Patent Description:
Embodiments of the present invention relate to charged particle detection and detection devices, and more particularly, to an optimal detector layout design for secondary charged particle detectors in a charged particle system using multiple columns for line scans.

Secondary charged particles are emitted from a surface of the specimen to be examined when electron or ion source impinges on the surface with sufficient energy. Since the energy and/or the energy distribution of such secondary charged particles offers information as to the topography of the specimen, detectors are employed to detect the secondary charged particles and convert them to electrical signals used to generate images of the specimen. Scanning electron microscopes (SEMs) are generally provided with such a detection device for secondary electrons.

Specifically in SEMs, an electron beam source generates a primary electron beam passing through a hole in the middle of a detection device. A variable electrostatic or magnetic field deflects the primary electron beam to scan it over a region of a specimen. When the primary beam strikes the specimen, secondary electrons are generated. Such particles have an energy which is significantly lower than that of the particles in the primary electron beam, e.g., <NUM> eV. Some of these secondary electrons pass back up through the electron optical column and interact with the primary beam deflection fields as they pass back through the optical column. Thereafter these secondary electrons are imaged onto the detection device.

To collect as many of the secondary electrons as possible, conventional SEM systems use secondary electron detectors that are relatively large. However, since leakage current and capacitance of a detector (e.g., a photodiode) are proportional to the detector area (e.g., the area of the photodiode depletion zone), it is not desirable to have an excessive detector area.

In addition, conventional secondary electron detectors are typically rotationally symmetric. However, while the detector may be rotationally symmetric, the pattern of electrons landing on the detector might not be symmetric. Secondary electrons traveling back up through the optical column tend to undergo rotation and deflection as a result of magnetic fields used in immersion lenses or the deflection by the optical column. The amount of rotation depends partly on the landing energy of the primary electrons. Higher energy electrons undergo less rotation since they spend less time in the magnetic field due to their relatively high velocities.

Conventional detectors generally include a metal shield to cover up any exposed dielectric on the detectors to prevent charging that would produce a deflection field. For example, prior art SEM systems use a MEMS-type shield made of thin metal foil that is patterned (e.g., by laser) and bonded to the detector. The shield and the detectors are conventionally manufactured separately and are integrated afterwards. Thus, conventional detectors require additional process steps that confer additional cost and complexity of alignment or assembly.

<CIT> discloses a charged particle beam device and a method of operation thereof. An emitter emits a primary charged particle beam. Depending on the action of a deflection system, which comprises at least three deflection stages, it can be switched between at least two detection units. Further, beam shaping means is provided and a lens for focusing at the primary charged particle beam on a specimen.

<CIT> describes an electron beam apparatus and method for collecting side-view and plane-view SEM imagery. The electron beam apparatus includes an electron source, some intermediate lenses if needed, an objective lens and an in-lens sectional detector. The electron source will provide an electron beam. The intermediate lenses focus the electron beam further. The objective lens is a combination of an immersion magnetic lens and a retarding electrostatic lens focuses the electron beam onto the specimen surface. The in-lens detector will be divided into two or more sections to collect secondary electrons emanating from the specimen with different azimuth and polar angle so that side-view SEM imagery can be obtained.

It is within this context that aspects of the present disclosure arise.

A charged particle optical system according to the present invention is defined by claim <NUM>.

Objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the accompanying drawings in which:.

In the following Detailed Description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. The drawings show illustrations in accordance with examples of embodiments, which are also referred to herein as "examples". The drawings are described in enough detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the present subject matter. Because components of embodiments of the present invention can be positioned in a number of different orientations, directional terminology is used for purposes of illustration and is in no way limiting. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural or logical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.

In this document, the terms "a" and "an" are used, as is common in patent documents, to include one or more than one. In this document, the term "or" is used to refer to a nonexclusive "or," such that "A or B" includes "A but not B," "B but not A," and "A and B," unless otherwise indicated. The following detailed description, therefore, is not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims.

<FIG> and <FIG> illustrate an example of a charged particle system <NUM> incorporating certain aspects of the present disclosure. In this non-limiting example, the system <NUM> is configured as a scanning electron microscope (SEM) having charged particle optical column <NUM> with an electron source <NUM>, beam optics <NUM>, a magnetic immersion lens <NUM>. The optical column <NUM> may be controlled by electronics <NUM>, referred to herein as a beam driver. The beam driver <NUM> may control the electron source <NUM>, beam optics <NUM> and immersion lens <NUM>. In this example, the beam optics <NUM> extract electrons from the source <NUM> and form them into a primary beam that travels in the direction of the target <NUM>. The immersion lens <NUM> focuses the primary beam into a narrow spot at the surface of the target.

