Patent Description:
The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted in ASCII format via EFS-Web. The ASCII copy of the Sequence Listing, which was created on December <NUM>, <NUM>, is named 13177N-<NUM>. txt and is <NUM> kilobytes in size.

The present invention relates to articles and methods for regulating conversion of nicotine to nornicotine. In particular, the presently-disclosed subject matter relates to transcription factors for regulating conversion of nicotine to nornicotine and methods of use thereof.

Nicotiana tabacum (common tobacco) is a natural allotetraploid originated about <NUM>,<NUM> years ago. The maternal S-genome is derived from ancestors of N. sylvestris and paternal T-genome from the relatives of N. tomentosiformis. Nicotine is the major alkaloid accumulated in most of the cultivated tobacco varieties. During the past decades, significant progress has been made in isolation and characterization structural genes in the nicotine biosynthetic pathway. Jasmonic acid (JA) is a major elicitor of nicotine biosynthesis. JA-responsive transcription factors (TFs) belong to two major families, APETALA2/ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTORS (AP2/ERFs) and the basic HELIX-LOOP-HELIX (bHLH), and are known to induce the expression of genes encoding key enzymes in the nicotine biosynthetic pathway.

Nicotine and other tropane alkaloids, such as hyoscyamine and scopolamine, are synthesized in roots, and transported through xylem to the leaves. A number transporters have been isolated and characterized for their role in transport and vacuolar sequestration of alkaloids in plants. In tobacco, a number of transporters belonging to the MULTIDRUG and TOXIC COMPOUND ETRUSION (MATE) family, including MATE1/<NUM> and Jasmonate-inducible Alkaloid Transporter (JAT1/<NUM>), are involved in transportation and vacuolar sequestration of nicotine. However, TFs involved in regulation of these transporter are not thoroughly studied.

In addition to nicotine, tobacco plants accumulate three other pyridine alkaloids namely, nornicotine, anabasine, and anatabine. Nornicotine is a demethylated nicotine (does not contain a methyl group) that is derived from nicotine by an enzymatic process. It is also a precursor to N-nitrosonornicotine (NNN), which is produced during the curing and processing of tobacco materials. More specifically, during post-harvest processing, nornicotine chemically reacts with the nitrosating agents to form NNN. As NNN belongs to a class of smoking related carcinogens called tobacco specific nitrosamines (TSNA), it is highly desirable to reduce TSNA in tobacco products.

There are two possible ways to reduce TSNA. One is to reduce overall nicotine content; the other is to eliminate conversion of nicotine to nornicotine. Conversion of nicotine to nornicotine is catalyzed by nicotine N-demethylase (NND), a small family of cytochrome P450 enzymes. Three NND genes, CYP82E4v1 (originated from N. tomentosiformis), CYP82E5v2 (originated from N. tomentosiformis), and CYP82E10 (originated from N. sylvestris), have been identified in the conversion of nicotine to nornicotine in tobacco (see, e.g., <CIT>, <CIT>, <CIT>et al and Liedschulte et al). CYP82E4v1 (E4) plays a major role in nicotine to nornicotine conversion in senescent leaves, while expression of CYP82E10 (E10) is reported to be in the roots and CYP82E5 (E5) functions in both roots and leaves. However, up to this point, transcription factors (TFs) involved in the regulation of nicotine to nornicotine conversion (i.e., transcriptional regulators of E4, <NUM>, and <NUM> genes) have not been identified. Therefore, although significant progress has been made in biochemical and molecular characterization of these nicotine transporters and enzymes involved in nornicotine biosynthesis, the molecular mechanism underlying the regulation of these genes remains to be elucidated.

Accordingly, there is a need for articles and methods that regulate the conversion of nicotine to nornicotine.

The presently-disclosed subject matter meets some or all of the above-identified needs, as will become evident to those of ordinary skill in the art after a study of information provided in this document.

