUM>. The output at a given point, A, <NUM>, can be obtained by multiplying the time shifted time reversed impulse response of the system with the input and integrating. The normalized time shifted time reversed impulse response of the unit, <NUM>, shows that the output at point A, <NUM>, is heavily influenced by the very recent past (within one time constant or <NUM> prior to point A), and almost not at all by events occurring earlier than <NUM> time constants prior to point A. To accommodate the changing set points within a pulse, the conventional controller must be very fast. As shown in <FIG> (prior art), speeding up the controller improves the ability of the output to follow the input accurately. The time constant of the closed loop response for this illustration is <NUM>. The response, <NUM>, shows that the output, <NUM>, follows the input, <NUM>, more closely. The normalized time shifted time reversed impulse response <NUM> shows that the point A, <NUM>, is now even more heavily influenced by the input in the very recent past.

In these conventional intra-period controllers, the error control is based on the measured value of the current output (within the period) against the set point. So, referring to <FIG>, for example, the measured value of the output at time <NUM> would be compared against the set point value at that same time to generate the error signal. Stated differently, the set point values are compared against the measured values during the current period to generate the error signal for the conventional intra-period controller. In contrast, an inter-period controller compares the measured value of the output one or more cycles in the past for a given set point and uses the past measured value at the set point to generate the current error signal and controller output. Referring again to <FIG>, for example, at time <NUM> with a set point of <NUM>, the measured value at time <NUM> (which is one waveform repetition period of <NUM> earlier or that part of the preceding pulse that correlates with time <NUM>) with the same set point of <NUM> would be used by the controller to generate the error and output, as opposed to the measured value within the pulse at time <NUM>. Notably, the inter-period controller need not be nearly as fast because it relies on a measured value one cycle in the past as opposed to an immediately proximate value within the pulse.

In some examples, the pulse (e.g., the pulse over period Tp) is divided into multiple time periods, and the corresponding (same) output value in the same time period of the previous pulse is used for the error signal. Referring again to the example immediately above referring to using the measured value at time <NUM> of the first pulse for the error correction at time <NUM> of the following second pulse, the time period would encompass the specific value of <NUM> within some range. In one example, the time periods by which pulses are divided are such that any given time period does not encompass different set points, with the exception of sloped set point transitions.

In various implementations, the inter-period pulse information is stored in some form of memory such that it can be accessed and used by the controller for the error feedback of the succeeding pulse. Complicated pulses, such as with sloped set point transitions, and otherwise different set points may benefit from relatively smaller time period subdivisions of the pulse, and therefore may require relatively larger and faster memory. In specific examples, pulses with between a <NUM> and <NUM> period Tp may be subdivided into <NUM> time slices, and output values for each slice stored for comparison to the measured values in the same time slice of the subsequent pulse.

In some applications no error signal is generated. In impedance matching applications using an inter-period control scheme information about an impedance presented to a generator one or multiple periods, Tp, <NUM>, in the past can be used to adjust variable impedance elements within the matching network at the present time. The information can be used to calculate adjustments to the variable impedance matching elements without first generating an error signal. In impedance matching applications the setpoint (e.g. <NUM>, <NUM>, <NUM>, <NUM>, <NUM>) is generally constant, but there is a periodic disturbance of the load impedance that must be matched to a desired input impedance. Such a periodic disturbance can for example arise from delivering power to a plasma load that follows a prescribed pattern of output versus time where the pattern repeats with a repetition period. In such a case a synchronization signal from for example the power source providing the prescribed pattern of power can be provided to the matching network to assist the matching network in synchronizing with the repetitive waveform of the disturbance.