Electrons from the electron beam column <NUM> are focused onto a target surface <NUM>, which may be an integrated circuit wafer or a test wafer. The target <NUM> is supported by a stage <NUM>. The electrons may be scanned across the surface of the target <NUM>, e.g., by magnet deflecting fields provided by one or more scanning coils or electrostatic deflector plates <NUM>. In some implementations, the beam scanner driver <NUM> may provide current to deflector coils <NUM> via a beam scanner driver <NUM>. In other implementations, the beam scanner driver <NUM> may apply voltages to electrostatic deflector plates to scan the electron beam across the target <NUM>.

Alternatively, the stage <NUM> may include a stage scanning mechanism <NUM> and stage scanner driver <NUM> configured to move the target along X-Y plane parallel to the surface of the target <NUM> in one or more directions relative to the optical column <NUM>. In some implementations the stage scanning mechanism <NUM> and stage scanner driver <NUM> may move the stage in one direction (e.g., the X direction) as the beam scanner driver <NUM> scans the beam in a different direction (e.g., the Y direction). Alternatively, the stage scanner driver <NUM> may drive the stage in both the X and Y directions relative to the optical column <NUM> to scan the beam across the target while the beam remains fixed relative to the optical column.

Electrons striking the target <NUM> are either backscattered or initiate secondary emission. The electron beam column collects a portion of such backscattered or secondary electrons <NUM> that emerge from the surface of the target <NUM>. The collected electrons <NUM> travel back up through the electron beam column and impinge on a detector <NUM>, which generates a signal proportional to the amount of backscattering or secondary emission. The signal may be amplified by an amplifier <NUM>. The amplified signal and a signal from the beam scanner driver <NUM> and/or stage scanner driver <NUM> are combined by an image generator <NUM> to produce a high-contrast, magnified image of the surface of the target <NUM>. The images generated by the image generator <NUM> may be analyzed by the image analyzer <NUM>, e.g., to determine a measure of quality of the modified surface or shape and size of resulting formed structures.

In alternative implementations, sources of energetic particles other than electrons (e.g., ions) may be used as alternatives to the electron source <NUM>, depending on the nature of the system. In addition, the energetic particle source may be separate from and/or located outside of the charged particle optical column <NUM>.

Also, in alternative implementations, other types of charged particles (e.g., positive or negative ions) may backscatter from or be emitted by the target and pass back up through the optical column <NUM> to impinge on the detector <NUM>. For example, in secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS) the primary particles are energetic ions and the secondary charged particles are ionized atoms of the target material that are knocked off of the target as a result of energetic impact by the primary ions.

Some charged particle systems include a charged particle energy analyzer (e.g., a cylindrical mirror analyzer, Bessel box, parallel plate analyzer) as part of the optical column <NUM> between the immersion lens <NUM> and the detector <NUM>. Such spectrometers are used for energy selection of secondary electrons, e.g., as in Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) for chemical analysis of the target <NUM>. Other systems include a mass spectrometer (e.g., a magnetic sector, RF quadrupole, or Wien filter to select secondary charged particles by mass, e.g., as in SIMS systems.

By way of example, and not by way of limitation, images may be generated by driving the beam scanner in a raster pattern in which the primary beam scans across the sample <NUM> in one direction with the beam scanner driver <NUM> and beam scanner coils <NUM> (or deflector plates) and the detector signal as a function of beam position is converted into a line of the image as is well known in the art. At an end of the scan of the beam in one direction (e.g., the X-direction), the beam location may be adjusted by a small amount (e.g., an amount comparable to a size of the beam spot on the sample) in a different direction (e.g., the Y-direction) and another scan may be performed to generate another line of the image. By repeating this process an image of part of the sample may be generated.

In alternative implementations, images may be generated by scanning the primary beam across the sample <NUM> in one direction (e.g., the X-direction) and converting the detector signal as a function of beam position into a line of the image. The stage scanner driver <NUM> and stage scanning mechanism may translate the sample <NUM> by a small amount in a different direction (e.g., the Y-direction) at the end of each line scan.

Detector <NUM> may be a diode device with a junction and depletion region. By way of example and not by way of limitation, detector <NUM> can be a PN junction, a PIN junction. In alternative implementations, the detector <NUM> may be a CMOS detector (e.g., a charge coupled device (CCD)), silicon-based or III-V detector, multi-channel plate, photodiode array, avalanche photodiode and/or Schottky diode.