The presently-disclosed subject matter includes a method of decreasing conversion of nicotine to nornicotine, the method comprising administering at least one basic region/leucine zipper (bZIP) type transcription factor inhibitor to a tobacco plant, tobacco plant cells, or tobacco plant cultures, wherein the at least one bZIP transcription factor inhibitor is selected from the group consisting of an NtbZIP1a inhibitor, an NtbZIP1b inhibitor, an NtbZIP2a inhibitor, an NtbZIP2b inhibitor, and combinations thereof. The at least one bZIP transcription factor inhibitor may comprise an NtbZIP1a inhibitor and an NtbZIP1b inhibitor. The at least one bZIP transcription factor inhibitor may comprise an NtbZIP2a inhibitor and an NtbZIP2b inhibitor. The at least one bZIP transcription factor inhibitor may comprise an NtbZIP1a inhibitor, an NtbZIP1b inhibitor, an NtbZIP2a inhibitor, and an NtbZIP2b inhibitor.

The at least one bZIP transcription factor inhibitor may be selected from the group consisting of antisense oligonucleotides, miRNA, siRNA, locked nucleic acid (LNA) nucleotides, and combinations thereof. The at least one bZIP transcription factor inhibitor may comprise an antisense oligonucleotide of a bZIP transcription factor selected from the group consisting of NtbZIP1a, NtbZIP1b, NtbZIP2a, NtbZIP2b, and combinations thereof.

Also provided herein is a method of decreasing conversion of nicotine to nornicotine, the method comprising mutating a basic region/leucine zipper (bZIP) type transcription factor binding site on a promoter of a nicotine N-demethylase (NND), wherein the NND is selected from the group consisting of CYP82E4v1, CYP82E5v2, and CYP82E10. The NND may be CYP82E4v1. The bZIP binding site on the promoter of CYP82E4v1 may be an A/G box with a pre-mutated sequence of TACGTC. The mutated binding site may have the sequence TGCGTC. The mutated binding site may be formed by site-directed mutagenesis.

Further provided herein, is a method of decreasing conversion of nicotine to nornicotine, the method comprising mutating a tobacco plant genome to knockout at least one basic region/leucine zipper (bZIP) type transcription factor, wherein the at least one bZIP transcription factor is selected from the group consisting of NtbZIP1a, NtbZIP1b, NtbZIP2a, NtbZIP2b, and combinations thereof, or NtbZIP1a and NtbZIP2a, NtbZIP1b and NtbZIP2b, and combinations thereof. The method may also include administering at least one bZIP type transcription factor inhibitor to a tobacco plant. The at least one bZIP transcription factor inhibitor may be selected from the group consisting of an NtbZIP1a inhibitor, an NtbZIP1b inhibitor, an NtbZIP2a inhibitor, an NtbZIP2b inhibitor, and combinations thereof.

The presently-disclosed subject matter will be better understood, and features, aspects and advantages other than those set forth above will become apparent when consideration is given to the following detailed description thereof. Such detailed description makes reference to the following drawings, wherein:.

While the disclosure is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are herein described below in detail.

Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the disclosure belongs. Any methods and materials similar to or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present disclosure, including the methods and materials are described below.

Following long-standing patent law convention, the terms "a," "an," and "the" refer to "one or more" when used in this application, including the claims. Thus, for example, reference to "a cell" includes a plurality of cells, and so forth.

Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities of ingredients, properties such as reaction conditions, and so forth used in the specification and claims are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term "about. " Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in this specification and claims are approximations that can vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by the presently-disclosed subject matter.

As used herein, the term "about," when referring to a value or to an amount of mass, weight, time, volume, concentration, percentage, or the like is meant to encompass variations of in some embodiments ±<NUM>%, in some embodiments ±<NUM>%, in some embodiments ±<NUM>%, in some embodiments ±<NUM>%, in some embodiments ±<NUM>%, in some embodiments ±<NUM>%, in some embodiments ±<NUM>%, in some embodiments ±<NUM>%, and in some embodiments ±<NUM>% from the specified amount, as such variations are appropriate to perform the disclosed method.

As used herein, ranges can be expressed as from "about" one particular value, and/or to "about" another particular value. It is also understood that there are a number of values disclosed herein, and that each value is also herein disclosed as "about" that particular value in addition to the value itself.

All combinations of method or process steps as used herein can be performed in any order, unless otherwise specified or clearly implied to the contrary by the context in which the referenced combination is made.

The details of the presently-disclosed subject matter are set forth in this document. The information provided in this document, and particularly the specific details of the described exemplary embodiments, is provided primarily for clearness of understanding and no unnecessary limitations are to be understood therefrom. In case of conflict, the specification of this document, including definitions, will control.

