Patent Description:
Optical proximity sensors as typically used in mobile phones emit a light signal and measure the back-reflected light intensity. Based on the measured back-reflected light intensity, the presence of an object is derived. Most of the proximity sensors include a single light source and a single photo detector in the same package. Such systems have been presented e.g. by Fadell et al. in US patent application <CIT>. Different ways to integrate an optical proximity sensor into a small module based on emitting light and measuring the back-reflected light signal from an object have been presented by Campbell in US patent <CIT> and by Rudmann in US patent <CIT>.

Other approaches have been presented to increase the reliability of the intensity-measurement based proximity sensor by mainly suppressing internal reflections and stray light paths as much as possible. Such approaches have been published by Findlay in US patent application <CIT> and by Rossi in US patent <CIT>. The key challenges of those system are first, to detect highly absorbing objects that reflect only little signal and second, to either suppress or compensate for stray light and reflections e.g. caused by dirt on the front cover of the proximity sensor or, if integrated in a mobile phone, dirt and / or dust on the mobile phone's front cover.

Recent trends to overcome stray light issues and to add more functionality into the proximity sensor module show that the latest proximity sensors tend to measure the proximity by actually measure the distance to the object in front of the proximity sensor module, also called depth sensing system. The terms depth and distance are interchangeable in all following context. A first proximity sensor based on a depth sensor module called time-of-flight depth sensor based on single photon avalanche diodes (SPAD) has been presented by Baxter in US <NUM>'<NUM>'043B2.

Next to SPAD-based proximity sensors, it is expected that so-called indirect time-of-flight depth measurement devices will be integrated in proximity sensors. A system based on indirect time-of-flight depth measurement approaches used as a proximity sensor has been presented in the US patent application <CIT>. Indirect time-of-flight measurement devices measure the phase shift of the emitted light compared to the reflected and captured light, which is delayed by the travel time of the light to the object and back. The actual depth is finally derived from the measured phase information. One of the key advantages of the indirect time-of-flight measurement compared to SPAD-based direct time-of-flight is that indirect (or phase-based) time-of-flight measurements systems have drastically reduced timing resolution requirements. Typically, such indirect time-of-flight sensors are based on demodulation pixels that are capable of sampling the impinging light at several points in time and based on those samplings, the phase, the amplitude and the offset information of the impinging light can be deduced.

Variants of pixels to perform the demodulation in indirect time-of-flight measurement systems are e.g. described in the following patents: <CIT>, <CIT>, <CIT> and <CIT>. However, it is well-known that indirect time-of-flight sensors strongly suffer from, temporal drifts, mixed depth pixels, multiple reflections and stray light caused by dirt or dust particles. All these measurement distortions make indirect time-of-flight systems extremely challenging and expensive to be operated reliably.

Further, the future depth sensor module in the proximity sensor application not only measures the depth of a single point in space, but preferably supplies a two-dimensional depth map in a given field of view measured by an array of depth measuring pixels. The availability of a depth map supplied by the proximity sensor in a mobile phone, even if only <NUM> x <NUM> pixels or less, will enable the introduction of completely new functionalities such as gesture recognition for touch free operation of devices, e.g. as presented in US patent application <CIT>.

Another approach has been published by <CIT>. It describes a measurement sensor comprising a PSD (Position Sensing Device) as an optoelectronic receiver, a transmitter for generating a spot an optics for reproducing said spot on the PSD and means for processing output signals generated by said PSD and for controlling the said transmitter depending on the processed output signals in order to measure the distance between the target and the sensor by a triangulation technique is disclosed. The transmitter comprises at least two optoelectronic signal sources for projecting at least two spots independent from each other on a target, the means comprising a digitally controlled potentiometer for balancing the output signals and a digital processor adapted for controlling the potentiometer.

It is an object of this invention, to provide a new type of depth sensor module and a corresponding new type of depth sensing method.

It is an object of this invention, to provide a highly robust depth sensor module and depth sensing method.

At least one of these objects can be achieved at least in part through features of the claims. Further advantageous embodiments follow from the dependent claims and the description.