In one example, the detector <NUM> is PN junction diode that includes a positively doped P region and a negatively doped N region. A depletion region, an area of neutral charge, exists between the P and N regions. When a photon enters the device, electrons in the crystalline structure become excited. If the energy of the photon is greater than the bandgap energy of the material, electrons will move into the conduction band crating holes in the valence band where the electrons were. These electron-hole pairs are created throughout the device. Those generated in the depletion region drift to their respective electrons. This results in a positive charge buildup in the P layer and a negative one in the N layer. The amount of charge is directly proportional to the amount of light falling on the detector.

As noted above, conventional detectors have relatively large and symmetrical design for the active portion for collecting the electrons. According to aspects of the present disclosure, the detector <NUM> may have a layout design (as discussed below in connection with <FIG>) that may be optimized for use in a charged particle system that uses one or more columns for line scans while moving the target relative to the column <NUM> perpendicular to the scan direction. It should be noted that in addition to SEM systems, many other charged particle systems may employ the secondary charged particle detection device according to the present disclosure. Examples of systems may include systems configured to implement focused ion beam (FIB), Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), and Secondary Ion Mass Spectroscopy (SIMS).

As shown in the block diagram of <FIG>, the image generator <NUM> and image analyzer may be part of a controller <NUM>. The controller <NUM> may be a self-contained microcontroller. Alternatively, the controller <NUM> may be a general purpose computer configured to include a central processor unit (CPU) <NUM>, memory <NUM> (e.g., RAM, DRAM, ROM, and the like) and well-known support circuits <NUM> such as power supplies <NUM>, input/output (I/O) functions <NUM>, clock <NUM>, cache <NUM>, and the like, coupled to a control system bus <NUM>. The memory <NUM> may contain instructions that the CPU <NUM> executes to facilitate the performance of the system <NUM>. The instructions in the memory <NUM> may be in the form of the program code <NUM>. The code <NUM> may control, e.g., the electron beam voltage and current produced by the source <NUM>, the focusing of the beam with the beam optics <NUM> and the immersion lens <NUM>, the scanning of the electron beam by the coils <NUM>, the scanning of the stage <NUM> by the stage scanner <NUM> and the formation of images with the signal from the detector <NUM> in a conventional fashion. The code <NUM> may also implement analysis of the images.

The code <NUM> may conform to any one of a number of different programming languages such as Assembly, C++, JAVA or a number of other languages. The controller <NUM> may also include an optional mass storage device, <NUM>, e.g., CD-ROM hard disk and/or removable storage, flash memory, and the like, which may be coupled to the control system bus <NUM>.

The controller <NUM> may optionally include a user interface <NUM>, such as a keyboard, mouse, or light pen, coupled to the CPU <NUM> to provide for the receipt of inputs from an operator (not shown). The controller <NUM> may also optionally include a display unit <NUM> to provide information to the operator in the form of graphical displays and/or alphanumeric characters under control of the processor unit <NUM>. The display unit <NUM> may be, e.g., a cathode ray tube (CRT) or flat screen monitor.

The controller <NUM> may exchange signals with the imaging device scanner driver <NUM>, the e-beam driver <NUM> and the detector <NUM> or amplifier <NUM> through the I/O functions <NUM> in response to data and program code instructions stored and retrieved by the memory <NUM>. Depending on the configuration or selection of controller <NUM> the scanner driver <NUM> and detector <NUM> or amplifier <NUM> may interface with the I/O functions via conditioning circuits. The conditioning circuits may be implemented in hardware or software form, e.g., within code <NUM>.

According to aspects of the present disclosure, the detector <NUM> is of unconventional design. <FIG> depicts a detector <NUM> of conventional design. The detector <NUM> is a PN junction diode with a central aperture <NUM>, an active portion <NUM> and a metal shield <NUM>. The active portion <NUM> is comprises four symmetrically arranged sector-shaped regions that surround the aperture <NUM>. The active portions <NUM> are electrically isolated by an insulator, e.g., an oxide. In particular, the insulator includes an oxide annulus <NUM> (shown in phantom) formed around the aperture <NUM> provides isolation of the detector <NUM> from leakage effects due to surface or edge states. The insulator, including the annulus <NUM>, is covered by the metal shield <NUM> to prevent charging. In this example, the aperture <NUM> is formed through the material of the detector and also through the metal shield <NUM>. The metal shield <NUM> is fabricated separately from the rest of the detector, e.g., using microelectromechancial systems (MEMS) processing. As noted above, the metal shield complicates assembly of the detector <NUM>. Portions of the shield <NUM> between the active portion sectors <NUM> can also cause signal clipping, particularly if the landing pattern of secondary electrons is asymmetric and significant numbers of secondary electrons would land on these portions of the shield.