The presently-disclosed subject matter relates to articles and methods for regulating conversion of nicotine to nornicotine. The articles include one or more inhibitors of basic region/leucine zipper (bZIP) type transcription factors. The bZIP type transcription factors are derived from tobacco. Of the <NUM> bZIP type transcription factors identified in tobacco by the instant inventors, which are classified into ten sub-groups: A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and S, suitable bZIP type transcription factors may include at least one of the <NUM> bZIPs in sub-group S, at least one of the <NUM> bZIPs in sub-group C, other bZIP <NUM> homologs, or a combination thereof. The S sub-group bZIP transcription factor includes, but is not limited to, NtbZIPla (SEQ ID NOs: <NUM> and <NUM>), NtbZIP1b (SEQ ID NOs: <NUM> and <NUM>), or a combination thereof; and/or the C sub-group bZIP transcription factor includes, but is not limited to, NtbZIP2a (SEQ ID NO: <NUM>), NtbZIP2b (SEQ ID NO: <NUM>), or a combination thereof.

The one or more transcription factor inhibitors include, but are not limited to, antisense oligonucleotides, miRNA, siRNA, locked nucleic acid (LNA) nucleotides, or a combination thereof. The inhibitors may provide RNAi-mediated knock-down/silencing of the bZIP type transcription factors. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the specific sequence/structure of the transcription factor inhibitors is based upon the sequence of the specific transcription factor. Accordingly, as will also be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the antisense oligonucleotides and/or LNAs may be formed by any suitable method using the bZIP type transcription factor sequences provided herein. For example, the inhibitor may include an antisense oligonucleotide having <NUM>% sequence homology with the complementary bZIP type transcription factor. Alternatively, the transcription factor inhibitor may include an antisense oligonucleotide having <NUM>% sequence homology with a bZIP type transcription factor complementary to NtbZIP1a, NtbZIP1b, NtbZIP2a, and/or NtbZIP2b. Optionally, the transcription factor inhibitor(s) provide RNAi-mediated knockdown/silencing of NtbZIP1a, NtbZIP1b, NtbZIP2a, and/or NtbZIP2b expression in tobacco.

Also described herein is a method of regulating the conversion of nicotine to nornicotine in a tobacco plant or other nicotine containing organism. The method may include administering one or more of the bZIP inhibitors disclosed herein to a nicotine containing organism. Administration of these one or more bZIP inhibitors decreases or eliminates conversion of the nicotine to nornicotine. The one or more inhibitors may be administered for a single type of bZIP transcription factor, or for a combination of bZIP transcription factors. For example, the method may include administering one or more inhibitors for S bZIP type transcription factors or C bZIP type transcription factors. Alternatively, the method may include administering one or more inhibitors for S bZIP type transcription factors and one or more transcription factors for C bZIP type transcription factors. Optionally, the method may include administering one or more inhibitors of NtbZIP1a, NtbZIP1b, NtbZIP2a, and/or NtbZIP2b to the organism. Inhibiting both S bZIP type transcription factors and C bZIP type transcription factors may have a synergistic effect on the reduction or elimination of nicotine conversion to nornicotine.

The methods disclosed herein include administering a single type of inhibitor or any suitable combination of inhibitors, which may be the same or different for each bZIP transcription factor being inhibited. For example, the method may include administering antisense oligonucleotides of NtbZIP1a, NtbZIP1b, NtbZIP2a, and/or NtbZIP2b. Alternatively, the method may include administering antisense oligonucleotides of one bZIP transcription factor, such as NtbZIP1a, and LNA nucleotides of another bZIP transcription factor, such as NtbZIP1b. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, although discussed above with regard to certain combinations of bZIP transcription factors and transcription factor inhibitors, the disclosure is not so limited and may include any other suitable combination of TFs and TF inhibitors.

Additionally or alternatively, the method may include bZIP type transcription factor knockout and/or mutation of a bZIP type transcription factor binding site on the promoter of the nicotine N-demethylase (NND). For example, the method may include editing the plant genome to knock-out NtbZIP1a, NtbZIP1b, NtbZIP2a, and/or NtbZIP2b. The genome editing may be performed through any suitable process, such as, but not limited to, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing. Optionally, the method may include mutating the bZIP binding element in the E4 promoter, called A/G box (TACGTC), to TGCGTC by site-directed mutagenesis. Although discussed above with regard to a specific mutation in the E4 promoter, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the disclosure is not so limited and includes any other mutation in the E4, E5, and/or E10 promoter to reduce or eliminate activation of the respective NND by the bZIP type transcription factor.