The depth sensor module can include a light emitting part for illuminating objects and a light detector part, the light emitting part and the light detector part being spatially offset in the direction of a triangulation baseline. The light emitting part can include at least two light sources spatially offset in the direction of the triangulation baseline, wherein the light detector part is configured to acquire light and to provide along the direction of the triangulation baseline an intensity distribution of the acquired light. In case an object is illuminated by the two light sources of the illuminating part of the depth sensor module, the intensity distribution of the acquired light stems from two different light sources accordingly. Knowing the spatial offsets between the light sources and the light detector part enables a triangulation, which enables a depth estimation, namely an estimation of the distance between the depth sensor module and the object.

In some embodiments, the depth sensor module is configured to perform a triangulation evaluation using the intensity distribution of the acquired light. By measuring and evaluating the intensity distribution of the at least two light sources, one can triangulate along the direction of the triangulation baseline, and hence, measure distances. , the depth sensor module can be operable to carry out triangulation calculations in dependence of the intensity distribution and, optionally, also in dependence of spatial offsets between the light sources and pixels of the light detecting part.

In some embodiments, the depth sensor module is configured to enable a triangulation evaluation by determining a zero-crossing point of the difference between two intensity distributions of acquired light originating from two of the at least two light sources of the light emitting part. The triangulation-based evaluation of the distance of the object based on the differential signals of the intensity distribution of acquired light originating from the at least two different light sources offset spatially in the direction of triangulation baseline enables to reduce typical prior art triangulation requirements of emitting well focused light points or structures to guarantee for precise lateral resolution.

Applying a system of the described kind, the light emitter part can emit non-structured light such as diffuse light generated by each of the at least two light sources. The light can have rather wide cones of light (emission cones) instead of having to exhibit sharp points, lines or structures as it is typically requested by prior art triangulation systems.

Since the position of the intensity difference of the light emitted by the at least two light sources is well defined in the direction of the triangulation basis (and can be determined with high precision), the evaluation of the triangulation system based on the signal difference (which is well structured) becomes straightforward, even when the cones of lights emitted are not well structured.

Further, the setup of the light emitting part is simplified, because in many cases light sources already emit cones of light and thus (more or less) unstructured light.

The requirements for projecting optics, if present, are drastically reduced. In instances, the depth sensor modules can be devoid any projecting optics.

Further, the evaluation of the differential signal along the direction of the triangulation baseline captured by the light detection part can result in an increased stability of the depth sensor measurements in terms of susceptibility to manufacturing tolerances, thermal drifts, aging artefacts and so on.

In some embodiments of the present invention, the at least two light sources are configured to be controlled individually. An individual control of the at least two light sources enables to alternate the light emission by the different light sources. if the light emitting part includes or even consists of a first and a second light sources, and both are individually controllable, the first light source can be turned on while the second light source is turned off. The back-reflected light is captured by the light detection part, and a first intensity distribution is measured. Thereafter, the first light source is turned off and the second light source is turned on. The back-reflected light is captured by the light detection part, and a second intensity distribution is measured. By subtracting the two intensity distribution measurements, a zero-crossing point along the direction of the triangulation baseline can be determined. Finally, the evaluation of the zero-crossing point directly refers (relates) to the depth of the object.

Further, the individual control of the at least two light sources enables to alternate the light emission of the at least two light sources during a single exposure. When combining an alternating control of the light sources with a light detection part that includes a sensor with demodulation pixels, the demodulation pixels can be synchronized with the alternating control of the at least two light sources. The demodulation pixels are capable to transfer photo-generated charges generated when the first light source is turned on into first storages of the pixels, to transfer photo-generated charges generated when a second light source is turned on into second storages and so on if further light sources and further storages are provided. This procedure can be repeated many times during a single exposure and the photo-generated charges can be integrated in the storages of the demodulation pixels before reading out the values and performing the evaluation.

Further, state-of-the-art demodulation pixels include a background light removal circuitry or a signal subtraction circuitry, which can further simplify evaluation and enhance the dynamic range.