<FIG> shows a schematic layout of an improved detector <NUM>.

In this example, the detector <NUM> has an active portion <NUM> formed on a substrate <NUM>. A through-hole aperture <NUM> formed through the substrate <NUM>. A metallization area <NUM> covers certain electrically insulated (non-active) portions of the substrate <NUM>. In this example, the active portion <NUM> is an approximately sector-shaped region. The through-hole aperture <NUM> is provided to allow a primary charged particle beam to pass through the detector <NUM> on its way to a target. In this example, the aperture <NUM> is formed through the active portion <NUM> and is located at an axis of symmetry of the substrate <NUM>. In the illustrated example, the substrate <NUM> is square or rectangular in shape with a symmetry about an axis perpendicular to a plane of the substrate that runs through the center of the aperture <NUM>, which also happens to be the center of the substrate <NUM> in this example. The aperture <NUM> may be circular or any other suitable shape. In addition, the aperture <NUM> is in the center of the detector <NUM> (e.g., on an axis of symmetry of the substrate <NUM>).

Since PN junctions for the active portion <NUM> cannot be made all the way to the edge of the aperture <NUM>, an inactive region (sometimes called a dead zone), which may result from an insulating (e.g., oxide) annulus <NUM>, typically exists around the aperture <NUM>. The aperture <NUM> and the dead zone would cause signal clipping for the secondary electron blobs that overlap them. Since the amount of clipping depends on the size of the aperture and the dead zone, the size of the aperture and the dead zone should be assessed and adjusted so that the signal loss is kept to <NUM>% or less. One alternative solution to reduce the signal loss is to modify the scan pattern to keep the secondary electrons from landing in the dead zone or the aperture.

The active portion <NUM> of detector <NUM> is the area that can capture secondary electrons emitted from the surface of a sample. The active portion <NUM> is shaped to accommodate an expected asymmetrical pattern of the secondary electrons at the detector location. In the example shown in <FIG>, the substrate <NUM> is symmetric with respect to an axis through the aperture <NUM> and the active region <NUM> is asymmetric with respect to the axis. The asymmetric shape of the active region <NUM> is configured to accommodate an estimated axially asymmetrical distribution of the secondary particles at the detector <NUM> with respect to a beam axis of a charged particle beam optical system <NUM>. The expected pattern and location of the secondary electrons at the location of the detector <NUM> can be determined by computer simulation utilizing knowledge of the electron optic performance, e.g., deflection and rotation of electrons, in a charged particle system. For example, with the deflection conditions (e.g., rotation and deflection) determined for the optical system <NUM>, the positions of secondary electron at the plane of the detector <NUM> plane can be analyzed via a Matlab script as in <FIG>.

<FIG> shows an example of an estimated asymmetric pattern of secondary electrons landing on the active portion in an asymmetrical pattern in a line scan. From the Matlab output, the secondary electron positions can be analyzed as a function of scan position and the capture result can be analyzed as a function of the size of the dead zone/active portion as shown in <FIG>. According to the simulation, the active portion <NUM> may be shaped to cover an expected area where the secondary electrons may land at the detector plane. With such an optimized design, the size of the active portion may be reduced, thereby improving leakage current and capacitance as well as the electrical performance and manufacturing yield.

As an example, <FIG> shows an active portion <NUM> in the shape of a sector, e.g., like a pie with a missing piece. In this example, the shape of the active portion <NUM> has been optimized for capturing the secondary electrons in a particular electron beam system for primary beam landing energies from <NUM> electron volts (eV) through 3keV. The angles are chosen to correspond to the secondary electron positions after they have gone through a rotation and then a deflection as they travel back upwards through the optical column <NUM> to plane of the detector <NUM> for the different landing energies. The chosen angles are variable depending on the system behavior and can be fine-tuned given prior knowledge of the performance of the optical column <NUM>. It should be noted that the active portion <NUM> may be in any shape, angle, and/or size as long as it is shaped to accommodate the expected asymmetrical pattern of the secondary electrons at the detector location. According to the claimed invention, the active portion is sector-shaped.