The administration of the TF inhibitors, the TF knockout, and/or the binding site mutation disclosed herein reduces or eliminates activation of the NND by the bZIP type transcription factor, which decreases or eliminates conversion of nicotine to nornicotine. As opposed to existing articles that include E4, E5, and E10 mutants, the articles disclosed herein control the expression of E4, E5, and E10 to reduce or eliminate the conversion of nicotine to nornicotine. By reducing or eliminating the conversion of nicotine to nornicotine the articles and methods disclosed herein decrease the harmful effects of products which typically contain the carcinogenic nornicotine, such as, but not limited to, tobacco products.

The presently-disclosed subject matter is further illustrated by the following specific but non-limiting examples. The following examples may include compilations of data that are representative of data gathered at various times during the course of development and experimentation related to the presently-disclosed subject matter.

This Example describes the analysis of transcriptome data sets of different tobacco tissues, including leaf (young, mature, and senesce leaf), root, stem, flower (young and mature flower), and capsule to generate a co-expression network. First, a hierarchical cluster analysis was performed, which revealed that each individual tissue type exhibits a unique expression pattern (<FIG>). Next, the genes encoding all major TF families in tobacco and its progenitors were identified. The tobacco genome contains more TF genes than its progenitors and the number of TFs belonging to MYB, AP2/ERFs, and bHLH families are significantly higher than other families (<FIG>). In view thereof, the TFs and structural genes in the nicotine biosynthetic pathway were then grouped into <NUM> different modules (color-coded side bar) based on their expression pattern in different tissues (<FIG>). The "black" module is particularly interesting as majority of the nicotine biosynthetic genes were found in this module along with a number of TF genes. Many of these TFs belong to MYB, bHLH, bZIP, and ERF families. As discussed in Examples <NUM>-<NUM> below, the role of these TFs in nicotine biosynthesis in tobacco is established through isolation and functional characterization thereof.

This Example describes two bZIP type transcription factors from tobacco (<FIG>), which regulate the conversion of nicotine to nornicotine, can be used for reduction of smoking related carcinogen, tobacco specific nitrosamines (TSNA).

bZIP TFs are characterized by a conserved leucine zipper motif that mediates dimer formation for DNA binding. In plants, bZIP TFs regulate processes including pathogen defense, light and stress signaling, seed maturation, and flower development. Many bZIP factors, especially those in tobacco, are not well characterized. By co-expression and clustering analyses, two bZIP TF genes that co-express with E4, E5, and E10 were identified herein. These tobacco bZIP TFs have been termed NtbZIPla and NtbZIP1b.

NtbZIP1 a/b exhibit similar expression patterns as compared to CYP82E4v1, the major NND enzyme involved in nicotine to nornicotine conversion, and are highly expressed in flowers and senescent leaves (<FIG>). As illustrated in <FIG>, <NUM> bZIPs were identified in tobacco and classified into ten sub-groups: A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, and S, with NtbZIP1 a/b belonging to sub-group S. In maize, expression of group-S bZIPs are induced by wounding, cold, and drought stress. Referring to <FIG>, it was also found that NtbZIP1a and b are more than <NUM>% identical at nucleotide and amino acid level. Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the two homologous bZIPs are derived from two progenitors of tobacco, N. sylvestris and N. tometosiformis.

After identifying the two bZIP TFs, whether overexpression of NtbZIP1a leads to upregulation of E4, <NUM>, and <NUM> was tested. NtbZIP1a was cloned into pCAMBIA2300 (binary vector) under the control of the CaMV <NUM> promoter and rbcS terminator. The binary vectors (empty control and NtbZIP1a) were mobilized into Agrobacterium, and tobacco leaves were infiltrated using the transformed Agrobacterium. Total RNA isolated from Agrobacterium-infiltrated leaf discs were used for cDNA synthesis and real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to detect the transcript levels of NtbZIP1a, NtbZIP1b, E4, <NUM>, and <NUM>. An ubiquitously expressed house-keeping gene, tubulin, was used as internal control in qRT-PCR. The results showed that, when NtbZIP1a was highly expressed transiently, the endogenous NtbZIP1b, E4, <NUM>, and <NUM> were upregulated (approx. <NUM>-<NUM> fold), indicating that NtbZIP1a induces the expression of NtbZIP1b, E4, <NUM>, and <NUM>, hence a possible transcriptional activator for these genes (<FIG>).