<FIG> illustrates a block diagram of one example of an inter-period controller <NUM> that may be implemented in a plasma power delivery system according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. <FIG> illustrates a block diagram of an alternate example implementation of an inter-period controller <NUM> that may be implemented in a plasma power delivery system according to another embodiment of the present disclosure. Some implementations of the inter-period controllers described herein may be considered multi-input-multi-output (MIMO) controllers. The controllers or more generally control elements may be implemented in hardware and software, with various possibly combinations of the same. The control element may be integrated with the generator or other device, or may be a separate component. In some applications the inter-period controller may reside in a different piece of equipment from what is being controlled. As an example, a controller connected to an impedance matching network may reside in the generator but control variable impedance elements in the impedance matching network. In such an application forward and reflected signals from a coupler may be obtained from a coupler residing in the generator, filtered in analog, digitized in an analog to digital converter, and processed to extract the impedance presented to the generator by the match network by a microprocessor running a software program or by digital logic circuits implemented in, for example, an FPGA. The measurements can be stored in memory by a microprocessor or reconfigurable digital circuits residing in an FPGA. The memory containing samples of impedance measurements at different times can be processed using software running in a microprocessor or by an FPGA. The software or FPGA can use samples one or multiple waveform repetition periods in the past to implement an inter-period control scheme. To implement such a scheme information about past values of variable impedance elements in the match can also be used. The controller can then send control signals to the match to change variable impedance elements in the match. <FIG> implements the inter-period controller (providing an interleaved scheme) as a number, N, of controllers each running at the repetition period, Tp, of the input. The block <NUM> shows the first such controller and the block <NUM> shows the N-th such controller. The input, <NUM>, is sampled and digitized by an analog to digital converter, <NUM>, at a sampling rate of <NUM>/Ts. (The input may already exist as a data stream in which case the converter <NUM> is not used. ) The sampled input is switched or routed to the controllers in turn by a switch, <NUM> so that each controller receives an updated input at a rate of <NUM>/Tp. The outputs of the controllers are routed to a common control input, c, by a switch <NUM>. The control input is converted to analog by a digital to analog converter <NUM> and applied to the control input of a plant, P, <NUM>. The output, y, <NUM>, is sampled by each controller at a rate of <NUM>/Tp by a sampler (<NUM> for controller <NUM>).

Each controller creates an error function (<NUM> for controller <NUM>) by subtracting the input from the sampled output. (Since the sampled output is delayed by a waveform period, Tp, this implements an inter-period controller. ) The error function is integrated (by <NUM> for controller <NUM>) producing an output (<NUM> for controller <NUM>). The number of controllers, N, and the sampling period Ts is adjusted so that NTs = Tp. To cater for situations where the repetition period of the input, Tp, may vary a few sampling periods, extra controllers may be utilized. For example, there may be N+<NUM> controllers to deal with a Tp that can vary three sampling periods. When an extra control section is not updated due to a shorter than maximum Tp, the state of the last updated controller can be copied to the extra control section.

<FIG> shows an alternate implementation of an inter-period controller <NUM> in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. The input <NUM> is sampled and digitized by an analog to digital converter, <NUM>, at a sampling rate of <NUM>/Ts. (The input may already exist as a data stream in which case the converter <NUM> is not used. ) The output <NUM> is sampled and digitized by an analog to digital converter <NUM>. (The output may be a digital data stream derived from a measurement of the output in which case the analog to digital converter may not be implemented as shown. ) An error function <NUM> is obtained by subtracting the input from the output. The controller <NUM> generates the control input to the plant, c, <NUM>, from the values of the control input to the plant, c, <NUM>, and the error function, e, <NUM>, one period of the input, Tp ago. This is significantly different from a conventional intra-period controller as will be shown infra. The control input to the plant is converted to an analog signal by a digital to analog converter, <NUM>, and applied to a plant, <NUM>. As for the controller <NUM>, provision can be made to deal with situations where the repetition period of the input, Tp, may vary a few sampling periods. In this case, N is allowed to vary based on the number of sampling periods Ts that fit in the previous period of the input Tp.

<FIG> show the response of an inter-period controller that may be implemented in a plasma power delivery system according to one embodiment of the present disclosure to a periodic control input. In <FIG> the response <NUM> of the output <NUM> to a periodic input <NUM> is shown. As shown in the response <NUM>, the output slowly converges to the input (<FIG>), but after about <NUM> cycles of the input (<FIG>) the output <NUM> follows the input <NUM> with almost imperceptible error. <FIG> shows that a point A, <NUM>, on the response <NUM> and the points that influence point A. Note that for the inter-period controller point A, <NUM>, is still significantly influenced by the input <NUM> in the past. Thus, even though each section of the output approaches the input with a time constant on the order of <NUM>, after a few periods of the input, the output can follow the input with almost imperceptible error. For the conventional intra-period controller, even with a <NUM> time constant, the output does not follow the input with this precision.