In addition, an electrically conductive layer <NUM> is provided over portions of the surface of the device other than active portion <NUM> to prevent charging that would produce a deflection field. The electrically conductive layer <NUM> is either deposited or formed on selected parts of the surface of the detector which may be isolated from the active portion, e.g., by an insulating layer, such as an oxide. The electrically conductive layer <NUM> may thus be integrated into the detector <NUM> and can be manufactured as part of the integrated circuit processing that forms the detector. This simplifies, reduces, or eliminates issues of alignment and assembly of a separate conductive shield and detector. The metallization area <NUM> may also provide electrical contacts <NUM>.

To illustrate the effects of beam rotation and the energy spread of secondary electrons it is useful to refer to <FIG> and <FIG> simultaneously. <FIG> depicts an example image plane for a line scan with a landing energy of 500eV at the target <NUM>. Three example points indicated at (-<NUM>,<NUM>), (<NUM>,<NUM>) and (<NUM>,<NUM>) correspond to three different locations where the primary beam lands on the target <NUM> during a line scan <NUM>. When secondary electrons from these three locations pass back up through the optical column, they are imaged onto the detector <NUM> as three different blobs along a detector scan <NUM> as shown in <FIG> and <FIG>. The detector scan <NUM> corresponds roughly to the line scan <NUM> but is rotated through an angle (<NUM>°) as shown in <FIG>. It is noted that for a conventional detector with a symmetric active portion like the one shown in <FIG>, a significant number of the secondary electrons are likely to land on parts of the metal shield <NUM> between adjacent active sectors <NUM>. This would result in signal clipping.

<FIG> shows blob positions relative to a detector <NUM> in the form of a <NUM> diameter photodiode <NUM> with an aperture <NUM> having a <NUM> radius. Each blob represents secondary electrons resulting from primary electrons with <NUM> eV landing energy impinging on the target <NUM> at the three corresponding locations (-<NUM>,<NUM>), (<NUM>,<NUM>) and (<NUM>,<NUM>) on the target <NUM> shown in <FIG>. As shown in <FIG>, the three secondary electron blobs land in a roughly sector-shaped region. The secondary electrons land on the detector in blob-shaped patterns for a number of reasons. First, the secondary electrons, unlike backscattered electrons, have a nearly uniform angular distribution. Second, the secondary electrons have a much lower average kinetic energy than backscattered electrons, e.g., about <NUM> eV. Third, there is distribution of secondary electron kinetic energies. These factors tend to spread the landing locations of the secondary electrons over a larger area than the primary beam spot size at the target.

In the example depicted in <FIG>, a dead zone <NUM> is shown as a black annulus surrounding the aperture <NUM> out to a radius of <NUM>. According to aspects of the present disclosure, the size of the dead zone relative to the size of the aperture, and the size of the aperture relative to the size of the detector may be optimized. <FIG> is a graph showing secondary electron capture as a function of the photodiode aperture radius and as a function of the dead zone radius with a landing energy of <NUM> eV and a primary image beam location of (<NUM>,<NUM>). The optimal diameters/sizes of the through-hole aperture and the dead zone can be determined based on graphs such as <FIG> to achieve better capture result.

Aspects of the present disclosure allow for charged particle detectors optimized for use in charged particle optical systems that use a line scan of a primary beam in conjunction with a translating target. The detector area can be made smaller and therefore leakage current and parasitic capacitance can be reduced.

Claim 1:
A charged particle optical system (<NUM>), comprising:
a source (<NUM>) configured to emit a primary beam of charged particles that impinge on a sample; a detection device (<NUM>);
a charged particle optical column (<NUM>) configured to collect charged particles from the sample (<NUM>) and image the charged particles onto the detection device (<NUM>) having an active portion (<NUM>) formed on a substrate (<NUM>), which is the area of the detection device that is configured to produce a signal in response to secondary charged particles emitted from the sample landing on the active portion (<NUM>), wherein the substrate (<NUM>) is symmetric with respect to an axis through a central aperture (<NUM>) of the detection device and wherein the active portion (<NUM>) is asymmetric with respect to the axis to accommodate an estimated axially asymmetrical distribution of the secondary particles at the detector (<NUM>) with respect to a beam axis of the charged particle beam optical system (<NUM>); wherein the central aperture (<NUM>) is formed through the substrate (<NUM>) at the axis of symmetry of the substrate (<NUM>) and is provided to allow the primary charged particle beam to pass through the detector;
wherein the active portion (<NUM>) is sector-shaped, wherein the shape of the active portion is configured to accommodate the axially asymmetrical distribution of the secondary particles at the detector with respect to the beam axis of the charged particle beam optical system (<NUM>).