According to the invention , the at least two light sources are arranged on a single die. , they can be included in a single die. The integration of the at least two light sources on a single die enables to reduce space and costs, both important criteria for high volume, low costs application of a proximity sensor. Further, having the at least two light sources on a single die can reduce the likelihood of possible performance discrepancies between the at least two light sources.

In some embodiments, a first and a second of the at least two light sources are operable to emit a first light beam having a first light intensity distribution and a second light beam having a second light intensity distribution, respectively. Therein, the first and second light intensity distributions can be mutually symmetric with respect to a plane aligned perpendicularly to the triangulation baseline. In some embodiments, the light emitting part is operable to alternatingly illuminate objects with a first one of the at least two light sources while not illuminating the objects with a second one of the at least two light sources; and illuminate objects with a second one of the at least two light sources while not illuminating the objects with a first one of the at least two light sources.

In some embodiments, the light detector part includes an image sensor configured to acquire light. The implementation of an image sensor in the light detector part enables the acquisition of a full two-dimensional image of intensity distributions. in case a first image is captured while a first light source is turned on and a second light source is turned off, and a second image is captured when a second light source is turned on and a first light source is turned off, the two intensity distribution images can be subtracted from each other. Possibly, a zero-crossing point can then be found on every pixel line of the image sensor in the direction of the triangulation baseline. Having e.g. an image sensor with a resolution of m x n pixels, where n is the number of pixels in along the direction of the triangulation baseline and m along the orthogonal direction (orthogonal to the triangulation baseline), m zero-crossing points representing distances to the object may be detected. In other words, a full depth line can be measured.

In some embodiments, the image sensor includes or even is a time-of-flight sensor. The time-of-flight sensor is capable of demodulating the incoming light. Synchronizing it with the at least two light sources enables to perform triangulation measurements as herein described. State-of-the-art time-of-flight pixels further enable to suppress background light. This means the pixels are capable of subtracting signals on the pixel and therefore increase the dynamic range of the system.

In some embodiments, the depth sensor module is configured to enable time-of-flight measurements. In case the image sensor includes or even consists of time-of-flight pixels, each of the time-of-flight pixels can be used to determine a depth using the described triangulation method, too. Having e.g. an image sensor with m x n time-of-flight pixels, where n is the number of pixels along the direction of the triangulation baseline and m along the orthogonal direction, m zero-crossing points representing distances to the object can be detected. Further, since each of the m x n time-of-flight pixels of the image sensor is capable of rendering a depth value, a full depth map can be generated. Based on the m depth values derived by the triangulation approach and the m x n depth values derived by the time-of-flight measurement, reliability of the depth measurements can be increased. since the described triangulation-based measurements suffer less from internal reflections and from stray light e.g. due to dirt and dust, the depth data derived by the triangulation method can be used to calibrate the time-of-flight depth map, while the time-of-flight depth map generates a full two-dimensional depth map.

In some embodiments, the light emitting part includes at least one optical feedback pixel. The at least one optical feedback pixel can be used to control the power of the at least two light sources. In case the pixel field of the image sensor consists of time-of-flight pixels, the at least one optical feedback pixel can be used to further calibrate the depth measurement accomplished using the time-of-flight pixels of the image sensor. In instances, the at least one optical feedback pixel is arranged on (e.g., included in) the same die as the pixel field.

Further, if there are several optical feedback pixels, the pixels can have different sensitivities to cover a bigger dynamic range. If there are several optical feedback pixels, the individual results of the optical feedback pixels can be averaged or combined to improve a signal-to-noise ratio of the optical feedback results.

Moreover, the depth sensor module can be configured as a proximity sensor.

The depth sensor module can be used as a (possibly simple) proximity sensor.