<FIG> illustrates a block diagram of an example combined inter-period and intra-period controller <NUM> that may be implemented in a plasma power delivery system according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. The input, <NUM>, is sampled and digitized by an analog to digital converter, <NUM>, at a sampling rate of <NUM>/Ts. (The input may already exist as a data stream in which case the converter <NUM> is not used. ) The output <NUM> is sampled and digitized by an analog to digital converter <NUM>. (The output may be a digital data stream derived from a measurement of the output in which case the analog to digital converter may not be implemented as shown. ) An error function <NUM> is obtained by subtracting the input from the output. The controller <NUM> generates the control input to the plant, c, <NUM>, from the values of the control input to the plant, c, <NUM>, and the error function, e, <NUM>, one period of the input, Tp, ago and one sampling period, Ts, ago. N and Ts are chosen to satisfy Tp=NTs. The control input, c, <NUM>, is a weighted average of a value based on values one sampling period, Ts, ago and one period of the input, Tp, ago. This weighting is perhaps more clearly illustrated in the sequence (sampled time) domain shown in equation <NUM>. In <NUM> and <NUM>, We is a real number between <NUM> and <NUM> and Wa = <NUM> - We. If We = <NUM>, the controller is a pure inter-period controller and if We=<NUM> the controller is a conventional intra-period controller. The control input to the plant, c, <NUM>, is converted to an analog signal by a digital to analog converter, <NUM>, and applied to a plant, <NUM>.

Provision can be made to deal with situations where the repetition period of the input, Tp, may vary a few sampling periods. In this case, N is allowed to vary based on the number of sampling periods, Ts, that fit in the previous period of the input, Tp. In this case, if a section towards the end of the repetition was not recently updated, rather than copying the state from a prior sample, the weighting can be changed to run a pure intra-period controller (We = <NUM>) until the start of the next period of the input. This example combined inter-period and intra-period controller <NUM> has the additional advantage that it can easily transition from operating with a periodic input to operating with a non-repetitive input, <NUM>.

<FIG> illustrate properties of an example inter-period controller such as <NUM>, <NUM> or <NUM> (with We=<NUM>) that may be implemented in a plasma power delivery system according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. For ease of illustration, in <FIG> the plant, P, <NUM>, <NUM> or <NUM> is a simple unity gain block, the sample period Ts = <NUM>, the repetition period Tp = <NUM>, and hence N = Tp/Ts = <NUM>, and k (ke in <NUM>) = <NUM>. The Bode plot of the loop gain of an inter-period controller is shown in <FIG>. The loop gain is very different from a traditional intra-period controller. There is a first gain cross over frequency at <NUM> as may be expected for a gain, k (ke in <NUM>) = <NUM> = 2π10, but the magnitude of the gain returns to infinity at the harmonics of the input (multiples of <NUM>/Tp); a unique property of the inter-period controller that allows it to follow a periodic input with unprecedented precision. <FIG> shows a Nyquist plot of the loop gain. To facilitate interpretation of the Nyquist plot, the magnitude of the loop gain is scaled by log<NUM>(<NUM> + log<NUM>(<NUM> + •)). This mapping maps <NUM> to <NUM>, <NUM> to <NUM> and is monotonically increasing so we can still verify that the point -<NUM> + j0 in the complex plane is not encircled. Despite the multiple gain crossings in the Bode plot, the Nyquist plot shows that the system is stable. <FIG> shows the magnitude and phase of the closed loop response of the system. <FIG> shows the magnitude and phase of the closed loop response of the system only at the harmonics of the input and +/-<NUM> from the harmonics of the input. <FIG> shows that the gain at the harmonics is unity gain confirming that a periodic input with period Tp will be followed with precision. In <FIG> the points that have exactly <NUM> dB gain and <NUM> phase (unity gain) are exactly at the harmonics of the input, points having a gain of -<NUM> dB and phase of +/-<NUM> degrees are <NUM> above and below the harmonic of the input.