Next, whether NtbZIP1a can bind to the promoters of its potential target genes was tested. The promoters (approximately <NUM>. 0kb fragment of the <NUM>' untranslated region of each coding gene) of E4, <NUM>, and <NUM> were isolated, and the individual promoters were fused to a firefly luciferase reporter gene. The NtbZIP1a gene was cloned into the pBlueScript (pBS) vector under the control of the CaMV <NUM> promoter and rbcS terminator. The plasmids were electroporated into tobacco protoplasts. NtbZIP1a significantly induced the luciferase gene expression controlled by the E4 and E10 promoters, but not E5 promoter, suggesting that NtbZIP1a can directly activate E4 and E10 genes, likely by binding to their promoters (<FIG>). NtbZIP1a did not appear to bind to the <NUM>. 0kb promoter region of E5, used for the activation experiment. However, as mentioned above, overexpression of NtbZIP1a led to upregulation of E5, together with E4 and <NUM>. The promoter activation experiment indicates two possible NtbZIP1a regulatory relationships with E5 gene: (<NUM>) NtbZIP1a binds to a site outside of the <NUM>. 0kb promoter fragment, or (<NUM>) NtbZIP1a indirectly activates E5, through another unidentified activator in tobacco (e.g., NtbZIP1a activates another activator, which in turn activates E5).

To support the possibility of NtbZIP1a directly binding to the E4 promoter to regulate transactivation the bZIP binding element in the E4 promoter, called A/G box (TACGTC), was mutated to TGCGTC by site-directed mutagenesis. The mutated promoter was fused to the luciferase reporter gene as described above. A transactivation experiment was then performed using the mutant reporter plasmid and the NtbZIP1a expression vector, as described above. The result showed that NtbZIP1a is unable to activate the luciferase gene expression under the control of the mutant promoter (<FIG>). This experiment demonstrated that the E4 promoter is activated through an A/G-box binding factor, most likely NtbZIP1a.

Referring to <FIG>, the transactivation experiment was also performed using a NtbZIP1b expression vector and the E4 promoter-luciferase reporter plasmid, as described for NtbZIP1a. NtbZIP1b also activated the E4 promoter at the similar level as NtbZIP1a.

Finally, as it has been established that the agronomic practice of tobacco topping (removal of the axillary shoots) induces nicotine production, the instant inventors analyzed the transcriptome data from tobacco plants that were topped or un-topped. More specifically, leaf samples were collected after <NUM> hours from the control (un-topped) and topped plants. RNA isolated from un-topped and topped leaves were used for cDNA synthesis and qRT-PCR analyses. The results showed that topping resulted in decreased expression of bZIP1 a/b, as well as E4, <NUM>, and <NUM>, by approximately <NUM>-<NUM>%, compared to the un-topped plants, suggesting that topping negatively regulates the expression of bZIP1 a/b and NNDs in tobacco (<FIG>). The result also indicates that bZIP1 a/b and NNDs are coordinately expressed in tobacco, as gene regulators and their target genes usually do.

Based upon the Example above, NtbZIP1a and 1b are believed to be involved in the regulation of the three NND genes as activators. Reduction or inactivation of NtbZIP1a/b may lead to reduction of nornicotine.

This Example describes the formation of transgenic lines overexpressing NtbZIP1a and the effect of these transgenic lines on endogenous E4 expression.

To form the transgenic lines, the pCAMBIA2300 (binary vector), containing NtbZIP1a under the control of the CaMV <NUM> promoter and rbcS terminator, was mobilized into Agrobacterium, and tobacco leaf discs were infected with the transformed Agrobacterium. More than <NUM> transgenic lines overexpressing NtbZIP1a were generated from Agrobacterium-infected leaf discs. Genomic DNA isolated from control and three transgenic lines were used to verify the transgenic status of the plants by PCR amplification of the antibiotic selection marker, neomycin phophotransferase II (nptII; kan). Total RNA isolated from leaves of control and three transgenic lines were used for cDNA synthesis. RT-PCR was used to verify the expression of nptII (kan) gene in the transgenic plants (<FIG>). Real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to detect the transcript levels of NtbZIP1a, and E4 (<FIG>). An ubiquitously expressed house-keeping gene, tubulin, was used as internal control in qRT-PCR.