Besides a depth sensor module, also a depth sensing method is described. The method can have properties corresponding to properties of any of the described sensor modules. It can be, e.g., a depth sensing method using a depth sensor having a light detector part and a light emitting part, the light emitting part and the light detector part being spatially offset in the direction of a triangulation baseline. The light emitting part includes at least two light sources spatially offset in the direction of the triangulation baseline. The depth sensing method comprises the steps of: acquiring light using the light detector part, and providing in the direction of the triangulation baseline an intensity distribution of the acquired light. In a variant, a triangulation evaluation using the intensity distribution of the acquired light is performed. In a variant, a triangulation evaluation is performed by determining a zero-crossing point of the difference between two intensity distributions of acquired light originating from two of the at least two light sources of the light emitting part. In a variant, the at least two light sources of the light emitting part are controlled individually. In a variant, the light is acquired using an image sensor included in the detector part. In a variant, a time-of-f light measurement is performed. In a variant, an optical-feedback measurement is performed using at least one optical feedback pixel in the light emitting part. In a variant, the depth sensor module is used as a proximity sensor.

The herein described apparatuses and methods will be more fully understood from the detailed description given herein below and the accompanying drawings which should not be considered limiting to the invention described in the appended claims. The drawings:.

Prior art proximity sensor modules include a light source and a photo detector. Light is emitted by the light source and detected by the photo detector. In case some light of the emitted light source is reflected back to the proximity sensor and detected by the photo detector, it is assumed that an object is in front of the proximity sensor. Typically simple signal thresholding is performed to decide whether there is an object in close range or not.

Recent developments towards the integration of actual depth sensors into proximity sensors promise more reliable proximity detections. However, those depth sensors strongly suffer from stray light caused by dirt and/or dust.

Triangulation is the process of determining the location (or distance) of a point in a scene. At either end of a baseline, the angles between the point and the baseline are measured or known, respectively. Using trigonometric formulas, the distance between the triangulation baseline and the point can be calculated.

<FIG> show a depth sensor module <NUM>. <FIG> a sketches the depth sensor module in a <NUM>-D view, while <FIG>shows a top view in the horizontal cross section, and <FIG>a side view in the vertical cross section. The depth sensor module <NUM> includes a light emitting part <NUM> and a light detection part <NUM>. The light emitting part <NUM> and the light detection part <NUM> are spatially offset in the direction of the triangulation baseline <NUM>. The light emitting part <NUM> includes at least two light sources 32a and 32b which are spatially offset along the direction of the triangulation baseline <NUM>. The two light sources may be on the same light emitting die <NUM> as illustrated in the drawing.

In some implementations, the two light sources 32a and 32b are, e.g., vertical cavity surface emitting laser diodes (VCSEL) on the same light emitting die <NUM>. In this illustrated case, the light emitting die <NUM> includes two pads to individually control the two light sources 32a and 32b from the outside, corresponding to a possible embodiment.

It is also possible to simply have two separate light sources 32a and 32b in the light emitting part <NUM> that are not on the same die, e.g. two separate LEDs, VCSELs or laser diodes. However, the two light sources 32a and 32b are spatially offset along the direction of the triangulation baseline <NUM>. The light generated by the first light source 32a and the second light source 32b is projected into the scene onto the object <NUM> (cf. <FIG>) by the projecting optics <NUM>. In case part of the emitted light is reflected back by the object <NUM>, the back-reflected light will be imaged by the imaging optics <NUM> onto a pixel field 211of the image sensor <NUM>. The image sensor <NUM> includes the pixel field <NUM>, but further may also include one or more of driving circuitries and further also includes one or more of control and evaluation circuitries. However, any or all of those circuitries may also be placed outside the image sensor <NUM>, e.g., in a separate chip.

<FIG> illustrate the depth sensor module <NUM> of <FIG>, but with a first light beam 35a and a second light beam 35b are shown in the drawing of <FIG> for illustration purposes. The light power of the first light beam 35a can be the same as the light power of the second light beam 35b, and the two light beams can be symmetric along a zero-crossing axis <NUM> (or more precisely: zero-crossing surface/plane in a three-dimensional space). The object <NUM> is illuminated by the first light beam 35a and the second light beam 35b individually. The image sensor <NUM> is used to acquire the light reflected by the object <NUM> illuminated by the first light beam 35a and the second light beam 35b. The intensity distribution of the light acquired by the image sensor <NUM> along the direction of the triangulation baseline <NUM> is plotted in the drawing of <FIG>, namely the intensity distribution 35a' of the acquired light during illumination by the first light beam 35a and the intensity distribution 35b' of the acquired light during illumination by the second light beam 35b. The differential signal 35a'-35b', namely the intensity distribution 35b' of the acquired light during illumination by the second light beam 35b subtracted from the intensity distribution 35a' of the acquired light during illumination by the first light beam 35a, is plotted in <FIG>.