<FIG> illustrate properties of an example combined inter-period controller and intra-period controller <NUM> with We=<NUM> that may be implemented in a plasma power delivery system according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. For ease of illustration, in <FIG> the plant, P, <NUM> is a simple unity gain block, the sample period Ts = <NUM>, the repetition period Tp = <NUM>, and hence N = Tp/Ts = <NUM>, ke = <NUM>, and ka = <NUM>. The Bode plot of the loop gain of the combined inter-period and intra-period controller is shown in <FIG>. The loop gain is very different from a traditional intra-period controller. There is a first gain cross over frequency at <NUM>, which is between the cross over frequency for We=<NUM> of <NUM>, and the cross over for We=<NUM> of <NUM>. The magnitude of the gain returns to high but finite values at the harmonics of the input (multiples of <NUM>/Tp); a unique property of the combined inter-period and intra-period controller. <FIG> shows a Nyquist plot of the loop gain. To facilitate interpretation of the Nyquist plot, the magnitude of the loop gain is scaled by log<NUM>(<NUM> + log<NUM>(<NUM> + •)). This mapping maps <NUM> to <NUM>, <NUM> to <NUM> and is monotonic increasing so we can still verify that the point -<NUM> + j0 in the complex plane is not encircled. Despite the multiple gain crossings in the Bode plot, the Nyquist plot shows that the system is stable. <FIG> shows the magnitude and phase of the closed loop response of the system. <FIG> shows the magnitude and phase of the closed loop response of the system only at the harmonics of the input and +/-<NUM> from the harmonics of the input. <FIG> shows that the gain at the first few harmonics of the input is close to unity gain showing that the first few harmonic components of the input will be followed with good precision.

<FIG> illustrate properties of an example combined inter-period controller and intra-period controller <NUM> with We=<NUM> that may be implemented in a plasma power delivery system according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. In <FIG> the plant, P, <NUM> is a simple unity gain block, the sample period Ts = <NUM>, the repetition period Tp = <NUM>, and hence N = Tp/Ts = <NUM>, ke = <NUM>, and ka = <NUM>. The Bode plot of the loop gain of the combined inter-period and intra-period controller is shown in <FIG>. The loop gain approaches that of a traditional intra-period controller. There is a first gain cross over frequency at <NUM>, which is between the cross over frequency for We=<NUM> of <NUM>, and the cross over for We=<NUM> of <NUM>. The magnitude of the gain returns to values higher than unity two more times as the frequency increases. <FIG> shows a Nyquist plot of the loop gain. To facilitate interpretation of the Nyquist plot, the magnitude of the loop gain is scaled by log<NUM>(<NUM> + log<NUM>(<NUM> + •)). This mapping maps <NUM> to <NUM>, <NUM> to <NUM> and is monotonic increasing so we can still verify that the point -<NUM> + j0 in the complex plane is not encircled. Despite the multiple gain crossings in the Bode plot, the Nyquist plot shows that the system is stable. <FIG> shows the magnitude and phase of the closed loop response of the system. <FIG> shows the magnitude and phase of the closed loop response of the system only at the harmonics of the input and +/-<NUM> from the harmonics of the input. <FIG> shows that the gain at the first few harmonics of the input is close to unity gain showing that the first few harmonic components of the input will be followed with good precision. This controller approaches the performance of an intra-period controller with a gain cross over frequency of <NUM>.

<FIG> illustrates a block diagram of a multi-input multi-output version of an example combined inter-period and intra-period controller <NUM> that may be implemented in a plasma power delivery system according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. The input, <NUM>, is sampled and digitized by analog to digital converters, <NUM>, at a sampling rate of <NUM>/Ts. (The input may already exist as a data stream in which case the converters <NUM> are not used. ) The input is multi-dimensional and may, for example, contain inputs for output power and generator source impedance. The output <NUM> is sampled and digitized by analog to digital converters <NUM>. (The output may be a digital data stream derived from a measurement of the output in which case the analog to digital converters may not be implemented as shown). The output is multi-dimensional and may, for example, include measurements of output power and impedance presented to the generator. The dimensionality of the input <NUM> and output <NUM> do not have to agree. This is so because an element of the output may contain a measure of something that is being minimized or maximized and thus does not require an input (e.g., the mismatch of the load impedance presented to the generator to a desired load impedance). Also, an element of the input may not require a corresponding measurement if the value can simply be set and does not require a corresponding measurement (e.g., setting the generator source impedance). Measurements of the input <NUM>, control input <NUM>, perturbation <NUM>, and output <NUM> are stored in a memory <NUM>. The controller <NUM> generates the control input to the plant, c, <NUM>, from the values stored in memory, one period of the input, Tp, ago and one sampling period, Ts ago. N and Ts are chosen to satisfy Tp=NTs.