The results of this Example showed that NtbZIP1a expression was significantly higher in the transgenic plants compared with control. When NtbZIP1a was highly expressed the endogenous E4 expression was upregulated (approx. <NUM>-<NUM> fold), indicating that NtbZIP1a induces the expression of E4 and therefore is a possible transcriptional activator for E4 gene. Additionally, metabolic analysis shows that nicotine to nornicotine conversion is higher in transgenic tobacco leaves as compared with a control (<FIG>). The formula used for calculating the conversion of nicotine to nornicotine was: <MAT> Two of the three lines analyzes showed higher nicotine to nornicotine conversion. Because the metabolic analysis was performed with independent T<NUM> (first generation transgenic plants) segregating population, the metabolic outcomes can vary.

As described in Example <NUM> above, the instant inventors have characterized NtbZIP1a and b, two NtbZIP belonging to group S bZIP factors. In Arabidopsis, group S bZIP factors are known to interact with certain group C factors to regulate gene expression. In view of this interaction, the instant inventors identified the tobacco homologs of Arabidopsis bZIP <NUM>, a group C member that interacts with group S factors. In tobacco, there are two bZIP <NUM> homologs, termed here as NtbZIP2a and b, that share greater than <NUM>% in amino acid identity (<FIG>). Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that NtbZIP2a and b are originated from the two tobacco progenitors, N. sylvestris and N. tometosiformis, and functionally redundant.

According to transcriptomic analysis, NtbZIP2a and b have similar expression patterns in tobacco flowers, leaves, stems, and roots (<FIG>). Based upon the foregoing discussion, the instant inventors hypothesized that NtbZIP2a and b also regulate E4/<NUM>/<NUM>, individually and/or cooperatively with NtbZIP1a and b. Thus, NtbZIP2a was tested for transactivation of the E4 promoter, individually or in combination with NtbZIP1a. More specifically, the E4 promoter was fused to the firefly luciferase reporter gene and the bZIP TFs were cloned into pBS vector under the control of the CaMV <NUM> promoter and rbcs terminator. The results showed that, individually, both NtbZIP1a and NtbZIP2a activate the E4 promoter; however, when both NtbZIP1a and 2a were co-expressed, transactivation of the E4 promoter was significantly increased, compared to that was induced by each factor alone (<FIG>).

Next, to determine whether NtbZIP1a/b interact with NtbZIP2a, the inventors performed yeast hybrid assay. The growth of the yeast cells on synthetic drop-out (SD) medium lacking leucine, trptophan, histidine, and adenine (SD-leu-trp-his-ade) suggests that NtbZIP1a/b interact with NtbZIP2a (<FIG>; <FIG> and <FIG>). In addition, NtbZIP2 interacts with itself to form a homo-dimer (<FIG>; <NUM>). The bZIP domains of NtbZIP1 and NtbZIP2 are illustrated in <FIG>.

Although the instant Example only tested NtbZIP2a activity on the E4 promoter, but not the E5 or E10 promoters, it is believed that both NtbZIP2 factors are activators of E4/<NUM>/<NUM> genes. That is, this Example suggests that the group C NtbZIP2a and b are two previously uncharacterized regulators of E4/<NUM>/<NUM> genes. In addition, this Example shows that NtbZIP1 and NtbZIP2 are synergistic in activation of the E4 (possibly E5 and <NUM>) promoter. In particular, without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that NtbZIP2a and/or b interact with NtbZIP1a and/or b to enhance DNA binding ability and significantly increase activation of the E4/<NUM>/<NUM> promoters, as compared to NtbZIP1 or NtbZIP2 alone.

Claim 1:
A method of decreasing conversion of nicotine to nornicotine, the method comprising administering at least one basic region/leucine zipper (bZIP) type transcription factor inhibitor to a tobacco plant, tobacco plant cells, or tobacco plant cultures, wherein the at least one bZIP transcription factor inhibitor is selected from the group consisting of an NtbZIP1a inhibitor, an NtbZIP1b inhibitor, an NtbZIP2a inhibitor, an NtbZIP2b inhibitor, and combinations thereof.