In order to obtain the differential signal 35a'-35b', the first light source 32a and the second light source 32b may be switched on and off in alternating series.

In <FIG>, while the first light source 32a together with the projecting optics <NUM> generates a first light beam 35a, the second light source 32b in combination with the projecting optics <NUM> generates a second light beam 35b, which is offset or tilted along direction of the triangulation baseline <NUM> with respect to the first light beam 35a. For example, the two light sources 32a and 32b are simply offset on the same light emitting die <NUM> and the projecting optics <NUM> in front of the two light sources 32a and 32b further modifies the shape of the two light beams 35a and 35b in order to enhance the detectability of the zero-crossing point.

The zero-crossing axis <NUM> represents the positions where the power of the first light beam 35a is equivalent to the power of the second light beam 35b. The projecting optics <NUM> may consist of several optical elements such as lenses and/or diffractive optical elements, or may be built by a single lens element or may even consist of a simple glass.

By imaging the back-reflection from the object <NUM> of each of the two emitted light beams 35a and 35b through the imaging optics <NUM> onto the pixel field <NUM> of the image sensor <NUM> and subtracting the signals generated while the second light source 32b is on from the signals captured when the first light source 32a is on, the resulting differential signal 35a'-35b' will show the zero-crossing point <NUM> (cf. <FIG>) along the direction of the triangulation baseline <NUM> where the intensity of the reflected light from the object <NUM> back to the light detector part <NUM> during illumination by the first light beam 35a is equal to the intensity of the reflected light from the object <NUM> back to the light detector part <NUM> during illumination by the second light beam 35b. The zero-crossing point <NUM> on the pixel field <NUM> on the image sensor <NUM> can be used to triangulate, which means, the location of the zero-crossing point <NUM> relates to and allows to determine the distance of the object <NUM> to the depth sensor module <NUM>. The drawing in <FIG> shows the intensity distribution of the acquired light during illumination by the first light beam 35a and the intensity distribution of the acquired light during illumination by the second light beam 35b along the direction of the triangulation baseline <NUM>. <FIG> illustrates the difference of the signal generated by the back-reflection of the first light beam 35a and the back-reflection of the second light beam 35b.

Varying the power ratio of the two light sources 32a and 32b enables to tilt the zero-crossing axis <NUM> back and forth along the direction of the triangulation baseline <NUM>. This may give certain flexibility in steering the zero-crossing axis.

Compared to actual time-of-flight depth sensing technologies, the proposed zero-crossing triangulation method is significantly more stable with respect to stray light originating, e.g., from reflections from dirt or dust particles appearing in front of the depth sensor module <NUM>. In case the pixel field <NUM> on the image sensor <NUM> includes or even consists of time-of-flight pixels, the signals of the time-of-flight image sensor can be used to first detect and localize the zero-crossing point, and, thus to reliably measure a first distance. Subsequently, the stable zero-crossing triangulation-based distance measurement can be used to calibrate the depth map generated by the time-of-flight measurements of each of the pixels of the time-of-flight image sensor. The zero-crossing triangulation-based calibration of the time-of-flight depth map can be done on-the-fly as long as the zero-crossing point <NUM> is imaged at least partly from the object <NUM> onto the pixel field <NUM> by the imaging optics <NUM>. In case object <NUM> is not always imaged onto the pixel field <NUM> by the imaging optics <NUM>, the calibration can at least be updated whenever the zero-crossing point becomes visible on the pixel field <NUM>. The detection of the position of the zero-crossing point <NUM> enables to correct for all stray light issues on the time-of-flight depth measurements. In case that the pixel field <NUM> includes or even consists of demodulation pixels such as used in indirect time-of-flight sensors, each of the pixels typically includes or even consists of two storage nodes. Such demodulation pixel architectures have been presented in patents <CIT>, <CIT>, <CIT> and <CIT>.