In addition to calculating values of the control input to the plant, <NUM>, the controller can also generate a perturbation <NUM> that is added to the calculated control. The control input <NUM> to the plant added to the perturbation <NUM> is converted to an analog signals by digital to analog converters, <NUM>, and applied to a plant, <NUM>. Perturbations <NUM> can be used to extract correlations between the control input <NUM> and output <NUM>. For example perturbing the control element in <NUM> that primarily controls output power (e.g. drive level to a power amplifier) and observing the change in both output power and impedance presented to the generator by the plasma load and then perturbing the control element that primarily controls the impedance presented to the generator (e.g. generator frequency) and observing both output power and impedance presented to the generator by the plasma load allows the controller to extract the correlation between control inputs <NUM> and outputs <NUM>. If the input is periodically modulated, the correlation between control inputs <NUM> and outputs <NUM> are also modulated (assuming the load is nonlinear as is the case for most plasma loads). An inter-period controller can correlate control inputs <NUM> and outputs <NUM> for each specific time period in the repetitive input cycle. For example, for Tp= <NUM> and Ts=<NUM>, the controller can maintain <NUM> matrices correlating <NUM> with <NUM> for each of the <NUM> time periods in the input. In addition to extracting correlation between elements of the control input <NUM> and elements of the output <NUM> for each specific time period, correlation can be extracted between different time periods. For example, the controller can determine how a change in an element of the control input in one time period affects the output in successive time periods.

A simple example illustrates the advantage of knowing these correlations. Consider the decision on how to update a two-dimensional control vector (e.g. drive and frequency) and a two dimensional output (e.g. output power and load resistance) for the <NUM>th time period in the periodic input. Let the desired change in the outputs of the <NUM>th time period be: <MAT> Assuming that through perturbation the correlation between the outputs in the <NUM>th time period and the control inputs in the <NUM>th and <NUM>th time periods are estimated: <MAT> It follows that (approximately): <MAT> When the inputs for the <NUM>th time period need to be adjusted, the changes to the inputs of the <NUM>th time period have already been made, thus: <MAT> <MAT> The simple example uses two inputs to the plant (drive and frequency) and two outputs (output power and load resistance). Output resistance is only one component of load impedance. In a practical application it is load impedance that is important, not just the resistive part of load impedance. In such a case a third input would have to be utilized (e.g. a variable reactance element in a matching network), or optimization techniques can be employed to find the best solution using only two inputs controlling three outputs rather than the simple computations in the example.

Multi-input multi-output control in conjunction with inter-period control allows control of multiple parameters in one control loop. This avoids the problem of interfering control loops which normally necessitates using widely differing speeds for different control loops in the same plasma power delivery system.

Inter-period control allows for a single controller to more readily control multiple generators delivering power to the same plasma system. The data rate for inter-period and intra-period controllers are the same since the control input to the plant is updated at the sampling rate <NUM>/Ts. However, the intra-period controller needs information from one sampling period Ts earlier to update a current control input to a plant whereas the inter-period controller needs information from one input period Tp earlier to update a control input to a plant. Since in most cases Tp is multiple times longer than Ts, it is much easier to get information to and from a controller before that information is needed for the inter-period controller. Inter-period controllers can thus much more readily take interactions between different generators into account to improve overall control of all generators delivering power to the same plasma system.

Claim 1:
A generator comprising:
a power amplifier (<NUM>) configured to produce a power signal comprising a periodic repeating pattern of values comprising multi-dimensional output values (<NUM>), the pattern of values produced over a period of time comprising a repetition period of the power signal; and
a control element (<NUM>) configured to control the power amplifier to produce the periodic repeating pattern based on:
a multi-dimensional input (<NUM>);
a measurement of a value of the periodic repeating pattern taken a repetition period of the power signal prior to a current period of the power signal;
and a plurality of correlations between elements of multi-dimensional control input values (<NUM>) and elements of the multi-dimensional output values (<NUM>).