Therefore, the photo-generated charges when the first light source 32a is turned on can be stored on the first storage nodes of the pixels, and the photo-generated charges when the second light source 32b is turned on can be stored in the second storage nodes of the pixels. The first and second light sources 32a, 32b can be alternately turned on and off during an exposure, while synchronizing them with the switches in the demodulation pixels steering the photo-generated charges to either the first storage nodes of the pixels or the second storage nodes of the pixels, respectively.

Further, having a background removal circuitry on the demodulation pixels enables to get rid of all the charges generated by background light. Such background removal circuitries for demodulation pixels have been presented in <CIT> and in the US patents <CIT> and <CIT>. The removal of a common mode signal level on the different storage nodes of each pixel can drastically increase the dynamic range of the depth sensor module <NUM>.

<FIG>illustrate an exemplary embodiment of the zero-crossing triangulation approach. In all drawings of <FIG>, a first light source 32a emits a first light beam 35a, and a second light source 32b emits a second light beam 35b. Both light beams are typically transformed by projecting optics <NUM>. But in instances, projection optics can also be dispensed with. The back-reflected light beams from object <NUM> are imaged by the (generally optional) imaging optics <NUM> (cf. <FIG>) onto the pixel field <NUM> of the image sensor <NUM>. In order to measure the zero-crossing point, the first and second light sources are alternately turned on and off.

At a short distance of the object <NUM> to the depth sensor module <NUM>, as illustrated in <FIG>, the zero-crossing point <NUM> in the differential image, where the intensity of the back-reflected and detected light during illumination by the first light beam 35a and the intensity of the back-reflected and detected light during illumination by the second light beam 35b are the same, is imaged by the imaging optics <NUM> to a position close to the right edge of the pixel field <NUM> on the image sensor <NUM>.

At a medium distance of the object <NUM> to the depth sensor module <NUM>, as illustrated in <FIG>, the zero-crossing point <NUM> of the differential image moves to the left on the pixel field <NUM> of the image sensor <NUM>, while at an even longer distance of the object <NUM> to the depth sensor module <NUM>, as illustrated in <FIG>, the zero-crossing point <NUM> of the differential image even further moves to the left on the pixel field <NUM> of the image sensor <NUM>.

The zero-crossing point <NUM> in the difference of the images captured when the first light source 32a is turned on and when the second light source 32b is turned on can be used for triangulation purposes. The image difference can be generated e.g. by sequentially capturing two images, namely one image with the first light source 32a turned on and one with the second light source 32b turned on, and subtract one from the other.

Another possibility is to integrate so-called demodulation pixels as light sensing pixels in the pixel field <NUM>. Such demodulation pixels have been presented in patents <CIT>, <CIT>, <CIT> and US7'<NUM>'310B2. Demodulation pixels can have two storage sites on each pixel. The steering of the photo-generated charges from the photo-sensitive area to one of the two charge storages can be done in synchronization with the alternate control of the first light source 32a and the second light source 32b. The result will be that the first storage nodes of each pixel of the pixel field <NUM> store the photo-generated charges generated while the first light source 32a is turned on, and the second storage nodes of each pixel of the pixel field <NUM> store photo-generated charges while the second light source 32b is turned on. More sophisticated demodulation pixels already include subtracting circuitry in each pixel. This enables a better background light signal removal and therefore a more robust system. In case the pixels in the pixel field <NUM> of the image sensor <NUM> are time-of-flight pixels, the raw sampling data - possibly in combination with the on-pixel background removal circuitry of the time-of-flight pixels - can be used to find the zero-crossing point <NUM> and determine depths, based on the localization of the zero-crossing point on the pixel field <NUM>. The travel times of the emitted light from the depth sensor module <NUM> to the object <NUM> and back measured by the time-of-flight pixels in the pixel field <NUM> on the image sensor <NUM> can further enable to build a full two-dimensional depth map. The depth measurements derived by the zero-crossing triangulation approach can be used to calibrate the two-dimensional depth map derived from the time-of-flight based depth measurements. The calibration performed using the zero-crossing triangulation approach improves the stability and robustness of the depth sensor module in terms of stray light, thermal drifts and many others artefacts. Time-of-flight pixels integrated in the image sensor <NUM> may be demodulation pixels as used in indirect (phase measurement based) time-of-flight measurement systems or direct (single photon avalanche detection-based) time-of-flight measurement systems. Depending on the need and application, the calibration evaluation based on the triangulation approach can be carried out with every single depth measurement, or may be done from time to time, or can be done simply whenever required.

The different illustrations in <FIG>show another embodiment. <FIG> is a three-dimensional drawing of the depth sensor module <NUM>. <FIG> shows the horizontal cross-section B-B, <FIG> the vertical cross-section A-A.

The depth measurement principle of the depth sensor module <NUM> is the same as the one sketched in <FIG> a to c. However, this embodiment further includes optical feedback pixels <NUM> in the light emitting part <NUM>. For example, there is not only one optical feedback pixel but a full array of optical feedback pixels, in order to increase signal-to-noise ratio of the measured feedback. The different optical feedback pixels also may have different sensitivities or different exposure times to increase the dynamic range of the optical feedback operation. The optical feedback pixels can be used to measure and then control the emitted light power of the first light source 32a and the second light source 32b. Furthermore, if the optical feedback pixels <NUM> are time-of-flight pixels, the optical feedback pixels can also be used to calibrate for the time-of-flight measurements. The optical feedback pixels can be on the same integrated image sensor <NUM> than the pixel field <NUM>, but they can also be on two separate chips.

The optical feedback pixels are used to be used as feedback pixels to adjust emitted light intensities, calibrate for intensities, adjust phase delay, calibrate for phase delays, or detect dirt/dust. Fast intensity variations may be caused by temperature changes or can mean deposition/removal of dirt/dust, while slow intensity variations may be consequences of aging.

<FIG> shows a sketch of a light emitting die <NUM>, which includes four different light sources 32a, 32b, 32c, and 32d. Each of the four light sources 32a to 32d can be controlled individually. In the given illustration, each of the four light sources 32a, 32b, 32c, and 32d has its own contact pad 32a2, 32b2, 32c2, and 32d2, respectively, and therefore full driving control from the outside of the light emitting die <NUM> is possible. The availability of more than two light sources in the light emitting part <NUM> as sketched in <FIG> enables to apply more sophisticated calibration schemes and renders the system more stable in terms of stray light e.g. caused by dirt or dust particles, deflecting parts of the emitted light beams directly back into the light detector part <NUM>.

Claim 1:
A depth sensor module (<NUM>) comprising a light emitting part (<NUM>) for illuminating an object(l) and a light detector part (<NUM>), the light emitting part (<NUM>) and the light detector part (<NUM>) being spatially offset in the direction of a triangulation baseline (<NUM>), wherein the light emitting part (<NUM>) comprises at least two light sources (32a, 32b) spatially offset in the direction of the triangulation baseline (<NUM>) and arranged on a single die, wherein the light detector part (<NUM>) is configured to acquire light and to provide along the direction of the triangulation baseline (<NUM>) an intensity distribution of the acquired light,
wherein the depth sensor module (<NUM>) further including:
control and evaluation circuitry operable to enable a triangulation evaluation by determining a zero-crossing point (<NUM>) which is a difference between two intensity distributions of acquired light originating from the at least two light sources (32a, 32b) of the light emitting part (<NUM>) and operable to perform the triangulation evaluation based on the determined zero-crossing point; and
a full array of optical feedback pixels to increase signal-to-noise ratio of a measured feedback;
wherein the optical feedback pixels (<NUM>) are used as feedback pixel (<NUM>) to adjust emitted light intensities.